THELEGOBATMAN

It's not a "snobby" comment, you made it seem like not only you knew the guy, but like you were also sure about his credibility - where in reality he dropped a false claim and deleted his account.

Definitely, but how about this: The day we get this episode we'll speculate about the things we could get as sets or characters that we want to get

There goes the "leaker" who "has been leaking products of MCU movies all day (wandavision included) and also has been leaking info about WV that came to be true (other marvel movies as well)". Another day, another false rumour. We really need legit info, don't we?

Movie releases in July, not very likely.

I mean D2C seems like a possibility tbh, and if not, then perhaps a retailer exclusive. Either way if you think he's reliable I trust it for now, hope it actually happens.

Then follow #legoleaks, not Eurobricks - it's a place for discussion about information, not information itself.

Not very smart of you then. DC is taking a much different path from MCU, which you consider invalid... because it's not like MCU? MCU has thus one cohesive, shared universe - everything is connected there, and not only that, everything's makes perfect sense there and you know exactly what is going on. DC, on the other hand, tried that with DCEU - but a few movies later Snyder singlehandedly not only made DCEU in desperate need of a fresh start, but also nearly destroyed whole DC as a movie business. After the major disappointment known as Justice League, they decided to go in ither direction - instead of having a shared universe, just focus on making good movies. Aquaman, Shazam!, Joker or Birds of Prey were all successful, one way or the other. Now if they still had a shared universe, there would be no place for a movie like Joker (which not only won 2 Oscars, but was also the first R rated movie to cross 1B in box office). Look me in the face (metaphorically), and tell me that The Suicide Squad, The Batman, Black Adam, The Flash, Shazam! Fury of The Gods, Aquaman 2, Wonder Woman 3, with a handful of other movies which undoubtedly are being banned as of now, not to mention TONS of HBO Max projects they have right now is not a plan.

I mean with DC finally having a plan for their movies, the future of DC itself is bright. We just have to hope that Lego decides to make sets for those movies - Shazam is a perfect movie for a Lego set, yet they didn't make even one.

I'm not saying I'm not writing a lot on this forum, but have you, for example, considered... I dunno... turning off email notifications?

There are a few obstacles - it won't do extremely well. Also, it's R rated, so a polybag is not a possibility (unless Lego changes their whole policy just to give Snyder fans a polybag).

No. It's an assumption made by MandR, but he wasn't sure who that last minifgure was.

https://t.co/WHA4DZH8wY https://t.co/Ujrt29p3JE Look at the screens. The Halloween costume wasn't teased, it was officially revealed. This is what a tease looks like.

Wanda's new suit is not a spoiler, as it was officially teased by Disney. Something that's officially revealed by the company that makes this something cannot be considered a spoiler.

That's what I was trying to tell him, but he kept writing about how it could make sense because something and something. They can take inspiration from a movie, but not only does it rarely happen, but there's also literally no way they'd make sets like this before the movie itself comes out.

It started with someone writing something about SM3 sets (you know, the 3 $20 ones), and then @Falconfan1414said something about "that we just assume" these are SM 3, implying that these 3 sets might not be SM3 sets after all. And then @Scarilian started wringing essays about how these sets might be loosely connected to SM3, but not entirely based on them and how they got delayed and so on and so on.

I'd like to believe this, but there are too many wannabe "leakers" looking for their 5 second of fame out there. Seeing as @Legofania has only 40 posts on Eurobricks, I assume it's fake until proven otherwise.

Okay, I'm officially done with you. I have no idea how to further explain things that are this simple to you. You don't believe me, fine, I couldn't care less. People on this forum know me. They also know CM4Sci. They don't need a direct link to that tweet, just as I don't ask @Guyon2002 or @Falconfan1414 for direct links to where they got their information.

No problem

Sorry, I didn't make that clear enough. I meant that I agree with you, and that the suit is not based on PS4 suit.

There's a difference between a source and a link to where that source said something - the source is CM4Sci, a reliable leaker. What part of "I don't want to ever see Wanda without her headpiece again" and "you won't have to" don't you understand? It clearly implies that she will get a new costume with the headpiece, and that's why "you won't ever have to see her without it". It's really simple. Also, stop with the Wanda appearing in SM3 sets - if it happens, I promise I'll delete this account the day the info comes out. In what other D+ shows could she appear? Falcon and Winter Soldier? Hawkeye? Give me a break.

I mean Insomniac's classic suit is not really special (like Homecoming or TASM 2 suits), it's just supposed to be a perfect representation of Spidey's most classic suit.

Great minfigure. Kind of a bummer that the set is 4+.

I mean by that logic he could say that Spidey from Homecoming sets is also based on PS4 Spider-Man, as the suit appears in it. There's a difference between being based on something and using elements from something. For example last year's Iron Man or Captain America are based on SE video game. This year's Doc Ock takes elements from PS4 video game. Jesus, why did you become such a pain in the neck recently? It's pretty obvious that he deleted this tweet after releasing that he said something he wasn't supposed to (as it's a leak), but here you go: https://www.google.com/search?lr=&hl=en-PL&as_qdr=all&q=Don't+worry+she+will+get+it+if+what+heard+about+some+LEGO+stuff+is+true+"Don't worry,+she+will+get+it+if+what+I've+heard+about+some+LEGO+stuff is true"&spell=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjPxPanyOnuAhWFjYsKHZIfAwgQBSgAegQIAhAC&biw=412&bih=718 (it doesn't say CM4Sci wrote it but it's the best you'll get). Also, yes, it's obvious that he's talking about a new suit: Charles Murphy says that after the Halloween episode, he never wants to see Wanda without the headpiece again, to which CM4Sci replies "If what I've heard about Lego is true, you won't have to". Now the only time we saw Wanda with a headpiece was the Halloween episode, but there's no way she's gonna keep it, as it was a one-and-done type of suit. That means that the only way we'd see her with that headpiece again is her getting a new upgraded suit with it. By saying that "she will get it", CM4Sci implies that he knows about a new Wanda suit that's being translated into Lego, which means at some point we'll get a new minfigure for Wanda with a new suit that has the headpiece - it's way too soon for In The Multiverse of Madness info, which means that it has to be based on WandaVision. I feel like I'm explaining something to a 4 year old kid.

I mean if you have an ability to properly read, then it's pretty obvious that he's talking about a new suit for Wanda. Also, I don't have to link anything, you got the whole conversation written down - just find it yourself if you want to see it on Twitter. You really think that instead of doing sets for Disney+ series (6 of them this year, and even more next year and so on), they would waste a CMF series on this? Not likely. Thsi doesn't really make sense. This movie was delayed by only 5 months - sets were supposed to release in April or May. Making a set that's loosely based on SM3 is not an option as of now, it doesn't make sense from any point of view.

18+ sets are more advanced type of sets that wouldn't interest children, they are supposed to be fir AFOLs or mature Lego collectors. They don't have anything to do with mature IPs.