Jump to content

L@go

Eurobricks Fellows
  • Posts

    1,950
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by L@go

  1. I really like this - it's a shame about the colours, but as you say, you have to make concessions there. There are some very nice details, like the money jar and not least the garden hose drum. And it does look lovely when delivered in that unique Lego box. Well done!
  2. Yeah... it's metallic silver, though - doesn't exist in dark gray :)
  3. Haha, I just noticed my new title :) thank you for that!
  4. Personally I'm a bit fed up with all the people who don't think it's fair that older sets increase in value. It's how the market works - deal with it. If you can't afford these sets, too bad. Unfair is the wrong word - a better one is probably unlucky. You were unlucky not to be interested in or aware of these sets at the time when they were easily available for anybody. You're late to the party, and it's hardly the collectors' or the investors' fault. Another point is that sets like 3450 Statue of Liberty and 10182 Café Corner have turned out to be much more popular after they were retired than they were when they were still in production - which means that it's not that likely that there was a whole lot of speculators who bought stacks of these with the purpose of making a lot of money. Now, I've got a Café Corner on my shelf. If I decide to sell that, by the reasoning of the people who are complaining that "it's not fair", I shouldn't charge what the market is now willing to pay - I should sell it cheaply so that they could enjoy it instead? I'll give you an example: The Bugatti Type 41 (Royale) Kellner Coupé was built at some point between 1927 and 1933. In 1950, it was sold to Briggs Cunningham for around $3000. In 1987, it changed hands for $8,700,000. If somebody was to walk up to the seller, suggesting that he sell it for $3000, "because I wasn't around when it was new and I think it's unfair that the price has increased to much," that would be considered ridiculous. My two cents, anyway, and points to take into consideration when somebody's whining about increasing second-hand prices. There, it's out of my system! And ub40: I'm not attacking you personally. Your post was just a very convenient opportunity to express my opinion. You're of course entitled to your own - but as you can see, I disagree :) EDIT: I'm not in favour of stacking up on sets to make money. I just don't like the notion that it's unfair to sell sets at their market value. EDIT2: Grammar.
  5. Some really nice entries this year. Here are my votes: 4. Dix - 2 10. Priovit70 - 1 13. Cecilie - 1 1. tatertots - 1
  6. I haven't got the baby T-Rex, but I tried with this, the "Dragon Baby 'Norbert'", and that's just a tiny bit too tall. It fits without problems, but it almost looks a bit too tiny: It's possible that it would look better with a round 1x1 plate underneath it - I don't know.
  7. Now, that is interesting - it seems like an exact parallel to the new lifejackets, because I've got that set with the old camera in it. I wonder if it's the same part ID as well (I understand that's the case with the lifejackets)?
  8. Good point with the four pieces, and I totally agree about the trike. That design should have been retired a long time ago.
  9. This is wonderful! The only thing - and I mean the only thing - I could dream of changing here would be the roof of that tower - there's something slightly off with it. But apart from that, I absolutely love this building. Being a great fan of your previous models, having bought instructions for - and built - both your brownstone and your Chilis restaurant, I can guarantee that this one is also going to end up on my shelf sooner or later. And I particularly appreciate the inclusion of stairs, which I think adds a lot of realism to a building. Great job, keep it up - I'll be a regular customer in the future :)
  10. Thanks for providing insightful and interesting answers! Those are good points, especially the VIP ones :) Didn't think of those. But 98% of the people here know about it, which is why I've thought it strange every time I see somebody on this forum talking about PaB - I've assumed that if you knew about BL, you wouldn't use PaB. Valid point - Lego's prices are probably more based on production cost than on rarity, which the BrickLink prices are not. Does it work with other words, too? Now I feel like trying :)
  11. I'm aware of that single piece, which is a pretty unique thing - but as you said, you had to order it by phone. Apart from that?
  12. A nice review, with good, clear pictures. Let me add a thought (I picked up this set a couple of weeks ago): When you criticise the building for not having a proper interior (remember, it has to easily accommodate the car) and the hot rod for being boring, I think it's important to remember that this isn't a big set. Lego could easily have "improved" on the design, but that would have meant adding pieces - which would have increased the price. Rather than ask for that, I think one should focus on the basic design and which possibilities they offer - if you don't like it, it's easily modified with those extra pieces. But that's just my opinion :) Yep, it goes on top of that new mudguard (which appears with seven different printed patterns, in other colours than black, in various Cars sets, but without printing only in this set), behind the dark red tile with handle.
  13. I've never ordered from PaB. Every time I've gone there to check prices, I've found that BrickLink is much cheaper on just about every item possible - and of course the selection of bricks on BL is vastly superior. For that reason, I keep getting amazed every time PaB comes up as a serious alternative. Can somebody with experience with both please enlighten me on this subject? I'd love to know what the attraction to PaB actually is (and I'm serious, I'm not trying to be a wise-a**). EDIT: I never realised that there was an automatic censorship function on this site - which replaced my three-letter word for the human behind with "megablocks"... Strange idea.
