Vincent Denis

*Fwom fwomma fwom fwom* Great, thank you. If I'm a misguided townie, what about my behavior suggests being misguided? I'm not challenging you. I'm asking an honest question to help me, and hopefully everybody, gain some perspective here. *Fwom fwomma fwomma fwom*

*Fwom fwom fwom fwom* What does that have to do with it? You're saying you brought up PMs first and that I was lying about doing it, when it's clear I brought up PMing other people first. *Fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom*

*Fwom fwom fwom fwom* You are the one lying. (Emphasis added) Why would you lie about this when, as you've said, everybody can see it? *Fwooooooooooooooooooooom fwoooooooooooooooooooom fwooooooooooooooooooooom fwooooooooooooooooooom*

*Fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom* I'm not even saying you're lying about it. I said it could be true as town or scum. Regardless, you have only commented on the people pushing/not pushing for a lynch and Daniel distracting everyone from an effective scum hunt. I agree with you there! But are you getting anything from the other discussion? Can you go through the thread and just skip his posts? Well, one of them has to come first. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I raised valid suspicions about Andrew, Justin and you without it having anything to do with Daniel. Yes, my suspicion is enhanced by the fact that he's doggedly defending you. Do Ctrl + F on any page and you'll see Andrew's name mentioned many, many more times than he's actually posted. There's a lot of discussion revolving around Andrew, who hasn't really said all that much. Or maybe he has, it's just hard to tell relative to Daniel. When someone is defending someone you're suspicious of, it's worth looking into and as you've mentioned, it's really really hard to look in this particular case. I wish we would've lynched the quietest, most flying-under-the-radar on a ship called The Enterprise but we didn't and that person turned out to be an incredibly patient scum. Sorry for the emoticon, we're missing a pirate wacko and that's what I needed for this. You're not doing yourself any favors by not reading the thread, even if it is due to the Daniel headaches, but you're not even reading your own words? Flying under the radar is one thing. Townies have valid reasons for doing so. But paying such little attention to the day thread indicates you have your focus on night activities. Quietly for migraine sufferers: *Fwom fwom fwom fwom* A question for everybody: Do any of you understand what Daniel even suspects me for? He says he caught me in half a dozen lies but hasn't clarified, he says I filled almost a whole page with videos/memes where I posted one, accusing me of being distracting. I'm not only seeing him as tunnel-visioned, but desperately pushing with lies now. Why would someone do this? I apologize if this sets him off again, but these are things I think are worth pointing out to everyone and getting some opinions and I hope we can discuss it without Daniel text-wall-bombing us. *Fwom fwomma fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom*

*Fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom* It'd be helpful if you shared your thoughts about both of them. If you're looking for an explanation, why are you voting? How many people are suspicious of Andrew at this point? I know Jean has mentioned being suspicious of him. I'm clearly suspicious of him. Joshua's actions are scummy, period. His statement about people pushing for a no-lynch, that actually weren't doing so, seems like someone trying to do enough to appear active and even getting that wrong. Jean is pointing out that Andrew's vote for Michael wasn't directly drawing attention to Joshua and thereby giving himself cover with the coin flip to justify a vote and still not directly implicate Joshua. I think Joshua is scummy enough on his own and I think Jean's case that Andrew was choosing Michael on purpose is an elaborate stretch, but it has merit. This is the type of discussion we actually need to be having. We haven't lynched anyone yet and it's day 2. We really need to get it together here. I'm applying more caution to lynching Andrew because if I'm wrong, he's clearly a smart player and we need smart townies. If Joshua is town, I'm not saying he's not smart. Just the attempt at flying under the radar makes him seem less useful. *Fwom fwomma fwomma fwom Fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwomma fwom fwom*

