Peanuts

How can you people dare to talk that much during my afternoon nap? First of all, why do you call me Peanuts? The other firefighters always called me like that, and I didn't like it. And I wasn't the first to announce the investigator. I couldn't. He had never talked one word to me, as did everyone else who knew his identity. Shadows told it first, and I apologize if I shouted it out loudly. We shouldn't say 100%. Let's say about 97%, but not 100%. The leaders of criminal or sinister groups often do their best to seem innoncent, maybe did he as well. I don't say Sal is sinister or that he can't be trusted, but I just want to remember you of the possibility. Well then, I think my reasons are pretty clear for me voting the King of Delaware. Burn the scum!

A bit early, isn't it? I sure don't want to rush things. You're now trying to lynich someone with no evidence but his vote for an investigator. And we have to consider that Martin acted quite scummy yesterday, when he first announced to randomly kill a staff member, then attacked Shadows out of nothing. I admit, even I barely voted for him, but shadows seemed to be the better alternative.

I wouldn't really call Shadows "not insane", depending on his exit yesterday I think the death of Martin has made Jesus even more trustworthy, although you never can be sure. I'm wondering why people still voted for our alien friend, even after Martin told us he were able to investigate. Even if you're not sinister, you were ready to kill an investigator just based on gut feelings or the fact you didn't want to vote Shadows. I think it's high time to get some sinister, any ideas anyone?

Oh, no, why did nobody protect Martin? That's not very good for us insanes, as he had investigating skills. I'm not very sad about Mitchell and Trucks, as we already knew about Mitchell's allegiance and Trucks doesn't seem to be different from him. Saves us another day, when we would have to convict him. So, the sinisters stroke again. So, if there's anyone with us who has stopped someone from using his night action, he may have got their killer. If there is a protector among us, why didn't he protect Martin, as he seemed to have a rather important role? Whatever else he did, I hope it was worth it. May I join his incineration?

Yes, great game so far, and the introductions are a great effect as well. I got no reason to object.

How can you be so sure? And who are the more suspicious people? And what are the suspects based on? Some clarification would be nice.

I said I would give Shadows another chance, but the day has brought up nothing else and it seems that his death would be the best option we have so far, so therefore I'll vote: Shadows.

I thought this was yet said often enough. Maybe they somehow were possible to override the securities. I have no idea how this asylum is secured, as I never tried to break out, but I think you can steal door keys very well. Me too. When I was brought here, I was pyromanic. Now I'm both pyromanic and paranoid. Great cure, Doctor Blut(zi)egel. To understand the last one, Blutegel is German for leech. Just in case someone doesn't get it. I guess Shadows was first to tell it publicly.

Thanks for the explanation. Now I get what you meant. May we learn the second you investigated? Not that it would be too useful, but it would be interesting who we can trust, just in case something happens to you tonight.

Wait a minute, I think I missed something. What exactly does the two day actions mean? I understood that Martin, the day investigator, has investigated Shadows on day one and got as result, that he's none of us. But where does the other investigaton come from? And what about the other day action? Has Stash investiagted him twice (why?) or were those two different actions, and which actions with which result? I'm more than confused now, would be nice, if someone explains this to me, cause I don't get it.

Sorry for this nonsense. Me and maths... Absolutely no idea. But it happened often enough. And now, they at least know you. Because the smaller group wins in most cases and many of us shouldn't be trusted as well, as they are trying to kill you. I'm insane, remember? Anyway, I'll give you a chance. Unvote: Shadows

That's complicated. And you know for sure that it only works on insanes, not just on insanes of every allegiance? I still belive Shadows is neutral, but day comes to his end and neutrals are inclined to team up with the scum, so I vote: Shadows.

Er, one thing: we are all insane (except for Shadows, as he says), even the sinister insanes are still insane. According to you, they would be sane

So, you want to say that you're neither insane nor sinister insane, so you're neutral to our case? Interesting... I'm not sure wether to trust you, but I won't yet vote for you, as my vote isn't going to change your fate anyway, from my point of view.

Your statement would be pretty important right now, and you wanna leave? Jesus, you gotta be insane...Oh, I don't mean you, Jesus, I just meant...ah, nevermind, you're insane as well. So, did you sence anything? Did you see something or someone? Was something stolen from you? Do you feel like you were blocked, investigated, raped, converted (stupid question) or killed (even more stupid question)?

So, you wanna say that someone has taken your cloths to do something with the King. Why should someone do? Maybe he finds your clothing very stylish or just likes the way it fits. Were you asked about your dressmaker? No, really, if he didn't plan to be caught (which would be a very stupid plan, if you ask me) he would have no need for your clothing. By the way, I didn't know you wore a wig. You think you know people...To be serious, you have no defense although it's obvious you were there. And, Doc, you found an anonymous message with this evidence addressed to you in the bathroom? Doesn't sound like a good place to me, it's also quite fishy...well, you can't be both scum, so I'm not sure what to think about this, but maybe I'm only paranoid.

