john cleese

i suppose he reminds me at least a bit of old JFK in that he beleives in truly liberating the country.

well gyl youve once again swayed me but the fact that (if this were happening), they aren't killing the individuals who revealed the conspiracy can be explained easily. They know these guys are looked at as nuts and wont play a very big role in forming popular views throughout the country, so to kill them would be unecessary and suspicious. I suppose it would also be less suspicious if they did blow up their own building, plus this building was looked at as more trouble than it was worth at the time.

i still dont know if i can give some of what you say credit. Just watch at 1:41:55 it talks about the north american union, an agreement that was made behind our backs, and watch until 1:47:56. No matter how much you dislike this movie, this segment i have selected is only 6 minutes. Now explain to me how this could all be made up. Please do Gyl, because im scared as hell. Edit: here's a link that is just as convincing as any of your references that argues that 911 was a conspiracy.

that guy isnt a knight, he's a lowly gaurd. Anyway great job on the vid. i would never have the patience for a stop motion film myself.

Im going to use an expression i rarely use and that is cool beans. I really like this thing, its very much what i would expect to see aliens driving for fun and recreation. I rather like the big headlights they would be useful when landing on a dark planet.

isnt this the guy who thinks we should get rid of fabulous institiutions like the UN. Nooo thanks.... Unless of course he would get rid of the fed reserve :-D (Just kidding)

i might accept a chip if it wasnt implanted, but i certainly wouldnt like something like that inside me. its weird science fiction social satire stuff that i would just like to stay the hell away from. Edit: Yeah im a teenager, and i cant be expected to know all this stuff. But Gyl youve almost completely disabused me of all these ideas, and now i beleive that this movies a real crock, except for maybe the religion part.

start watching from 1:14:09 and tell me how these guys are good. Infact it says that the economic instability of the time you mentioned is at the fault of j.p. morgan who put a rumor in the paper that a prominent bank in new york was insolvent, causing the public to make huge withdraws, which affected other banks. Then this Nelson Aldrich proposed a central banking institution to prevent a fiasco like that again. Now to me it seems like a smooth operation. Mainly i have to ask why would anyone make this up? If its because they are losers i'll have to study losers more carefully to get a better understanding of how they opperate. And for the last time i do not accept this movie as the gospel truth, but i give many of its implications the credit of being plausible and i fear and am disgusted by them. Gyl are you telling me youd want a chip implant that carried all your assets? or for canada to become part of the US? Canada as far as im concerned should keep its borders as they are and hold onto its values. Morally Canada is still ahead of America.

oh im serious that i accept this as plausible. Plausible, nothing more. I told you that thomas jefferson was against the federal bank seen at 1:14:28. Surely he doesnt necessarily beleive that the unscrupulous federal bank would be beyond killing massive numbers of people to further their wallets, would he? I take this movie with a grain of salt and i also take some of whats on cnn with a grain of salt, and whats on fox news with a whole shaker of salt. I suppose i dont beleive anything anymore except what is manifest, which is little. I just thought this movie contained some interesting information and that i should share it here. Ill admit while watching the movie i was scared as hell though, esp at the rdif chip part and your doubt has alleviated me somewhat so i thank you. never the less the federal bank is a scam and it wouldnt hurt to get rid of it under controlled conditions.

well let's look at what the real problem is. It's the damn federal bankers, those psychopaths i was speaking of earlier. I dont think you watched the whole thing, simply because it talks about how they are all too happy about the notion of all of north america (including canada) becoming a borderless supernation. This is why i said i would flee the jurisdiction. It also has an interview with a man who made freinds with one of the rockefellers and told him that eventually they were going to have everyone implanted with RDIF chips, allowing them to track your every move and if you go out of line, they'll turn your chip off discluding you from society. Aparently all your profit would be on this chip aswell, If this sounds too bizzare to be true, give me a break, they are already in all new american passports. By no means was i suggesting that we get rid of america, its a strong nation that has played a vital role throughout history, but to get rid of the federal bank which has been a real megablocks disturber since the 30's. The federal bankers even found reasons for america to enter wars that had nothing to do with them for profit, often funding both sides. When the countrys money is spent, you see, it makes them money as they dont simply print bills and give them to the country but rather loan them at interest. The founding fathers knew this would lead to a whole lot of debt and thomas jefferson said that a society with a federal bank is as good as enslaved. I beleive the children are the ones who are to afraid to even accept these notions as atleast plausible, turn a blind eye to them and decide to let nature take it's course. I for one dont necessarily think all this will happen or that all the conspiracies talked about in the movie are true but ill atleast give them credit. Besides this is a 2 hour long movie and if you watched it youd be at your window yelling "Im a human being god damn it and im mad as hell!" I did it. I really did. EDIT: As for 911 being a conspiracy, i personally found enough evidence of this in the film. One of the structural engineers himself said that the building was built to be able to endure a boeing smashing into it and another one said that it probably would have taken 4 or 5 planes just to knock down one building. Also i dont accept it as a coincidence that it fell just as it would in a controlled demolition and that collumns appeared to have been cut in the fashoin they would cut them i a controlled demolition. Infact i might not beleive that it was an inside job if they had done a better job, but they did a crap job. Also that guy who befreinded the rockefeller was told by him that they were going to have this big war against terror and the twin towers were going to come down and lots of people would die so they would support the war. The guy said to him "well isnt that wrong?" or something to that effect. In response rockefeller said "no, why should yo care about other people. You take care of yourself, you take care of your family and thats it." But i suppose these guys would have nothing better to do than make a little known 2 hour long movie about nothing and show it for free eh? Ps: the last paragraph of what you said, apparently it was offesive and well just not very polite and also made ridiculous insinuations. But why? thats the question. And what to make of this double post...