*Fwomma fwomma fwom* Looking back over the day thread, this pings me: I'm not sure why but I figure it was worth pointing out. If I feel something, maybe somebody outside the interaction can help me pinpoint it. I'm trying to think of when I've tried to prove myself to another townie in a game. I think I typically try to prove myself to all townies, not just one. The word "trying" gets me too. I envision this "trying to prove I'm a proactive townie right up until the last day when I'm the smart scum nobody else suspected. Mwahahaha." Aha! This pings me because it's a true statement no matter what side he's on. Town or scum, he's going to keep trying to prove that he's a proactive townie. Yeah. I don't like it. *Fwom fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom*

*Fwom fwom fwom fwom* Now that he's done for the day, let's take a look at the people who are hiding behind Daniel's walls of text. Joshua, who has a few votes for him, came in and said he hates arguing because it has the potential to give him headaches. While I believe this is true, it's also an easy spot for him to pop up, seem a little active, and then coast by as Daniel continues to fill page after page with his ramblings. You can hate arguments, get headaches and still be scum. Justin has also disappeared after coming in and voting for me. Again, this is an "under the radar" position that is easy enough to validate with all of the nonsense and chaos occurring around Daniel. He's already told us he's reading every post and choosing not to chime in. Both of these guys could easily be sitting back and watching the fireworks, happy to have some cover for them to continue to fly under. We also have Fabien, Peter and Alex not being very active. Anybody could be taking advantage of the atmosphere that's been created, and I take ownership of my part in it. I'm doing my best to correct that. I'm not for lynching a claimed town power role, even if it from someone whose posting style is causing chaos. He says he trusts everyone I'm accusing because "everything they've said is concise." And I still don't understand exactly what he finds scummy about me. It's possible he's a scum jailkeeper, but I'm just not sure scum would go after a townie (me) so hard two days in a row. The most troubling thing is that he picks apart everybody who questions him and puts Andrew, Justin, Joshua and Fred into the town column for being concise. Is concise a town tell? I guess I do have one question for Daniel, you said you've caught me in half a dozen lies. Where? I'm town and everything I've posted is true. I haven't lied about anything. I'd appreciate some concise clarification on this. Thanks. *Fwomma fwomma fwom fwom Fwom fwom fwom fwom Fwomma fwomma fwomma fwomma fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom*

*Fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwom fwom fwom* It's hard to tell which two jerkoffs you would be referring to as you've insulted everyone who has questioned you. And your volume of posting makes it difficult to find sense anywhere. I made exactly one meme post. You made more meme/video posts than I did. How exactly would I dilute your argument with other people calling you unhelpful? I lack the ability to make other people call you things. Daniel, do you think Andrew, Justin, Joshua and Fred are all town, because I've voiced suspicions about them? Are you defending all of the people I specifically suspect? If that's your reasoning, you're still in the rose garden because I'm town. I'm a loyal soldier. I'm not scum. Trusting all of the people one person is suspecting is a bad tactic. Do you think someone playing scum would only voice suspicions of townies? *Fwom fwomma fwommma fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom*

*Fwom fwom fwom—:look: wait, what? I'm sorry. This strikes me as hilarious. If Alex was targeted by a jailkeeper, the only action that would've targeted him and been unsuccessful would be killer. Are you asking if anyone tried to kill Alex last night? *Fwom fwomma fwomma fwom Fwom fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwom fwom fwom*

*Fwom fwomma fwom fwom* Good thing for me, everybody loves the tuba! Ah, crap. Now I'm going to metagame who I think it is and that would give me pause to vote for Joshua as I often misunderstand how he expresses himself. Metagaming is really dangerous in an anonymous game, though. But now I'm starting to chalk the absence and statement about people pushing for a no-lynch to who I think it is. Not enough to unvote yet, but it's got my gears turning in a different direction. Believe me, I know what it's like to be on the other side of Daniel's constant yammerings. From that I can come up with my own reason, but I'd like to hear from you why you're not voting for him if you'll probably vote for him. And who else might you vote for? Most of what you've said is that Daniel is not helpful and you think Fred is also scummy. I agree with both of these takes, but what else is on your mind. Join us outside of the Daniel tunnel. *Fwommma fwomma fwom fwom fwom Oh everybody loves the tuba! Fwomma fwom fwom fwom Yeah! Fwom fwom Everybody! Fwomma fwomma fwom fwom*

