Forresto

How about the smaller curving plates like seen on the Umbaran tank? http://lego.wikia.com/wiki/75013_Umbaran_MHC_(Mobile_Heavy_Cannon) Excellent MOC btw. Love to see takes on obscure vehicles.

B

He stuck with his vote when voting for Ozzel was unpopular so I have to give him at that credit. I don't know if he was as motivated, I really put my neck out, if Ozzel turned town it would've been really bad for me today. He may have escaped unscathed if attention was focused on me. Yularen could've avoided that risk by switching votes after Thrawn tried to taint the Ozzel vote and no one would've really cared.

WOW, cheers! I could've easily voted for you to dissapear into that crowd if I was scum. Why would I take a risk and not do that? It's because I suspect Thrawn more then you. We clashed all of yesterday because I was leading the charge against Ozzel, I was pushing abd advocating at hour zero for those last votes to get him lynched while you were amongst the opposition. You don't seem particularly scummy to me but if you are lynched today, hopefully I'm wrong. How does saying Thrawn guided the vote against you make me scummy? He did by virture voting so quickly off the bat (I'd give him benefit of coincidence of timing irl but he won't even concede that with Yularen and my votes on Ozzel). So please elaborate, you've said you've felt off about me since day one? I helped start the vote for Ozzel, I kept it relevant to the discussion the whole day, and I made sure he was lynched in the end. Tell me what winning strategy is starting a vote against a scum member at the begining of the day, keep bringing it up constantly through the day when attention moves elsewhere, and to make sure we get the last votes to get him lynched? Because Ozzel wouldn't have been lynched if I hadn't been the annoying thorn pushing for it.

I read this thread twice and it actually made me suspect you more. Although I will give you credit for calling out band wagoners. ~~ You keep dismissing Ozzel lynch as luck as if those like Yularen and myself didn't have reasons for voting for Ozzel. He was acting totally scummy in every post yesterday. It wasn't luck, it was perception, and everything is telling me you're off. It's as if you're doing everything you can to distance yourself from Ozzel. Tarkin never struck me as off because he was so blatant and obvious in his defense of Ozzel whereas Thrawn was far more subtle. Is Tarkin guilty? I don't know. I just suspect Thrawn more.

Upon review my biggest suspect has to be our so called esteemed Grand Admiral Thrawn. His actions have ranged from very middle of the road to fear mongering. Yesterday he continually tried to derail the vote against Ozzel by claiming their was a band wagon despite there not being one. One vote, followed by votes written coincidentally Then he voted for Piett at the last minute, along with Jellico who we know now was scum. Sure it's possible he's innocent but he's been playing it so safe I'm wary. Vote: Grand Admiral Thrawn (MediumSnowMan) *Wow a lot has happened, sorry for the inactivity it's been a rough day. Thrawn's early-bird vote also caught me as suspect. If I was amongst the surviving mafia or the last remaining member I feel like I would definitely try to be amongst the first to vote. It's an easy way of claiming you started a discussion and shift attention from yourself. And I will note I find it very strange how Thrawn has guided us so quickly into a final vote for Tarkin this soon in the daym Where is his concern for band wagons now when it is by his design?

AHA! I knew Ozzel was off and I'm glad I stuck to my gut and helped hold him to the fire. Thank you to every loyal officer for taking a chance in yesterdays vote and most importantly let's not get complacent. We lucked out, big time. Especially with only one town death in three days. The surviving traitor/traitors amongst us will be in full survival mode and employ every trick they can muster. They will attempt to divide us and get us to vote one of our own out today. Right now we hold the advantage and as a result are the greatest threat to our con tinting survival.

Honestly I don't recognize that spaceship at all. It looks sort've like the Ghost from Star Wars Rebels from this perspective.

WOW! That is impressive. I might have to buy three packs of the ten each.

Clearly, since we all know only rebels suck at math

For what it's worth this game has had some of the higest levels of participation of a mafia game in the past several years on this forum. I think it's only marginally behind Trial by Jury as the most participated in since at least 2015. So congrats everyone and let's keep it up!

Yep I just re counted, don't know how I missed two

And acotrbuilder has acted like this when he's been scum or vigilante as well, so that arguement doesn't work. Some people change behavior each game as a reaction to failed strategies. Some change so minimally they might as well not have changed. That's why it's wise to stay within the context of each game and not metagame. ~~~ We need 2 more votes for Ozzel I believe.

