Yzalirk

Siegfried, I'll have you know I'm not the "town investigator" but I do like trying to solve things. I also didn't know you where investigated so I'm sorry. I'm also not trying to lead the town and I don't want to. I'm trying to help find people who are scum just like everyone else who is actually innocent. So if you are being truthful, I'm a bit relieved on that I suppose. I still think Addie should be investigated after what happened last night with Bryant being gone and only she suspected him. She could be the vigilante but it's hard to determine at the moment. Maybe it's Siegfried? Thinking too much about it is making my brain hurt. But I'm still suspicious of you, Addie. If you are with Octan, I'm a bit surprised though that you haven't gone for me but I suppose it would have been too obvious.

I'm not.

Damn, Jack, you had us all thinking you were Octan! I hope I get a funny impeachment, Jack hiding under the desk was pretty funny.

Looking at the votes, I think we should have eyes on Addie and Siegfried. Addie has posted quite a bit of fluff for the first two days. I found that a bit unnecessary but Addie voted against Bryant (Brickelodeon) on Day One then he gets impeached last night. So, I'm thinking, she could be an Octan or a Vigilante. Who else would have a motive to get rid of Bryant who turned out to be a Loyalist? Or maybe Siegfried wanted Bryant gone because he was the only one to vote against him the other day. The only voter against our speaker turns up to be impeached and a Loyalist as well. I don't think it's a coincidence. Could our speaker be with Octan or maybe a vigilante? I'd lean more on Octan with this one. I suggest we keep our eyes on those two. You guys can keep an eye on me, I have no problem with it. If anyone wants to counter my idea, I'd like to hear it because I think this is a good start and is essentially our only lead.

"They're almost done for! Let's finish this." Salt-Upon-Wounds attacks the Steed of Pestilence with Static Staff from Front Row

Thanks for the answers, guys.

Awesome build! Is that supposed to be a huge Ballista? It's badass and I like the Dwarf with the goggles on manning it, nice touch.

Yeah, you're right. I apologize, Pierce (Piratedave84) for insulting you by calling you a kid and saying your statements are quite idiotic. I'm just so used to calling everyone a kid, that's why. I think it's clear who's going to be impeached by the end of the day but I sure do hope he turns out to be Octan otherwise I'll feel bad about my vote. But we shouldn't refrain from trying to find scum since that's our duty. Hopefully there is something good that comes out of this day that we can use for the next.

Awesome build, I really love the trees and tents!

Extended to the end of January? I would love for that to happen, especially since January is quite busy since it's the new year. I'll definitely have an entry up for each of the three categories then.

It seemed like you think my reason is stupid, that's why, and it still seems like that for me. Let me tell you, you are wasting your time trying to go after me because I'm genuinely a Loyalist. Nothing you are doing is working against me. That's fine if you don't believe me but if you are a Loyalist, you "trying to find scum" isn't working because you're going after the wrong guy.

Just stop, kid. You continuously trying to go after is not working. You are saying some of the most idiotic things I've heard to the point I'm starting to laugh. For example: Do you have proof of this? Did I ever say that hands down Jacob is scum? No. All I said was because of his posting only twice this day, it appears to me he's trying to hide under the radar. We'll see if he's scum or not. And why are you so fired up because of my vote? If he was done already without my vote, wouldn't you think my vote is kind of meaningless? That doesn't mean I jumped on the bandwagon. I looked back to see what the fuss was with Jacob and I noticed he doesn't talk much and I found that very suspicious. From playing Town of Salem, this is a common tactic used by the mafia or the serial killer. But coming after me for no reason for almost all your posts is just unnecessary. I'm not really sure what vendetta you have against me but I find it a bit scummy. And just so you know, nobody is "safe". Well, maybe for you if you're an Octan scumbag.

Does anyone know if the helmet with fit with other Dwarven beards like Gimli's or the ones from the Fantasy Era sets?

I was wondering the same thing but I never got an answer back.

There is the possibility from night actions as well. Maybe I shouldn't be so negative but it's hard not to be when you have quite a bit of votes against you, if you where in my position. I assure you I'm a Loyalist but I can't say the same for Jacob, especially since he's been awfully quiet and only has one post each day which, like I said, leads me to think he's scum.

So you admit to bandwagoning? I thought you were against doing it? You can think I'm bandwagoning but quite frankly, I could care less what you or anyone else thinks. I'd say it's wiser to keep the talkative in rather than the quiet who tends to have nothing to contribute, but that's my opinion. I'm not hiding anything at all. For people who vote against me, I honestly don't care. If Jacob comes up as an Octan, than that's good. If he comes up as a Loyalist, than I'll probably be tomorrows lynch since I'm the second person with most votes. But then you guys will be down another Loyalist which is no good.

Because he's only had TWO POSTS this day? And because I think he's hiding something because of that? Can you please explain to me why I shouldn't believe he's scum? Please, I'm very curious right now. And apparently everyone else is bandwagoning, right? Or just me? Wakey-wakey hands of snakely! Hello, am I the only one who thinks that's a bit suspicious to say the least?

Best reason, end 2014. Great job for the most rediculous reason. But I'll vote: Vote: JackJonespaw (Jacob Palacios) Because he's only had two posts on this day which makes me believe he's trying to avoid detection from other players. If you truly are a Loyalist, you should have nothing to hide. I know I talk to much but that's how I am, even my last game. But I turned out to be innocent. Still, you guys may not believe me, of course, since we're all paranoid and it's Day Two so it's kind of hard to tell. Now, before you guys say my vote is for the bandwagon, it's not. I feel everyone should participate because that's what we all agreed to before coming here. One post every real day is a bit pathetic, if you ask me and shouldn't cut it. I understand people are busy with life but everyone can take that little bit of time to post one thing to contribute. Now if I were with Octan, wouldn't you think I'd be less talkative? I'd think so since that's usually how most scum players are from what I've seen. But if I do get impeached and you guys will see my innocence, I hope you guys feel a bit foolish if you are a Loyalist like myself.