*Fwom fwom fwom fwom* Ouch. I will take that to heart. If you think my style is more annoying then it's time for some introspection. I'm not at all sure how to vote today. I think we're onto something between you, Justin, Daniel, Fred, Joshua. It may not be you, but something's there. Thinking you're a proactive townie or a skilled scummo, and not knowing which, doesn't compel me to vote for you right now. As for Justin, at the beginning of the day, I'd prefer to have voted for him. His response does give me pause, despite it being 10% OMGUS. I still see contradictions, but that could be a communication difference. Despite what he said about leaving his vote on Joshua to keep everyone talking, he did follow that up with what I can see as a valid reason. You and Justin have this cloud hovering over you as Daniel defended you and you can be seen as defending him today. However, Joshua posting that he was worried about people saying they didn't want a day one lynch–and there not being anyone who said such a thing–may be the scummiest thing said in this game so far. If he were to be lynched and flip scum, I still don't think there'd be a clear picture of your alignment, but I would question Justin more about why he didn't respond to the scummy things Joshua said after he did show up. Joshua's actions seem like lazy scum hoping to fly under the radar and not even paying attention to what's actually being said, like he skimmed activity to find something to respond to and even got that wrong. More than anything, I find myself annoyed with this entire game right now. I won't go into why as I'm sure you can imagine why, but hopefully I can spend more time looking at the big picture now. And play my tuba. It helps me think. *Fwom fwomma fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom. Fwomma fwomma fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom*

*Fwom fwom fwom fwom* I missed that at first, but upon reading the thread over again, it struck me as well. You responded about it while I was reading. That is an odd response to your suspicions about Andrew and Joshua. Andrew was my first vote yesterday and the example Jean points out is not his only "petulant child"-type post. I'm putting that in quotes so it's clear it's about the feeling I get from his game play and I'm not insulting Andrew as a person. Similar to how I feel about Justin leaving his vote on Joshua, Andrew ignores all concerns about his poke voting and barrels forward like the suspicions don't matter. It's like he's worried only a scum would drop their tactic when questioned. This is a smart tactic for scum. Seem proactive and allows him to spread votes out. This could also be a proactive townie who is sure of his ways and he prefers to barrel through BS, which would be fine. I have other concerns about Andrew. I've said all along there seems to be something between Justin and Andrew. Daniel came in to defend them and to me, it looks also like Andrew is defending him in return. This is Andrew's response to Daniel's PMs. His only response is a defense of Daniel PMing people he doesn't trust. Andrew, in your past endeavors to killer intruders, did you ever PM someone you didn't trust and say "Hey, let's work together?" Is this another poke vote? The reasoning you give could be applied to everyone but you, if you are town. Why Joshua as compared to all of the other soldiers you wouldn't be sure of? Are you going to poke vote all of us? The hefty glass of WIFOM in the "I could have not started out the whole voting..." because scum would never poke an inactive scum buddy, right? Andrew has told us he has a lot of experience and this seems like he's setting something up. "Oh, they're all 3 town, they're all 3 town, the way they're arguing, they're town, they're town, they're town... Maybe Vincent is scum, though." And why me? And here he allows the seed to start to grow a bit. Oh well, now I've found a reason in the new thing Vincent said. Let's lynch him. Yes, I realize he didn't say that...yet. And then why I flip town, does he encourage everyone to go for Aiden next? Because this looks like Andrew trying to keep the heat off of Daniel and yesterday Daniel started his whole case against me when I said I was suspicious of Andrew and voted for him. Why are these two defending each other? Again, Andrew seems pretty dangerous if he is scum. If these are scum tactics, they seem like they can easily blend in with active townies. He hasn't blatantly come out and defended Daniel but looking at his actions, that could be the motive. How do you feel about Alex and Fred today? Why did you lynch preferences take a back seat to Joshua? I find the potential connection interesting between Andrew and Joshua. Andrew's vote could be WIFOM. Joshua's only contribution yesterday was saying that two people were against a lynch that actually weren't. Neither Justin nor Andrew have pointed this out in talking about Joshua's contributions and that's the scummiest thing Joshua has done. Justin says he's still suspicious of him because he didn't say much but makes no mention of what he did say. I'm still suspicious of Justin and Andrew but let's see where this goes: Vote: Joshua Levitt *Fwomma fwomma fwom fwom Fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwooooooooooom fwoooooooooooom* *Fwom fwom fwom fwom* I forgot about this one. Like he's pre-justifying lining up townies for the lynch. *Fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwomma fwom fwom*

