-
Posts
9,817 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by XimenaPaulina
-
Whoopsie! Thanks for the correction. It's a bit of a misnomer in this part of the world, so yeah, double cleft chin it is!
-
I assume you're referring to the middle 2007 minifig in the picture (below) - that's Qui-Gon from the 7665 Republic Cruiser set. There are two versions of Qui-Gon minifig in that particular set (both the 2007 versions in the pic). The middle one you're referring to uses the Ep. III Obi-Wan head hence the confusion. Reference Bricklink Links: 2007 Qui-Gon Version 1 2007 Qui-Gon Version 2 (Ep. III Obi-Wan head) List of Qui-Gon Minifigs
-
Thanks for the positive feedback guys! Really appreciate it. Looks like the general consensus (at least by the initial posts) about this set is: Great Queen Amidala minifig + so-so Gungan Sub/"not a fan of the vehicle" + and terrible price. I could understand the Bongo not being a fan favorite, I think I'm just in the small minority that actually like this vehicle. Though I may not fully understand the set price sentiments, maybe because living in a place where LEGO prices are almost double I tend to be appreciative when I get sets at actual US prices. Thanks Doc! You sure know your photography, I indeed used a lightbox/light tent (like this one), which I just recently invested in and first time I used in this review. I'm very glad how the photos turned out.
-
Yes, it is all about the Queen – Queen Amidala that is – the character that most Star Wars FOLs have been clamoring to see in minifig form for a very long time. For some reason or another, TLG has kept depriving us of this highly-requested minifig year after year after year. But after 13 long years, the big revelation came out at in last year’s San Diego Comic-Con that TLG will finally release a Queen Amidala minifig – to almost all SW FOLs’ delight and excitement! People wondered in what set this minifig would come in, until came the news that it will come with the set 9499 Gungan Sub, an updated version of the similarly-named 7161 Gungan Sub from way back 1999. Arguably this Queen Amidala minifig is the perceived highlight of this particular set, but one has to wonder, is it worth purchasing the whole set just to get this mighty fine-looking minifig? Does the set have more to offer other than the Queen Amidala minifig? Let’s all take a closer look in this set review to find out. Name: Gungan Sub Number: 9499 Theme: Star Wars | Subtheme: Prequel Trilogy (Episode I) Year: 2012 Pieces: 465 Minifigs: 4 Price: $69.99 | £54.99 Links: Brickset | Bricklink | Peeron (not yet inventoried) | LEGO Shop@Home The Box The box is in the unusual vertical/upright orientation - because regular horizontal rectangular boxes are too mainstream. This wave will be the last we’ll see Darth Maul’s twisted neck mug in the boxart (thankfully, I’m just not a fan ) as 2013 will usher in the new Yoda boxart. The size is just about the normal size for a $70-set, and there’s one intriguing ‘surprise’ that came in this box (which we’ll see later). Click on the images to see hi-res versions. The hazy greenish background is a bit bland compared to other set backdrops, but it represents the dark murky waters of Otoh Gunga perfectly. The faint detail of the Opee Sea Killer creepily stalking underneath/behind the Gungan Sub complements the vehicle quite well in recreating the “There’s always a bigger fish” scene in the movie. I also like the little air bubble details that creates the illusion of being underwater. However, an unwelcome eyesore appears as a flick-fire missile inexplicably fires off from the sub (I do not even recall the Bongo using a torpedo in the movie ). The minifig line-up at the right side and the set details on the left complete the front look of the box. Displayed at the back are the various playability features of the set plus a couple of movie scenes that can be recreated with this set. The layout is very professionally-designed, which I’ve always felt was under-appreciated and/or overlooked by fans. I like looking at these back panels, and I must say that the packaging designers really did a great job on this! (as well as with other SW sets) And look Ma, no push-off tabs! Now I wonder what could that mean… As what has become the recent trend, the minifig line-up shown at the top of the box differs from the one in the front, featuring the alternate faces of Qui-Gon Jinn and Obi-Wan Kenobi (with their underwater breathing mouthpiece). It’s also interesting to note that there is no 1:1 minifig panel as the minifigs are already shown in actual minifig size – first time I actually observed this in a set. The Contents Surprise! Surprise! Pizza LEGO anyone? The box opens like a pizza box – quite an