  14. While I was a bit disappointed that I didn't get a single vote, it doesn't really matter - because there's no doubt in my mind that the top three entries were the three most worthy winners. So congratulations to you, guys! :)
  15. I'm very much with you on that - I have a hard time choosing between the GG and the CC, but if pressed I'd have to say GG - it's bigger and better, and it's got interior features. My affection for the CC has less to do with the building itself and more with the fact that I came out of my dark ages because of it :) Also, I agree that the GE has to be third. Personally, FB is my least favourite in the series so far.
  16. Strange how the fifth and final instructions leaflet is missing on Lego.com...
  17. At some point I'm going to have to get to a convention to see some of the fantastic trains, built by the true masters of the art, in action It's such a joy to see something like that running. Fabulous!
  18. Congratulations on the Best in Show prize - from what I can see it must have been well deserved, it's a fantastic diorama! I particularly like the kindergarten and the main station building, and the train cars covered with fabric are also very nice.
  19. Oh, it's entirely possible. Here's the recipe.
  20. Nice! While I'm not too keen on the exterior designs, your interiors are top notch, all of them. The idea of a comic store with the new Superman figure is great, and I really like your arcade. I think maybe I'd move the crane game outside so it sits next to a wall instead of where it is now, so the people playing won't have to stand in the street or occupy so much space on the sidewalk. Although there isn't really any available wall space :) And your funny comments are worth mentioning. Humor is always appreciated!
  21. Great work, as always, and HUGE, as always! Can't wait to see it finished. Also, it's instantly recognisable as your work. Well done!
  22. I really like this - it's decorated without being overly ornate. Personally, I'm not crazy about the sign, but I do like the colours, both shades of blue, and the general design. My favourite part is probably the balconies in the back, they're a very nice touch. Well done, I'll be looking forward to seeing the final version!
  23. EDIT: Posting mistake.
  24. Irving was so MAD when the Maersk train took an unexpected turn, disturbing him in his weekly ritual of trimming his bush (...), that he passed out. Train guy 1: "What does the manual say about this kind of situation?" Train guy 2: "Er... I don't know." EDIT: I didn't notice the part about photo-editing being prohibited. I hope adding a watermark isn't considered editing... Well, even if I'm disqualified, I had fun :)
  25. I was amazed to see that Lego had made the front page of VG Helg, the weekend magazine from Norway's biggest newspaper VG (Verdens Gang). The caption on the front cover reads: "The Lego girl has become a babe - labelled as a hindrance to gender equality": I thought you might like to read the nine-page story, so I've translated it for you. Now, I'm not a native English speaker, so I'd be very surprised (and delighted) if my translation is without flaws, but you'll get the idea. Here goes: I'm a Lego girl in a Barbie world Around the world, these figures are making people protest: The new Lego babes are too sugar sweet. And gender stereotypical. She's got long, blond hair, a short skirt, pink shoes and a tiny tight top. Her name isn't Barbie, but Stephanie, and she's Lego's new girls' toy. NEDRE EIKER/OSLO (VG) They're taller and slimmer than the classic, square Lego figure with the yellow head – and they've got female forms. With friends Stephanie, Mia, Emma, Andrea, and Olivia, Lego wants to conquer all the world's girls aged five and up. But the blonde waitress Stephanie, with her singlet and short skirt, has upset the people who regarded Lego as the "good" actor in a toy business that's getting more and more cynical and gender segregated. Under the slogan #Liberate Lego the sugar sweet figures have been accused of being gender stereotypical Lego Barbies in social media. Even the Danish Minister of Gender Equality, Manu Sareen, is put off by Lego's new series. - It's annoying that Lego's unique and inspiring toys are now reinforcing the kind of traditional gender patterns that the Friends line does, the minister wrote on his Facebook profile. At the same time, an old Lego advert from 1981 is going viral as an example that everything was better back in the old days. On Facebook, 19,000 people have thus far liked the image of a tough, red-haired girl with jeans and blue trainers, proudly presenting a Lego build stripped of princesses and pink. The headline goes like this: "What it is is beautiful". On Facebook the image has been shared thousands of times, with the caption: "Dear Lego: More ads like this one, please". The image has led to an endless number of blog posts, heated comments and tweets. - The girl in the ad from 1981 is no tomboy; she's a completely ordinary girl. We are the ones who have turned five-year-old girls into pink princesses – and the toy industry has played a major part, says Solveig Østrem, associate professor at the Kindergarten Centre at the University College of Vestfold. She's been studying children playing and learning in nursery schools, and she thinks that girls' failure to participate in constructional play is hampering the girls' development. - Pink "princess Lego" that can hardly be used for building won't help the girls. This is Lego designed to be put together easily and played with as dolls, it doesn't invite to