*Fwom fwom fwom fwom* I admit I play like your children and have for years. It's been a long time since I had someone I felt I needed to keep responding to, but look at most of what I'm saying to him yesterday. The idea that I knew it wasn't helpful is not a new one. I said it repeatedly to him yesterday, I said it via PM when he contacted me after the day ended. I said it yesterday, I'll say it again, a lot of my responses were mafia school mode and I was trying to get him to be a productive townie. After his PMs and the lying today, I'm not responding to his accusations, I'm accusing him. I agree with you that the town can afford to lose players along the way. My fear isn't that I'll be lynched or killed, it's that Daniel will vomit 10s of thousands of words into every day thread and continue to make it unreadable, confusing, and if he's town, keep giving the scum the ability to sit back behind it. Hell, even if he's scum they can hide behind it. I'm trying to play the game outside of my squabble with him. The boy is an energy vampire. Look at how many of my posts yesterday, especially towards the end of the day, are me trying to get him to see that his posts aren't helpful. I am trying to be much more concise today so as not to continue to contribute to it. *Fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwomma fwom fwom*

*Fwom fwomma fwom fwom* These are literally your words. You used killer as a verb and referred to the scum as intruders. So they're not words I put in your mouth so much as they are words you put in your own mouth. If this is your view, then Daniel's insistence on getting answers from several people despite us answering them, repeatedly, should make him the king scum in your eyes. Your reason for voting for me seems to be solely based on me asking for clarification on what I see as inconsistencies in your statements and answers. I'm not scum so my intention is not to get you to appear any certain way, I'm trying to discern your intentions. The perceived inconsistencies and parroting of Andrew ping me. If you could humor me for a second, in what ways has a poke vote gotten other players talking more in previous games? What about it works, in your experience? *Fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom*

