Peanuts

I still believe no word Stash said, and your doggetness to kill him just makes me suspicious of you. I´m not supid at all, Stash´s arguments just make no sence to me. I still don´t know why he should want to stop the scum. Yeah, the town is much bigger, and three mobsters are dead, so this would increase his chances to survive, but what´s his use if he dies for this? He won´t win this game...of life...like that, unless his winning condition is to die. Also almost every one on his list is working for the government, and Sandy said, you were trying to kill the governemnt. And even if he dies, what do we gain from this? Oh, some vests become useless, but we don´t know if there´s any scum with a vest. We don´t know who are given them, we don´t know who gives them, we don´t even know how they are given and if the scum knows how to get some. We could harm townies more than any scum. And how does his death improve his credibility? We will only learn he´s neutral, and noone is doubting that. We still don´t know if the people on his list are scum or not. (But if you want to vote for Dick, I´ll join you killing this wanna-be punk! ) There are lots of unanswered questions, but you ignore them all and call us stupid. That makes me very suspicious of you.

I thought WhiteFang was about to host the Soviet vs. USA game? Or did he change his topic from ninjas to communists?

Well, this I understood. But to clarify my question: What the hell does he gain from taking their protection? He´ll be dead after this, so there is no advantage for him, just for us. And as we all know, the town´s sake is nothing a neutral would sacrifice himself for. He won´t win this game of life if he takes their vests, I guess, and his side won´t win either, as he has none. So what is this thing about?

There once was a game in the future games list titled "Ninja vs. Samurai". I don´t remember who wanted to host it or what has happened to this, but the idea isn´t completely new.

What the hell has happened here? I´m just away to get some coffee and now this...all has happened. I can´t even sum it up in one word. So, let´s look. Stash is killing himself. What does he try to gain from that? He´s neutral, why should he sacrifice himself for the town? Very fishy. I don´t trust this. I read this whole thing, and I must say, that I won´t vote for Stash, because this might end in some bad surprise. So, I think Shaun has acted very fishy, when he immediately voted for him and so on... I just go with the chief, who seems so eager to get rid of him, the mayor, who bets his life for his guilt, and the detective, who just follows the others, and everyone else who has voted for Shaun right now. The authorities can´t all be scum, no matter what Stash and Shaun tell us. Vote: Shaun Dows/Shadows

It would be interesting to know this person´s name. Just to avoid voting him out accidently, if something happens to you, so you aren´t able to confirm this anymore. It would also be interesting to know if you actually know this or just trust the person who told you this. Well, that is a word. But even if he´s neutral (which would already make him a liar), what tells us that he´s dangerous? As Stash said, it´s propably the best for the neutrals to join forces with the town, especially while we seem to have the upper hand in this struggle. And someone has assumed before, that there are no vigilantes in this town. This would mean, that the golden sword killer was neutral or scum. Katanas ain´t usual mafia weapons and the noodles didn´t kill their own man, I guess, so we should believe that the katana killer is neutral (or a vigilante if there is still one we didn´t know about). And let´s remember Shaun´s great fighting skills (and his many other abilities). Wouldn´t it be possible, that Shaun is the Noodles-killing katana killer? And by the way, we know, that Stash is neutral since the 3rd day and we didn´t kill him either.

He can see the roles of the people he investigates, and it seems, as if he invastigated Stashs attacker. He is not sure which side this blocker is on and he doesn´t want to tell him in case he´s a townie. Taht´s at least what I understand, and it makes perfectly sence to me. And from what I heared, he even believes that the blocker is a townie. He said nothing about knowing or scum at all.

I just remembered, that Stash wanted to talk to an investiagtor due to a suspect of him. Did someone talk to you, Stash, and if yes, did he invastigate your suspect and what was the result? And I guess, Sandy didn´t tell you anything further before she died, or did she?

I just wondered if there will always be a 1/3 minimum to convict or if the voting rules will be changed if we reach a normal number of players? Anyways, a great game so far. Interesting twist in the game.

So, we managed to kill the bosses of both mafia familys, but there is another, yet unknown gang. We don´t know how many Ronzinis and Fedelinis are left, or how many Noodles there are. But at least it looks as if no one was converted last night, so the possibility of converting maybe died with the bosses. This should give us an advantage we could use. So, any clues or evidence anyone? What are we gonna do? Concentarte our forces on the last members of the old gangs or deal with the new problem? And what are we doing with the neutrals, Shaun and Stash? They have both helped us very much, but they might join forces with the scum... I wonder how many sides there are...Ronzinis, Fedelinis, Noodles, 2 or more Neutrals and Night Watch...there can´t be many townies out there

Vote: Senator Zephington/Zepher Well, I also like the game very much, it´s a great experience so far. Thanks for letting me play, it´s really fun... So therefore: Unvote: Senator Zephington/Zepher

He has no night action (or at least he didn´t tell us), and while nobody uses a night action on him, he is powerless...but alright, if you say so, I agree to kill Shaun.

I see no reason to do that. While Shaun has no killing action (as far as I heard), he is no danger to us, but can help us to get rid of the scum. And even if he can´t/won´t ghelp us, he still can´t harm us as well, I think. Just because he´s got to kill all the police and government, doesn´t mean, that he´s able to do this. The scum is more important to me.

Well, I think, there is no other choice than vote: Sandy Quest/Sandy.