I don't know if Ozzel is scummy but I see it this way and you can go back through all my posts today and yesterday and confirm this. If he's innocent he didnt provide anything to the town and what few instances he did split and sowed confusion amongst us. We're better off without that distraction. If he's guilty of being scum then we lucked out and are closer to winning. If we assume him innocent and he is scum then he'll help pick us off. (I hate playing meta cause I find it spoils things but I remember from past games he always plays this way to some degree whether he's scum, innocent, or third party.)

Ozzel is in the clear lead for votes and time is running short.

Which is why I voted for Dellus yesterday. And was chastised for it being seemingly non committal when I said it was due to their inactivity.

People come on. We have a sliver of time to get something accomplished today. We can't go into day three with no lynch. If this is to be the last post of the day then I must applaud the rebel scum at brilliantly splitting the vote once again. I have zero doubt that some of the deflecting and gaslighting of today was enacted by scum. We were on the verge of greatness, we were this close to providing Lord Vader a suspect.

I'd switch my vote to Piett if it means a lynch as well. Unfortunately right now the vote seems split. I think Ozzel and Jellico both have 4 votes against. I don't know about Jellico yet. I just know Ozzel's behavior will likely remain the same. If Town that's extremely unfortunate. If scum it's a very clever way to stay under the radar. Ozzel I think is our best bet.

I've kept my vote on Ozzel because I believe we will benefit the most from his elimination the most out of those on the block. I don't know if he's scum but he is coasting. Evey post is an explanation of his inactivity without any input or analysis of the day or even recent comments. If we got any ibsight from him in those rare posts I would be okay keeping him in. Add that to a weakly explained vote and he doesn't look so good. You can't only participate ocassionally and NOT add anything substantial to the conversation. If Ozzel is scum then he's playing a perfect game so far and pepole are defending him. Tomorrow when we bicker about how there wasn't a lynch today, remember how we could've gotten Ozzel. Remember that a few particulars amongst us railroaded the justified attempt by claiming it was a bandwagon, tht somehowr scum were perpetrating it, only to turn around and do the exact same thing to Daala and Jellico. So don't say we gave no reason when this entire day both Yularen and myself have fought and made a case against Ozzel.

I will review the evidence before deciding on a change of vote. Maybe Daala is scummy. All I know is we need a lynch today 100% but I want a reason to vote for someone other then just following popular decision. I do however find it very curious this sudden change of admonition of a band wagon only to band wagon someone else. Ozzel gave a good real world reason for his lack of participation certainly, however at a certain point when does that stop becoming a testament to innocence? All I'm saying is I don't see Daala as any different then Ozzel in terms of trying to be participatory but really not. The biggest problem is that doesn't speak to their innocence or their scumminess since they don't speak enough for us to gauge their allegience. A night action takes a single PM over the course of a few days. I think even the least active person is capable of that. . (Uni student here I understand the struggle, I'm not trying to be mean Actorbuilder sorry I love playing mafia with/against you. )

Again not defending him but there was some discussion on roles yesterday. I believe there was mention of a flying pumpkin that shoots lasers out its butt. Piett could totally be scum but in this instance hes not as isolated in action as everyone else seems to be making him and im trying to be objective and factual here.

There is no bandwagon on Ozzel. The way I see a bandwagon is when a sequence of people vote for a person because others have and they themselves have no other reason. The three people who voted for Ozzel all have actual, legitimite ressons. I suspected Ozzel earlier today and the first vote for Ozzel caused me to review yesterday, which led me to also believe Ozzel is acting scummy enough to vote for. Yularen also has expressed his reasons. I would also like to note I was typing my vote for Ozzel at the same time as Yularen, but was having trouble quoting Isard from the day/topic before on my phone and commute.

Like I said its a red flag and we should keep an eye on him (sandy). Thus far his manner has also elicited for me a melingering suspicion of his allegience. If you think this is enough then you should vote for him. I'm not convinced enough to change my vote from Ozzel as of right now. The latter of whom is obviously coasting in a middle o the road fashion.

I think this warrants a close eye to be placed on our dear captain. However I think it the height of incredulity to think even asking what roles there might be in a game is an absolute sign of scumminess when such questions have been commonplace in so many other investigations. It's vague and broad and more to do with possible mechanics in general then anything specific to the town block. Now the moment someone does broach specific questions regarding our town block and who they might be then i'd be inclined for immediate action.

Yesterday our votes are too spread out. Today they're too focused. You can't have it both ways. Ozzel is an obvious pick for votes because he's put himself on the line claiming he'd be commited to a lynch Day two, but has now dissapeared. That's coasting. I'm open to changing my vote as evidence arises since I dont think inactivity is always a sign of guilt, but for now I am committed to Ozzel.