JunkstyleGio

@anomalocaris92 That is quite the list of problems you are discribing. Could you make some pictures of "the probleme areas"? And about the "testing": I do not think that Lego test new products in a extended period. Models like these should be tested "out of company", on durability and not by collegues who are biased with company rules. "We of Lego advice Lego..."

That is very, and I mean very very very, nice! Good luck on getting the votes on Lego Ideas!

That is brilliant! So many functions in a limited space.

I'm looking forward on how this idea developes!

High: 42202 Ducatti A fun build from begin to end. Both fysical and digital.. Low: There were no other sets in the Technic line that i liked. (but I did a few "other brands"..) Expectation for 2026: The only one so far is the 42221 NASA Artemis. I like the kinetics of this model. Let's wait and see.

This is what Technic is all about. Love it!

Oh dear... I only got me the Ducati this year... The rest of the sets were kind of "meh" to me. Am i in my dark ages?

RoscoPC is RoscoPC.

That is really sad.

Step number and pictures please! The usually say more than a thousand words.

Nice. Something completely different!

Can somebody please explain why TLG doesn't add driver numbers to their F1 cars? In case of this RB20 a 1 or a 11 would have been nice.

Lovely work. I really like the looks! Nice video by the way! About the accuracy: 0,12 per 5 minutes slower/faster is about 35 seconds per day. (about 3h33m per year.) I really would lke to see the result of a 24 hour test!

@manglegrat That is it! Thanks!

All of a sudden parts become invisible in stud.io... The invisible parts are in the io-file and available in the stud.io parts list. You can place new parts and those are visible... In my case it is with part 28192 Slope 45 2 x 1 with Cutout without Stud anybobody got an idea?