Peanuts

Hey, this was the first time I was ever lynched in a Mafia Game...hm, it's kind of unspectacular Well, thanks for letting me play, Bob! Good luck to all players!

Oh well, I guess that's it. Good night, everyone, and be sure to lynch/kill Holly&Michael tomorrow!

But how do you know, if you investigated me? I figure they didn't tell you...

Do you have any proof of that, or is that just what they said? I can't believe that we are fighting against two scum teams, together with a million of neutrals. Seriously, and I thought Eurodina had too many neutrals and scum groups.

Can't say I am. Yeah, I have no idea what's happening right now. But I kinda like the thought that the whole scum team are scarficing themselves just to get me out of their way...

Quote from Holly's PM that was made public by Ms. Cruise Director: Okay, this is just confusing. I have no idea what happened there, but if both you and your investiagtor said the truth, the result is false. That's all I can say about this, as all I know is, that I am not a Thief.

So, Michael's partner-in-crime is the formerly accused Holly? That...certainly makes sense, somehow. None of them has helped the town so far in any way. Well, I knew Michael was lying, and Holly's weird PMs don't seem very...elaborate. Guess they had to make something up really fast. Well, I'd usually would give Michael another chance to say something to speak up and make his accusation clear, but since I already know he is lying, I'll just go ahead and Vote: Michael (Badboytje) Though I'm really inclined to vote for Holly instead, but I don't think it makes any difference. They're both scum. Oops, he already did. Guess I'm just that slow at posting

Well, I find Michael's claim hard to believe (and I know it's a lie), but apart from that...no. I got no night action. That said, I wonder what he hopes to benefit from accusing me. He's going to be lynched tomorrow, so what does he gain from getting me lynched?

Wait, what? So, Neutral Mastermind Girl said that she knows of two other thieves, and you are a thief, as well as your partner? Is anyone on this ship NOT a neutral thief? And you started out as town, with a partner, who was a thief, and knew you were town, and the you suddenly were a thief, and what the hell? Yeah, all I can say about this, is, that it's not true. I never was in possession of the diamond, nor am I currently, and as long as I don't suddenly turn into a neutral thief, I never will be. There's one thing that makes me wonder: What's your goal? If you two, just like Neutral Mastermind Girl, only have to own the diamond once, why not make your partner's name public? Or is this a deviation on this neutral thief role? In fact, there's a second thing that makes me wonder: We have...three other neutral thieves, right? Who all are, basically, investigators? Who cleared a decent number of people so far, and were helpful to the town, so that we don't accidentally lynch someone who isn't scum? That's really very nice, and very helpful, but it's a bit hard to believe. My opinion is, if it tastes too sweet, it will propably give you diabetes. Why would they sabotage their own efforts by helping us find scum? If they aren't lying, what incentive would they have to help us? With every scum that is lynched/killed, their chances of success decrease. Michael hasn't told us the name of his partner, which tells me (assuming they are telling the truth) that their objective isn't done yet, otherwise, why be secretive? But if he really has to, say, survive with the diamond, why come forward at all? Why not (again, assuming they told the truth) just steal the dimond from me and leave me in the dark about it, increasing their chances at doing whatever they have to do? I know I'm not scum, obviously, and that this is a lie. I don't know if I would believe me, though. BTW, thanks to autosave for saving this post when I accidentally deleted it, phew!

It sounds a bit weird, and the most manifest thing would be that she either speaks the truth or is an SK. But she wouldn't want to help us before she has gotten the diamond; even if she tries to steal and targetted an townie, assuming she doesn't lie, she wouldn't want to tell us, because we'd have one less suspect, improving our chances at lynching scum, and diminuishing her chances at stealing from scum. I don't know, it seems unnatural, after all, if Waiter Guy kills Whatever-His-Name-Was, why would she target him as well?

Eh, did I say something? I'm pretty sure I haven't said a thing so far, I was just thinking about my first comment today, while listening closely to everything Pirate Guy said... So, what was I going to say? Well, it's good we got two scum...

