Fallenangel

Who you gonna call? Spambuster! - for reporting many, many spammers yesterday. Presumably awarded by either KielDaMan or Big Cam, since they were the last to take attention.

Come now, I'm sure I've stated before that a 'real' Executor (as opposed to a 'canon' Executor) would be 17.6km. 13-14 studs is still about right for a scaled Imperator, though.

The funny thing is that while the crew pit configuration in ILYA's creation is in fact accurate to that of the bridge of an Imperial II (kudos to that ), it differs significantly from that of the Executor's, which featured rows of crew pits arranged parallel to the command walkway as opposed to perpendicular. Now there are two simple ways to rectify this: - Add a console to the rear of the walkway (since the bridge was redesigned for Jedi) - Or more simply, call it something other than the bridge of the Executor.

Actually, they're brains in six-legged droid bodies, the latter of which resemble spiders.

Oh, of course! I don't know what we would have done if Brickdoctor hadn't already had a Plan C.

You mustn't leave out the part where we make costumes for all of our sigfigs. I've had that X-wing suit sitting in my garage for about six months now.

Are we under some sort of organized attack? Today I've seen maybe seven or eight spam accounts with their birthday listed as being around January 17 and their location as a random sequence of letters in the format 'usernameXX', such as this guy, this guy, this guy, this guy, this guy, and this guy. Searching for their usernames on Google reveals that most of them have made accounts on at least a dozen forums and been banned at least once. So far I've been reporting them as I see them.

In addition, I've been told that the company has granted bulk orders through the missing parts system without batting an eyelash. There's a possibility there.

I recall all of the capital ships in Battlefront being shrunken (for obvious reasons), so if one were to use the Imperial II model from the space maps as a ruler, it's possible that the Victoria could turn out to be larger.

It worked with Transformers, didn't it?

Others have recommended having old versions of LDD saved so that you can access parts in a previous release. Perhaps someone could be so kind as to provide links to said previous releases?

Hello, jonnyboyca! I had no idea you had been lurking on Eurobricks. Glad that you've finally made your first post. I blogged your creation yesterday after seeing it on Brickshelf. An impressive feat!

It's essentially this technique.

Don't see what good that will do. I think it's better we stay on topic. I've already taken this too far.

Yes.

Thanks for the clarification, Oky. Not really testing, just adhering to a norm established by AFOLs that are fluent in English (as I assume you are, having grown up in the U.S. with Dapper-D2). dWhisper of FBTB has always stressed this point (see here), and as a result his posts tend to be well-written and clearly understood. But we digress.

Perhaps it is intended to be able to serve as both. It appears to be a walker from which the legs can be easily removed (after which it becomes a starship).

'Collection' could just as well mean a collection of parts as sets, which is probably why Anio suggested that Oky clarify the title. I don't have anything against people attending ellipses often, but it does prove somewhat irksome when people on an online forum choose to end nearly every sentence they post with suspension points (or an excess of any punctuation, for that matter).

To my knowledge, it's simply something else that can be built from the parts. If it exists in the canon, I haven't seen it (though it does bear a passing resemblance to the AT-XT).

All sets I've bought are Star Wars, with the exception of one. But I don't buy very many sets, so that isn't saying much. Something obvious is being missed here. Sets that are significantly larger than minifigure scale are going to count more as parts than a MINI, even if each is only one set (biomass vs. population, if anyone here remembers that from secondary school ). Just wondering - why such frequent use of ellipses? It makes all of your ideas look unfinished, which can come across as poor posting to some.

At least one of them has been reverse-engineered as well.

See here. Remember the days of: @CaptainCRO: Everything after 9495 (excluding 9674-9676, since these have already been released) and probably after the Toy Fair next month, respectively.