CloneCommando99 Posted January 29 Posted January 29 Imma point out that the supposed 2015-19 ‘dark ages’ of clone sets are quite a myth. There was still a decent assortment of Clone Wars sets every year. Considering that Lego had to also juggle lineups for 3 trilogies, 2 other movies and rebels. In the following years Clone Wars adjacent sets included the following (not including sets with prequel exclusive applications): 2015: 75072, 75073, 75076, 75077, 75080, 75085, 75086, 75087, 75088, 75089, 75107, 75108, 75109 and 75112. This was out of 45 sets. 2016: 75142 and 75151 (these were pretty substantial sets despite TFA and R1 needing a focus) out of 49 sets 2017: 75168, 75182 and 75191 (pretty good since Rebels S3, TLJ and R1 required sets.) out of 47 sets. 2018: 75199, 75206, 75214 and 75537 out of 48 sets. This was a year where both the TLJ and Solo released within 6 months of each other. 2019: 75224, 75233, 75234 and 75261 out of 46 sets. This was the year where The Mandalorian and TROS released. Granted, there was a lack in different units. But the reports of there being next to ‘nothing’ for Clone Wars fans during the 2015-19 era are greatly exaggerated. Especially when you consider the combined years. There was always something for Clone Wars fans. Just not the amount the films that we’re releasing at the time, ones that had stronger connections to the OT than the prequels, were getting. 12 hours ago, Darth_Bane13 said: Are the clone bros with us in the room right now? Seriously though I've seen more complaining about clone bros on this forum then actual clone bros. Last year the only clone wars sets we got were a clone battle pack and a micro fighter, no one was melting down like people on this forum. It's just one year of Lego Star Wars, if you walk into a store the variety is still pretty good, which at the end of the day is more important for the average LEGO fan. You don’t seem to have seen the online outrage that the Dark Falcon took up the $170 august set slot instead of a Turbo Tank which many people had theorised. A bunch of people complained in 2022 that the Clone Minifig pack wasn’t a 212th one as MandR had said it should have been. The constant demand for more clone sets. The amount of army-building YouTube channels. I believe there was even a petition to fire a LSW designer at one point because of their preference for the OT over the PT (correct me if I’m wrong I can’t recall where I heard that last part) And then there’s the 501st BP movement which kept hounding Lego employees and social media channels until it eventually got made. In fact recently people are starting to do this again for a Wolfpack BP. Quote
CallumPears Posted January 29 Posted January 29 (edited) 8 hours ago, Mandalorianknight said: Do not remind them they did that. The only good one of these they've ever done is the bounty hunter one, just because it was essentially a scalper stomper battle pack. (The Inferno Squad pack wasn't awful either, despite including a random made-up member of the squad- and they even HAD a fourth member in a book, but she was a girl and wasn't at Endor so it isn't her- but with what they've done to the BPs at this point I do not need another one that comes with unique jedi wearing nonstandard robes. My thoughts as well. In principle I'm not against a "named character battle pack" (though a complaint I have about the Bounty Hunters pack is that Dengar was also cheaply available in the Eclipse fighter and more importantly I don't count IG-88 as a real minifigure; I would've preferred replacing those two with Boba and Zuckuss, or at least replace IG-88 with one of them, or since it's not a traditional battle pack anyway just include all 6 and charge a bit more for it) but the Jedi and Clones pack was quite possibly the worst execution of that concept they could've done. Two massable plain Clones? Great, people wanted those, but that means it is something people will want multiples of, so having non-massable figures mixed in is immediately a problem. Two Jedi? Could've been alright but already not great as it cuts down the number of the army-buildable figures. Now if you wanted Clones you had to get Jedi as well. But the choice of which Jedi in particular was terrible. They chose two of the most distinctive Jedi possible. Even Anakin and Obi-Wan it would have been better as you can just replace their heads to make generic Jedi, but Barriss and Ki-Adi have very distinctive robes so you only really need one of each. And unlike other alien Jedi (e.g. Coleman Trebor, or any of the weequay/nikto Jedi) their faces are also very distinctive so those also can't really be reused. Therefore, any multiples you get of the set have half the figures wasted. Not just for the people who buy 100 of them: people like me who were kids at the time and would maybe buy 2 or 3 of a battle pack to get a squad of troops also couldn't