Duvors
-
Posts
3,890 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Duvors
-
BRICKYWOOD - Confirmation and Discussion
Duvors replied to KotZ's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
Hello? -
I agree with Finn, and in addition I will add that most of Audrey's accusations against him are extremely weak and are not backed up by any verifiable evidence. Vote: Audrey Hepbrick (Dragonator).
-
As I recall, that theory is one he no longer holds. And anyway, it neither proves or disproves any of the arguments he made yesterday in any way.
-
Firstly I apologize for disappearing for the latter part of the previous day, I was very stressed and I needed a respite from this game for I while. I did not expect the day would be extended by another twelve hours. Now that I am here I must say that I was protecting myself last night, I don't know if that helps any. I don't understand, how does this prove Finn's argument wrong exactly?
-
I'm having trouble properly articulating what I'm thinking right now. For one I'm honestly confused as to why the scum would leave me and Audrey alive for so long unless either Audrey's blocking really has been successful or one of us is secretly the godfather. On the one hand we have no concrete evidence that Audrey is telling the truth about her night actions over the last three nights. On the other hand Finn's explanation for how she could be the godfather, block, and now kill people seems a bit complex, it would be simpler to assume that either he or I was the Godfather. But Finn has raised some good points in his argument, enough that I am starting to worry about blindly trusting Audrey. Vote: Audrey Hepbrick (Dragonator)
-
You mean night two. Look, your theory is very interesting, but it doesn't explain how Audrey would supposedly gain the blocker's ability after his death. Although it would explain why Brickie was targeted on night two.
-
That would actually be possible based on the night actions that have occurred. And it would explain why she's still alive despite her claim that she's the town blocker, a prime target for a scum kill. However, this hinges on your claim of being a vanilla townie being true. And it also doesn't explain why I'm still alive despite my claim I'm the town doctor.
-
I'm not certain that the idea of the scum godfather having the ability to block roles is likely in this game. To be honest I've never encountered such a thing before. Could you please explain the last part of this sentence?
-
Honestly, as everyone save Brick and myself have been cleared by this point it's either me or him. Barring the presence of a godfather of corse. Vote: Brick Affleck (Actor Builder).
-
Just because Audrey blocked Finn last night and there was no kill doesn't necessarily mean that he had a night action. Something else entirely may have prevented the killer from acting, or they may have just not done anything last night, or there may be no one left who can kill people at night. Assuming automatically that Finn is the killer based on incomplete evidence is faulty.
-
To be entirely honest, most of the times I've not voted were due to me simply being trepidatious about voting and uncertain about who I was going to vote for. For instance when I changed my vote off Audrey it was because I felt she was the town blocker, but Thelma hadn't come off as particularly scummy to me so I didn't instantly vote for her. I was going to vote for her at the end but I had unfortunately procrastinated too long and the day was over. It was a desire to avoid this again (coupled with possession of certain information) that lead me to vote for Studcille so quickly yesterday. As for voting I must say that I don't believe that Brick Affleck is scum, his lack of contribution would be suspicious, but his bizarre vote for Glenn on day four seems too obviously scum to actually be scum. There could be some sort of reverse psychology going on here but that seems too risky.
-
I apologize for my absence, I was unexpectedly separated from my computer for an extended period. I should be back in action sometime tomorrow. Again I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.
-
Vote: Studcille De Mille (Khscarymovie4).
-
Well, that explains some things. Unvote: Audrey Hepbrick (Dragonator)
-
I personally feel that, between Audrey's general inactivity and lack of proper defense for her behavior she is a person who seems scummy to me. Her sudden bout of fishing today and apparent lack of trust for the only confirmed townie we've seen so far only makes me more leery of her. The only thing that makes me in any way hesitant to vote is this sudden blocker claim. But I don't feel that this claim has enough weight to dissuade me from voting for her. Vote: Audrey Hepbrick (Dragonator)
-
How could you possibly know that? Did you know it earlier? If so, why did you not volunteer this information before? Roleclaim to whom exactly? You seem to be awfully interested in what everyone did at night. So your defense is to excuse yourself for not doing a good job of appearing to be a townie. Convincing. Yes, practically everyone here has said that at some point. It does not contribute to the discussion or help up in any way. It seems more like a stock phrase used to make oneself seem more town.
-
Before anything, I'd like to ask why everyone seems to think that last night's death was caused by Burpamont? It's entirely possible that last night's killer was the vigilante. I'm almost in agreement with you, however I don't feel as strongly about Thelma as you do.
-
Why? Glenn is basically confirmed to either be the investigator or in contact with him. If they voted for the wrong person yesterday then the reason is more likely to be that the investigator didn't get a scum result on last night's investigation rather than foul play.
-
What? But I never voted for her yesterday, both my votes were for entirely different people. How on earth did that happen?
-
Look, he started out asking for information on weather or not I had been told that my death would trigger an event for someone else with no explanation as to why, which seemed very scummy at the time. The explanation I just passed on to you only came after I had voted for him. And anyway, he never asked if I had a role, only if I was aware of his. And if I did have a role his questions would still have been scummy as I'd have no way of telling if he really was selling the truth or lying to me to get me to reveal information to the scum. Conversely, if I don't have a role than it becomes less scummy as the scum would have no reason to tell such a lie to a normal townie.
-
Well, after my vote for him I received a message from him stating that the reason he was asking me strange questions was that he had a condition where if I was killed his role would change from vanilla townie to something else. Unfortunately by the time I saw the message the day had already ended.
-
Warning in case of merging, what you are about to read was written twelve minutes after the above. I've already started doubting my decision to vote for Gopher, Leonardo has contacted me in private and started asking me if I'm aware of anyone having a role linked to me (my death causing an event for another player or similar). This feels threatening to me and reminiscent of fishing. I really don't feel safe right now. Unvote: Gopher (Zepher) Vote: Legonardo Brickcaprio (Umbra-Manis)
-
I am trying to decide who to vote for right now. As I have said I find William's behavior yesterday and his odd inconsistency about what his role was supposed to be suspicious, but voting for him now would be useless as there is no chance of him getting lynched and providing us with information. On the other hand I don't feel fine with voting for Rosamund Bricke. As others have pointed out she feels more like an overeager townie than a scum. Leonardo is someone I'm starting to feel a little weird about, but I'll let that wait for now. Gopher is very interesting right now though. His Vote for Ari yesterday was without any real reasoning behind it other than 'we need some forward movement and a lynch or a conviction or whatever' and comes off as a little strange since it came immediately after criticizing Glenn's initial reasons for voting in the very same post. And yet today he says that one of his reasons for voting for Ari was because he 'thought Ms. Clutch had a good reason for voting as she did', a statement that contradicts what he actually said. In addition to that His initial vote today was a very weak attack on Nash Brickman for making a vote against Glenn yesterday that was in fact perfectly logical at the time. All in all it's starting to seem to me as if Gopher is more scummy than my other choices, therefore; Vote: Gopher (Zepher)
-
I never claimed that Ari told William that he was an investigator, in fact that would be counter to my express opinion that William is probably lying. As to your second question that is sort of what I'm saying, the final vote had not been cast yet when he made his claim to being in contact with an investigator that had cleared Ari, the whole I-saw-Ari-investigate-someone-and assumed-he-was-town story came after Ari told us he was scum, which would, in this scenario, be a combination frantic attempt to clear his own name/make himself look good to the town.
-
No, that's not what you said, what you said was; If you admit that the first investigator was Ari then I don't see how you could still say there are two investigators since Ari is the only person other than Glenn's 'contact' who claimed to be the investigator.