Jump to content

Hinckley

Root Administrator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    35,896

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Hinckley

  1. Hinckley
    Advice to future vigs: Testing out a slight suspicion on a strong player by killing them is dumb. So, who did the Scum kill? Vazquez or Laura? I thought they were most likely to be vig kills. Why would the Scum kill either one of them? Scum, can you tell us? That was my point, genius.
  2. Hinckley
    OK.... Unvote: 4 of 2 (mostlytechnic)
  3. Hinckley
    I voted for 4 of 2 without seeing this. It was obviously a merged post as the breath before that she was voting for him. I'm intrigued to hear what the second Scummiest player is now claiming to be. Rolecop?
  4. Hinckley
    Why can't Minga tell us?
  5. Hinckley
    I'll hammer. Vote: 4 of 2 (mostlytechnic) So, I didn't wait until the last vote, it's close enough.
  6. Hinckley
    God complex...
  7. Hinckley
    Stop saying that! You're making me anxious.
  8. Hinckley
    I agree with Scummy Rip. What the Bock is going on?
  9. Hinckley
    Claw says it. See? We're still finding him Scummy. OK, but seriously was this the seed that made the Scum decide not be in both bandwagons? I need to check the time of it. I'm not going through all of Day One again, searching for "vote". We use that word a lot. And one talkative player has it in their freaking signature. It's before voting even starts.
  10. Hinckley
    Almost like he said on the Scum writeboard, "Hey guys, Scum always spread their votes around. Let's all jump on the same wagon." Didn't someone else try this argument earlier? Who else said "Scum like to spread their votes around"? I'm having deja vu again. All my deja vu revolves around 4 of 2. "And the white knight is talking backwards, And the Red Queen's lost her head"
  11. Hinckley
    Look! The roulette wheel hasn't hit red for the last twenty hits! Bet it all on red!
  12. Hinckley
    I'm glad to hear this echoed from someone else because it was confounding trying to figure out what the hell ZipZop was thinking. But again, go back and check what he said when I asked him that. He seems to have dropped that as a suspicion. I think... Who freaking knows with Commander Cuckoo–Pants? Oh, what a relief! Now we all know you're a Townie.
  13. Hinckley
    Where's the list of non–voters? So I can pick on them... To me, that's a Scum tell. He wants everyone to hear he's claimed Watcher so he won't get lynched. Town Perspective: keep your PR secret. Scum Perspective: Let everyone know I have a power role so I won't get lynched and I'm not afraid of being Scum–killed... I know because I've made the mistake myself...
  14. Hinckley
    I hate to even consider going into the logic–hole that is anything to do with ZipZop but these are good questions. Minga, ZipZop has answered that question already. I asked him why he suspected me when I didn't know Vazquez's name and was the one that alerted him 4 of 2 was contacting me about the code and then he retracted his suspicions. But Bock makes a good point. Why doesn't ZipZop suspect the ones he did tell Vazquez's name to? I have trouble seeing ZipZop as Scum because he went to the trouble of concocting this insane code and then the tracker was killed. But, what I've finally reconciled in my head is that a lot of people were suspicious of Laura, so it doesn't necessarily follow that Scum killed Laura. If ZipZop is Scum, it's possible that: 1. He was advised to contact me. 2. I advised him to make a code. 3. He did. And sent it to six people. 4. The tracker dies. 5. He focuses on the code and Vazquez for some reason, illogically concluded (forcing the conclusion?) that I somehow knew Vazquez had 1/6 of the code. 6. And what does he mean when he says the code was meant to start a Town block? WHoa, whoa! No. No no no no no no no no. I'm almost went down the rabbit hole. No "One side will make you larger and the other side will make you smaller" for me. No thank you. I'll just sit in the center of the mushroom with the caterpillar. :blank_expression:
  15. Hinckley
    I know it's long but I think it's important for people to read all of this post.
  16. Hinckley
    Go screw, Minga. I'm not asking for anything. Get over yourself.
  17. Hinckley
    Listen, I'm the first to admit that I think I'm more clever than is healthy for me to think. And once a train of thought leads me somewhere, I get stuck in that station. Yes, we all saw it in Ragnarok when I got Pie lynched. When I just had to get him lynched because I was so sure I had figured it out. It's unhealthy. I know. Yes, it's true. But...Dave is 1000 times Scummier than Pie was when he played the seventh Scum of Ragnarok III. 1000 times, precisely. And you possibly have the Scum Perspective to theorize about Clem's possible Actions through a role that Dave actually has and used in exactly that way. And you've done a lot of Scummy things on top of that. Proposing to claim to Clem, but then saying not to! Proposing to connect the code to identify the tracker, but then saying not to! You're saying two things and proving my point. 1. You aren't aware of the EB standard. 2. You thought of Watcher because hosts like to try new things. But, being unaware that Scum Watcher isn't common on EB would explain why you would use Scum Watcher as the example without knowing it would later cause your team trouble and directly implicate your Watcher. Sowwy.