*Fwom fwom fwom fwom-fwom-a-ram* Great question. I have thought a lot about Daniel's actions last night and his lies about them today. He only admitted he lied when I asked others to confirm his story. I find Fred very scummy and he's voting for Daniel which threw me off. Thinking about it, if Daniel was directed by his scum team to contact me and try to smooth things over and/or get a role claim out of me, then they are likely disappointed by the results and would be able to see that his lying might get him lynched. So, Fred and Daniel can conceivably be on the same team and Fred is doing his best to distance himself by voting for Daniel early. My biggest concern continues to be Justin, who Daniel jumped in to defend yesterday. I am not ready to vote as I'd like to see how more people respond to what is happening here. Justin, while I was composing my reply to you, posted even more pings for me. Weird that you left out your actual reason from your self-quote. Here's your full quote: Yet, you only quoted the part about not wasting a chance to killer one of the intruders. So, you're saying that your vote was to killer Joshua, who you believed to be an intruder? But, if you thought he was an intruder, you never responded to anything he posted. You thought he was an intruder for not posting up to the point where you voted for him? As Jean demonstrated, Andrew was trying to keep mention away from Joshua. You seem to be distancing yourself from him, are you and Tweedledee on the same team with Joshua? Your followup reason says nothing of killering an intruder, nor does it make mention of Andrew's actual reasoning for poke-voting Michael. How was your knowledge of foresight so keen that you would poke-vote a player who hadn't posted and it would get other people talking? None of your reasons for your vote on Joshua make any sense. I don't buy that you voted for Joshua to get everyone besides him to talk. It sounds more like I was right on with my idea that you were just trying to appear useful and didn't unvote Joshua when I pointed out you hadn't, so you wouldn't seem on the defensive. Truly, the idea that keeping your vote there would cause more discussion is likewise ludicrous. And Daniel has certainly swooped in to defend you and Andrew. He posted twice about you being "straightforward" and "right on." And you don't find his defense of you odd? Point taken and I apologize for misunderstanding your last line about Joshua. As I've said, I don't expect anyone to read these walls of text and have tried, several times, to point that out to Daniel. Daniel throwing a wall of text at every syllable I utter is distracting for me too. I responded to a lot of what he said because I'm trying to point out the ridiculousness of his accusations to others and if he's town, the ridiculousness of his behavior to him. I am trying to be more concise. I know these walls of texts aren't helpful for the town as I've said repeatedly. And while your explanation of poking Joshua further so he doesn't try to stay under the radar makes more sense to me, you gave two reasons in that post that you quoted: Your poke vote was meant to get everyone talking, as I've said, makes no sense. And you say you won't remove it because people are still talking. And while you finally give a sound reason for leaving your vote on Joshua in your last statement, you say above that that you think a more suitable candidate will present himself. So, you don't think Joshua was a suitable candidate? And what do you think of his activity today? What has he done since then to convince you he's not trying to lay low? *Fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwomma fwomma fwom fwom Fwooooooooooom Fwooooooooooooooom Fwooooooooooooooom*

*fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom* I don't trust him enough to put him in the definite town column, but if the three people I suspect and find the scummiest–you, Justin and Fred–all voted for him yesterday, how would you expect me to think of him as scum too? *Fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwomma fwomma fwoooooooom fwoooooooooom* *Fwom fwom fwom fwom* I agree with everything you're seeing here. It also is worth noting that Justin never gave us any further opinion on Joshua after he showed up. If he truly wanted to get him talking out of concern that he would try to remain silent, he didn't discern anything Joshua said after showing up. And Joshua didn't give me any solid read as a townie. I want to know what's going on with these three as well, but I think Justin would be the better place to focus than Joshua. *Fwomma fwomma fwom fwom Fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwooooooom fwooooooom*

*Fwom fwomma fwomma fwom* Followed by six bullet points of suggestive questions. I'd answer them but I hear they are twisting. Here's an explicit question for you-what is the real reason you PMed me? I don't believe it was because you wanted to ask about the tuba playing. Why would you consider claiming to me (nice soft claim, by the way) if you have so many pings and reasons to not trust me? If I was the person you trusted least on day 1, why would you come to me on night 1 trying to build trust? As far as my motivations, the conversation is out there for everyone to see. I'm town so if anyone else has explicit questions about my behavior, I'll answer them. But I won't let you twist my words with paragraph after paragraph of implicit questions. *Fwomma fwomma fwom fwom Fwomma fwomma fwomma fwom*

*Fwoom fwoom* Why would I repeat what is still there for you to read? You say you lied about talking to other people to protect yourself from me killing you when I was the one who brought up PMing other people. You say I said Aiden was 100% OK when I clearly did not. You propose that I wasn't afraid of being killed when I was copying our PMs to someone in case I ended up dead. Are these points just inconvenient for you? Why no acknowledgment. Let's add to the list you said I was fishing for your role. Where did I do that? I'm glad you see my point about Fred. However, Aiden is not the only one to talk about a policy lynch, that is basically Robin's point as well. It's striking how neither Robin nor Fred mention the points that would make you scum; PMing me to ask to work together and then lying about PMing other people and then lying about your reasoning for lying about PMing people, and generally being confusing and distracting—because you are, regardless of alignment. It's like they lean on believing you are town while voting. There's something between Andrew, Justin, Robin, Fred and you. I lean the most town, now-since much more has happened since I said I lean the most town on Daniel, on Jean (watch him be the actual scum) so throw Joshua into the mix too. Do I think there are six scum in the game? No. My point is, somebody in there is scum and maybe two or more who got wrapped up in all this bullshit. *Fwoooma fwom fwooooooma fwomma fwommma fwom fwom fwom fwom*

