Peanuts

Well, you can't say you couldn't have anticipated the day to end after 72 hours. But that's why some games included proxying. My advice would be not to unvote without voting directly after if it's late in the game day and you aren't sure you'll be able to get online on time.

I thought that was already clear by the wording, so I didn't bother to use the correct expression. I apologize for the wrong expression and the confusion it created, and henceforth I'll always be like "" when I use sarcasm.

I was being sarcastically, hence my "" expression. And lying might buy him more than a day, assuming he's scum and Catwoman's town, it's not yet clear we'll vote him out tomorrow, and even if we do and he doesn't have a lethal action, he'd still have managed to get an innoncent criminal lynched. And if I was scum and about to be lynched, I'd lie as hell. I know he could be lying.

What do you mean? In fact, my sentence included two statements, the one being you jumping on everything, the other you avoiding the bandwagon. Which one of those do you think isn't true? I think I've got my reasons right. Yes, because none of use would have imagined he could have lied. Because in these situations, everyone always speaks the truth, especially the accused nearly lynched ones. I'd still rather risk losing you than losing a possible investigator.

I think that's a good idea, I don't know what else to search.

Honestly, I don't have a damn clue, and I believe nobody has a damn clue but the scum. But I don't think Nigma's an agent, and I won't risk losing the investigator, and catwoman has the second most votes, she was always early to jump on anything but the bandwagon, while she never really brought anything up herself, she's neither been proactive nor really flying under the radar, I have to vote and we have to convict somebody. I believe that's enough reason to vote for her. I vote: Catwoman (CallMePie)

So you find this day lame? This must be the most interesting day one ever. And the vote is no completely blind vote, I see where the so-called evidence" is coming from, although I don't find it's enough to convict somebody and not even the "strongest" case we have. Of course, with all those sheeps around it's nearly a blind vote. Although sometimes I think we'd be better off with a random vote, seeing as in every example I read about in the paper about similar situation, a member of the majority was voted out, except for two times, as in one example a werewolf was killed, who didn't have friends to help him, and in another example there were only one townie to start with. So basically, we can say, that there almost never is a real scum kill on day one and I don't think this day will be an exception. And how are we supposed to gather hard evidence? You might not have noticed, but it's day one and we cannot find evidence. So this is only another way to say you sure as hell won't change your vote.

So you can't simply admit you've worded your sentence poorly? I almost believe you're an agent fearing such a mistake would get you bad publicity. Yes, it was evident to me you didn't think much about your vote, but yet you act like it was an aphorism. Right now, to me, you're more suspect than the Riddler.

It's not. Are you just a sheep following the flock, or are you scum? Because you can't have thought about that decision much, otherwise you'd know it's not strong. There rarely is a strong case on day one at all. I can tolerate people voting for him because they don't know what else to do, but frankly, saying the case was strong is wrong.

That's interesting, considering she was the second one to jump on the Ventriloquist after the Riddler brought him up, she was the second one to jump on Ra's after the Ventriloquist brought him up, and she was the second one to "split the votes" after you suggested so. She never really came up with anything, but was always fast to support plans which involved voting or convicting. I'm inclined to vote for her, but I'll give it some thought. For now, I unvote: Riddler (Sok).

I'd like to examine the ground in case it was recently dug.

Recalling the discussion it appears you're right, you asking twice would be correct. So, yeah, all we have is you asking twice about an ability, and not even very explicite. I'm inclined to believe you and vote for somebody else, but I'm not sure who. Until I've decided, I'll stay with my vote. But I have to admit we don't have a much of a reason to create a bandwagon against you. As I said before - and as I could practically quote my previous speech to answer this, as you said few new - everyone is a suspect. And everyone who looks town might be scum trying to look town. And everyone who looks scum might be a stupid townie. So what? Vote for the ones who look town? Honestly, that's insane. But okay, you said you didn't have the intention to covict him. It's basically good to accuse many people, but it's never good to jump on conclusions. And if you accuse someone with few reason, don't be surprised if someone else defends him. In fact, those who don't defend him are more likely to be scum, as the scum would see the accusation and wait for it to form a bandwagon, in case the Creeper is town, of course. We have to work together, we should all together discuss our suspects. And if you vote for the Creeper, who I don't think should be convicted, I state why I think he shouldn't be convicted, as I try to avoid a wrongful conviction, as it would only be useful for the scum. I don't know him much, yes, but I see he's active, and I don't want an active player to die although he's no more suspect than a less active player.