do that. Also the Barriss figure was a bit of a downgrade on the 2010 version now that she had the weird eyes. And both Barriss and Ki-Adi's previous versions were already very cheaply available. I know that doesn't tend to factor into LEGO's decisions as kids don't use Bricklink, but surely it makes more sense to make something that would please everyone (any of the missing Jedi from Geonosis could've filled those slots, e.g. Bultar Swan and Pablo Jill mentioned in this thread). This argument also applies to Kithaba in the Sail Barge. Any other guard in that slot (even Barada, who is basically just a Kithaba recolour) would've made no difference to modern fans who just want any guard, but for people like me who already have 6 of the old Kithaba it would've been much more worth having. Edited January 29 by CallumPears Quote
Legoman123 Posted January 29 Posted January 29 Is the rumour true surrounding the Death Star only having two rooms/scenes included in it? I am beyond hyped for a UCS Slave 1 but bringing that out the same year as a normal scale Slave 1 makes zero sense to me. I actually it’s more like microscale now to be honest. Quote
Flawless Cowboy Posted January 29 Posted January 29 2 hours ago, Legoman123 said: Is the rumour true surrounding the Death Star only having two rooms/scenes included in it? I am beyond hyped for a UCS Slave 1 but bringing that out the same year as a normal scale Slave 1 makes zero sense to me. I actually it’s more like microscale now to be honest. Who claims this rumor? Quote
Mandalorianknight Posted January 29 Posted January 29 3 hours ago, CallumPears said: My thoughts as well. In principle I'm not against a "named character battle pack" (though a complaint I have about the Bounty Hunters pack is that Dengar was also cheaply available in the Eclipse fighter and more importantly I don't count IG-88 as a real minifigure; I would've preferred replacing those two with Boba and Zuckuss, or at least replace IG-88 with one of them, or since it's not a traditional battle pack anyway just include all 6 and charge a bit more for it) but the Jedi and Clones pack was quite possibly the worst execution of that concept they could've done. Good overall breakdown, especially agree on the choice of jedi being one of the worst possible. If they did 4 jedi, ideally ones with more generic robe styles (Ki-Adi's isn't terrible but Bariss's robes are unique), I think it'd have been better, but as-is you're stuck without any real options. 2 hours ago, Legoman123 said: Is the rumour true surrounding the Death Star only having two rooms/scenes included in it? Where are you getting this information? Quote
Coryo Posted January 29 Posted January 29 Releasing Jango's Slave I as both a UCS and a regular playset in the same year is certainly an interesting tactic, almost like when smartphone companies will release a flagship phone and a lower-spec version alongside it. Kinda funny that the cheaper version will supposedly have one more minifig though. I just hope the playscale one will be able to seat both Jango and Boba in the cockpit, I believe the last version with room for two minifigs came out over 20 years ago. Also, I tried my hand at making a colour-coded list of all the rumoured 2025 sets: Spoiler Original Trilogy | Prequels (Non-CW) | Clone Wars | Filoni-verse | Sequels | Andor/Rogue One | Other Playsets Andor U-Wing Ahsoka's Jedi Interceptor ARC-170 Mando and Grogu's N-1 Starfighter (4+) Death Trooper & Night Trooper Battle Pack UT-AT Rebuild the Galaxy (Turbo Tank?) 327th Star Corps Battle Pack V-19 Torrent Jango Fett's Slave I MTT UCS Jango Fett's Slave I AT-ST Death Star II Midi-Scale Acclamator-Class Assault Ship Home One Starcruiser Kylo Ren's Shuttle Helmets Jango Fett Helmet Kylo Ren Helmet AT-AT Driver Helmet Buildable Characters Grogu with Hover Pram Chopper Battle Droid Ewok K-2SO Other Millennium Falcon (Polybag) Plo Koon's Jedi Starfighter (Microfighter) Buildable Star Wars Logo Darth Maul Mech (Unless he has robot legs) Advent Calendar Quote
Darth_Bane13 Posted January 29 Posted January 29 11 hours ago, Mandalorianknight said: That's fair, it has certainly happened before. I'd still argue it's a different situation, but on a sheer proportion level 06 is roughly equivalent with 25. (Also like man, 8 playsets for the whole year SUCKS. It's sad that we're closing back in on that number.) Similar here- I only had an Instagram because they blocked full access to the hashtag for non-users or something at some point on the browser (I should probably delete it, I just use R/legoleaks now since the feed isn't full of unrelated posts). I have youtube, which is where it's worse- I spam the "don't reccomend channel" button like a fiend in general, so none of the youtubers for it pop up, but literally any lego star wars video or community post invariably has a number of comments saying borderline