unusual way to pack the contents for a set this size. I’m really curious why TLG decided not to use the usual box with the push/pull-off tabs for this set. The contents of the box include five numbered bags of precious LEGO, two instruction booklets, a small sticker sheet, and four loose flexi-tube pieces. The Instruction Booklets The two instruction booklets came in relatively good condition without any folds and creases, even without any cardboard support. Sample Pages Here's a couple of interesting pages inside the instruction booklets: Left: A mini 4-panel comic strip showcasing the Gungan Sub in action and the obligatory Jar-Jar’s clumsiness scene. Right: A page showing the minifig line-up and the playability features – just in case you haven’t seen them in the box. A two-page spread displaying the sets (left) and minifigs (right) from this wave, subtly enticing the consumer: Gotta collect ‘em all! Sticker Sheet and Loose Parts Left: Who says “bigger is better” or “the more, the merrier”? Not with LEGO sets dreaded stickers, and I’m relieved to see only a small sticker sheet came in this set (though I would’ve preferred 100% printed elements). Right: Unlike most sets where the loose parts are usually big plates and/or huge <insert that tiresome argument> pieces, only four small flexi-tube pieces came loose in this set. The LEGO parts Bag #1 Contents: As we might all know from now, the bagged contents are systematically packed together with respect to the chronological order of the building process. As such the first bag contains the parts to build the first “part” of the set. The Jar-Jar Binks minifig is included in this bag. Noteworthy part for me is the trans-orange half-sphere rock piece. Plus, free brick separator! Bag #2 Contents: This is the bag with the least parts content but with the “most monetary value” as the three new minifigures, particularly the Queen Amidala fig, is contained in this bag. Bag #3 Contents: Lots of bley and blue pieces in the third bag, giving an idea that these would (obviously) make up for majority of the vehicle’s build. Bag #4 Contents: Is this déjà vu? No you’re eyes aren’t deceiving you, this is not an error even if the contents of Bag #4 is almost exactly the same as those of Bag #3. They’re about 80% similar, the difference being the opposite orientation of the wedge plates. Know why? Hint: Symmetry. Bag #5 Contents: Being the last bag the pieces contained here will be those for the “finishing touches” of the build. Pieces of interest are the three trans-clear bubble canopies. The Minifigures The set treats us with the three new minifigs, though it feels like that the Queen Amidala minifig is the only “new” one since she’s the lone new character in the line-up. The Qui-Gon Jinn and Obi-Wan Kenobi minifigs have double-faced heads to justify their “new status”, while Jar-Jar Binks is the same one from the 7929 Battle of Naboo set. We’ll take a closer look at these minifigs shortly. Qui-Gon Jinn The Qui-Gon Jinn minifig has the same face details as the one from the 7961 Sith Filtrator set. Nothing much going on with the torso, it’s the same ol' jedi robe print. As stated earlier, this new version has an alternate face featuring the underwater-breathing mouthpiece (A99 aquata breather say the SW geeks). The torso has back printing, thought it’s concealed when the cape is used. Comparison of the Qui-Gon Jinn minifigure with previous versions Here’s the evolution of the Qui-Gon Jinn minifig throughout the years. I personally prefer the original yellow-toned version, which, despite its relative simplicity, perfectly captures the overall look of the Qui-Gon in the movie. The additional face wrinkle details of the newer versions make the Qui-Gon look too old and in the process reduced the resemblance to the actual look of the character. Obi-Wan Kenobi (Jedi Padawan) First thing I noticed in this minifig – Ewan McGregor’s double cleft chin! That part is accurate, but other than that, I can’t see any other resemblance to young Obi-Wan. Though I like the belt detailing in the torso, which is an improvement from the previous versions. Comparison of the Obi-Wan Kenobi minifigure with previous versions: The Jedi Padawan version of Obi-Wan Kenobi has also undergone various redesigns, five to be exact. The ‘99 version is still the best for me, as I prefer the more stoic, calm, and serious Jedi look as opposed to the more detailed but less Jedi-like expressive facial emotions of the newer ones. “Ready for a swim, Master?” Just wanted to show the pic of Obi-Wan and Qui-Gon with their aqua-breather faces, which is true to the movie source material. Jar-Jar Binks The only minifig in the set that is not “new” is Jar-Jar Binks, being the same version as