deskp
-
Posts
4,707 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by deskp
-
Well, it's a special license for minifigures sold seperatley. "minimates" makes alot of figures for properties that also gets normal action figures from other companies. With star wars however hasbro proapbly have their own thing going.
-
curent flash is new 52. the yellow ligthning stirpes are not always vsible on him so lego proapbly chosue not to do them in order to make him look more classic, since the other ehroes lego did were classic. Would be nice to get a new print for him with that on though!
-
Perhaps, but when the origin of the rumor is random person's assumption theres not much to it. Rumors usualy have some legitimate source. Lego indiana jones had plenty of combat, as does the movies. JP has like no combat.
-
Don't think tehre a real rumor at all. Any time a new lego lcisece is announced people jump to conclution that theres a videogame coming.. Theres not much lego gameply to be ahd in JP
-
They would have looked exacty the same even if soemone else voiced them though... In no way a representation of the actors apperancce at any point. Also in alot of countries they have other voice artists.. -
Lego wouldnt be allowed to say they got who license yet, because it would undermine 'characters' uppcoming and current 2014 sales.
-
They could do it right and still fit very well. even if they needed the shape from the agme they should print it.
-
game manta's helmet(neck) isnt right.
-
Well 'character' still has the ation figure license most likely, wich often interfers with legos ability to sell just figures. Lego wouldn't get the license just for the IDEAS thing. if 'character' still wanted to make their full range of products.
-
well the Lego movie was just a special case I think.
-
Lego has a set date for revealing wich sets got "rejected"(not made) Character building used to have doctor who license, they might not have it beyond 2014
-
^ CLose enough isnt a thing. If its not licensed and diretly based off it does not count.
-
No no no, only apearance counts. In no way are vocie artists represented in a lego fig.
-
Lego migth have the license+plans for it. That would be another reason for the IDEAS for not being made.
-
Because it does not really matter. Us costumer are never supposed to see them. Also with electro hes more recognizable in yellow and green, so when ur making a prelim fig that might read better, it's for their interal work. But his hood is white...
-
Got a pic or link? didnt think he'd look new in the game.
-
Thats your opinion. I disagree.
-
I think the t-rex is bigger.
-
Yes, superman returns did really bad. Man of steel did decent.
-
Well, the other 2016 movie is most likely Shazam or Aquaman, both of wich would be considered fairly "risky" In fact most DC movies are risky Except batman, wich gets sets anyways right.
-
Lego is getting the comic JLA out of the way in 2015. because in 2016 and after theres 2 dc movies each year.
-
Yeah but the persons opinion on 1 set could easily affect his opinion on the whole thing. Like the shock of 1 bad set can leave you with a bad taste for the entire wave. Especialy if you dont get alot of time to take in what you're seeing.
-
Not that there is any business reason for lego to make that anyways. lego follows the movies, and we got planety of ironmen in other sets. And theres no demand for iron monger or wiplash. I dont think the license is split btween companies in that manner for any theme. JW will have plenty of trucks and dinosaurs.
-
Didnt someone say they are amking a JUNIOR labelled pirate set? so if person saw that it makes sense he thought it looked like jjunior x] And yeah IF they were prelim images, they very well could easily look bad, they often do. But we'll now whats up when we see finished pix.
-
Sigrid, tilda and normal sauron are already in my gallery. Noone wants a glowing sauron.