Jump to content

Hinckley

Root Administrator
  • Posts

    35,896
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Hinckley

  1. Maybe we can be so bold as to ask the Serial Killer to stay home tonight. And hopefully the vig will take a night off unless there's a really solid target to give us the time to catch up. Common mistake, it's "led". I noticed this about Rip too. He also encourage the "blocker [sic]" not to protect Clementine. The second day was interesting. Seamus had been going on Claw for most of the day, before eventually quoting and using Maurice's reasons. Now today he's leading a charge against Paul, who was acting quite scummy yesterday I will admit. I would say Paul was Scummier than Laura. Not much of my case against Paul relies on how Laura was acting. I'm not sure why people think her flipping Town has any bearing on Paul. Let's wait to make sure a counterclaim doesn't crop up. I hate the clothes–switching. I absolutely hate it. It reeks of bus driving. Switch targets and we're given an indication by the clothes being switched. You say it's an actual role?? I got an actual result so the host seems to think it is. You are a PR that does nothing but switch people's clothes? I'm not asking Clementine to announce publicly if she's acquired a role. I imagine there haven't been 7 vanilla Townie deaths. But I imagine she might know if the investigator has been killed or not. If two PRs die in one night, does the host give the backup a choice between the two roles? I don't remember ever using a backup. I'm not sure what I would do. I guess I'd have a hierarchy of kills solely to determine first Town PR killed. Why is Clementine green? I would hope Minga would've led with "so–and–so is Scum" if that was the case and I don't think we should be publicly announcing those cleared by investigation. If this turns out to be the real investigator, perhaps Minga can steer us away if that person is in danger of being lynched. By whom? I hope the investigator, him/herself isn't contacting them directly. It should be you in case of a Tailor or GodfatherTM.
  2. Here's how I feel about Paul: He admits to jumping on a bandwagon and having no good reason to vote for Dr. Wen yet when he votes, he says: He says his mind was made a while back but! Ay, that's odd. He says he sheeped it. I can't emphasize this enough: he admits to joining a bandwagon for no reason. He sheeped the vote. That's what Scum do. Lynch a Townie, hide in the bandwagon. Baaaaaaaaaaaaa! Now these three quotes together: He believes Clem's claim and is suspicious of Minga for analyzing the vote in a way that makes Paul look suspicious. He states again that he's "ready to believe" Clem's claim and then states later that he was going after her. Does this read like he's going after her? I ask him to clarify these things a few times and then this happens: Because I'm defending Clem which, as far as I can see, cannot be corroborated with real evidence. Maybe he was jobby–fizzog jaked but I feel like I only concluded Clem's claim should be believed for now. Clem is not in my Town column, she's only in the "Begrudgingly agree not to lynch for now" column. I replied with this: And he deflects, and it's not the only time yesterday he did it. He responds but skirts the issue of what I'm calling him out for being Scummy. He seemed to have done this a few times in the latter third of the day. Every time I brought up a concern about his reaction to Minga's vote analysis or his over–reaction to Clementine, he ignores it and responds to anything else but. Scummy.
  3. Oh, did I? I see a few posts but it looks like I spend a lot more time on you than Claw. And even after I vote for Claw, I go after Paul for his Scumminess. If he hadn't revealed his Scummy ways so late in the day, I probably would've tried my best to get him lynched. I'm a little annoyed our vig didn't target him.
  4. Is this true? I should stop huffing the kerosene, but it seems to me, Bock, that the day starts on September 6th and I don't mention Claw until the 8th. I spend the first part of the day picking apart the things that Clementine said. Then after mentioning the Claw, I concentrate on Paul for a while before deciding to vote for Claw. Doesn't seem to me like you represented reality but the amount of huffing I'm doing will kill a lot of brain cells, so correct me if I'm wrong...
  5. Wait, so no more ping? Ping away. And Paul is really, really Scummy, ISO.
  6. Changing someone's quote is abysmally terrible form. And search away, Clemmy. If you don't see his Actions Scummy, perhaps you're seeing with your blinders on. And there was more than his reaction to Minga's analysis. And furthermore, just because Laura's reaction to it seemed Scummy and she flipped Town, doesn't exonerate Paul. It looks like Vazquez's only real contribution was picking apart Clementine's claim.
  7. There was a lot of suspicion around Laura and Vazquez posted twice, drunk. I think of Major Dave as a formidable player and only one person suspected him. It's a gut feeling, could be wrong, although I doubt very much the Scum killed Laura, unless they role–copped her Night One and she was something important. Just came up with that thought as I was typing...Hmmmmm... Vazquez and Major Dave both were very low posters. Laura was under ten posts herself. This is why the speculation game is fun. OK. I reckon all three of them up in the air, dudes. Like a long puff of something transcendent...
  8. Quit stealing my breeks! Though my bawbag feels right free in this skart! If we were voting right now, I'd be dafty not to vote for Paul Harkonnen after his Scumminess yesterday. And now for speculation on the night kills: I assume Scum killed Major Dave. It's up in the air who killed Laura and Vazquez as they both were under some scrutiny yesterday, no? At least we now have confirmation there are three killers among us.
  9. Seriously, how long will it be? I'm waiting for someone to pick me up, should I shut down my computer or keep hitting refresh?
  10. megablocking read. Oh. Or you did. Sorry...
  11. Yeah, I did it this morning. The word "soon" gets replaced with "Bob sucks" but I thought I removed that one along time ago.
  12. Can you tell us when we should expect Day Three?
  13. What can I say? I can actually suspend both of your posting ability for 24 hours.
  14. If you're not posting a new day, you shouldn't tease us by posting at all. Log out altogether. Jerks.
  15. Once the host says the day ends, you cannot post in the topic any more. It is left open so that players can quote it on the following days. Please don't post after a day deadline again. Thank you.
  16. I don't know if anybody has said this one yet but Starbuck is the pilot and Laura is the name of the Secretary of Education turned President...
  17. Read!!!! that's what I'm afraid of! I don't think the tracker targeted two people!!!!
  18. Did the tracker track one person targeting two people? Can you stick around for a freakin minute and answer all questions?
  19. Can you speak outside of metaphors and non–parenthetically for a second? One's a tracker and he/she tracked...what role? And why are you not believing them and why would they contact you about it? And how did those six lines of dialogue take up so much time?
  20. Nah, you've been Scummy the whole time.
  21. You were going after her? Funny that it seems more like you were postulating that she is Town and has that role and berating her for how she handled it. You even say you're ready to believe her. I disagree with your reasons for berating her but you seem to think you were going after her. If you suspected her, I propose you did a poor job communicating that. And as I pointed out that you seemed to be blowing things out of proportion, the more I look at it the more it seems like Scum trying to appear concerned for the well–being of the Town. Are you trying to act Scummy so the vig will target you and you can redirect him or her? Sorry, copious amount of space spice makes me paranoid.
×
×
  • Create New...