the one from the 7929 Battle of Naboo set. If somehow you missed on that particular set, then this is a good chance to own this fig. Comparison of the Jar-Jar Binks minifigure with previous version: As there have only been two variants of the Jar-Jar Binks minifig, it’s quite obvious that the new printed one looks much better with detailed prints. And I just wanted to annoy you with that dorky Jar-Jar image! Queen Amidala “Gentlemen and Ladies, Her Majesty Queen Amidala of Naboo”. The minifig that almost all SW FOLs have been waiting for, the Queen Amidala fig certainly doesn’t disappoint. Just look at those intricate pearl gold prints on the torso and gown, and the elaborate mold detailing of the headdress – quite impressive aren’t they? The “expression-less but with a hint of concern” look is also captured perfectly by the head face print. For those who are curious, here’s a shot of the interior/underside of the leg/dress part. The circular area of the gown covers an area of 4 x 4 studs. Comparison of the Queen Amidala minifigure with the source material On the spot, I must say! Very accurate to the reference material but still retaining the LEGO look, despite the extravagance of the outfit. And in spite of a couple of obvious but minor limitations (the inability to rotate the head and put the minifig in sitting position), the designers couldn’t have done a better job with this minifig IMO. The Build Bag #1 Build First to be built is the back part of the Gungan Sub with the rotating tail propulsion. As we’ll see later, this also functions as a “mini-sub” a.k.a. “escape vehicle when all underwater hell breaks loose”. Jar-Jar Binks, two storage boxes, and an unidentified thingy (water bomb? Inflatable something?) also came from this bag. Bag #2 Build The base foundation of the Gungan Sub is built from Bag #2, together with the three new minifigs of the set. Not much to look at at this point, but it’s a start. Bag #3 Build The Gungan Sub is slowly taking its shape as the first half of the body is built from the third bag. It’s at this stage that some interesting techniques were employed to achieve the tricky curved and sloping shape of the Bongo – specifically with the clever use of hinge plates and curved slopes. Bag #4 Build To complete the other half of the sub, the steps from the Bag 3 instructions are basically repeated, but in the opposite direction. Bag #5 Build Lastly, the final bag comprises of parts to build the top part of the sub and the curved part at the back. The “mini-sub” from Bag 1 is attached in the rear end and the Gungan Sub is now complete! Leftover Parts The usual suspects – 1x1 elements as extra parts. Good thing to know there’s no weird ‘regular’ part left hence no “hey, doofus you forgot something along the build” moment. Different Views of the Gungan Sub Quarter View Top View Side View Quarter Rear View Front View Just to give everybody an idea on the size of this sub, here’s side-by-side shot with the 7965 Millennium Falcon: Playability Features Main Cockpit The main control cockpit is spacious enough to seat three minifigs – a vast improvement from the original version which could only fit one. The set shows the jedi can only be seated without the capes (left), but I was able to seat Obi-Wan and Qui-Gon even without removing their capes (right). Cargo Compartments The two side cockpit cargo compartments have a 6 x 4 x 3 interior space where you could store stuff inside like the unidentified thingy and the capes (left). There’s also a clip on both cockpits where the lightsabers can be placed (right). Detachable "Mini-Sub" The detachable “mini-sub” is a non-canon feature of this vehicle, included in the set simply to provide additional playability. It is attached to the main body using clips in the front and slides in and out of the body with side rails. It can comfortably fit a minifig inside during escape situations, though one has to wonder how in Neptune’s world can the pilot see without any windscreen? Cargo Boxes and Compartment Slots Two cargo boxes with a trans-blue item each is included in the set, though I don’t know what their specific use is. Probably some valuable Gungan artifact that needs to be safely transported by the Bongo? The cargo boxes fit in designated slots on each side of the sub Flick-fire Missiles Torpedoes The ever notorious flick-fire missiles, in this case torpedoes, can be found underneath the side edges of the sub, which, as is the case in most vehicles, can be easily removed according to the user’s liking. Rotating Tail Propulsion This is a pretty neat feature that’s accurate to the source material, though I’m not a fan of the flexi-tube tails which look too thin. I think Pepa Quin’s solution in his Tribubble Bongo