1gor

It looks impressive; where did you hide receiver? What model was your inspiration? You are tempting me to make one of those, but I have used all my train Battery boxes in my MOCs...

Because all my models start from wheels, I use this tool to gain desired proportions. The reason for sentence above is that it looks like tires are to small for 1:13 scale; tires of that rally cars had some 640mm diameter and 43.2 tires give some 1:15 scale. Very nice details BTW

I'm still favorizing excavator. Perhaps it could be yellow and dilemma is solved...

Perhaps this discussion could help you ...

Yes they are more "everyday" proportions, than that pimped custom

You nailed the shape

Final version is much much improved in comparison to starting version. Cab reminds me a bit on COE Chevy

IMHO it looks very nice so far, but white and then using to compress fresh asphalt? No way this will remain such beauty...where I live they are all orange or red; sometimes green (but not for long)

Impressive amount of features in such small package

Second would be my choice then.

Second and third have its own pros and cons, but to make final decision I have a question - which loader was your main inspiration?

That should be official control+ set

IMHO even trailer would be fine

Very nice usage if seat panel.

You should upload images on Flickr, bricksafe, etc and post like here. Please note that images should be max 1024 ... Then we can make more objective comments...

Front part is extraordinary solved. Great work

Who knows maybe there will pop-up "genius" who thinks that we could actually land on sun only if we wait until night

Looks very nice. Specially dump bed is made extraordinary good.

@Jundis this is really beautiful little dozer

It seems that torque from XL motors is to high for Lego material so with direct downgearing resistance is not big enough to prevent axle twisting (I think axle twisting us what causes this rubber band phenomenon)

@2GodBDGlory I have them on my 1:15 Unimog 423 I had to put a 62.4 tire inside because it is very soft and suitable only for light MOCs

I think it is combination of factors; when I used gear 40 to 24 tooth reduction and then combination of 12 tooth with new differential but without planetary hubs it didn't work. Problem with planetary hubs is that they fit to arms with ball joints and there is no 4 studs long suspension arm; smallest is 5 studs long...

@gyenesvi I have managed to solve that issue with help from @Zerobricks. My solution is like this: From 2 coupled PF XL motors I use 36 tooth gear to central axle with 12 tooth gear. Instead of using axle that could twist I use axle connectors like this one https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=6538c#T=C Then I use new differential from Zetros with 12 tooth gear combination and at the end I use reduction hubs from 42099 set. I hope that this images could help you: I'm sorry if I have derailed your topic to much. Unfortunately I wasn't able to make the same thing with unequal tires on smaller scale. Work in progress posted above is for 1:15 model and 1:18 model is extremely challenging for me...

Victor, How does it perform on flat surface? I have always issues when using XL motors without reduction hubs and with central differential, only when upgearing XL motors 36 to 12 gear and then with using hubs from 42099 set MOC has continuous power output...

Indeed it is beautiful small model