Jump to content

Piratedave84

Eurobricks Counts
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,643

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Piratedave84

  1. Piratedave84
    I was claiming, revealing my results and trying to seek input on how to deal with my role.
  2. Piratedave84
    No worries!!! I for sure thought we would all be dead this morning; I'm VERY curious to see whom the blocker blocked!
  3. Piratedave84
    T minus 9 hours!
  4. Piratedave84
    What about us? Do you not think some townies are against a tie/no lynch? Generally it's first to the gate so I don't think we can have a no-lynch if 2 players have 7 votes Well that is if we were 14 ... And you know what? I have no problem with lunching Rip seeing he contributed even less than me! Here I'll sway the vote and let someone hammer him: unvote: bock (Bob) Vote : Rip (captain nemo)
  5. Piratedave84
    I was reading So were several other people ... Well like 3 but still!
  6. Piratedave84
    Well... I was convinced Hinck was the vig after today ... unvote: 4 of 2 (mostly) I really think we need a lynch today, my first choice of not 4 of 2 would have been zip zop but we can't afford a no-lynch so I'll vote for the player with the most current vote in the hopes that Clem's gut feeling is a good one ... vote: bock (Bob)
  7. Piratedave84
    I'm going to vote for the person whom I feel is the scummiest in the whole code business: vote: 4 of 2 (mostlytechnic) I'm very busy today so I'll come back later tonight.
  8. Piratedave84
    This is what bothers me here; of you 3(Bock, Zio Zop, Seamus) someone is bound to be lying and therefore scum. (Personally I'm leaning Zip Zop) There's no way the code thing should be this complicated; Christ, we had a 75 000 000 part code going in another 'situation' and we managed to sort through it with relative ease.
  9. Piratedave84
    I'm not implicated with 4 of 2 in any way. I decided to watch Clem to see if someone would target him given he had outed himself as a (sort of) PR. You're analysis is good but again, it's not representative of the truth. I'm still unsure of where to place my vote but I have a few ideas namely: zip zop and 4 of 2 over the code sharing thing which I still don't understand; can we sort out once and for all who actually got codes? And Seamus for reasons stated earlier
  10. Piratedave84
    Last night I visited Clem and someone visited him.
  11. Piratedave84
    I wanted a lynch and I had not seen Bock's vote so I thought I would be the hammer vote.
  12. Piratedave84
    We cross posted. I was scum not too long ago and it was understood then that we would stay away from you on day one due to the risk of your being watched or protected. This is what my logic is based on.
  13. Piratedave84
    you're who you are and I find it odd that no one from town (besides me) tried to have you as a asset. I also considered that you could be town and genuinely have not been targeted but I find that unlikely. I'm meta gaming like crazy here but that's my logic. My primary goal in targeting you was to try and find scum or another PR but it did not and that makes me wonder. I just think the odds of your being targeted on day one are far better than anybody else here and I think the odds of your being targeted by town are better than scum targeting you; again this is all meta as hell but it's all I've got.
  14. Piratedave84
    I have an issue handling PRs this has happened before. I tried to lay low and post enough to keep me from appearing as flying under the radar. Today when you started scrutinizing me I panicked and tried to explain and utterly failed at it. I'm wary of you because, and that's very little to go on, because I watched you on day one and no one targeted you. Now this, to me, is the weirdest thing EVER. Why would no one target you, not even a tracker, not a cop, not a blocker; no one! This to me is the biggest red flag and truly leads me to believe you may be scum hence my vote for you. There; you forced my hand, I'm the town watcher.
  15. Piratedave84
    Seamus; i came here earlier to PM because there were important matters that needed discussing in private which by far superseded the need to address your misplaced concerns. i'm not hiding, I have other matters to attend in private and that's where I'm focusing my attention for now. One of the people involved in the code-sharing business; one of you is lying or at least is misrepresenting the truth. I'm still trying to wrap my head around how the codes worked and who actually received a piece of the code
  16. Piratedave84
    Confessed what exactly?
  17. Piratedave84
    I'm here, I'm here. I came by twice today to send potato messages but otherwise was incapable of posting due to ... Pressing apples to make cider Now; i realize that my behaviour of yesterday was not-so-townish but I had little time to gather my thoughts so it all came up scrambled and was quite scummy. I was somewhat suspicious of Clem's claim as it was/ is an unusual claim and seemed like an easy claim for scum to make. I now know my suspicions to have been misplaced. I also made some comments about Minga's analysis which were probably not the best thought out. Now this being said, I don't want to be lynched and I have contacted Clem and Minga's to clear the air and I think we're in good standing now.
  18. Piratedave84
    ^ this!
  19. Piratedave84
    I'm lost ... What's being reproached here? I stated I did not agree with the quality of the analysis and was told it was good and to shut up and when I didn't, I became scummy ... Clem and Seamus got a weird thing going on here ... They stand of for each other when there's no real need to do so. It'd be stupid for scum to so blatantly backup each other so my guess is that one of them is town and one is scum.
  20. Piratedave84
    I was going after Clem for a reason I thought was valid and all my actions were contested by Seamus. I call it defending, you can call it whatever you want. Seamus found it necessary to shut down my comments to Clem.
  21. Piratedave84
    I apologize for my relative inaction today RL is kicking my megablocks. I'm going to vote: Seamus(Hinck) Because there is no way he should have defended Clem like he did ... Unless he knew his affiliation ... Which he almost certainly doesn't ... Or does because he is scum.
  22. Piratedave84
    I'm a fan of gambits and all I can think about now is how it would totally be worth it to claim an unusual role and then potentially have a PR claim to them. 2 things are potentially being accomplished here; 1) she saved herself from a lynch and 2) she may just get a PR claim. I'm being paranoid here but just think about it; she's likely to be investigated tonight and if she is the godfather will come up town. Like you said it's a risky gambit but I can see the benefits. I might be barking up the wrong tree ... But at this stage we can agree that almost any barking is good barking ... That was a shitty metaphor but you get the point.
  23. Piratedave84
    I still think he divulged too much. I'll admit to sheeping the vote. Which is why I'm trying to weigh my options more thoroughly today. What makes you sure sure Clem is on the level?
  24. Piratedave84
    I don't have a better one, in fact I don't think there's much to analyse. To me it reads like a "think-out-loud" post rather than an actual analysis. The only true analysis we can do is pin the now-confirmed dead townies vote on there and see where they voted.
  25. Piratedave84
    Yeah but I can't help but think this information is more beneficial to the scum than town. Imagine for one moment that scum had found out who the vig (or any PR for that matter) is and they kill him/her, now the scum knows the role will pass on and expects it to. Whereas if you had kept quiet, this role would have been passed on without anyone knowing and would surely have confused the hell out of them. You also clarified for scum that they failed to kill a PR so you eliminate all doubt to that effect so they know to expect investigations, kills and whatever other NA there may be. All this to say, I'm ready to believe you but I think you should not have claimed and that you did reveal too much information.
×
×
  • Create New...