MOC is much better in this aspect (though I don’t know if it’s sturdy enough for this set). Comparison with the Reference Material So how does this new LEGO Gungan Sub compare to the source material? Let’s break it down with this comparison: The Good: The overall shape, proportions, and color scheme are pretty much accurate. For a blocky medium, the designers did a good job maximizing the use of curved slopes to achieve the overall curved shape of the Bongo. Even small details like the front navigational sensor (anchor thingy), headlights, sidelights, and rotating tail propulsion are true to the source material. The Bad: Two things: (1) I would’ve preferred printed bubble canopy pieces (like in the original version) over the bare and detail-less ones that came in this set. I felt this was the only step-back from its predecessor. (2) Like what I said earlier, the use of flexi-tubes for the tail is too thin for my liking and I would’ve wanted a broader set of tail propulsions. The Ugly: This might be a limitation of the technique used in the design, but it’s hard to ignore the gaps on the curved part of the sides. Comparison with the 7161 Gungan Sub Instead of unfairly comparing this new Gungan Sub with the original 7161 version, let’s just highlight the significant improvements we’ve seen in this updated Bongo: - Improved overall shape using curved slopes and hingle plates to achieve the curvaceous finish of the Gungan Sub versus the use of blocky slopes in the original version. - More space in the main cockpit to seat three minifigs instead of only one in 7161. - More and better details (front headlights, navigational side lights, etc.) Rating the Set: Design – 8/10 The design of this new Gungan Sub is a vast improvement from the original version, maximizing the use of curved slopes and some nifty angling using hinge plates to approximate the overall curvaceous look of the source material. I’m only bringing the score a couple of notches down due to the lack of printed bubble canopy pieces (which make those parts look bare) and the thin tail propulsions which could be still be improved IMO. Build – 7/10 Aside from a couple of clever techniques, majority of the build is pretty straightforward and there’s not much complexities involved. Parts – 8/10 I like the fact that for a Star Wars set you’ll get in this set a significant amount of useful blue parts as opposed to the usual bleys, blacks, and whites of other ‘regular’ SW sets. The rich selection of curved slopes and wedges are also very much welcome to my parts collection. Minifigures – 7/10 If not for the majestic Queen Amidala fig, I would’ve given this set a failing grade in this aspect. The trio of Qui-Gon, Obi-Wan and Jar-Jar, however compulsory in this particular set because of the movie material, just doesn’t appeal to me like what other new minifig-centric sets do (ex. 9496 Desert Skiff). Now it makes perfect sense why TLG decided to include the Queen Amidala fig in this set, and it’s quite ironic that the minifig that doesn’t have anything to do with the vehicle is the one which made the minifig line-up interesting. Playability – 7/10 For its size as a set it has a pretty decent amount of playability, at par with the play features of other SW vehicles of similar prize range (X-Wing, Y-Wing, ARC-170 Starfighter, etc.) Price – 8/10 The $70 price tag is justified with a well-designed vehicle plus the highly-anticipated Queen Amidala fig along with the three other characters. Its $0.15 price-to-parts ratio is 36% higher than that of the original 7161 version, though that’s quite an acceptable price increase for a long 13-year gap Overall: 75% Going back to the original question, is this set worthy enough to purchase aside from the “I really want that awesome Queen Amidala minifig badly” motive? I’d say yes, but only if you’re really a fan of well-made SW vehicles. I have a bit of a bias with this set since for some weird reason I like this Tribubble Bongo ever since I saw it Phantom Menace. I would’ve wanted to have gotten the original Gungan Sub set back in ’99 but I was in the middle of my “financially-challenged” college years back then. This may not be one of the popular vehicles in the SW universe, but no one can deny how sleek and cool-looking this vehicle is, and if you appreciate the merits of the vehicle’s design then it’s more than enough reason to buy this set, and the much-hyped Queen Amidala minifig will just be the proverbial “icing on the cake”. As a parting shot, let me share with you this very cool "Building Video Review" of this 9499 Gungan Sub made by the great Artifex Creations. I think this is a nice way to appreciate the build of the set if you wouldn't get the chance to purchase this set. Enjoy!