*Fwom fwom fwom fwom* OK, so the song you requested had already been requested twice, Mr. Dumont. This is the third time you've voted the same as the person who posted above you. And you're voting along with the person you stood by your vote for yesterday against the person you agreed with at the end of the day. What changed in the mean time that your reads are opposite? You stood by your vote that Robing was scummy for voting for an absent player, then he came in and voted for Daniel—and Daniel is right about Robin's vote, he doesn't call him scum, he almost leans towards town—and now you're voting for Daniel. But yesterday you agreed with Daniel's reasoning and changed your vote from Robin to Aiden, despite your conviction that voting for Robing was a good vote. The only thing that swayed you from this vote you stood by was Justin and Daniel, who you're now voting for. You make no sense. Also, Daniel has posted twice now ignoring my accusations. Interesting how he demands responses to his suspicions but when he's accused, he turns tail and hides in the corner. At least he's shut up for once. *Fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwoooooooom fwooooooom fwooooooom*

*Fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwom* Besides my tuba blaring, there's a disturbing silence... Hey, guy who flips out ten seconds after everything I say, how come an hour has gone since I made two posts pointing out your contradictions, and you've got no response to me? *Fwom fwomma fwomma fwom, Fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom*

*Fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom* With apologies, please just skip this if you're already tired of hearing from Daniel and me, but here it is: (The subject of the PM he sent, by the way, is "hey douche." which is what I called Andrew yesterday) It is at this point I start PMing someone else, copying the conversation, along with the discussion "Is this guy scum after all or just insane??" Also I thought this was your call and I've gave my honest response to it. You are the one believing me that I'm town. If this is the case, your best shot at this moment is to utilize it. As you can see, unlike what Daniel has told you, I was the first to bring up PMing other people about me. I actually told him to PM every player. You can also see that he said he'd already been PMing people. Seems less like he's trying to keep himself safe from a potential scum kill and more like he's saying he's smart enough he doesn't need my advice. As you wish means he loves me. Maybe that's the real issue here. And that was the end of it. I copied all the messages to another player and asked them to post them for me if I ended up dead in the morning. My deepest apologies for skirting so close to turning day 2 into a repeat of the day 1 Daniel & Vincent show. Daniel's contradictions are pinging me and I think it's important people see them. *Fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom*

*Fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom* Would you prefer I write a play???? I checked the party foul list and saw no such indication. Can you clarify @Bob? If you want, I can quote the whole PM conversation. But does anybody really want that? Do you really want to hear more between me and Daniel? I tried to explain to him our squabble was most likely dismissed and was distracting and confusing. He clearly doesn't get it. Either way, I'm willing to post it all here should anybody ask to see it. Just be careful what you wish for. It's the same thing as yesterday. Me trying to explain to him that his posts aren't helpful and him circling back to his same blabber. As I found Andrew suspicious yesterday, I'm much more interested in what Jean is saying about Joshua and Andrew. How does Justin fit it, Jean? Because he seems scummy along the same lines, sprinkled with a little bit of Fred. I was really hoping to not go through another day of bickering with Daniel. Your undies are in a huge bunch, dude. Jean is correct. You're saying I threatened to reveal it the next night, but I said in the new day thread and I did exactly as I said I would. Wasn't the first warning in our conversation where you told me it was my best shot to work with you? And don't you worry about what I thought you might be up to. I copied every one of our PMs to someone and asked them to post them if I ended up dead. You were PMing me long before the night action deadline. No. Absolutely not. My job is the tubist. You soldiers may get all the noble work of killing pirates and getting eaten by islanders and shooting things but my job is tubist and it is a noble job to blow everyone and I take great pride in it. I cry "bullshit" on your inability to read around it as you've never complained about the drummer in the last game, the bugler in this game, what's-his-bucket who thought he was a novelist in the last game. But, the tuba's scummy? No. I shall proudly continue to play my tuba in every post as long as I'm in the game. I don't believe you PMed me only to find out about the tuba playing. I don't believe you told me you had PMed other people so that I'd be afraid to kill you (which I don't have the ability to, by the way. I'm town and not the vigilante) because I told you to PM other people and ask them if they agreed with you about me and you responded that you were so smart you had done so without my suggestion. So, nothing you're saying adds up. Why are you lying so much? This one's for you, Daniel: *Fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwomma fwooooooooom fwooooooooooom fwooooooooooom*