nonsensical things about how whatever clone sets we're getting aren't enough or are being deliberately sabotaged. We haven't had anyone say that on here in a good while, but it's all over youtube. As mentioned with R/legoleaks I do have an account there too- I think i made it to sell a moc or something- but I'm deleting it as soon as I find the time since there's nothing really stopping someone from browing legoleak or legodeals without an account. And yeah the comments are bad there too, not even clone bro specific, it's just a cesspool in general. Sure, there were more OT sets than prequel/clone sets, I just don't think it was on the level this year is. There were still a number of options for clones, OT, Mando, or lego's RTG stuff. (I keep expecting the bob fighter and dark falcon to go on sale, and I've seen incredible one-copy deals in-store for the DF but never anything past the standard 20% for the bob fighter, and never anything online/full retailer for the falcon. Yeah I do the same with YouTube, I don't watch any of the brain rot Lego content on there. Jang for reviews, Solid bricks for MOCS, the occasional MandR video (set comparisons), RR slugger for high quality Lego videos, besides that I may see a good MOC or stop motion every now and then. Lego YouTube used to be much better before 2020 in my opinion, now it's all Mr Beast style videos, spending $1000s on lining figures up on gray baseplates. On reddit from what I've seen there is a lot of pushback to the army building/scalping side of Lego. Yeah I think this year will just be an anomaly, next year we'll probably get an entire wave of Mando movie sets. They probably just wanted to capitalize on the anniversary this year, and to be fair a lot of the sets we're getting we're due for a remake, or first time set. 3 hours ago, CloneCommando99 said: Imma point out that the supposed 2015-19 ‘dark ages’ of clone sets are quite a myth. There was still a decent assortment of Clone Wars sets every year. Considering that Lego had to also juggle lineups for 3 trilogies, 2 other movies and rebels. In the following years Clone Wars adjacent sets included the following (not including sets with prequel exclusive applications): 2015: 75072, 75073, 75076, 75077, 75080, 75085, 75086, 75087, 75088, 75089, 75107, 75108, 75109 and 75112. This was out of 45 sets. 2016: 75142 and 75151 (these were pretty substantial sets despite TFA and R1 needing a focus) out of 49 sets 2017: 75168, 75182 and 75191 (pretty good since Rebels S3, TLJ and R1 required sets.) out of 47 sets. 2018: 75199, 75206, 75214 and 75537 out of 48 sets. This was a year where both the TLJ and Solo released within 6 months of each other. 2019: 75224, 75233, 75234 and 75261 out of 46 sets. This was the year where The Mandalorian and TROS released. Granted, there was a lack in different units. But the reports of there being next to ‘nothing’ for Clone Wars fans during the 2015-19 era are greatly exaggerated. Especially when you consider the combined years. There was always something for Clone Wars fans. Just not the amount the films that we’re releasing at the time, ones that had stronger connections to the OT than the prequels, were getting. You don’t seem to have seen the online outrage that the Dark Falcon took up the $170 august set slot instead of a Turbo Tank which many people had theorised. A bunch of people complained in 2022 that the Clone Minifig pack wasn’t a 212th one as MandR had said it should have been. The constant demand for more clone sets. The amount of army-building YouTube channels. I believe there was even a petition to fire a LSW designer at one point because of their preference for the OT over the PT (correct me if I’m wrong I can’t recall where I heard that last part) And then there’s the 501st BP movement which kept hounding Lego employees and social media channels until it eventually got made. In fact recently people are starting to do this again for a Wolfpack BP. The thing with 2015-2019 is just that it was way less than 2008-2014, I also wouldn't count the buildable figures. Yeah there we're clone wars sets but a lot of them we're downgrades and small sets, by 2019 people had enough of all the sequel sets and the iconic clone wars sets we're overdue for remakes. Lego listened to what the fans wanted and here we are today. The majority of people were happy with the dark falcon, and the reviews I've seen are positive. There's always gonna be people who'd rather have something else, it's just the way it is. The 212th would've made more sense since the AT-TE came out that year. The 501st battle pack movement was awesome, the community came together and campaigned for a set they wanted. Lego benefitted greatly by making tons of money off the set by selling it at twice the amount of a normal battle pack. It was a win win situation, not sure why anyone would be upset about that. I participated as well, it was a fun moment for the community. Keep in mind at that time it had been years since the last real clone battle pack. Quote
