Jump to content

Starwars4J

Banned Outlaws
  • Posts

    4,959
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Starwars4J

  1. I guess this goes here...anyway, it's fairly well done I guess. Though I prefer RBs fig X-D
  2. Actually, if you check the description we find out: And on the first page of comments: A little further down: Of course that last part is if you plan on obtaining the song legally :-P
  3. Not much to say...it's just amazing, if they can make the PT look good... :-P
  4. Well of course it is...however if children need to be told this...I'd rather think things aren't THAT bad :-P
  5. This is great! Actually, I really like that the R2 can slide off, it shows that happening in the movies, and up till now it has just been left out! What I don't like, however, is that the stickers are a different color than the bricks...I'm starting to get really fed up with these color problems! Also, what about the shooting mechanism? Does it go off easily when swooshing, or you don't have to be careful?
  6. Hm, that's really a stupid move with the instructions...I wonder how that came about *wacko* But this is a fantastic review! I can't wait for this set, and I'm glad my fears about the ring being fragile were wrong X-D Thanks for the great review!
  7. Also the thread in general here. No problem though, I'll close it. If anyone wants to discuss the set, feel free to in the thread I linked to :-)
  8. That begs the question, for the sets in America are they already eligible for the chrome C3PO if I were to find them next week?
  9. Actually Jamie, it ended up being sent to me. Because of where I live there was no shipping charge, so we ended up saving $40! But we have a long time before we need to finalize details. I didn't get any >:-( :-P That's probably why you didn't win, too :-D *yoda*'s new JSF X-D
  10. As soon as I finish posting here, I'm going to run to Community and find out just how this happened :'-( It's such an awesome fig! I can't believe how many head-tails there are, and they're layered like that! I don't think I've ever seen such a high-quality head mold *sweet* One question though: in the first picture on the left-hand-side you notice some of the brown appears to be lifted off a bit, is it like a brown fabric wrapped around the head, or just a trick of the lighting and angle? Damn you're lucky! :-P
  11. Well, I mean you're 17, but I guess that's close enough :-P And I said "often", not all of us are that way, but I don't know you well enough to make a call either way :-D But let's try to keep this on topic...
  12. This 21-year-old agrees :-P People my age, and younger often believe themselves invincible, and thus do some really stupid things. but that's all over the news, I don't really need to get into this. As for this woman, it's a horrible tragedy :-/ I guess she figured she'd be there for just a second...a really sad mistake :-( My condolences go to her family, and my prayers as well
  13. The serebii forums? Oh god, please tell me not there. Serebii (Joe) is a complete megablocks and steals everything he puts up, often claiming "You saw it first here!" The whole community is just...eh. You can find more competent communities for that stuff here. If you ever need help on something, just ask me.
  14. Edited in. And if anyone else adds theirs, I'll try to keep on top of it and keep editing the first post.
  15. Exactly! Now you have it! The two postulated futures are that either there is not enough gravity to keep everything together, and the universe expands forever, as matter spreads out thinner and thinner in the Universe. As this happens, the chance for stars to form becomes less and less likely, and eventually everything dies. The Universe becomes a cold void, with matter spread infinitely thin. Well that depends on how you define space. I define space as where you can move matter, or rather, where matter can move in. If you only account for space as that being what matter exists in, then how do you define a true void? Is it dimensionless? That can't be. But it does exist... This is more a matter (no pun intended) of common sense. Do you have mass? I think so! The quarks and leptons (not to mention the myriad of other subatomic particles...tacyons anyone?) are far more unproven. And electrons? We don't even know what electrons are! That's something they teach you in uni astronomy courses, we don't know what the hell we're talking about :-P Electrons are just modeled as regions of negative charge density, because that's what we can understand and it's simplest to work with. That isn't what it actually is though. What is it, then? I dunno, check back in a hundred years, maybe we'll know then ;-) Einstein has been wrong before :-P You're starting to see the flaw in your "the universe is infinite and so is matter" theory then. The universe has infinite capacity to expand, but as it does the matter becomes more thinly spread! There's a certain mass at which either the universe would continue to spread forever, or collapse back in on itself in the "Big Crunch". Currently it's measured that, taking everything into account, the Universe is at that critical mass, so at some point trillions of years from now, the Big Crunch will occur! One