Well, it's good we got two scum. I think that should clear a few people, especially those who worked hard to turn the votes against Spanish Waiter Guy. I also think that should finally get this stupid numbers theory off the table, as both the thieves actually had town numbers, if I remember correctly. Losing Stupid Theory Guy is not good, and it's obvious why the scum killed him. He was basically proven to be town. Now here's me wondering wheter teh necksnapper was a vigilante (as far as I remember, the whole idea that Baseball Guy was a vig was based on the fact he had a bat and an action; he might as well have been a blocker), or an SK. I'm looking at Neutral Thief Girl right now, I doubt, there would be both several neutrals without a killing ability and an SK. Maybe Dead Theory Guy was right about her being an SK thief... By the way, yesterday, while accusing Michael, I said: I found out that he didn't actually say that, but Sums-up-but-doesn't-vote Girl (Alice, if you're confused). So, just forget about that. I'm still suspicious of him, and I guess I didn't quite make myself clear before, so I'll just sum up my accusation in four short sentences: 1) This. In my opinion he contradicted herself/changed her opinion completely, we talked in private, and she said, that "sometimes shallow is the way to go", which doesn't quite satisfy me. 2) He went with Stupid Theory Guy's Stupid Theory, which I cosidered stupid and distracting. 3) He didn't even mention Spanish Waiter Guy; scum would do that, as he wouldn't want to defend him (in case he is lynched anyway), nor speak up against him, and just hope that Weird Number Girl is lynched instead. 4) He over-all was a rather quiet person, which adds to my suspicion. That's all I got against Michael. My other suspects would be: Lifeguard Girl (just a tad, hasn't actually been that suspicious ever since), and either Weird Number Girl (Mary) or Sums-up Girl (Alice), but not both, naturally. Lynching Neutral Thief Girl is also pretty helpful, because, think about it: If she speaks the truth: She wouldn't want us to make progress before she finds scum, because the more we lynch, the smaller her chances of success. If she lies: Well, that's obvious. She might be an SK. Or even a second scum group, think about it, two scum groups, the "Thieves" and the "Masterminds", with the Masterminds orchestrating the whole heist, and then ripping off the Thieves. It's pretty dangerous to have her around, if you ask me. Do we know he was the investigator? Because that would suck pretty hard. Anyway, I'm not sure. There's, like, no evidence. But I don't mind to see Neutral Thief Girl lynched, and I currently trust you, as you worked hard to get Spanish Waiter Guy lynched.

Okay, sorry if I was confusing, my comment consisted of two parts, one where I said why I voted for someone who wasn't my primary candidate for lynching, and one where I said why I kept voting for him. He wasn't a dead man back then, but now he is. Also, I never said I was convinced of Mastermind Girl's claim to be one of many. In fact, I wanted to state I was not. If I had been I'd voted for Spanish Guy from the beginning; I just wanted to hear from other thieves so I know there are other thieves, and that she said the truth about that, almost clearing her from being an SK. I don't think Theory Guy lied, he was too forward for being scum, and the conversation with Spanish Guy obviously existed. There's not much else he could have lied about (unless I'm missing something, in which case, pelase tell me). No, in my opinion it depends on wheter the second claim actually existed or if it was made up by an SK trying to save himself.

I voted for someone I think is scum, you know. I just said that the two tracker claims are more important, as they are more substantial. So why wasn't I voting for Spanish Waiter Guy? As I said, I wanted to hear from other neutral thieves, before I trust someone who claimed such a role. Right now, no matter what affiliation Waiter Guy has, lynching Neural Non-Thief Mastermind Girl still sounds like a good idea to me. We can't trust her, and she still could be an SK. I think it's possible Spanish Guy said the truth and is one of us, but we'll find out tomorrow, that's for sure. I'll stick with my vote for now, as once again, there's no point in voting with the group once a majority is reached. And I know my vote at that point could have led to a lynch of Michael Guy, but really, I would have liked that. I'm more suspicious of him than of Weird Number Girl. Spanish Waiter Guy is basically dead, and wheter or not he's scum depends a lot on wheter or not Neutral Girl said the truth, and maybe she did, maybe she didn't. I'm not sure. But who cares, it's a risk we can take, as someone said, the tracker is basically useless now that he's found out.