australia, ill probably flee the jurisdiction and end up there if any of this megabloks takes place.

ok so i recently caught this movie that is about questioning authority and talks about some pretty disturbing stuff, infact it seems the most powerful country in the world is run by psychopaths. zeitgeist Well i felt it was atleast my duty to share this with the small groups to which i belong. But do you think we have a hope in hell?

fine im done despite the moral outrages. Anyway something on topic zouave i doubt youll say yes after all those previous posts but can you be my whakee

As i said im dropping it i just want 4j to stop thinking im a slime ball. I regret even asking for that torso. Also 4j you have to understand im alot like larry david from curb your enthusiasm i get myself into this rough spots and keep digging myself in to a pit. Also i was airing my greivences because i didnt want everybody looking at 4j's post and saying that cleese is a slime ball. and as i mentioned i dont want 4j himself thinking that of me.

for god sakes i KNOW i wanted to do it, i still want to. I meant that my complaining about having to get her permission (a rule i forgot about) did not have the implication of getting around the rules. That was the hypothetical part. Ofcourse i want to whack her, it 's funny , but i know now that i cant and am happy to realize this and not post the vig. I did say to hell with it. edit: Really i just wanted to make a vig that made sense, as this one would've. Infact without that factor i found no reason to enter the contest. Now im just trying to convince you that this is just shtick not a grudge against cutlass iz. Also I'll admit that my post in the icecube tray thread was dreadfully offtopic and basically spam, but i hadnt even written a post before then that was as disrespectful as some of hers. Before i had been respectful while speaking my mind. A Edit: sorry i missed the part of your post where you stated and i quote "Why would she not let you just to piss you off." Well why wouldnt she let me go about my EB business instead of making condesending lectures and sarcastic comments towards me? How come when i sent her a PM to try to extend the olive branch she wouldn't reply back? Or reply when i mentioned that her comment on the ice cube tray thread had offended me? I asked you to serve as a moderating party so i could find out what she has against me but you didnt even get back to me. And now your accusing me of flaming her by having considered using her in my whack a fig vig?

nope you're misinterpreting the implications of my posts. I truly dont care if i cant whack her, its just funnier because i have recently expressed my anger towards her, which i assure you has disipated completely. I was saying its not fair i cant whack her because she wouldnt allow me to whack her, merely to piss me off i wasnt trying to get around the rules of the contest. Merely stating that her reasons for not letting me whack her would constitute hypothetical extenuating circumstances leading to the hypothetical exception of that rule in my own little perfect world. I mean that can't be too hard to beleive can it? Come to think of it probably it is. But i'm just going to say to hell with it all, it appears im creating a stir in the community. Please 4j your being a little harsh what with the eyerolls and the like.

well then zouave. You mentioned that youd like to whack me. Can i assume then that you wouldnt mind me whacking you?

no i'm not trying to carry out a personal agenda any more. I vented all my anger out in the ice cube tray thread. You know very well that she's not going to say i can whack her and i dont see why thats fair and why i need to get her permission to create this vig. Its just for comedic purposes and the whole reason i would want to whack her is because we know she wouldnt let me whack her. I'm not trying to carry out a personal agenda here i just want to whack someone and she's the best the candidate. I wouldnt be offended if everyone of you whacked my sigfig without my permission. Infact i'd love it if she'd whack old prof millenium (my sig fig), if anything i'd look at that as a nice gesture. Really 4j dont be upset with me, i've put this behind me, it's nothing more than a farce now. I also apologize for my discourse in regards to izzy on this forum lately.

you know they had a transformers movie in 1986. The plan was with transformers large fan base, the creators figured they could make a movie in which all the early transformers died, so the kids would want to buy the new series of transformers, (the heroes). All it did instead was make the kids angry that all their favorite transformers had been killed off. Needless to say they didnt buy the new line. heres a wiki on it.

oh it was in the library all along... *slaps forhead* :-$ yep thats the one.

The main reason i hate the new skellies is the same reason i boo'd bley. This sort of change creates inconsistencies in your collection. Say you want an army of skeletons, atleast 100, only problem is 50 are old skellies and 50 are the new ones. I wouldnt even want the new skeletons in 'my' army because the arms are too friggn long! I'm sure it wouldnt've been that hard for lego to just make the old skellie arms stronger. New skellies a definate *n* from me.

hey actually you know that first suggestion really was quite dumb. Anyway Hinkley i have some buisness i need to take care of could you email me a copy of a decal of that custom torso? I really want to enter and i think its obvious who i would be whacking. >:-) Also anybody fell free to whack me.

Mine is Francais Ford Copola's Rumblefish. It has a great psychological plot line, some interesting cinematography and the music is done by my man Stewart Copeland. Also mikey Rourke plays a really awesome role as the motorcycle boy. Definately check it out.

of course you can John cleese taking matters into his own hands since 1907

I love the story line, but this is the most unique ship moc i have seen yet. I find the lion figurehead is a really nice touch and its an overall flawless design. Egbert looks pretty full of himself for a guy named eggbert.