-
Lego Superheroes 2013 Rumours & Discussion
XimenaPaulina replied to CorneliusMurdock's topic in LEGO Licensed
I don't think so, not all Super Hero sets need to be "minifig-centric", and if there's a set that could oppose that trend and make the "actual building elements" (the vehicles) be the main selling point, it would be this TDKR set. I mean, a Cammo-Tumbler and the new Batwing? Who would complain about that? This is one of those sets that I couldn't care less about the figs as I'm more interested with the vehicles. Now what I'm curious about is how will this Tumbler look like, will it be the same big size as the previous one or will we actually see a minifig-scaled version this time around? (though I highly doubt how will TLG come up with a minifig-scale version that meets its "build sturdiness" criterion that most great-looking Tumbler MOCs do not adhere to). -
x 2
-
This is amazingly brilliant artwork Catanas! (Thanks for including Kid Flare. ) You don't know how much I envy your comic-drawing skills, if I had it I would've made a comics featuring this contest's entries, as there are really a lot of awesome characters made by the partcipants. Once again thanks for sharing these (and hope to see more of these comics from you (?)).
-
Lego Superheroes 2013 Rumours & Discussion
XimenaPaulina replied to CorneliusMurdock's topic in LEGO Licensed
Hmmm, interesting indeed. So it looks like it would be Spider-man + Nick Fury vs. Venom + Beetle set. Arkham Asylum Breakout - that sounds plausible. Besides, the previous Arkham set had Poison Ivy and Scarecrow in their normal costumes, so it wouldn't surprise if that's also the case in this new set. -
A Bail Organa fig in his sleek dark red speeder is the best way that we'll have Bail (like Darth Yogi's cool MOC below). And I wouldn't be worried about the "homicidally violent" scene associated with Bail and this speeder. Why focus on the Jedi Massacre when it could have a description like "The Jedi Temple is under attack! Help Senator bail Organa rescue Master Yoda with his speeder!" Something like that.
-
MOC: Tyrnosaurus-REX
XimenaPaulina replied to captain kaos2's topic in LEGO Action and Adventure Themes
Hilarious! One of the best ways I've seen the new LEGO T-Rex has been used in a MOC. The napkin, crown, butcher knife are funny touches, now it only need a pitchfork to complete the Jurassic dining experience. Great job! -
Lego Superheroes 2013 Rumours & Discussion
XimenaPaulina replied to CorneliusMurdock's topic in LEGO Licensed
I thought of that too, that's why I firmly believe we'll get the TDKR sets the same time the movie is released. Toy merchandise is a marketing ploy to generate interest towards a movie, and with DC's TDKR having the pressure to rival Marvel's Avenger's record-breaking box-office success, they would definitely maximize brand exposure, especially with toys to garner the attention of the most important money-making target audience of all - the kids (adult content of the movie be damned). -
Lego Superheroes 2013 Rumours & Discussion
XimenaPaulina replied to CorneliusMurdock's topic in LEGO Licensed
We have the same read based on the minifig line-ups: I highly doubt that they would release the TDKR set(s) 5 months after the movie, it just doesn't make sense at all from a sales & marketing perspective. It also does not mean that just because the TDKR minifigs were first shown together with the other 2013 figs that the TDKR sets will be for 2013. I'd bet they would release it to coincide with the movie's opening, and like as you said, it might be one big set (Batwing + Camo Tumbler with the Batman, Bane, Gordon figs). So if TLG will go this route (which makes perfect sense) then we, or at least the first lucky ones, would have the TDKR sets in a few days time. -
LEGO Superheroes 2012 Rumours & Discussion
XimenaPaulina replied to Hinckley's topic in LEGO Licensed
Yeah it is expected to be the largest of the Batman sets - basing on the size of the previous release and it makes sense to include as many villain prisoners as possible to 'populate' the Arkham prison cells. Besides, this would be a structure-based set and not a vehicle-based one (which I assume is more sellable), so the minifigs will be the selling point of this big set. It can be likened to the recent Jabba's Palace set - 8+ awesome minifigs in a decent-but-not-so-great palace build. -
