Brickdoctor

I'll take that as a 'yes'. Moving on. We have more important suspects to deal with than you. Hopefully, we can get her investigated and get an idea of whether she is the Jester or a Scum pretending to be the Jester so she won't be lynched.

So, how did you think you could possibly save anyone by acting Scummy? The Scum (or SK) won't kill you, because you're acting Scummy and they want us to get rid of you for them. If you're lynched or killed by a vig, you've taken away a chance for the Town to kill a Scum. It's not sacrificing yourself. It's throwing your life away for no gain.

So, in other words, you decided to act Scummy so that we'd waste a lynch on you? You wouldn't happen to the Jester, would you?

By doing what? You're explaining nothing.

Wait, so you're saying you want to die? Do you even care about this game? Besides, you said that you were probably going to be lynched for being unhelpful. What part of what you apparently thought you'd be lynched for could you possibly blame on someone else? 'Oh, it's all that other Townie's fault. He made me decide not to help you.'

I meant to say, "...and then left..."

So, you're saying that you hope the Town gets organized? Well, I should hope we do. We don't have a chance if we aren't, and I don't think any true Townies really wish for us not to be organized. I don't get why that needed to be stated here, though.Oh, and, look, Tamiko viewed the thread entered our little group here are then left without saying anything. Can't make sense of your statement, either, Tamiko?

What? I'm confused. Who invited themselves to be lynched? You? And if you were Scum, what Townies could you blame for your own unhelpfulness?

Not nearly as Scummy as acting like you've given up in saying that you're probably going to be lynched for being unhelpful even though no one has accused you, then doing absolutely nothing to be more helpful.

Oh, oh, I get it! You meant to say that if you were Scum, you would be behaving the same way you did in the last life, since you regarded that life as successful. I get it! MegaBloks, I seem to misinterpreting things left and right Today.

I hope I'm not misinterpreting this statement, but I want to point out that if you have to try to be yourself, then you really aren't, which to me would indicate that you are Scum.

GM Note:Yes, it is, and yes, they do. There are two battles in line before yours, though, so you'll probably be waiting for a bit.

Wait, so you're saying that you didn't change your style, yet you're not used to the way you're trying to play the game? So you were never used to your style? You can't try to change the way you play the game without changing your style. (however subtle such a change might be)Wait a minute. I just noticed this: Last life, you were Scum. Are you saying that you haven't changed your playing style from the last game to this game? Despite the fact that you were Scum in that game? I don't see how you could expect to be successful as a Townie player using a Scum playing style. Unless you think your Scum style will be successful again because you are Scum in this game, too.

It's clear that in your version of the quote, you were telling me that you weren't clever enough. (to figure out which suspect was close to a sensible option to vote for) If it didn't apply to the conversation, why say it?

I suppose. I myself wasn't that confident of Yasu's Scumminess then, though she was the best suspect at the time. Fair point.

No. You can as Scum sow the seeds of doubt, then hope that the Town will be split into multiple bandwagons, allowing the Scum to come in and tip the votes in their favor. (or convince the Townies to do so, which I think would be much easier if the Townies already doubted their current vote) Thus, the Scum can participate in the lynch and cast doubts at the same time. And admitting to being overly defensive? I have to say that that does not help my suspicions of you.

All right, then, if you admit that you aren't clever enough to decide who's the best choice for a vote (seriously, there was little to no chance for your vote for Maniko to impact Yesterday's lynch, and it's not as if you were doing it to prove a point of your own, since you made no points of your own Yesterday), you are in no way helping the Townie effort if you are actually a Townie. If nothing more suspicious comes up before the end of the Day, I don't think it's a bad move to risk eliminating a Townie who isn't able to decide which suspect should be sheepishly voted for and only votes, suspects, or accuses in agreement with the latest accusation.If a Townie doesn't help the Town, he is only helping the Scum. Of course, that's a big 'if' when I say, "If nothing more suspicious comes up before the end of the Day". I still think Shizuko could have been trying to cast doubts on our lynch, and earlier Today after my last statement concerning her, I saw her posting open her mouth and then leave the thread then say nothing.

Nobody said you were a "no-doubt-about-it Scum". Fine, if you want to use the word that way, then you were highly suspicious and acted Scum-like. It doesn't change my opinion of your actions. (and neither should it change anybody else's - now it's just being called something else) Nobody asked you to jump on convenient bandwagons. (and I realize you were being sarcastic, but it's obvious that you did that to mock my assessment of your behavior, so I'm going to point out that I never asked you to do anything close to that) You weren't even jumping on bandwagons in the first place. You jumped on one bandwagon, and then switched your vote to another suspect for whom there were no votes and who wasn't as suspicious. The problem is that you didn't make the vote that makes sense. You just decided to agree with the latest accusation instead. Good Townies used their heads and reason out who is the most suspicious. Maniko was not the most suspicious.

I am convinced that there is no limit to your creativity in making Star Wars MOCs out of other things. Excellent work, Legostein.

Fantastic work, Brickthing. That is probably the best variant I have seen of the EB logo in my 2-year experience here. (including lurking period)

I attack Foul Wyvern from the Back Row.

I suppose that's a reasonable explanation. You don't seem to have made any attempt to improve your play, but it's reasonable. Like I said, you weren't avoiding the lynch. I never said you were avoiding the lynch. I said you could have been trying to cast doubt on the lynch, and I also specifically said that there was a difference between casting doubt on a lynch and avoiding a lynch. Either you misread my statement or you are being overly defensive. Or maybe both. Incorrect. Were they Scummy? Yes. That is why I suspect you. I wouldn't suspect you if your actions weren't Scummy. You were a sheep, you jumped on three different people, you voted for one person when there were stronger cases against two others whom you had previously suspected, you seemed very eager to agree with whoever accused someone else, and you made a really bad excuse for inactivity, which no one had pointed out about you anyways. That's Scummy, or at the very least the sign of an inexperienced sheep who isn't helping. (and thus only helps the Scum) Are you, in fact, a Scum? I don't know. But did you act like one? Yes, you did.

I'm not sure I see how speculating about who was killed by whom or who has what action is going to help us with the lynch. The Scum obviously aren't going to come out and tell us what their roles are. Unless you have info from last Night (a Watcher or Tracker seeing who targeted Lloyd Jr., for example), I don't this will help us decide on a lynch.

Sorry, I misread that section. (though in response to Tadao, it could be argued that if your target was protected, you still acted, you just couldn't complete the action successfully - but that's beside the point)

And what about Blockers? Protectors? Bullet-proof targets? People who did nothing because they thought they might be Tracked or their target Watched? People who were lazy and forgot to perform an action?