Jump to content

Aventador2004

Eurobricks Dukes
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,140

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Aventador2004

  1. Aventador2004
    The matter does need to be adressed, but banning is not the way to go. That would be like giving one chance, no ability to think it over, or even talk to someone about it. Also, the Chinese spam has reappeared it seems.
  2. Aventador2004
    This really was my trying to apologize. I hadn't had a great day, so I went outside calmed down, and wrote that post. I also wrongly misunderstood @M_longer's comment, which BTW, I shouldn't have. I think it definitely was me being like; " Maybe we should encourage him to try to make it more like the crane or change the name. When @Sariel joined in, I was trying to backtrack, realizing I made a mistake. I lost my cool because it got to the point I may have pissed some members off. Also tried to backtrack here. Bad idea. Just plain and simple tried to make myself into the blame. THIS IS MY FAULT, Ok. No one else. But when I tried to stop, it escalated. This is a learning curve. A forum should be helpfull, not hopefull for peace. Bottom line: RTFP.
  3. Aventador2004
    Well, it appears I opened a Goddamn can of worms. This has gone way too far. I meant it to be a calm conversation. But no, I said a single comment and offend pretty much everyone. Can a mod please close this topic before it escalates.
  4. Aventador2004
    This is exactly what I was looking for. Just say "Maybe change the name" has worked for me plenty of times. @gate is definitely being calm in this matter Bro.
  5. Aventador2004
    Start of Topic ====================================================================================== While you do have the points against me, if we are to keep the hobby alive and not make it into "Only the fittest survive". We need to encourage some builders onward. This does mean holding our tongue once in a while, or just not posting. If you dont like it, don't comment. Simple
  6. Aventador2004
    So be it. Literally did not want to argue about it. The below post was simple trying to say this was not that bad and that it works fine. It now seems like you think my post was insulting you. I want those others reading to keep in mind that even thought everyone respects you for your contributions, you can be a little harsh about this. A simple title change could have been an easy response. *quotes taken because they are show several times.*
  7. Aventador2004
    Keep in mind however, this is a Technic model. The OP clearly wanted something able to do those functions, focusing less on body, more on it working well. The name can be changed but it is still a model that the person could relate to. The model you showed is also a SYSTEM build, not a beam / panel body. There are less choices in how to shape, move or color in Technic.
  8. Aventador2004
    Quite similar actually, it has the body lines, capability, and all the functions.
  9. Aventador2004
    Sorry, I misunderstood your original post. It is well put together as a whole.
  10. Aventador2004
    It doesn't have to look good to work. I see nothing wrong with something like this. A freestyle build based on something else.
  11. Aventador2004
    The car is amazingly put together and the system parts add so much to it. The video is also incredible!
  12. Aventador2004
    I think it is this: @steph77?
  13. Aventador2004
    I actually did paste it, not sure where it went. It means Shown Before The Contest Starts. You are fine to show it Erik.
  14. Aventador2004
    All TC14 topics: (15) + Withdrawn ones: *I did not put mine on top because its mine, but because It was one of the first in order of posted, but the order got mixed.
  15. Aventador2004
    Nice new version of a great machine. Well done!
  16. Aventador2004
    Again, this is a great build, but just think that it is better that way. Maybe use the Claas rims instead?
  17. Aventador2004
    I'm not saying its bad, but i would change the title to; "What 42082 Could Have Been". To be honest 42082 is a lot better finished
  18. Aventador2004
    That's some nice bike! It looks quite realistic too.
  19. Aventador2004
    Nice mechanics for the boom. The 42042 chassis fits great.
  20. Aventador2004
    And @brunojj1's P1: https://www.eurobricks.com/forum/index.php?/forums/topic/164576-moc-mclaren-p1-hypercar-18-w-instructions/
  21. Aventador2004
    I believe @Sariel used it here:
  22. Aventador2004
    Okay, thanks for criticizing me. It seems I needed some motivation and I and definitely getting some from you guys. 2 weeks is plenty. Thanks!
  23. Aventador2004
    Well, it seems like I will be doing some redesigns anyway. Thank you for comments. I think I agree, this is a little too functionless, so making it launch mechanically is a good idea.
  24. Aventador2004
    I know, not to all tastes, but I think simple is much better right now. Also I do have a video in case anyone wants it. I don't think it is the best I can do, but it is something no one else is trying, and I want it to take the least amount of parts, still look realistic, and function fine.
  25. Aventador2004
    Video:
×
×
  • Create New...