Peanuts

Would you please pay attention, I think I told it loud enough, and many people replied to that. I investigated Ted Tompkins, and got as result that there was no file about him. Completely right. I would vote for Timtam, but I already did and therefore I will Unvote: Timatam Tommers/Arjay, just to Vote: Timatam Tommers/Arjay Looks much more drastical when spoken out like that.

Fair point you have, but I myself don't think the sinisters can convert. Just think about it: There are 5 or 7 sinisters in this hospital, if they can convert, there would be 4 more, which makes 9 or 11. There are 20 people left, so IF they can convert they have started with 5 and are now 9, as there seems to be no blocker among us-at least nobody I know of. In this case we have to convict a sinister today, or we're all gonna die tomorrow. And as someone said before, a killer and a converter would be too unfair. Considering there is no converter, there are no convertible ones, so the scum would only need someone who finds out night actions. I think it would be risky to stage such a play (metagaming), especially while I am a relatively new player (metagame off). Okay, let's do some brainstorming: Who do I trust? -D. Eisenhower: Don't ask why, I won't tell. But I think he's propably the most trustworthy person in here. -Jesus: Would act greatly if he was scum. I trust him. -Nurse Pepper: Not that I know much about her, but from what I know, I got no reason not to trust her. -Perry Noid: Asking clever questions and has no night action. Although he doesn't trust me, just means he's trying to figure out some scum. -Sal Samuels: Not very active, but investigated innoncent. -Nurse Penny:Asks silly questions, but seems yet trustworthy, but inexperienced. Who don't I trust: -Dr. Ballbricker: Doesn't contribute much. -Ted Tompkins: No file. Few help to our case. -Timtam: Has blue arms. -Prof. Diem: Has black arms. -Misty Monroe: Has stopped talking, has never been any help at all. -Cookie Custer: Has disappeared. I think he's trying to fly under the radar. Who I'm unsure about: -Nurse Pendelton: I used to trust her, and I used to be suspicious of her. Now I just have no idea. -the Mexican: No idea. -Ryan Catchers: I'm very unsure about him. Might be useful, but might be scum as well. -Sandy Craws: Has contributed very much, but I haven's seen him today. -Mr. Nowhere: I used to trust him, but now I'm unsure. He clearly has a position which would be great for a scum. -Lupo: I tend to tread him as trustworthy, but I don't know much about him. -Stanley Spussemmin: Same as Lupo. Who am I gonna vote for? Vote Timtam/Arjay. I think we should use what our photographer has got us. Please note this ain't final, I just try to answer Jesus' question.

You mean, I am in contact with an investigator, and claim that I got all of his results? What speaks against this possiblity? -The investigator might tell publicly that he's the real investigator -Claiming to be a random investigator might have got me killed. I could simply tell the investigator publicly and try to get by him another insane convicted, abd then act like "Oh, he was really a random investigator, who might have known? It was really an unlikely story. I don't think anyone would blame me if I did. IF I would take the responsibility for another investigator. What I don't do. -He might get suspect of me, like "Wait a minute, I didn't want to be target of the scum, that's why I told my results someone else. Now he claims to have my role? And the scum doesn't kill him? Fishy." -even much more. I apologize if I'm too harsh, but this is really the most unlikely possibility. I agree that I am still not very trustworthy, but you have to admit I got a fair point there.

You're right, I forgot completely about that. In this case, something better has shown up: we just have four people with blue or black arms: Mr. Nowhere, Timtam, the Prof and my humble self. Mr. Nowhere has a perfacte position, as Jesus has already said, but white hands. I myself have no such alibi, but nobody has said anything against my defense before, so I think nobody as found an error. Until one is found, I will consider myself as insane. Leaves the Prof and the single twin. We should remember the arm actually looked blue, so I would really lean toward Timtam. But for now something has shown up, so I will not longer bother Ted...for now. Unvote: Ted Tompkins/WhiteFang

As am I myself. Well, I've got both sinister and not sinister results, but all of them turned out to be insane. I don't think there's any other logical possibility. I'm not sure, but I think I get random results for everyone, except for Ted and maybe even some others, whose files are missing. I have no idea wether if he's insane, neutral or sinister, but since some were suspect of him and there's no file about him and we don't have any other leads so far, I stay with my vote. But otherwise than the King and Havel I will take no responsibility for his death. I'm afraid, yes. And since we have no investigators left save me, the random one, is't not very propable we'll get much information in future. I have no idea what we're gonna base future convictions on.