JohnTPT17 Posted January 29 Posted January 29 8 hours ago, wesker said: We need Adi Gallia first before another Stass Allie minifigure. "They're the same picture." Though Adi could also be included in a Kenobi/Maul/Savage dual set. Quote
BrickBob Studpants Posted January 29 Posted January 29 (edited) 33 minutes ago, Darth_Bane13 said: It was a win win situation, not sure why anyone would be upset about that. I participated as well, it was a fun moment for the community. Keep in mind at that time it had been years since the last real clone battle pack. Not sure how fun it was for the people handling TLG‘s social media accounts, and I wouldn‘t be surprised if some people pestered store employees as well My issue with movements like these is that it inflates some people’s giant egos even more. Not to single out Mandr too much, he just serves as an example here, but he seems to have gained a sizeable ego after „his“ campaign was successful. So much so that he claimed he was „cheated“ when the 250th Brickheadz was Ahsoka rather than Jar Jar, believing he had enough of a following to sway the vote. Edited January 29 by BrickBob Studpants Quote
Legoman123 Posted January 29 Posted January 29 (edited) 2 hours ago, Flawless Cowboy said: Who claims this rumor? 1 hour ago, Mandalorianknight said: Good overall breakdown, especially agree on the choice of jedi being one of the worst possible. If they did 4 jedi, ideally ones with more generic robe styles (Ki-Adi's isn't terrible but Bariss's robes are unique), I think it'd have been better, but as-is you're stuck without any real options. Where are you getting this information? I’d seen a couple of seperate posts on Instagram, I’ll try find the account and get back to you on it. It was said a couple of weeks ago in fairness and I’d assumed it wasn’t true but I thought it rather odd to make up and I’m sure it’d been mentioned in the superhero’s thread somewhere. I want to make it clear this isn’t from me and I’d seen it on Instagram so I don’t want people thinking I’m speeding fake rumours, I never have. EDIT - Is the UT-AT releasing in June or August? Edited January 29 by Legoman123 Quote
Mandalorianknight Posted January 29 Posted January 29 (edited) 1 hour ago, Coryo said: Releasing Jango's Slave I as both a UCS and a regular playset in the same year is certainly an interesting tactic, almost like when smartphone companies will release a flagship phone and a lower-spec version alongside it. Kinda funny that the cheaper version will supposedly have one more minifig though. Also, I tried my hand at making a colour-coded list of all the rumoured 2025 sets: Hide contents Original Trilogy | Prequels (Non-CW) | Clone Wars | Filoni-verse | Sequels | Andor/Rogue One | Other Playsets Andor U-Wing Ahsoka's Jedi Interceptor ARC-170 Mando and Grogu's N-1 Starfighter (4+) Death Trooper & Night Trooper Battle Pack UT-AT Rebuild the Galaxy (Turbo Tank?) 327th Star Corps Battle Pack V-19 Torrent Jango Fett's Slave I MTT UCS Jango Fett's Slave I AT-ST Death Star II Midi-Scale Acclamator-Class Assault Ship Home One Starcruiser Kylo Ren's Shuttle Helmets Jango Fett Helmet Kylo Ren Helmet AT-AT Driver Helmet Buildable Characters Grogu with Hover Pram Chopper Battle Droid Ewok K-2SO Other Millennium Falcon (Polybag) Plo Koon's Jedi Starfighter (Microfighter) Buildable Star Wars Logo Darth Maul Mech (Unless he has robot legs) Advent Calendar I honestly don't see what the goal is here. If the demand for Jango's Slave One was just absurd, and included a LOT of kids, I could see it, but as-is the main demo that's been pushing for it seemed happy about the UCS set, and while I can't see many people buying both (at least, people who don't normally buy full waves of sets), I can see a lot of people who may have been considering the UCS one opting for the cheaper option. That color coded list really puts things in perspective, huh? -The main issue is we're only getting 10-12 playsets the entire year (I personally count the microfighter and mech but respect that you didn't, although I do not count 4+ sets.) -About 3/4 of the sets are clone wars/clone related (I'm giving the RTG turbo tank and Jango's Slave One half points) -There isn't a single OT playset -Contrary to what's been stated here, the OT isn't dominating the 18+ sets. They actually have the variety I'd like to see from the playsets. I do think the clear biggest issue is that the year has an abysmal number of playsets. 12 is down from 16 in 2024, 18 in 2023, 15 in 2022, 13 in 2021, 19 in 2020, etc. It's a new low for the era. But the issue is compounded by the lack of variety. 