Imho it deserves the negativity. Lego made a bad choice by replacing PF with PU. It would be different if both systems coexisted. It took me a while to figure out, but I've come to the conclusion that IR (PF) and bluetooth (PU/Sbrick/etc) have different target audiences. It is not a replacement by a long shot.
Actual example; I currently have 42030 build and can play with that in an instant with my not even 2 year old. Turn it on and play. He loves to put stuff into the bucket and can even drive a bit, be it only backwards :) The same can't be said about any bluetooth controlled sets. I'm not going to talk about the official apps. I have the Liebherr and it's a paperweight until I dismantle it for other MOCs. In their current form they are an abomination as far as I'm concerned. So let's take a bluetooth receiver, appcontroller2 and a physical controller (no way I'm letting my kid become one of those screens staring zombies). Nice setup, but not for quick playing. I have to turn on 1 or more hubs, turn on bluetooth and location on my mobile (always disabled, except for this). Turn on controller. Start an app, click through it, select a profile, connect to all devices. By now anybody who just wants a quick play has lost interest. It works for me as an engineer who likes to tinker (lots and lots of possibilities), but for kids? I do realise my situation is not your typical teenager technic lego combo, but you get the point I'm trying to make.
Now I did order the set, but mainly as a parts pack since I'm seriously lacking yellow panels and I could buy it for less that 200 euro (or in other words 28% discount compared to list price here in Sweden). Maybe take the PU parts and tinker with Pybrick a bit or something similar. Without panel need and discount I would not have ordered it, purely due to the PU dependency.