Okay, Weird Number Girl is lynched. That's good, now we don't have to bother about her anymore. There's, like, a good chance she'll turn up scum, but I'm a bit disappointed the whole two trackers thing wasn't acted on, and neither did any other jewel thieves come up. No matter what allegiance Number Girl has, we should look deeper into the tracker thing tomorrow; if there really are two tracker claims (that is, if Thief Girl doesn't lie), I'd bet a lot of money that one of them is scum. It's possible neither is, since their roles are apparently different, but it's something we can't ignore. But there is more than 2 scum members, and I've been, like, very suspicious of Michael. I already have been so earlier, but the tracker/thief thing seemed more important, and I didn't want to distract the town form the task at hand, but now that the day is coming to an end, here we go. Ever since the whole two tracker thing came up, all he said was: Not even talking about it, or about the fact that there is at least one neutral person, and possibly even more, with a potentially deadly action. So, did you find something you need to address? Once again, you were flying under the radar. I had already accused you earlier of this, as well as distracting from the numbers, but I think you didn't reply. I don't know, I thought you said something, about me being contradicting myself, but I couldn't find that comment, and I feel like I'm hallucinating because of it. So, since my vote isn't going to change anything, I'll use this opportunity to Vote: Michael (badboytje88) I'm just suspicious of you, I don't want to repeat myself, so if anyone wants to know why exactly, please look at everything I said about Michael today. I don't think he should be our lynch today, or even tomorrow, but he should be scrutinized, after we're done with the business of the two tracker claims and the neutral jewel thief (thieves?).

Didn't Stupid Theory Guy say it had been three people targetting Engi Guy, or did he just bring up teh possibility? Anyway, it's not a far stretch to blame the neutral, nor one of the two people who claimed tracker, nor someone third. I'm not sure if I want to know Thief Girl's contact, right now, the scum may already know enough. On the other hand, it would be great to know if that contact really exists, because it's hard to believe we really have two trackers.

I pointed something out? I haven't been talking for hours! Anyway, I'm not sure I got everything, but we seem to have two tracker claims (either that, or Neutral Thief Girl has lied to us). If we really got two tracker claims, we should lynch one of them, and Spanish Waiter Guy has already revealed himself. What I find strange is, that no other jewel thief has come up so far. If there really are any, why shouldn't they talk to her? It helps them organize, and Neutral Thief Girl's strategy would work out for them in my opinion. Also, another major flaw in her claim is, that she seems to be able to steal the diamond from every scum member (according to herself). I'm not a physics genius, but wouldn't that imply that each scum member carries the jewel? I don't really trust her so far, and if she was lying, it's possible that she brought up her own tracker in order to defend herself. That said, I'm not going to vote for Spanish Waiter Guy before another jewel thief comes up. I won't vote for Crazy Weird Number Girl either right now, because I don't want to end the day prematurely, when there's so much left to talk about (and so much rum left to drink! Island Day forever!). I don't think Stupid Theory Guy is scum, no scum would do what he did, in my opinion. Lynching the neutral is never a bad idea either, but I don't like to let go of Spanish Waiter Guy before we know wheter or not Neutral Thief Girl has said the truth about there being other thiefs.

Well, I just used Multiquote, so I don't mind if they're locked. I wouldn't be averse to keeping them open, either.