"Let's hit 'em again!" Salt-Upon-Wounds attacks the Steed of Pestilence with Static Staff from Front Row

I was mainly talking about when his method was to lynch people to prove their innocence. What would be the point when the person, or people, are gone. I get this impression that he doesn't look back to find people who possibly targeted certain people. But, of course, when there's a vigilante, it's hard to tell who got to who. What I'm suggesting is that method should be loosened up and find connections. I hate contributing to lynching people who are town but I'll be honest, there will be mistakes and, of course, some sacrifices might have to be made. And Pierce, I misinterpreted something you said to Siegfred, so that's my fault there. But you it seems like you have said things similar to Siegfred. I don't necessarily find that scummy but a bit odd. But when you went after me quite a bit on Day One and quite a bit now. Have I made a connection? Anyways, I'll have my eye on the both of you and if I do turn out to be impeached by Octan at night, hopefully people will look more into you guys if you both truly aren't Loyalists. Having that said, I want to hear from the people who hardly say anything. If people keep this up, I might just change my vote to one of them since I feel like everyone should contribute and shouldn't hide by not saying anything. I just saw your new post, Siegfried, and you do make a good point. So, for now, I'll... Unvote: Speedy (Siegfried Dixon) Maybe I am wrong about you but for now, I want to hear what to "inactive" people have to say. By that, I mean the people who don't talk much.

Exactly how would you propose I do that? If I where scum, wouldn't I bit a bit less paranoid, wouldn't you think? I know for a fact that I'm a Loyalist and if any Octans knew my role, well, not only would it be bad for us Loyalists but it would make for an easier Octan win. We can all point fingers at each other but I feel like some people are just doing it without an evidence. It's not hard to look back and find a bit of evidence. Right now, with my accusations from this day, I'm leaning on maybe Addie may be a Loyalist [who was just useless and posted fluff] and Siegfred and Pierce are scum because they seem to be working together like scum. Two days in a row can't be a coincident, can't it? Also, Siegfred was quite eager to lynch Carol [Calanon] the other day which I find suspicious since she did turn up to be a Loyalist. But Pierce really is confusing me by saying I don't understand something when he hasn't told me what I don't understand. So I don't understand nothing? I'm not sure whether that's a scum tactic but if it's simply to confuse me, well, good job then because I'm confused at what you are trying to say, Pierce.

You keep saying I don't understand something? What is it that I don't understand that you keep talking about? But I'll gladly keep in mind your baseless vote and bandwagoning with your Octan pal. All I know is that voting against people with little to no reason is not how we should approach it. If you have half a brain, you'd know that the best we can can by know is back track and try and put the pieces together. I stand by my vote unless Siegfred proves he's trustworthy. But because Pierce has been following in Siegfred's steps on Day One and now Day Two, it's difficult. But I really want to know how you are a verified Loyalist, Siegred, like you said. Can you please shed light on that? But, Addie, I still have my eye on you for a potential scumbag for posting too much fluff on Day One.

Just stop, seriously, just stop. You make all these claims yet you can get them checked out. Where is your proof for being a certified Loyalist? Let me tell you, I don't see anything to back up your claims. And when you play the woe-is-me, that points out being scum to me and then trying to save your own big behind by throwing people under the bus and don't have any reason as to why you did. If we're down a Loyalist, well then that sucks. But you making petty accusations isn't making you look better. We had a Loyalist get lynched and no one is really suspecting of them as guilty so why should you be different? Like you said, everyone is guilty until proven innocent, at least that's how it is according to you. I also never asked to see a screenshot of your role and I doubt you have one of an innocent role because you ask me to see it but then you just say no to it. That makes me think your scum even more. Having that said, I think I have all the reason to back-up why I think your scum. So who are you to say that my reasons are lazy when you're just making yourself look like a complete idiot right now. And clearly your vote is a revenge vote because Molly's vote is basically meaningless (I guess because she didn't vote the other day) and Laughlin probably got you good so you didn't know how to respond. You gave little to no reason for your vote against me so stop trying to hide from it. I don't care if you revenge vote me, seriously, I find it kind of amusing. And polluted thinking? According to you we should basically push to lynch someone who is thought to be scummy but turns out to be a Loyalist. Look what happened the other night, a Loyalist is gone because of that thinking. If you ask me how I'd approach it, I'd say look back, connect the dots, and find a motive for the possible scum to get rid of a person who was found to be a Loyalist. Your polluted thinking is getting us impeached. We need evidence, not gut feelings. So, again, just stop making petty accusations and get your head in this if you truly are a Loyalist. I still don't believe you are after what you've said and your revenge vote and because you haven't simply sold me the idea of your innocence. My vote was also meant to be bit of a poke, not a shove.

Way to stick it to him, Molly! As to what you said about him basically saying "guilty until proven innocent", I fee I should respond to this: How do we know for a %100 facto-mundo that you are a Loyalist that you claim to be? How do we know you're already not an Octan Speaker? Like you said yourself, by your logic, no one is considered a Loyalist until lynched and found to be one. By that logic, it seems like we might as well play Russian Roulette. And it does seem quite scummy to play the woe-is-me game when you essentially have one vote that counts against you. So, for now, I'll do this. Vote: Speedy (Siegfrieid Dixon) Until you sell the idea that you are truly a Loyalist like you claim to be, I think I'll keep my vote.

"I need to heal up, hold on." Salt-Upon-Wounds uses Potion from Back Row. OoC: I didn't know about that, thanks for letting me know. I'll do that for my next attack.