  18. Hinckley
    It's so strange. 4 of 2 and Paul were hovering around here, doing nothing. Then I posted and they left! Amazing... I'm like a magician. I can make Scum disappear. Or maybe I'm some sort of household cleaner! For cleaning out Scum buildup.
  19. Hinckley
    Yes, Paul claimed Scum Watcher. Are you even reading? *I know he didn't claim Scum Watcher but that's what is highly implicated by 4 of 2 postulating yesterday that the Scum Watcher would target Clem to find the protector...and Paul targeted Clem and found (I assume) the protector! Hello???? Yes you are. I've implicated you with him. You watched Clem and found someone targeting her. 4 of 2 postulated that the Scum Watcher would watch Clem to find the protector. That implicates you two together if you like it or not. You're implicated with him. You are. Implicated. With. 4 of 2. Mmmmm Hmmmmmmm. I see. So you randomly chose Scum Watcher because hosts try new things. Yet at the same time you say you weren't even aware that it would be different from the norm. I'm not saying it's an outlandish role. I'm saying it's an uncanny coincidence that there's never (or rarely) been one on EB and you randomly chose it to postulate what Clem could do with claiming her role. Then the Scummiest player in the game claimed Watcher and did what you said the Scum Watcher would do. You could've been trying to play the Townie and not realized that Scum Watcher wasn't common on EB (because you've only played Scum twice ) and made that list not realizing it would implicate you later. Or you forgot you had said it when you were discussing Night Actions. Or wouldn't realize anyone would pick up on it or it might be left as WIFOM. And just to be an megablocks, I reject the idea that you wouldn't know a Scum setup because you've only played Scum twice. So you don't pay attention when people report Night Action results? You've never tried to figure out what the Scum could be doing? You've never read the Conclusion of a game where the host posts all the roles and Night Actions?
  20. Hinckley
    Why are people not voting??
  21. Hinckley
    Your logic is dizzying, mate. So, 4 of 2 contacted me about him and Bock having the other parts of the code (after the NA deadline, yes I can confirm that, 7 hours after the NA deadline to be exact) and I didn't respond to him and instead went directly to you. Then in the morning, 4 of 2 suggests that me, him and Bock connect our code even though you're still alive and you don't have any suspicion of 4 of 2? And you suspect me because Vazquez got killed when her name was never mentioned to me as someone who had the code? And where did I push for the identities of the people you gave the code to? Also, your earlier implications that Bock, 4 of 2 and I were working together because 4 of 2 told me that they were involved with the code doesn't make sense as you did give 4 of 2 mine and Bock's name. You are one of the most confusing people I've ever had to deal with in this game. Furthermore, if you gave 2 identical codes to two sets of three people how does the code break when one person dies? One set of three is still complete. Nobody can honestly be this illogical. Your tracker is dead and for some reason you're focusing on why someone you gave your tortured code to is dead, whenever it seems to me that Vazquez wasn't even one of the people that was revealed to anybody else as being part of the code. I kind of don't want to even post this because if you respond to it, I'm going to have to read it and just trying to sift through your logic fills me with a sense of dread. You're all mouth and trousers!
  22. Hinckley
    It's a IRL problem of mine that I think I'm the only one who can joke. Sorry. A common Scum tell is only posting to defend one's self. So some of these people who are dropping in just to comment, it should be noted which ones only comment on the issues that pertain directly to them and skirt all other issues.
  23. Hinckley
    4 of 2, have you ever played a game here with a Scum Watcher?
  24. Hinckley
    I got +2 Someone got 1 and 17 Another person was told order of confirmed in the C&D thread, higher number is the tracker. The third and nineteenth people to confirm. Clem and Laura. I admit to rambling off so many theories that I can find almost anything possible so I want everyone to be objective about my suspicion. However, I will say that Dave and 4 of 2 both seem to be rather:
  25. Hinckley
×
×
  • Create New...