Maybe he's just stolen it from the King or found it while looking through his stuff, so if we assume the syringe means something evil, the King might be the sinister as well. Also we can't say for sure itÄ's something bad, maybe it's a truth serum or such, used to investigate him. Although I agree he maybe just tried to poison or recruit him somehow.

So, do you want to say it's likely that the sinisters tried to protect Cookie from a conviction, or are you just wondering? Because I myself did vote for Cam instead of anyone else, because of two reasons: 1)It was almost sure a conviction would be done. Certain people were forcing a conviction, as they didn't unvote. That's why I voted. I would have prefered no conviction. 2)Why Cam? Because, if we would have convicted someone else, who would have been scum, we were as clueless as before. If Cam would have been scum, we would have lots of further suspects. That's why. Anyone had the same chance to be scum, but I wanted us to get as many advantages as possible. I hope you understand me, I didn't act illogical at all.

Well, it was surely an interesting experience to play my first mafia game, although I think, my role-playing wasn't very good I didn't have many leads, and I didn't talk much in private, so I think I wasn't a that great help to my party. I think I'll play better in def's game. The only thing I can say, is, that Iwas quite suspect of Roncanator from very early in the game, even before he was converted. But I had no evidence about that, but I planned to vote for him the next day, when I died. Without anything more to share, my role: Oh, and congrats to the winners and thanks to Zepher for hosting such a great game.

So, day seems to come to an end, and we will most propably get a conviction, so I Vote: Big cam You want to know why? Well, there will be a conviction today. If we kill someone else, and he turns out to be innoncent, we just lost an innoncent. If we convict someone else who turns out to be sinister, we killed a sinister, but we are as clueless as before. If we kill Cam, and he was innoncent, we also lost an innoncent. But if he was sinister, we got plenty of new suspects, That's all. I think, the chance he is scum, is about the same as the others. Give me a better reason to vote for someone else, and I will do it, but if we have to convict someone blindly, I want to make the best out of it.

Cats...I don't like them. Once I saved a kitten out of a burning house -oh, I loved that house. The furniture was completely wooden. The flames grew so large and cozy warm - well, anyway, the kitten thanked it by scratching me in the face. The wound burned even some weeks after, and not the good, warm kind of burning. You are the one trying to kill Big Cam, you psycho. Sorry, did you say something?

I completely agree. But we have three people voted for so far, and if Jesus, Stan and Cat don't take their votes back, someone will die. Cat has acted quite suspicious to me, while he voted for Cam without any reason but the fact he got many votes for PR. I don't think that many votes must be suspect, because the elections were pretty unorganized and many seemed just to vote for someone blindly, so the first few votes created a bushfire-like bandwagon effect. So I don't think we should go after the PR elections. We might take them as supporting evidence, but I wouldn't base my vote on them. While they are the only thing we have, the best was just to share wild accusations, without voting for anyone. Therefore I beg Cat, Jesus and Stan to unvote the others, but if they don't, we should think as collective about the one we prefer to die.

So there's one vote for Big Cam, and one vote for Dr. Ballbricker. As I agree that all staff should be suspect, because those murderers need someone who's got access to everything, I don't think we should vote for them by now. Anyway, what I want to say, is, now that the first votes are casted, we will have to think about this sharply. We sould vote, because there will either be a conviction made by us all, or a conviction made by a single person. I don't suspect the male nurse, while there is no evidence but he's male and he's a nurse. Big Cam has done nothing so far. The only thing he did was getting some votes. 5, right? So, if he was scum, there were only five of them. That sounds unbelievable to me, there must be more. Jesus tried to elect Big Cam, now he tries to kill him. Seems like a pretty scummy plan to me. By the way, did the King say I would burn down his palace? The file says, I'm harmless unless I have contact with fire. I think I'm more normal than most of you others, who live in their fantasy worlds, eat humans, believe to be Jesus or think they were sane doctors taking care of a bunch of crazy patients or such.

I'm unsure about the vote. Of course we are wasting time if we vote, but there is no evidence at all at this point, besides from the vote for the PR. The odds are very bad to get someone who's scum if we're just guessing. Evaluating is a good point, but what shall we base our evaluation on? Maybe we should first wait for those with night actions to do the first move. You can also force us to lynch as well, as everyone can. I'm open for any evidence or suspects, but we have neither so far.

At first I would like to congratulate the chief. I am sure, he will be a good leader of us patients and will be a worthy represetataive of us insanes. I'm afarid taht I kind of sad I missed the election, I always liked elections. I remember especially the last hours before the resultst were told, the ambiance was just great. All the hope, the fight, the fire within the people's souls...just great. So, I'm afraid I wasn't here the last few seconds, I was away, looking for a cigarette, I miss smoking. I didn't find any, and nobody gave me fire. Well, Siggy is dead. Poor guy. Did he deserve death? Maybe. Many do. But who actually killed him, deserves it even more. I'm just wondering if someone has ever killed before? I sure didn't. If there are any, they should be even more suspect than the others. The killers also maybe have some staff with them, as they had acces to the rooms and knew how to avoid being seen. Much to think about. I think, a cigarette might help concentrate. Has anyone fire?