constructional play, Østrem says. According to human geographer Karl-Fredrik Tangen at the Oslo School of Management, constructing pink princesses can have dire consequences. - Girls are socialised into a world of decorations and care, pulling them into low-salary care jobs. This contributes to women's powerlessness. It is a good thing if the girls learn how to build, but they should be building bridges and skyscrapers. Lego is playing a part in presenting the world like it's natural that women are subdued. Now Lego is going to reinforce the gender segregation in the shops, instead of decreasing it, Tangen says. In Norway's biggest toy shop, Toys'R'Us at Alna in Oslo, shiny, tiny princess costumes fill the aisles. The pink trail of glitter and dolls continues through a corridor decorated with Barbie curtains. Long, thin legs with stilettos, pink toy castles, and Hello Kitty. And then, a towering wall of Lego reveals itself: Warriors, space ships, fast cars, swords and guns in dark colours. But in February, the macho warriors will be accompanied by the Lego girls from the fictitious city of Heartland (sic), when the Lego Friends line is launched in Norway. Birthday girl Agnes Eikseth Aas (7) is right in the middle of the new line's target group. Today, she's invited the girls from her class to a birthday party at Lindern, Oslo. The girls are excited, sitting in a circle on the living room floor as the girl with the crown on her head spins the bottle. Whomever the bottle points at, is to give her present to the birthday girl. - Woooow, you're lucky, the classmates shout in unison as Agnes pulls the blonde Barbie doll from the wrapping paper. - Mum, see what I got! Agnes shouts, reaching her arms in the air, clutching the plastic box. Seven-year-old Agnes is no typical pink-girl. She joins in when her dad does carpenting, and her mother is very consciously avoiding the typical girl clichés. For Christmas, Agnes wished for a toolbox – and a make-up head. - Our mothers were very politically conscious and wanted to show that girls can do the same things boys can do. But now the pendulum has swung too far in the opposite direction, thinks mother Barbro Grude Eikseth, who's also got a nine-year-old daughter. She feels that toy shops are way too occupied with pointing out gender differences. Her seven-year-old daughter does not play with Lego; she associates it with boys' toys and Star Wars, the mother explains. - I try to provide a critical voice, but I'm not fanatical. There's something life-affirming in dressing up and live out your dreams, she says. - She yells at me when I buy Hello Kitty for the girls, laughs father Harald Aas. Daniel Fernandez-Kaspersen is also celebrating his seventh birthday. The noise level is even higher than at Agnes's all-girl party. - It's Lego! The birthday kid from Nedre Eiker shouts, throwing the paper away. - Oh, it's war! The seven-year-old boys gather around the box of Lego Kingdoms, knights with armour and shields. The next present contains Lego Star Wars. It's a battlepack that Daniel's already got, then some NinjaGo, and some Bakugan figures. - Boys are supposed to play with Spider-Man, Star Wars, Beyblade and karate. Girls play with dolls, Barbie and skipping ropes, classmate Andreas Wernar Hasselberg says, before the birthday boy's dad steps in to negotiate which one of the boys will get to borrow Daniel's Star Wars light sabre. - Nowadays the toys are supposed to be very boyish. I was always thinking that I wouldn't let my children play with gender-stereotypical toys, and we gave him a toy kitchen when he was a little boy. We also thought that we weren't going to buy just pink stuff for our two-year-old daughter, but it doesn't work that way. She likes to dress up, and she likes pink. And boys like to be tough, says father David Fernandez-García. - Toys are more divided into typical girls' and boys' toys now. At Daniel's age it's a crisis if he get something that can be considered girly, mother Eva Fernandez-Kaspersen chimes in. - We had a lot of good intentions, but we can't escape the fact that we're living in a society, David sighs. - It's been a clear trend for the past ten years that toys and clothes are less unisex, says Mari Rysst, a researcher at Norway's National Institute for Consumer Research (Sifo): - Girls are supposed to be cute, pretty and even sexy, while boys are hard and tough. This stereotypical pattern is something that the gender equality movement has worked a long time to get rid of, so it's a paradox that this is the situation for children today. Rysst thinks the extreme gender segregation in the toy industry shows two things: - For one, that the manufacturers are looking for new niches to make money. And secondly, that maybe gender equality is taken more and more for granted, so one doesn't really realise that toys can reproduce old, stereotypical gender patterns, Rysst says. But the consumers have spoken. The Lego Friends figures are the results of four years' worth of research, design development, focus groups and play testing in girls' homes in several countries. A collaboration between the company's own team of analysts, called "anthros", external consultants, designers and marketing people has resulted in what Lego thinks is exactly what girls and their mothers want. So far, Lego products have proved not to appeal to girls; 90% of today's Lego users are boys. - The idea of the unisex toy is dead. There's no use in giving girls and boys the same thing, states Niels Sandal Jakobsen, head of Market and Consumer Insights at Lego. Even though girls like to build, they