Purpearljellyblob

Great job in combining those two themes and the sunflowers are lovely!

Sorry for your loss Tamamono. Take care and don't worry about us.

Love the monkey face at the back of the ship! Your MOC cannon looks good as well!

Congratulations in making it to the Frontpage! Very impressive build with all the details that resembles the real castle!

I still can't wrap my head around how the poisoner can make a day kill and a night kill on Day 3. I am still not convinced why you decided to pull in Clay when people suspected you and wanted to vote for you. I don't think style has got anything to do with it. Vote: Michael Thompson (Mencot)

I just came in and saw your pm and I am glad that you have done the right thing by defending yourself in public. Michael, So you had some heat on you at the start of the day, and you attempted to redirect the suspicion to Clay by saying there is something suspicious about Clay's behaviour and you will be back with some justification. Now you are back, I only see one sentence about Clay, which doesn't mean anything. So is Clay still suspicious to you? How is Clay still bugging you? I would actually like to hear what Kenneth has to say in response to the discussion that is happening here.

I re-read the thread again and found these posts rather off. Shortly after Perry listed his long list of suspects, Abigail responded to Perry with the following post(s): The first part seemed like a reasonable response asking for clarification, but the second part seemed rather off. Abigail, I would like to know why did you subtly suggest that Perry is scum without hearing his clarification first? Same question to you Abigail, why did you subtly suggest that Perry is scum without hearing his clarification? First part [unbolded] - asking for clarification Second part [bolded] - subtly suggest Perry is scum? And Abigail, you have done the same thing 3 times after being called out. Care to justify why did you do that? I believe Perry hasn't come by to answer your questions yet, so why the rush to vote for Michael? If you think Perry is rather weird, shouldn't you wait till you have heard from Perry, happy with his justification, before you cast your eyes elsewhere? Again, I noticed your two part post. First part [unbolded] - reasonable comment (not a fan of policy lynching) Second part [bolded] - subtly suggesting people to metagame you so as to justify your inactivity? I guess I will be waiting for you to come back with some comments on Clay. Good point and I agree with you on the possibilities.

Sorry, given my short past life here in this land, I would have to admit day kills are kind of new to me. I am not sure if there is a role that can perform kills both in the day and in the night. If you have any questions with regards to my behaviour, I am happy to answer them.

As others have mentioned, the poisoner has been killing off our suspicions. This poisoner could very well be the vig. If this poisoner is a day vig (like how Zachary was killed), then Connie should die in the day as well. But Connie was killed at night. So there is a huge gap in reasoning if one is to say the same person killed off Zachary and Connie. Unless the poisoner can choose to kill anytime, day or night, at will, then it will make sense. Similarly, if this poisoner is the third party, how can you explain the day/night kills? So I would say yes if you think this poisoner is the third party and no if you think he/she is the vig.

Keep up the great work badboytje88! Those lamps with melting wax are looking great and nice use of transparent treasure chest!

Nice assortment of soldiers and love the whole setup as well :thumbup:. Very creative to use ice cream pieces as smothering smoke!

Although Connie has come out and addressed concerns, stating Beatrice as her next highest suspicion seemed as though she is trying to avoid giving reasons to vote that others have already stated. I am still going back and forth on her. As for Beatrice, her behaviour seemed anti-town to me. Her general behaviour throughout seemed very reserved, doesn't reveal much, and doesn't address concerns. As though Beatrice is afraid she might slip up if she started talking. Between the two, Beatrice is striking as more suspicious to me. I am going to Vote: Beatrice Kingsley (Bob).

Fantastic work there Konajra! :thumbup: Your ship looked like the real Grampian Don! Congratulations in making it to the Frontpage!

Day 1 Post no. #103 Connie comes in after Sheridan's claim and did a very nice summary of what is going on, with no input coming from herself. Following up on his advice to everyone, Connie questioned Esther, and literally left it hanging. Post no. #203 That bolded sentence, saying she is totally not scummy by doing nothing, made me think it is a total WIFOM. And I don't see any proactive approach coming from you in Day 1. Post no. #228 Connie promised to be proactive, but came back and said, 'I am totally late in my vote, and I am totally busy with something else so there you go, I am voting Esther'. Technically, Connie voted for Esther without stating her reasons. What does it mean by "worst"? Some comparison please. Who is bad, who is worse and why Esther is worst? What happened to Connie's proactive-ness that she promised? Day 2 Post no. #18 Fishing for roles, Connie? That is not proactive behaviour. Passive behaviour I would say. Post no. #79 Now Esther forced everyone to take a vote, Connie came in and provided a very nice piece of noble advice. But Connie didn't pursued her suspicions, or even name her suspicions. Post no. #147 I don't know what is Connie's game plan, she had suspicions but she sit back and did nothing. What is "a few bits here and there"? What is "nothing that feels like a solid lead"? Connie, please come out and play.