You´re right, of course. But I´m wondering what kind of alibi you mean. If you´re talking about Sandy´s claim, that she had told Shaun and Stash, they´re going to confirm. She wouldn´t tell stuff like this, if she wasn´t able to back it up. Sorry, I wasn´t clear. By "unvoting" I meant voting off, sorry. So Stash would have to be convited by the town until day 7, not to survive. But forget about this one. As Ron already said, it isn´t going to lead us anywhere at all.

If we kill Sandy today, she died on day 6. Tomorrow we´ll know, he was lying, so we´ll kill him on day 7. He didn´t do anything like that yet, so if this one is right, he tried to do something more subtil, but got afraid, he wouldn´t manage to get himself convicted on time, so he decided to frame sandy today and get killed tomorrow. Just thought this was clear. In this case, he would also have chosen Sandy, because he needed someone who wouldn´t be scum to make sure that we´ll kill him, so he chose the one who told him, she could protect. This is far fetched and I don´t think it´s true, it´s just one of the only four alternatives I could imagine.

No, my son, my very dear son! Why did this evil mobsters killed of all those guys just my son? He didn´t do anything to anyone! I´m tempted to go with you, just to get rid of all those scum, who has killed my son. You make a big point here, once again someone bets his life for information. I guess you wouldn´t tell us things like this, if you really wouldn´t have told them. But just for insurance, did she really tell you, Shaun and Stash? So...you have more names for us? But you won´t tell them until we know for sure you´re trustable, when Sandy turns out to be scum? Why don´t you tell ´em now? I don´t want to make any assumptions, but it´s still possible, that you won´t survive the night. The town can´t protect everyone at the same time, I think, any protector will prefer to protect walter, while he´s a townie and you´re neutral. It´s better for you to give up any use for us and therefore any reason to kill you by revealing anything. I can barely imagine any reason, why Stash should try to kill you like this. He won´t get outa this, if he lies to us. I can see only four reason, which make really sence: 1) Stash´s right, Sandy´s the boss. 2) stash thinks he was right, Sandy isn´t the boss. 3) Stash was converted and is now part of a plot, made by an usurper, to get rid of the boss. Boths are scum. 4) Stash is a neutral, whose winning condition is to be unvoted till day 7. He tries it the decent way, now he´s panicing and tries to do things the hard way. The two last ones on´t seem to be very usual, the second one is a bit fishy too. I´d go for the first one, if nothing happens.

This is the first time I really made a Comic, I´m not quite sure about the theme, but I classify it as an adventure Comic. I´m not good about names, so it still has no, but maybe I´ll change this one. The Comic is about 6 adventurers, who try to find a treasure in the desert. The whole plot will be revealed during the Comic. The Characters are Shaun, the leader, Bob, the driver, Phil, the cook, Jordan, a former soldier who serves as security, and Rod and Paulie, the workers. It starts with Bob and the introduction. Part one consists of 34 pictures, part two will have 38, part three is still about to be done. Others might take longer time. Part 1: Robert-The Transporter Part 2: Jordan-The Thaiphoon Part 3: Shaun-The Adventurer Part 4: Phil-The Cook, The Goose Please read it and tell me what you think. Questions are also welcome.

I´m not sure I understand what this game´s rules and basics are. To me it seems like a mafia game withoutr voting, where you can choose rour character´s biography, where dead players may discuss the game and whitch has a completly mad host more night actions than normal. Is that right or is there more difference from mafia games?

I made some vignettes short time before after I got 3 vampires out of 6 series two minifig bags. I decided to use the faces of the pantomime for the protagonist and built three vignettes, then I created two more after I had some ideas I liked. The protagonist is, as the headline tells, a vampire named Eric, who lives together with his brothers: No 1: A scary discovery While wandering through his castle Eric makes a terrible discovery: His brother´s working at the electrics without antistatic gloves! No 2: The "lucky" vampire When they´re bored, Eric and his brothers sometimes play some poker. For some reason Erci seems always to win... No 3: Lonely As a cruel monster, Eric has rarely visitors. And most of them aren´t very friendly either: Who might have sent this guy? - Right, the IRS No 4: Erics brothers try to visit their homeland: "I said Transsylvania. There isn´t even a country called Transsibiria!" No 5: Eric´s relative from downtown´s coming...and creates a big mess. More pictures at Brickshelf Please note that beyond the figures nothing was used twice. Questions and comments welcome.

This very day or by tomorrow? Can´t wait since teh day before was so short... And fun like or fun like ? And for the mod or for the players?

So, we have 19 votes. Alea iacta est. Now let´s hope, that Mr. White is really the boss, that the possible left Ronzini won´t convert much and that the other gang sees this one as a lesson...and that we´ll all be alive tomorrow. So, who wants to go to the bar till sunset?

This seemed so fun, I decided to dress my sigfig pumkin-like and called it Pumpkins(the evil twin brother of Peanuts ). For those who didn´t notice my sigfig the small time between I uploaded it and my participation at Eurodina:

Oh, come on, coulnd´t you wait for me? I wanted to be there when the conga starts... But seriously, I also vote: Frank White/Whitefang, I think there´s more than enough evidence and I was suspect for him since day four.

He´s vouching for his guilt with his life. This is every evidence I need, the most we ever could get and far mare than I hoped to gain once more. This is as sure as Shaun´s attack on Carrie, and you know, how this turned out. But if you really want more evidence: Carrie said, she investigated Mr. White innoncent, after she had predicated that she had investigated Eric King. So she most propably had protected her Boss, and now we have the chance to take out the leader of one family. I don´t think we can allow ourselves to waste this chance.