Well, now that Stupid Theory Guy has called my attention to that Michael Guy (seriously, no wonder I didn't notice him, he's so characterless; no name for you, Michael Guy ), I've been remembering of the first day, when he said: ...followed by... Which is terribly shallow and no game host in his proper state of mind would do something so obvious as giving the members of team scum ‘evil’ looking/sounding LEGO set numbers. [...] ...and today... So, either he completely changed his mind within few hours, or the first statement was meant to be some kind of trap for the scum. That's surprising, because he's not been very aggressive so far (I can't even come up with a name for him, so I'll have to learn his real one), and setting traps is usually more a thing aggressive players do. Also, he never really followed it up with more than two sentences. Which, by itself, is strange, but not necessarily scummy. What's really interesting is how he changed his opinion again, today, after Stupid Theory Guy and Lifeguard Girl promoted this theory. Yep, you're definitely added to my list of suspicious people, and you've even surpassed Lifeguard Girl, who's just gone with Stupid Theory Guy's stupid theory.

Well, you for one have brought up the whole theory, which is not something scum would do, because it means taking responsibility for the failed lynch that comes with it. As far as I could tell, what I would do as scum is just take someone else's theory and push it, so that they are the ones to blame for the lynch. As for that Michael Guy, I actually had to look the name up, because I had no idea who that was. I checked his posts, and I gotta say, he's not really any better than Lifegard Girl. Like, at all. I wouldn't mind if he got lynched.

I just re-read Day One for your comments, and while I can't say I got the feel you knew about people's allegiances, I just realized you were the person who kept writing off the numbers as nothing even before we were told they were for a contest, which I found a bit suspicious yesterday. Hm, right I'm torn between Lifeguard Girl, who gives these numbers, like, way too much meaning, and you, who's quick to write them off (as well as generally flying under the radar). I consider you both good candidates for a lynch, but I'd rather vote for you right now. So, as long as we're not allowed to vote, does anyone know any island-themed songs I could sing?

Maybe it's just me, but the theory sounds, like, just wrong to me. Even if the Pirate Guy has messed up the set-up, I don't think he'd deliberately lie to us, and he had already told us these numbers'd be for a building contest. I don't think he'll stage a contest just to cover that he goofed up. Thus I think this theory distracts us from what's important. And scum would love to run with a theory that's distractive, especially since they already know wheter or not this stupid theory is right. I don't like voting for someone just because they have a 'bad' number. I'm not against voting for Crazy Weird Number Girl (again) or Sums-Up-But-Doesn't-Vote Girl (Do you know how hard it is to make up names when you're as unimaginative as I am? ), since they're still being suspicious, but not because their numbers are 'bad'. And, I find it fishy how people still want to go on that. It#s exactly what the scum would do; distract and look helpful.

Yeah, it's not very good. You're, like, totally not memorable, like, at all.

Okay, I hadn't understood that, sorry. Still, you'd imply that the Pirate Guy has been deliberately lying to us, which a host never should do. Well, he shouldn't have interfered with your stupid theory, either, I admit that. But I trust him to not flat-out lie to us. Actually, sorry if that came out wrong, but what I was trying to say, was, that while Stupid Theory Guy's theory was nothing but distracting and therefore something a scum member would say, what they would say even more is just take his theory and run with it, just as Lifeguard Girl did. Therefore, I consider her a far better suspect.

Wow, I was, like, really sure Jordan would be scum. That's definitely not a surprise I like. And hearing that our vig is gone is pretty damn shocking, too. Actually, no. At least not by the time you asked that... So...we were told, that these were for a building contest, yet you were implying that they might not be, and that there is a correlation between numbers and roles, which would be considered a bastard set-up, right until God clarified they were not? Why would the SK kill Confused Engineer Guy? It's not like he was, like, totally silent, which is the kidn of person I'd kill, if I was an SK. And you seem to know who the vig was, and that he's dead. Of course, I don't know why you would tell us if you were scum, which speaks in your favor. Yeah, you kept talking about this correlation, and to me, it just seems to be a distraction. This looks like scummy behavior to me, but I still can't explain why you would tell us you knew who the vig was. So maybe I shouldn't look at you... ...but at the person who was completey fine with that 'theory'. Yeah, I'm highly suspicious of you now. You didn't make it up, but you endorsed it, which is totally, like, scummy behavior.