1 hour ago, Darth_Bane13 said: Yeah I think this year will just be an anomaly, next year we'll probably get an entire wave of Mando movie sets. We better, I just hope we get an overall larger number of system sets. While Mando sets would probably be closer to the OT, and therefore provide some year-to-year balance (Though ironically an Spoiler AT-RT will probably be a set) I still would want some actual variety within the year itself. 16 minutes ago, Legoman123 said: I’d seen a couple of seperate posts on Instagram, I’ll try find the account and get back to you on it. It was said a couple of weeks ago in fairness and I’d assumed it wasn’t true but I thought it rather odd to make up and I’m sure it’d been mentioned in the superhero’s thread somewhere. I want to make it clear this isn’t from me and I’d seen it on Instagram so I don’t want people thinking I’m speeding fake rumours, I never have. Sure, but, from who? I can go on instagram and say "The death star will be the first set to include spacetroopers" but that doesn't give it any weight, that's just me speculating. Edited January 29 by Mandalorianknight Quote
Darth_Bane13 Posted January 29 Posted January 29 1 hour ago, BrickBob Studpants said: Not sure how fun it was for the people handling TLG‘s social media accounts, and I wouldn‘t be surprised if some people pestered store employees as well My issue with movements like these is that it inflates some people’s giant egos even more. Not to single out Mandr too much, he just serves as an example here, but he seems to have gained a sizeable ego after „his“ campaign was successful. So much so that he claimed he was „cheated“ when the 250th Brickheadz was Ahsoka rather than Jar Jar, believing he had enough of a following to sway the vote. I just don't think it was that serious, it was just fans asking for a set. Having a large social media account means you'll get lots of comments, if they were that bothered by it they would've not made the set. 29 minutes ago, Mandalorianknight said: We better, I just hope we get an overall larger number of system sets. While Mando sets would probably be closer to the OT, and therefore provide some year-to-year balance Yeah sadly I think all the 18+ sets are here to stay. Quote
Flawless Cowboy Posted January 29 Posted January 29 4 minutes ago, Darth_Bane13 said: Yeah sadly I think all the 18+ sets are here to stay. We’re getting a thousand dollar set this year. Lego is charging “luxury toy” prices now. I’d really love to see breakdown of how much money is spent on adult vs kids sets. And what the demographics of the consumer base look like. Quote
Darth_Bane13 Posted January 29 Posted January 29 23 minutes ago, Flawless Cowboy said: We’re getting a thousand dollar set this year. Lego is charging “luxury toy” prices now. I’d really love to see breakdown of how much money is spent on adult vs kids sets. And what the demographics of the consumer base look like. I would guess that the majority of the consumer base for Lego Star Wars nowadays is adults. I think Star Wars is only still popular due to nostalgia from adults, most of the Disney plus shows have to bring back characters from the past to get people interested. It's only because the OT and to a lesser extent the prequels/TCW have so many diehard fans that keep the brand on life support that Star Wars has a bit of popularity still, similar to lord of the rings. And yes I'm aware some people here love the sequels and the acolyte but they're still a small minority. Quote
Brickwraith Posted January 29 Posted January 29 16 minutes ago, Darth_Bane13 said: I would guess that the majority of the consumer base for Lego Star Wars nowadays is adults. I think Star Wars is only still popular due to nostalgia from adults, most of the Disney plus shows have to bring back characters from the past to get people interested. It's only because the OT and to a lesser extent the prequels/TCW have so many diehard fans that keep the brand on life support that Star Wars has a bit of popularity still, similar to lord of the rings. And yes I'm aware some people here love the sequels and the acolyte but they're still a small minority. I think you are missing Mando in your calculations here. I know a large number of people that had never watched Star Wars at all before that show and are big fans of it now because of that show. Quote
Darth_Bane13 Posted January 29 Posted January 29 48 minutes ago, Brickwraith said: I think you are missing Mando in your calculations here. I know a large number of people that had never watched Star Wars at all before that show and are big fans of it now because of that show. Fair enough, season 1 and 2 were big when they came out. Quote