I'd like to check under the table.

You misunderstand, I meant, everyone is a possible suspect, not that we are all scum.

Honestly, your post is contradictory and confusing, in my opinion. So, your statements in this passage are: 1. Most of the scum try to fly under the radar. Yet you vote for one of the most active players. 2. You don't think we should vote for those who don't speak up, but for those, who said little of substance. Yet you vote for the first person to vote. Voting is IMO not just enough to be noticed, but very straight-forward. You admit he isn't among those "we should look at", but yet you vote for him. There may very well be agents who try to look active, I agree, and want to get in lead of the town. But honestly, why would we vote out everyone who tries to bring the town forward, just because they might be scum? Everyone might be scum, after all we know, but voting for the contradictory, the silent and the ones who act scummy helps us more than voting for the active ones. So, what you're saying is, I am suspect, because I point out flaws in your logic, to avoid the lynch of a propably useful possible townie, while you would rather ignore this and vote for anyone who isn't you, as you only care about yourself and those you know they are town, which is nobody? Yes, that's the spirit the town needs.

Great. I know you are as thick as your reptile skin, Croc, but I guess you can count? And I believe the Riddler has already defended himself. I wonder what else he could say about that matter? In fact, we don't have much of a cse anyway.

I never said you shouldn't change the vote for one suspect lateron, but establishing a bandwagon early in the day helps absolutely nobody. I never said we should let Joker do the decision for us, and I also never said we shouldn't think logically or disregard the rules. What are you referring to?

Trouble is, there are 4 characters which could be called Doc, Dr. Crane, Dr. Quinzel, Dr. Fries and I believe Hush could also be called Doc, correct? I'm not sure about him. But "Doc" would create even more confusion, I think. And I have no problem with the way Scarface talks, the accent really works well. Are you trying to get a Ventriloquist tag as well, Flitwick?

You're right, of course. Where was my mind? Vote: Riddler (Sok) I have also seen the movie, since it was also featured in the paper I read, as a very realistic portrayal of these situations. By the way, Creeper's idea of voting for several people was a good one, but I really think you people have reduced it ad absurdum. Especially after Joker told us a conviction would be forced - why did this clown even bring up the rule of the majority then? Such a fool! - I think you shouldn't have stayed with such a tied vote. Hush, on the other hand, seemed to recommend a pure bandwagon vote against one of the quiet people, which made me suspicious. As I said before, a bandwagon vote doesn't help us at all, and if we start voting against the quiet ones, we are likely to hit a useless townie instead of the scum. Also we should consider that Hush's comment was not very helpful considering the overall situation with Riddler being accused. And Riddler, you said you hadn't seen something like Baby Doll's confirmation before, which is the same with me, but some other "villain", I believe it was Egghead, had shown us an article with information about this special role, so you had time to read a small bit about it. And asking about further information about abilities, I must admit, is either stupid or scummy.

Now that's simply insane. Do you need some medicine? I can prescribe you some excellent fear gas. With Killer Croc being stupid enough to get himself penalty votes, I suppose I'll vote for the Riddler for now: Vote: The Riddler/Sok I don't have much time right now, so I might change my vote later. Now I got to get back to another experiment I'm running right now.

I agree with that. And while we're talking about priorities, I haven't even maintained my journal today. Also, we shouldn't forget Ras isn't the only one to be silent. The Mad Hatter also has spoken up only once, without adding any substance to anything. Joker, how nice you turned up. There's a question I have to ask you, what exactly happens if we're tied below the 50% mark? Will there still be a conviction? And I hope you've left me enough Bats for the next time I meet him.

Huh, a zombie. I guess that means I can't die anymore except if I'm shot in the head? Yay for nearly invulnerability!

Maybe he hasn't had time to reply yet? As Mask has pointed out, we weren't here for that long right now. Yet I think it's a good idea to keep an eye on the silent ones, though the paper I read suggested that successful scum tries to be neither too silent nor too active. But let's not panic and overinterprete putative scumtells right now, that's the worst thing we can do on day 1.

I'm not sure either, but I'm inclined to believe her. I'm assume she'd be too scared of being killed for lying a lie that can be proven wrong so easily. But we'll learn if she told the truth tomorrow anyway.

But how can he see the pic from the other house to confirm?