*Fwom fwom fwom fwom* OK. So you lied in answer to my question about why you suddenly trusted me enough to ask me to work with you? Town lie to people they think are scum, yes. But why would a townie lie about this? Most of the conversation didn't revolve around my tuba-playing as you claim your real intent with PMing me was. Most of it was me trying to figure out why you were asking the person you found the most suspicious to work with you. Your story now makes even less sense. Not only did you trust me the least, you said you were sure you were right on me and were positive I was working on the information that I knew who was who. Now, all of your actions are not adding up. At all. I don't care to spam up the thread with another marathon argument with you so I'll wait to see what others think of this new information. *Fwom fwom fwooooooooooom fwom fwom fwoooooooooom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwomma fwoooom fwooooom fwooooooooooooom Fwom Fwom!

*Fwomma fwom—:hmpf: In reality what I said was: Doesn't sound like "his points were 100% okay" to me. Now you think it's scummy to not play the tuba in PM? Good God, if I played the tuba in a PM, I'd be in desperate need of in-home care. I'm the tubist! I'm playing the tuba! I'm following along with this guideline from the host: Why is that so hard for you to comprehend? My bullshit meter is off the charts with this. Biggest ping from you yet, Mr. Lucas. *Fwom fwomma fwom fwom Fwomma fwomma fwom fwom Fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom*

*Fwom fwom fwom fwom* Remi didn't even vote yesterday. He questioned Andrew about his post that seemed to suggest we might not have any night actions. Then he asked for clarification from Jean regarding his vote for Justin, saying Jean looked scummy for suggesting allowing others to change our viewpoints was scummy. Fred jumped to the quick conclusion that scum targeted Remi because he wasn't likely to be watched or protected. I'm assuming that's what Fred meant. Were the scum trying to implicate Jean or Andrew? Or was Remi onto something with Jean or Andrew? Speaking of Mr. Dumont: This pinged me yesterday that you would twice mention standing by your vote in the same post in which you changed your vote. Especially echoing the word's of scummy Justin and blabbering Daniel, neither of which I felt had compelling reasons for voting for Aiden. Daniel might, but I don't have much luck in discerning what he's saying in his massive posts (I know that people who live in wall of text houses, shouldn't throw walls of text...). But, with few hours left in the day, you twice voted for who the person a couple posts above you had voted for, all while touting your desire to have a day 1 lynch. As Peter Lyon pointed out, you broached this topic and then waited for others to respond before sharing your own opinion. Then re-iterated that opinion with almost all of your posts. The reasons you stated for your votes seem more like someone looking for wagon momentum than having their own reasonings. Justin, I asked you questions at the end of day 1 and I'd appreciate a response that goes beyond "I got people talking," please. *Fwooooom fwom fwommma fwom Fwoooom fwoooooooom fwoooooooom fwomma fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwom Fwooooooooooooooooooooooooooom!*