of the things i learned is that Scientists are some of the most Religious people you'll ever find, because they, themselves find it almost impossible to believe things are so precise and work out so neatly...that it could have happened on its own. But the numbers and data are there, and again, I can try to find it if you want. Rule 1 of academic discussions: Never use wiki as a reference. The only valid places are links to official Journal Articles. I can log onto wiki right now and make it so that 0=-7 :-D There's actually a proof for that, but it's ludicrous. The fact is that we're just humans. We're flawed. Every equation we have is flawed. E != m(c^2), it's just a very very very very very very good approximation. Our math systems are flawed. There are even holes in basic arithmatic, since you can PROVE 0.99~=1, but clearly it is 0.0~1 less than 1. That's how messed up the system is.
  16. Negative density refers primarily to metamaterials, and while everything is in a stage of how well it's known, that is a really grey area. There are no paradoxes in there. You can have infinite space without infinite mass, why couldn't you? I just don't see what contradicts :-P But matter and energy are the same thing... Not true at all. Saying that would be saying you can never have a vacuum, which we know isn't true. And I'm not talking about space, which isn't truly a vacuum, or the quantum particles that pop in and out of existence, it's entirely possible to have a true vacuum, which wouldn't be possible as no matter = no space according to you. Well besides that we have been able to calculate it anyway, we have a pretty good idea what both dark matter and dark energy are :-P I took a class in this stuff freshman year Hm...the astronomic community? :-D I'm afraid you've lost me there. Mass isn't myth. It CLEARLY isn't myth...unless you're saying that you, yourself, are just a myth. And that would be getting into philosophy, not astronomy X-D Could you provice some links to articles that talk about where mass presents a problem in physics? If you really want I can find one... Let me put it another way. Space CAN be infinite. The universe as we know it has a finite size, though it is expanding. Whether or not we have the critical mass is still a matter of debate (as currently it's been calculated to be EXACTLY the critical mass which is crazy when you think about it). And that's not even mentioning that the Universe as we know it is just one particular "bubble" with our own set of physical laws. Other bubbles have other ones. Er? Mass doesn't become more or less dense, density is a function of mass per area. And antimatter has nothing to do with anything. Antimatter is just normal matter with a reverse charge. It's really not all that mysterious, it's overall density in the universe is exceedingly low as our set of molecules (protons, neurtons, and electrons) outnumber by a huge margin their anti-selves. And the moment they're created they're usually annihelated when they run into their couterparts. Actually, as far as I'm aware that theory is as defunct as the string theory. Infinite is infinite. The spectrum of numbers from -1 to 1 is the same as -100 to 100, infinite. Think of it this way: infinity-1 is just as far away from 0 as infinity is.
  17. Of course ;-) I was quite a vet back in the day, and played a rather significant part in the downfall of Pokemonforever.com and the rise of serebii.net...though it was unintentional, as I really dislike serebii (he's a completely jerk) Friend Code: 2277-3147-9800 If you ever feel like talking about EV training or IVs give me a yell :-D
  18. Well actually nobody said that :-P Sure the Universe may be infinite, but nobody said the matter inside is infinite! In fact it can't be infinite if it once fit into something the size of a pin tip, since no matter how compact you make something, infinite matter will take up infinite volume! Even with my theory of overlapping prime particles that can have infinite density would need infinite volume for an infinite amount. That's why people throw around "infinite" too much, without stopping to consider the gravity of it (haha pun 8-| ). Well, actually the exact amount (mass) of all the matter in the universe has been calculated. Even the amount of dark matter and dark energy, the latter of which makes up the majority of the universe, has been calculated. Space is infinite. Time is infinite. Matter is finite :-) Could you explain what you mean by infinity has a measurement? And by the hypothesis you mentioned, do you mean the multiverse theory, the cycling of big bang and big crunch, or the epkyrotic theory?
  19. Hm...that makes me want to make a Han Solo wizard :-D He could be riding IN his bird :-P
  20. Hence my theory of there being a fundamental particle with infinite density that composed the universe prior to the big bang, which could be produced in black holes, or a similar macro-particle. Though of course since we only know of the existence of black holes, and know next to nothing about them (and likely won't for hundreds or thousands of years if we live that long), we can't say anything for sure. But it's fun to speculate, isn't it? :-)
  21. Now I'm curious... 8-|
×
×
  • Create New...