LEGO Collectable Minifgures Series 8 Rumours & Discussion
XimenaPaulina replied to Piranha's topic in Special LEGO Themes
I appreciate you taking the time to address my comments in a constructive and mature manner, this is what discussion should be all about. While I don't agree with your opinion that my comments are 'very uninformed' and caused by 'quick and hasty judgement' (as I did take the time to look closely at each of the minifigure elements in this series), I agree that there are a number of interseting and useful pieces in this series - particularly for me the pretzel, the headphone-hair mold, probably the trophy and the Shakeperean ruffled neck thingy, the black bowler hat. The printed torsos and legs are also quite useful for customisers like me. But judging the series as a whole? I still stick with my stance that this is probably the weakest of all CMS releases, again which IMO is due to the fact that almost all the awesome minifig fan-wishes have already been released in the previous series, and we're left with the second- to third-tier choices in the collectible minifig fan wishlist. -
LEGO Superheroes 2012 Rumours & Discussion
XimenaPaulina replied to Hinckley's topic in LEGO Licensed
This is my educated guess based on the minifig combinations: Arkham Asylum - Black Winged Batman, Nightwing, Joker in Prison Suit, Scarecrow, Doctor Harley Quinn, Poison Ivy, The Penguin, Prison Guard Mr. Freeze vs. White Batman and Aquaman set TDKR set - TDKR Batman, Bane, Comm. Gordon possibly in a "Bat"/Batwing and/or Cammo Tumbler set Ultimate Spider-man Set #1 - Spiderman, Venom, Nick Fury (?) Ultimate Spider-man Set#2 - Spiderman, Beetle, Nova, Dr. Doom, JJJ (?) Just my hunches. -
LEGO Superheroes 2012 Rumours & Discussion
XimenaPaulina replied to Hinckley's topic in LEGO Licensed
For those who can't be bothered to go to flickr: Enjoy! -
LEGO Superheroes 2012 Rumours & Discussion
XimenaPaulina replied to Hinckley's topic in LEGO Licensed
FBTB's flickr photostream has got all the clear images of the new figs. --> http://www.flickr.com/photos/fbtbnet/page2/ -
LEGO Superheroes 2012 Rumours & Discussion
XimenaPaulina replied to Hinckley's topic in LEGO Licensed
I think it would be a good bet to say that we'll probably get the "Bat"/Batwing (with the TDKR version of the Batman minifig) and the Camo Tumbler (w/ the Bane and Gordon figs) considering these two are the primary new vehicles of the movie (and knowing how vehicle-based almost all Batman sets are). A small set featuring Catwoman in the Batpod is also in the realm of possibility. The confirmation of TDKR sets is really a pleasant surprise, and hopefully they would be released at the same time as the movie comes out (which is a few days away!) It wouldn't make sense if the TDKR sets are released very much later right? -
LEGO Collectable Minifgures Series 8 Rumours & Discussion
XimenaPaulina replied to Piranha's topic in Special LEGO Themes
Am I not allowed to post my honest negative views of this series? Is it supposed to be all positive comments every time for TLG's products? And please tell me how your post adds to the discussion about the topic. Attacking the poster instead of refuting his arguments? Pls. be more respectful, you're making yourself look like an ignorant fool with that comment. -
LEGO Collectable Minifgures Series 8 Rumours & Discussion
XimenaPaulina replied to Piranha's topic in Special LEGO Themes