Claim to someone you trust, so 'AYE'. I am just hoping you are busy finding someone you can trust and not stalling for time by leaving us hanging. Unless there are new developments, I will Vote: Esther Thompson (Esurient)

Here are my thoughts, Final Vote Count Caleb Norman (Captain Nemo) - 10 (Scubacarrot, Mencot, jamesn, Peanuts, Adam, LegoDad, Purpearljellyblob, Esurient, TinyPiesRUs, mostlytechnic) Esther Thompson (Esurient) - 7 (Kadabra, CallMePie, Trumpetking, Darkdragon, TheBoyWonder, Captain Nemo, Clanure) Michael Thompson (Mencot) - 4 (Capt. Redblade, Bob, Dannylonglegs, Kristel) Sheridan Thompson (Scubacarrot) - 1 (Zakura) Beatrice Kingsley (Bob) - 1 (PirateDave84) No vote - 1 (KielDaMan) I believe it was 8 votes Esther and 7 votes Caleb before Esther tied up the votes. In that case, Esther would still be lynched. So Esther's vote on Caleb is most likely saving her butt. I also noticed something interesting. Tony and Kenneth were there when Sheridan posted ^. Esther voted 17 minutes after Sheridan's call. And Tony voted 5 minutes after Esther. I am not there when these votes were casted so I am not sure how long Tony and Kenneth had been around. But it seemed to me as if Tony had made a very quick strategic vote to save Esther. Assuming Kenneth were to cast a vote after on Caleb to force a tie, Caleb would still be lynched. Molly subsequently switched her vote for Caleb to make it 10-7. The fact that Esther is still around on Day 2 made it seem that there is a plot to keep Esther around. Could easily be a scum motive because she is scum or that the scum wants to keep her around or a town motive to save a potential PR. I am interested to see what Tony and Esther has to say and what they will do today.

Unfortunately, there isn't any date for those Series 4 SW planet sets, which is rather bizarre as those balls usually turn up in the half yearly catalogue . Just the new SW 75021, 75017, 75015, 75016, 75019, 75022, 75018 and 75020 sets that are in the catalogue and are due in August.

It sure does! August Star Wars City Legends of Chima (Including the Hero Factory - like buildables) September Castle Galaxy Squad Hero Factory Technic Mindstorms EV3 CMF Series 11 (no pictures of this though ) November 3 new Legends of Chima speedorz 70110 Tower Target (Grizzam), 70112 Croc Chomp (Crug) and 70111 Swamp Jump (Furty)

Just got my hands on the Lego catalogue for the second half of 2013 today. Looks like 41015, 41013, 41009, 41010 and 41005 will most likely hit the stores around August, with the exception of Friends Series 3 polybags, which will be out around September.

Millers will always have that cloud of suspicion all over them throughout the game once they claim. That being said, Millers probably won't last long in any game, they would be a liability if we reach a situation whereby Sheridan, if she hasn't been verified, and we need to lynch a scum or else Town would lose the game. As for Esther, I am not really comfortable with voting for her today. Her activity has been rather 'in-your-face' and flogging wild accusations all over. I don't think scum would be so audacious to do such a thing to take the centre stage on Day 1. I believe that you do know that claiming not only includes PRs but non-PRs as well (i.e. vanilla). Claiming vanilla is still a claim. But the issue is whether it's Town or Scum, that we have to decide. But now you are saying you are vanilla town and you don't know how to convince us? Your actions throughout the day as a town vanilla (so you said to be) doesn't convince me for sure. Vote: Caleb Norman (Captain Nemo)

I took a look at the link you provided on the possibility of Sheridan having a restriction. I am not entire sure why this suggestion was made in the first place. I am sure it is clearly roleplaying. From what I read from that link, it concludes by stating that most players that claim from such restriction are often scum faking them. But it is interesting that you seem to suggest that such roleplaying is scummy. It is also interesting to see that your two big suspects did not include Sheridan. Why the sudden drop? I have no problems with you listing Michael and Esther as scummy, but I am more concerned on the "why(s)". Esther and Michael are hot topics for discussion right now and I am seeing it as you blending in, is it not? I agree with you about Esther, claiming late would not help Town as we would have little time to decide if her claim is true or not. If she manages to pull off this lynch, I suggest the current PRs to check her out. If she is Town, we can look into her suspicions, if she is scum, it is always good to lynch scum on Day 2. I may be metagaming Esther right now, but I seem to be wary of Esther turning scummy later on in the game, which may be hard to salvage.

Oh! What a day at school! Those kids... are really a handful bunch So you claimed town scapegoat.. so I should expect to see townie behaviour coming from you? It is interesting to see how people react to Sheridan's claim. Maybe we can start from there. Sorry, I don't know that you are town, even though you said you are, I am not convinced. I don't see what scum has to benefit by laying all their cards down on the table first thing, first post on Day 1. Can you point out to me where you find Sheridan's claim and words suspicious? Maybe the town can discuss it through? First you think Sheridan is scummy then townie then you sit on the fence, so what is your view on Sheridan now? I am actually confused. So you are saying Sheridan is a townie but you find Michael and her buddying up suspicious? To me I think Michael is buddying up to Sheridan for whatever reasons, and I would like Michael to clarify that. I took into account that he was roleplaying and all but if that were the only posts he made then it warrants an explanation.

Prudence Jellison, your beloved school teacher, at your service.

1. I've been in 1 school game - Aperture and 1 real game - Mafia Mafia 2. Will be having my winter break so I am pretty much be free then 3. My favourite role in mafia would be Town blocker

Vote: The Goon (fhomess)