don't want to be warriors or aliens in Lego concepts like Star Wars, Hero Factory, Alien Conquest or NinjaGo. - Lego might just as well have put up a sign saying "No girls allowed", Peggy Orenstein commented in the international best-selling book "Cinderella Ate My Daughter" from 2011, where she describes how the princess mania has taken over the present generation of little girls. Internationally, the Danish toy manufacturer has gone from losing a million dollars a day in 2005 to increasing profits by 106% since 2006. The main focus has been on cultivating a portfolio with focused boys' themes. In Norway, Lego has grown with approximately 30% a year for the past five years. After a very successful turnaround, Lego is now hungry for the remaining half of the market. Lego is planning to use more than 40 million dollars on marketing for their new girls' concept. - We're doing what we can to remain relevant for girls, and to reach them we need to move towards everyday themes and roles that they can identify with, Jakobsen declares. In the decade leading up to the "tomboy's" appearance in the Lego ad from 1981, the battle for gender equality rages. There should be no differences between the sexes in children's toy boxes, either: Baby brother gets doll stroller. Baby sister gets hammer and saw. - This has had no effect of any importance. The girls who grew up back then still didn't get any less traditional or concerned with make-up, Stein Ulvund says. He's a professor of pedagogy at the University of Oslo, and he has studied the importance of toys on children's intelligence. Ulvund's opinion is that the toy business isn't solely to blame for the fact that children are trapped in an old-fashioned gender pattern, but he does think that the business is moving in the wrong direction. - The toy industry reinforces traditional gender patterns, speculating in pink and blue. The gender segregation has become more extreme than ever, Ulvund says. He doesn't think it's as simple as the gender difference in toy preferences is something that we're born with, like previous research has hinted at. - I think that it's to a major extent something we learn through our social environment. We can't rule out the possibility that gender-segregated toys will have consequences for how children develop – we don't know a lot about this, Ulvund says, but he still thinks that the main influence on children's perception of gender roles is their parents. Ulvund is disappointed in Lego. - I've been thinking of Lego as a serious player, and I think they could have gained much more by resisting the pressure for gender segregation, the professor says about the new Lego. Beauty has been an essential factor in the development of the new girl Lego. - Girls like pretty things, and care about details and finesse, says Lego's Niels Sandal Jakobsen. He thinks all kinds of play are about identity. - When the girls are between the age of three and nine, they grow conscious about their sex and who they are. There are roles to adapt to, says Jakobsen. He's convinced that children's preferences have got to do with genes. He thinks that the critics' opinions are based on a misconceived anxiety that the children will become what they play. - They see "fashion dolls" and a view on women that they don't approve of, and conclude that "I won't let my daughter play with these kinds of products, because she'll become just like the dolls." Despite the fact that Helle Vaagland, a program host with Norwegian national broadcaster NRK and author of the book "Go Mum", is a self-proclaimed feminist, she welcomes the new Lego line. - I don't think the urge to decorate, or what we think of as typical girls' interests, can be oppressed. I have to admit that I have a hard time being engaged when my sons build Star Wars spaceships and Indiana Jones planes. But if I could build a pink café instead, where the Lego friends could get together for a chat, I might just get more interested, says Vaagland. She's pleasantly surprised by the new Lego ladies, in spite of them "naturally being slimmer than the Lego figures for boys". - They're very versatile. They build tree houses and run a design school, a beauty salon and a veterinarian clinic. And the fact that they also enjoy giving their dogs pink ribbons can hardly be dangerous, she says. Vaagland thinks that the politically correct approach from the 70s and 80s could actually work against its purpose. - My mother dressed me up in blue jeans and brown corduroy, but deep inside I really wanted to wear pink princess dresses, a dream that I didn't fulfil until I grew up. - Now I wear pink as often as I can, while fighting for gender equality on a daily basis, says Vaagland. In seven-year-old birthday girl Agnes's room, VG Weekend introduces a little surprise to the girls' party: A sneak preview of the Lego Friends figures. - Ooooh, so nice! - That looks like a lot of fun! - I want to be Mia, says Hanan (6). - I want to be Sophia, says Sofie (6). - I want to be Olivia, says older sister Ella (9). - But there's none for me, the birthday girl exclaims – before she notices something she wants: - I'll have the horse! The girls rip open the bags with the small girl figures and immediately start talking about what clothes they'll dress them in. - But do you like building? - Yeeeeaaah, the girls answer in unison. - But we must look at the building instructions first, says Helene (6) and picks up the little brochure buried under the pile of pink and purple bricks. By ida.giske@vg.no, beate.koren@vg.no, janne.moller-hansen@vg.no
×
×
  • Create New...