Actually you're not alone as I also find this series relatively underwhelming compared to the previous releases. I tried looking at the image several times to look for something that would make me say 'Wow' but in the end I say Meh overall for this series. Majority of the figs are not 'conceptually new' and just rehashes of other figs: - Cheerleader in another uniform - Alien Queen lazily recycled from the Alien Conquest theme - A Santa that even Yoda Santa would trump - A Football player who'll play with his team with a trophy instead of a proper football 'egghand' - Black Robot which is simply a black version of the S1 Robot - Black Man-bat - another recolor job of the Monster Fighters brown variant - Another Ice Skier - A Pirate that's no better than the previous ones we got from the Pirates theme - A fairy that's less magically-looking than the keychain one And the 'new' ones (Cowgirl, old scuba diver, pretzel guy, Shakespearean dude, the boring guy in a black suit and bowler hat which I don't have any idea what he is) also fail to impress me. The only figs that pass for me are the headphone kid and the conquistador, and even these two are not as awesome as the Aztec Warriors, Spartans, Elves, Galactic Marines, etc. of the previous series. IMO, this is a step-back from the previous series which leaves me to believe (contrary to what others have said) that TLG is finally running out of cool new minifigs to release. It's actually not their fault, since I think the main reason is majority of the fan-favorite minifig wishes have already been released in the previous series. Eventually, TLG is bound to run out of interesting concepts/ideas/material for collectible minifigs, and it looks like the lack of impressive minifigs in this series is a sign of that trend slowly dawning upon us (hopefully I'm wrong). -
Haha, you're actually the first one I thought of when I saw that new pretzel piece. And if you'll have that new pretzel, then I'll be having Bombur's weapon wiener sausage. Seriously, the more I look at the close-up images at fbtb's flickr photostream, the more I'm appreciating the very intricate detailing of the structure - particularly the trans turtable for the main window which is pure win IMO. The effective use of normal and curved slopes also give a smooth flowing organic feel throughout together with the lively greenery and brown/tan woodwork. I agree with a previous poster when he said this set is like a MOC, and rarely do regular non-exclusive sets get that compliment from AFOLs.
-
The Bat!!! I think you nailed the design perfectly! I know since I previously planned to do this also and I studied some screenshots, but never got much into it as I gave up halfway , so it's really nice to see the first proper MOC of this Bat air vehicle, and a very good one! You certainly got my vote(s) for the Bat and your Tumbler collection (the camo versions with missile launchers are sweet!)
-
LEGO Superheroes 2012 Rumours & Discussion
XimenaPaulina replied to Hinckley's topic in LEGO Licensed
I think the most viable solution for the fuss/complaints about the exclusive ComicCon minifigs is for TLG to simply release those characters in a different form in future sets, much like what they did with the Iron Man and Captain America exclusives which were released in regular sets in different variants. That way, they would satisfy the general fans' "need to get these characters in LEGO" while the ComiCon attendees get to keep their over-hyped/over-priced exclusive minifigures. I'm still optimistic about a Green Lantern set, and I'm hoping that we'll also eventually get these 4 exclusives (Phoenix, Venom, Shazam, Bizaaro) in regular sets somewhere along the line. -
Not really, it looks very much "complete" when viewed from the front, sides and even the top. And why would they close/complete the back if this is meant to be a playset? I think it works well as it is, the front looks great display for AFOLs while the back/interiors are good for playability for kids - so a WIN-WIN situation for both target audience.
-
LEGO Star Wars 2013 Pictures and Rumors
XimenaPaulina replied to Erdbeereis's topic in LEGO Star Wars
As a standalone set, the Rancor Pit looks underwhelming, but keeping the perspective that this set is specifically designed to go with Jabba's Palace, this won't look bad that much and would justify the rather simple design of the pit. It might be hard to shell out significant bucks to get this set just for the Rancor (which is awesome), but if you look at the bigger picture I believe it's definitely worthy to buy together with Jabba's Palace and possibly other future "add-on sets".