Jurgen Krooshoop

Totally wicked creation !!

This new 8069 looks like an interresting model. But as others mentioned, it's not as good as the old 8455 or as my fully remote controlled backhoe loader:

Although the old ones seem pretty strong, I did breaksome in a very large Technic model I'm making. Since my 8043 was the first version, I don't have these new 16T's, but if they're stronger, than they would be a great addition to my parts-collection.

Awesome MOC, the green colour is very nice and the list of techical functions is impressive. Good work

Instrucions would be sooooo great !! If there were instructions I'd definately try building it.

Although it a bit too crowded (IMO) with too much details, it's a very nice truck. The orange and chrome detail are really cool.

Thanks for the compliment. But my 8466 - Offroad version takes a lot more parts than just one 8466 (like PF-parts). And I didn't use the big 8466-wheels, but smaller 8297-wheels. Personally, I like the original 8466-set very much (especially the door-mechanism) and I don't I'd ever sell it.

I like this model a lot. And it shows that Power Functions are not neccesary to make a cool model. Great job Nico71 !!

Very nice model indeed, the front is really cool. The colour is nice too. But it looks like pendular suspension to me (not full independent suspension)

I've seen many Technic creations, but this one is really mind-blowing. And the story behind it is very fascinating as well.

OMG Blakbird, now I really have to pick up my jaw from the ground. That "Little DeLoren" looks totally awesome !!!

I haven't even recieved my service-pack yet. But I did suggest the solution to the track-problem, which was integrated in the service-pack, which makes me quite sad...

Oh man, I feel honoured by you guys building my model. And Blakbird, a silver one would be really cool !!

Nice, very nice

Welcome to EB, Oscar !! Good too see you here.

@ Jantjuh: Yes you're right, but this does increase the side-effects during slewing, meaning the tracks move slightly during superstructure-rotation.

@ Mixtil & DLuders: First of all: thank you for your feedback about my instructions, it's being appreciated. As for the errors: "part 2, pages 24-25: there is no instructions for the yellow pieces": The instructions for the "fake"-shockabsorbers is missing, it's not about the yellow 1x3 liftarms (sorry, DLuders...) I'll include the sub-instructions ASAP. "part 1, page 41 N°2: wrong pieces 'description'" The parts-list image is wrong. I'll correct it. "part 2, page 39 N° 2 and 3 : mix of pieces 'description'" The parts-list images of steps 2 and 3 are reversed. I'll correct it. "part 3, page 6 N° 2: This depends on which u-joints you use. I use 3L u-joints. If you use 4L U-joints, you'll need to replace the middle 4L-axle by a 2L axle. If you use new 3L U-joints, you need the 4L axle. (2 x 4 + 2 = 10, 2 x 3 + 4 = 10). "part 3, page 6 N° 2: I have changed one axle 4 for a axle (red) 2, because otherwise I couldn't fix this pieces in the car": This is the only one I don't know: you're propably right, but I'd need the model here to check it (and it has been disassembled lont time ago). I'll correct these mistakes ASAP and post the new instructions on my website Jurgens Tewchnic Corner and I'll make a note of it in this thread.

Damn, this is nice !! And I thought 3 wheels was the minimum for a fully remote controlled Lego-vehicule, but I'm glad that Zblj has proven me wrong. Well done

A lot of your models have this "Organic" quality, which I really like. This one is surely no exception. The walking horse looks really good, and the moving head is nice detail

Nice model, good work

Konajra's models are truly truly amazing. They look tremendous and are technically correct. And one of the coolest things is: it's all Minifig-scale !!

You've created some nice MOC's with some good technic-idea's

I think the most impressive part of this MOC is the transmission. The way the 3 differentials are used for controlling the car is amazing

Wonderfull design. The video shows well how the model is built-up, which is much appreciated

And believe me: it sure was/is.