Rwbricks Posted January 29 Posted January 29 5 hours ago, Coryo said: Also, I tried my hand at making a colour-coded list of all the rumoured 2025 sets: Reveal hidden contents Original Trilogy | Prequels (Non-CW) | Clone Wars | Filoni-verse | Sequels | Andor/Rogue One | Other Playsets Andor U-Wing Ahsoka's Jedi Interceptor ARC-170 Mando and Grogu's N-1 Starfighter (4+) Death Trooper & Night Trooper Battle Pack UT-AT Rebuild the Galaxy (Turbo Tank?) 327th Star Corps Battle Pack V-19 Torrent Jango Fett's Slave I MTT UCS Jango Fett's Slave I AT-ST Death Star II Midi-Scale Acclamator-Class Assault Ship Home One Starcruiser Kylo Ren's Shuttle Helmets Jango Fett Helmet Kylo Ren Helmet AT-AT Driver Helmet Buildable Characters Grogu with Hover Pram Chopper Battle Droid Ewok K-2SO Other Millennium Falcon (Polybag) Plo Koon's Jedi Starfighter (Microfighter) Buildable Star Wars Logo Darth Maul Mech (Unless he has robot legs) Advent Calendar I appreciate the list. It’s a neat way to see the distribution. I believe that it was reported that Maul in the mech would be the Clone Wars robot legs version, but I don’t remember who said that. Quote
Agent Kallus Posted January 29 Posted January 29 Is Childish Landoino reliable? He's posted a round up, little new information but it does list the U-Wing's Figs as Cassian, K2-SO, Dedra Meero ( @THELEGOBATMAN's Wife) and 2 Stormtroopers Quote
CallumPears Posted January 29 Posted January 29 32 minutes ago, Agent Kallus said: Is Childish Landoino reliable? He's posted a round up, little new information but it does list the U-Wing's Figs as Cassian, K2-SO, Dedra Meero ( @THELEGOBATMAN's Wife) and 2 Stormtroopers Yeah as far as I remember he's been pretty accurate in the past That was the rumoured figure lineup a couple months ago though, so I guess it could be that that was fake from someone else and he's just included it as part of his summary but I'm on the side of believing it's real. Quote
BrickBob Studpants Posted January 29 Posted January 29 5 minutes ago, CallumPears said: […] but I'm on the side of believing it's real. I hope not. Including two Stormies is the lamest thing they could do when the Death Trooper helmet piece is back! Quote
Legoman123 Posted January 29 Posted January 29 I just think the desire for Jangos Slave 1 isn’t high enough to merit two versions. I don’t think there’s many sets that do in any theme to be honest. Realistically how many kids actually want a Jangos Slave 1, it’s mainly adults now. Maybe it would have made sense 10 years ago when the kids who grew up with the prequels (like me) were still kids so they’d want a cheaper version and the adults who grew up with the og trilogy could get the UCS set, but now we’re all adults and in reality most of us will go for the UCS set. I don’t imagine the kids who grew up with the seuqal trilogy are all that bothered about Jango (maybe I’m wrong here) but he only appeared in one movie, it’s not like it’s Boba who’s appeared in multiple movies/tv shows so the sequal kids like him and can relate to him. This is a set that should be on its third incarnation now, when I was a young teen I wanted this set so badly back in 2013 but we are now 12 years later only just getting it again after 23 years, and now going to flood the market with overkill on it. Quote
BrickBob Studpants Posted January 29 Posted January 29 The only potentially interesting thing about the Slave I playset is gonna be the Kaminoan. If it‘s Lama Su, that is. Given their weird choices this year, I wouldn‘t be surprised to see Taun We again, meaning you end up with two Taun Wes if you wanna recreate the chase scene Quote
JohnTPT17 Posted January 29 Posted January 29 Hopefully those Stormtroopers were just blurry/in the background and we get something a little more unique. Otherwise, glad to see that K2S0 and Dedra seem to be in the pipeline. If it's death troopers/shore troopers/something besides basic Stormtroopers, I might look into the whole set - otherwise, just K2S0. Maybe Dedra - depends on what she looks like and how expensive she would go for on Bricklink. Quote
CallumPears Posted January 29 Posted January 29 54 minutes ago, BrickBob Studpants said: I hope not. Including two Stormies is the lamest thing they could do when the Death Trooper helmet piece is back! Oh yeah I absolutely hope not too but Landino has among the best record of all the leakers so it's likely correct. Death troopers would indeed be way better (insert obligatory "new stormies bad" comment here), or some other type; wasn't there some speculation about Range Troopers showing up in Andor too from a Hasbro toy or whatever? 15 minutes ago, BrickBob Studpants said: The only potentially interesting thing about the Slave I playset is gonna be the Kaminoan. If it‘s Lama Su, that is. Given their weird choices this year, I wouldn‘t be surprised to see Taun We again, meaning you end up with two Taun Wes if you wanna recreate the chase scene Yeah I've somehow managed to end up with 4 Taun Wes after buying 2 of Obi-Wan's fighter and getting the other 2 in bulk auctions on eBay over the past couple of years so she wouldn't interest me. Lama Su, or anyone else, though? Yes please. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.