Scubacarrot

Aha! You must be scum!

That was again a joke. Laughing out Loud.

Because we can't vote yet, noob. I am still voting for Campbell, as it stands now.

It's called a joke. This is the part where you say: "Lol" or "" or "O.M.G. Gordon, you so funny."

Well, maybe you should have accused that someone .

You may also realize that there are also always a few scum that hide between the sheep. Maybe it's not a bad idea to keep poking the sheep. Or did one of your friends got poked? Small question: Why are you much less active and assertive than in the simulation. I can't have been the only one that have noticed it? I realize you were scum in there, but should it not have been changed the other way around? And you brag about it as being succesful while you have been doing it less...? What's up with that?

You should not stop, but maybe you should not be such a hypocrite. Just saying.

This does not make sense. You are able to read the PM chain, yes?

No. Why are you a bad lynch? What do we learn if you flip town? Come on man, help us out here! Even if you are lynched, don't give up, lead the town to victory, damn it. You are not yet lynched, man. As long as you are alive, you have the potential to be useful to us. Help us root out the scum, any way you can. Also remember it's not about personal life, the CREW is more important. THAT is the picture.

Right. So there are two candidates for lynching: Pewter and Ensign "Dakar" Campbell. I think we should do everything we can to at least get a lynch today, I doubt we will be in a good position if we keep not lynching. Not saying that lynching innocents is better, but you know what I mean . I am a bit hesistant still, though, since what if we are just directed to these two targets by the scum? If we focus too much on them, we might miss something obvious. Just saying. Alright, for what I said earlier: Pewter and Campbell. I am leaning towards Campbell, at the moment, I am very much awaiting his defense on this things. Pewter is always goofy in these sort of things, but this is obviously a bit too much. I think he is just trying to very much trying to catch scum in his own way. Not saying it's very effective, but there you go.

My vote is staying where it is, with Pewter. I don't know about you, but I think it looks like he is a scum of a second team trying to get in contact with another scum team. Why did he say his scum team had no killer? It's too specific. If he had just said: haha, I'm scum, it would have been fine, but he added this... And, as pointed out earlier, it's very easy to draw a paralell to this Japanese gang movie, it's quite good, there is a badass Ninja-grandma in it.

I'm confused.

18 in 37?

Uhm. Possibly...? If he is a jester, what would have happened if he is lynched: We have lost a third party player that was not going to be useful anyway, we would NOT have lynched a townie. But, we satisfied his win-condition, which does not negatively impact the town, but we obviously should not go out of our way for. But: what is the actual chance he is a jester?

I'll be honest, I don't think Mandel is scum, I think it would be very odd for a scum to go so front-line so soon, and without a (good?) case at that. I think he is just not playing a very smart game up until now. Where my vote is now, Campbell, is going to go away. He defended himself, and it was an actual sufficient defense, I think. Along with the words that someone mentioned earlier, splitting our votes between so many people only benefits the scum, I will: Unvote: Ensign Campbell (Dakar A) Now, there is only one viable target on the board for me, haha. If Rockford is telling the truth, we have catched a scum, I don't see why Ensign Pewter would be joking? Would it mean there are two scum factions? I very much want to hear from him: Vote: Ensign Pewter (Palathadric)

You don't present valid arguments, not saying you are dumb, but I'm just saying. And don't compare me with yourself. Really. I said that already. And it was not that, I'm not being useful like this, the longer I have to respond to this useless crap, the less I'm doing useful stuff. Obviously. Yes it is, you don't have any other arguments. Then think about! ? Uhm... no? Sounds like a personal problem. AGAIN you have not read. Go back, read, tell me what is wrong with this part. Go. Fine. First part you say you might have tunnelvision, indecisive, much, buddy? Can we be friends again? Until one of us dies, that is?

At least you are less impossible to talk to than some other people here. Go read again, that's not why I voted for you, gogogogo.

Seriously. You haven't read everything. Roles have been turned around, obviously. You really think we are facing the same thing as in the virtual reality? I don't think so. And with between 4 and 7 I mean the number of scum.

You quoted it in your last post.

Call me a jerk, a dick, you haven't responded to my question... Need I go on? I have been hearing anything from 4 to 7, I don't think such information is only useful to the scum, why would I have said it then? Also, it was not a compliment. So this point is wrong. Next. And you are saying your whole accusing of me is not metagaming? Don't make me laugh. And no, I don't think I have the need to be considered "useful". Play makes useful, talk not. Figure it out for yourself... You are reading too much into it because that's what you want. Where have I used that? I have been calling it stupid in every game , I think. No, I would never say something like that, it's pointless. And I considered it over, so I went over to do something useful. Obviously your expectations were wrong. There is not much I can respond to in this. I can say Thank You for the last bit though. Heh. You don't? Yes I do, I have explained why, you might want to read it, it's good . And what does "looking for a noob to vote off again" mean?? Also, why respond to all points if it is not convenient? It's not true though. If you had read more you would have seen that. Also, I expected a vote, come on, don't be shy, I can take it. Come on man, I don't want to respond to the same stuff over and over again, come with something better, or cut your losses and back off. I realize you don't want to seem scummy by suddenly backing off, but there you go.

Where have I said that??

How have I flipped? I don't see it..?

I see no reason to wait, we can unvote all we want, anyway, and there is enough time. I'm going to vote for Ensign Campbell, he has conviniently not read half my statement, and is (to me) quite obviously trying to form a bandwagon on me. He sees, with someone else, holes that don't exist. (repeated) Newsflash! How can you "know" someone's playstyle by a quarter of a game? Answer, you can't. I think there is a decent chance Campbell jumped on this oppertunity, unable to see how ridiculous the claim is, and misjudging Falcon, who is a veteran on this sort of thing, that he is supporting Mandel's accusation, while the truth is I hurt Falcon's feelings, which is why he will vote for me. Vote: Ensign Campbell (Dakar A)

Yeah right, read the bottom part of my statement. Smartass.

Okay. I am the dick now. That's fine. Have YOU actually said anything useful yet? There is enough chatting about haircuts (you should not say anything in that regard, really, yours is terrible) and other nonsense, the slight hint of seriousness when you raised suspicion over something trivial: namely the timepoint when someone send you a PM. Which you disregarded when it was explained right away. Can I ask what your actual problem with that thing was in the first place? And not seeing the point of made up accusations and pointless jokes that aren't funny is not being a dick. If the jokes were funny, maybe. But they are not. Just saying. You calling people out on being a dick, however...