I wouldn't be so sure about that. I hope that Ted is sinister, and that other sinisters or every sinister in general has got rid of his file, but I can't be sure about that, as I can't be sure Ted is sinister. As a random investigator don't exspect me to get you that much of information. I don't mind, you had good reasons to vote for me. And thanks for unvoting I remember myself to ask him publicly about his second investigation and he told that he had investigated Sal insane. Just to clarify. More unfair than a random investigator?

I just realized something: 1)I told you I can steal files. 2)By stealing files I can invetsigate. So if 1) is right, 2) is right as well. 3)I am insane. If 2) is right and I am an investigator, I am insane. Why would the sinisters need an investigator? 4)I got the results: Chief and King sinister, Havel not sinister, no file about Ted. So if 3) is right and I am insane, why should I lie? 5)Ted Tompkins admitted there was no file about him. How could I know if 1) was wrong? Possibilities: -One of my conclusions is wrong. I can't steal files, can't investigate, am not insane, didn't get thsoe results or Ted didn't admit it. Please tell me what is wrong. -This is all true, I am really insane. You shouldn't kill me. -This is all true, despite the fact that both me and Ted are sinister. Why should I want to vote for him? -something else I didn't imagine. Please tell me.

I'm sorry, I should have read this more carefully Well, at least I tried. Well, all I can tell is that there was none. It's yours to trust me or not, but I'm afraid I can't promise that we won't convict another insane. Not that anyone of you would still trust me But if I think about it, it makes sence that the sinisters try to let their files disappear, to avoid an investigator with the same idea as me but more intelligence than me can investigate them. Unfortunetly there is no. Well, if I can't vote for myself, I will vote: ted Tompkins/WhiteFang. Trust me or trust me not, kill me or kill me not, I have no idea what to do, no other leads and nobody I can trust.

So we can be sure, I get random results. The reveal of Havel's allegiance is quite disillusioning. I am very sad a good man had to die because of my results, and I understand you all if you want to vote for me. Also I were sure Tamtam Tommers would be a part of the sinister, which seems to be wrong as well. I realize I know nothing that happens in this hospital. And even worse we lost our photographer, the last one to give us trustable information. I will give you the result of last night, I don't know if it will help you at all: I investigated Ted Tompkins, but there was no file I could have stolen. Theoretically taken there is no Ted Tompkins in this hospital. Is he neutral? Is he sinister? Has anyone just lost his file? No idea. Anyway, as yesterday promised to the Mexican whose name I forgot: vote: Petey Pirowski/Peanuts

Indeed, great storytelling, def. I absolutely love Dr. Blutziegel's character. I hope my roleclaiming wasn't agianst the rules

Great Moc, R2-N2. I love your excessive use of SNOT. Vader's sleeping room looks awesome.

An interesting speech havel has hold, he surely knows how to unsettle people. I'll still keep with my vote, as it's the only way to find out if my results are trustworthy. Also an interesting thought, but he hasn't got sinister and not sinister, but insane and not insane/not insane. I thought about this when he told us, and I had been suspect of him before, because I thought the Chief was sinister, and he was the third one to vote for the chief and the one to start the chief-bandwagon. Back then I suspected him to be their leader, who looks innoncent if investigated, but when the Chief was insane, I bandoned this theory. I still think this is unlikely, although yet not impossible. I thought about that and got teh idea that he didn't get insane, not insane or siniter, but insane or not insane, as I get sinister or not sinister. But this is only a theory, based on my own night action results. Oh, by the way, what was the solution of the riddle? I had no idea.

I admitted it, because I was responsible of the death of the King of Delaware. If I wouldn't have told my role by myself, Mr. Nowhere would have told me for ovious reasons. Also I had evidence against you, which provides me a reason to survive. If I was paranoid, I would be worthless for us insanes. I am pretty sure I'm insane (about my night action), because I can't be paranoid, naive or sane, and random results would just be unlikely. And while I'm insane, I got "not sinister" on you, which means you're sinister. Re-reading through the past days, I admit that you wasn't inactive and that there were others who wrote talked much less. And it's not that you didn't vote for insanes, it's because you completely abstained from voting. But I admit, it seems it was merely luck that I investigated you without any real reason. We have files about the staff as well. And it's not the files, it's what you can read out of them. And I am just an investigator, that's all I know maybe Dr. Burnziegel is too lazy to get himself out of his office and do some work. If Havel turns out to be insane, I will even place a vote for myself, without any defense. Okay?

