Duvors

I love this so much. As for hopes and expectations I'd love to see the fourth doctor, of my favorite doctors he is the most popular, so he's the most likely to be included.

That is one amazing beast! I can't wait to see what comes next, Cerberus perhaps?

Yes, but I can't vote for myself can I? Oh wow! That must be true, because you say so! And nobody in this game could possibly have any reason to lie about their allegiance! In other words, it's very nice to say you're Oak, but how do you intend to prove it?

Sorry, I was forced to take a break due to circumstances beyond my control. You are highly accusative of everyone, something I dislike a lot. It smacks of a tree that is desperately trying to appear helpful while simultaneously sowing the seeds of suspicion everywhere.My attitude towards Catarina is rapidly becoming negative, this tree has only been unhelpful, uncooperative, far too ready to jump to conclusions, seems determined to direct attention away from herself, and just plain annoying. After rereading much of what this tree has said I feel there are sufficient grounds for me to; Vote: Catarina Dogwood (adventurer1)

Well, suspect would more accurately convey what I mean, As a person I think you are very nice.Yes, interesting coincidence that. Funny, but irrelevant.

I want to hear that voice.I have no specific voice for Throlar, maybe I ought to think about that.

Here's the post, and My blatant missing of it's existence will probably annoy me for the rest of the game. Sorry, I retract my comment. I dislike people who accuse everyone who doesn't agree with them, there was some discussion about this tendency of your's earlier, as well as a rather strange burst of laughter. The former. but if it's already been said then why would Waldorf say; Why would he assume that it had been established if there had been objections raised?

Yes, I concede that point.That seems unnecessarily complicated, why not just claim to those they trust in private before getting stumped? And it seems I did.

Thank you for being impatient when I didn't even have a chance to respond due to not being on the internet when you asked the question you are referring to.Well I just didn't have anything else to add at the time, I ought to have kept my mouth shut, but quite frankly I have trouble doing that. As for the prior day, I'm just very bad at being helpful. And who gets to have all these codes? You Mr. Unconfirmed Aggressive-Defensive Accusatory Trying Far Harder Than Anyone Else To Appear Helpful Tree? In public presumably. And the fact that Simon could just be making up nonexistent claims that where never made is a possibility, although an unlikely one.

Ditto.Well aside from that poignant remark I nothing even vaguely useful to add at the moment. Sorry.

Throlar searches the room, paying special attention to the ceiling.

Good.

Wow, I really like this, and It's nice to see you getting back into building.

I like this build, especially the inclusion of the Dragon Masters cape, and I think the basic idea of this build makes sense.

Like Superman, but a bowl.

Brilliant, just brilliant.

I made a typo.

Especially red, spiders with bright underbellies look cool.By the way, did you guys know that spiders don't actually have thoraxes? Just heads and abdomens.

Maybe he's been arrested for allowing us to make horrible tree puns?

I agree, I like that far better than the second version.

Horrifying?And welcome Robert, nice to see such an original character design!

Translation; "Hahahahha I'm much smarter that you, you have no chance of winning without me! If you kill me you'll all die and I'll rub it in your faces! Haha!"Look, the way you phrased it, 'people I've let slip under the radar too many times' makes it seem like you're trying to cast suspicion on people who have been your opponents in previous games, not to point out that people who don't talk a lot are dangerous, which we already know.

"Me too, I'll be off to the common room, with Mr. Heckz."

In lieu of this however my position is somewhat moderated, and I don't think I'll vote for Catarina. You know how I said that I hadn't seen anything overtly Maple? Forget it. This is at the very least unhelpful townie metagaming in a very badly thought-out attempt to cast off suspicion on people who were the bad guys in previous situations, blatantly disregarding the fact that roles can change from one game to the next. And I also second this, therefore; Vote: Alistair Pear. Wow, I literally did not notice that. But that wasn't a freudian slip, and I'm highly suspicious of anything freutian anyway, his theories are out of date remember?

An active player who isn't being helpful, thats why it's called 'fluff' instead of 'useful comments', at least he's trying to get something done.Because I've seen other people doing it, that's why. And what is that about me typing the word 'lying'? That is blatantly untrue. I'm beginning to see why people want to vote for you.