Err, that's my neck, and it's not blue-purple but grey. It's a third degree burn, which has left serious scars. I've only got them on my head, as my arms are protected against fire.

Not insane, but sinister. There's a difference: If I would investigate a neutral (if I was a sane cop) I would get "not sinister". If everything is the opposite, both insanes and neutrals seem sinister, while sinisters seem "not sinister" So I can't figure out whether people are insane, but if they're sinister. You understand the difference? Because I investigated him and got "not sinister". Two insanes were shown as sinister, so I'm most likely an insane investigator. I hope you understand I'm not gonna tell publicly. You never know what the scum have got up their sleeves. And I don't exactly understand how your plan works, but if it helps you to figure out some scum: Unvote: Havel Pavlov/Sok Proxy: Sal Samuels/Dragonator

I'm not sure what you mean, I definitely know I'm stealing files every night. I just learned that I seem to assess the results wrong.

After the death of the King, who I still believed to be scum, I had plenty of suspects, including of course most who voted for the Chief, who I believed to be scum as well. I decided to take Havel, because he wasn't very active, never contributed at voting and some others seemed to be suspicious of him, too. And I just had a gut feeling. I know.

But I understand you wnat to have every information you can get, I would do the same. I just wanted to tell you that it won't help you that much.

They can only confirm I contacted them, and why should I lie about that? I haven't told them my newest result yet, because I decided to do it publicly.

I beg you all to unvote Mr. Nowhere. Why? Simply because he's recived his information from me. Yes, I am the night investigator have the ability to steal patient's files. My results were meant to show up as either sinister insane or not sinister insane. Just to clarified that. Yes, I investigated the Chief on night one and got sinister, then I investigated the King on night two and got sinister as well. I realize both my results were wrong, as I was insane (this replies to my night action as investigator, not to my allegiance, which would be insane). I contacted both Mr. Nowhere and Dudley Eisenhower, just as insurance. Mr. Nowhere gave my information to Jesus. You may wonder, how I know I'm insane and not just paranoid? Simply just because I got a "not sinister " result yesternight, which makes only sence if I'm insane. Why should you trust me? You have every reason not to do, I can't say I would, so it's up to you. Please do it. If you decide to convict me today, and when I turn out to be insane, be sure to vote: Havel Pavlov/Sok. He was the one I investigated tonight and I got "not sinister", and as Martin is dead, I might be your last investigator (besides the photographer). I know that it looks bad for me, but please give me one more chance. You now have to choose: Me or Havel Pavlov/Sok

Well, this makes even more sense than my idea of explanation.

No, you didn't. That's a really confusing thing you bring up there. Did he persuade you publicly or privately in the bathroom? And did he directly tell you to vote for him or indirectly by his actions? It seems a bit odd that he really wants you people to vote for his strongest rival, especially because he never voted for Cam himself? Yeah, that's a bit weird, but makes sence somehow, as if both investigators would e.g. investigate Shadows (if he still lived) one would get "not insane" and one "not sinister", so they could figure out his true identity. Maybe just to add some variety or such. Either that or it's a mistake.

I think talking about the Jesus photo has no use anymore, as the King won't live tomorrow anymore and Jesus already admitted he was there and owns the syringe. There isn't any other thing to read out of this photo. I have no reason not to trust his words, I mean, we have a photo showing him at the King's bed, he said he was at the King's bed, what else do you want, God saying: "Yes, my son was there and used a syringe on the King of Delaware?" Yes, I wear black, and maybe the lightning might even change the look to blue, and I must say, I can't alibi that I didn't kill Martin, unless someone wants to ask my bed about one? Oh, if it should answer...then this is the right place for you

I think it's just the lightning, why Jesus arms look a bit white. But we surely can exclude on the new photo white, green, red, yellow or tan, as they all wouldn't look like the arm on the picture, independent form the lightning. So the circle of possible scum killers is: the Spactwins, Cat manuel, Mr. Nowhere ( who seems trustworthy to me) and the accused King.

Always this "Peanuts". I don't see any peanuts around here And maybe I should clarify my words: I knew he was investigated. What I meant was, and now I'll use some insane words you delusionals will propably understand: I wanted to say was, that the investigator was maybe wrong, cause godfathers often seem innoncent when investigated, and maybe Sal Samuels is the godfather. So his result is no 100% sure one.