-
Posts
1,568 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About MstrOfPppts

- Birthday 01/14/1984
Spam Prevention
-
What is favorite LEGO theme? (we need this info to prevent spam)
star wars
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Ljubljana
Extra
-
Country
Slovenia
-
Special Tags 1
https://www.eurobricks.com/forum/public/style_images/tags/redcoats.gif
-
Special Tags 2
https://www.eurobricks.com/forum/uploads/1262945452/gallery_101_23_3320.jpg
-
Special Tags 3
https://www.eurobricks.com/forum/public/style_images/tags/sw_sebulba.png
-
Special Tags 4
https://www.eurobricks.com/forum/uploads/monthly_05_2011/post-273-13057081546.png
-
Special Tags 5
https://www.eurobricks.com/forum/public/style_images/tags/sw_silver.png
-
Special Tags 6
https://www.eurobricks.com/forum/public/style_images/tags/tag_dc_2.png
Recent Profile Visitors
8,552 profile views
-
I admit that this topic is moving too fast and I didn't read everything and so didn't probably many before me. I also must've skipped the two systems debate, so I have no idea what is going on here. I've already decided to move on from this topic, but I have to say that man @aFrInati0n this is starting to get a woke vibe. Clonebrand is a term that's been around for quite some time and to me it has no bad meaning in a name itself. Why would a clone of something good be a bad thing? The term is far better than calling all brands copycats or whatnot. Besides there's also a lot of other users, that support your idea using the same terms clonebrands and clone bricks ... So if purists are understood as haters for using a well established term we all understand and because it hurts your feelings that's a bit over the edge. Or maybe it's just me - I'm a bit old school and from Balkans where the exact translation of F*** you, can sometimes be translated into something like how you doin, and people are not that easily offended? At least my generation anyway. It's an interesting topic, but I'd much rather continue it at the next event in live at a beer with less participants. In the forum format it's firstly moving too slow and then you come back in a few hours and have 5 replies added while trying to read through all the pages and another 5 while writing the reply. Besides I guess that both sides have stated their opinion, noone want's to fully admit the other side as relevant and now same arguments are thrown both ways from all different angles. I guess there's already enough data for the mods to chew on for the future decisions!
-
I've already explained that I don't want to look at MOCs scraching my head how something was done, which is a part of my Hobby - to reverse engeneer and reuse or evolve on things I like. I have no problem with people using other brands pieces and colors that exist in Lego. Though the smooth studs do look ugly to me. I also have no problem with some 3rd party accessories and minifigures, mostly because I can recognize most by heart and if the build is primarily about these pieces, I'd just skip it. A cool Imperial station with some troopers with custom guns is allright, but a small build with a trench with dozens of 3rd party commandos and so on is not my cup of tea. Now when it comes to building parts Lego does not produce, I have a bigger issue. But still, it's my feelings speaking out, maybe nothing will change. People have used other pieces before and I can't recall any specific occasion of noticing it. But to me it's counter intuitive to encourage this on this site and to support other brands is like spitting in your own dish. If competitors rise, Lego might fall and here goes my hobby ... And about the tagging - who's gonna do it? I don't trust the users to be precise. Tags are already supported, but if you go and filter by Star Wars tag for example, you'd still miss quite a few good builds. Yes, I can skip builds I don't like as said above, but when I'll dislike every other build, visiting the site might not be worth my time anymore. Maybe I'll just skip it ... Enough from me, I'll enjoy my vacation now. Whatever will be done, we'll see what comes out of it. Some things are just not meant to last forever ;)
-
It's not as simple as it seems. This is the worse scenario for my taste and some others I presume too. As said I consider myself a purist, but only do MOCs. I don't care for sets and all the reviews for my taste can be tucked into one subforum regardless of the theme or brand - including Revell and Tamia ;)
-
I guess @Siroco replied a bit sarcasticly. I feel that many here are taking us purists too much like we are all haters, who despise people using other brands. Not to say "racists"?! Of course both of those two sayings are completely OK! But we all here are talking about a lego forum being to some degree transfered into a bricks forum, and some of us would just prefer if this wasn't the case. I have no problem with people using alt-brands in their MOCs, but unfortunately have no interest in seeing them yet alone comment on them. And as such would prefer this place I'm used to visiting not to change in a direction that doesn't suite me ... But at the end of the day, I think the more important question here is, who would the change benefit? Are there new users waiting for the change to sign up? Are there any users, that would become more active after the changes? Or will we just loose some hardcore fans? For me it's really hard to tell, since I have no idea how big of a cummunity the alt-bricks one is and whether there are any existing forums and how big or active they are.
-
On vacation and following this with my left eye ... it is amusing to me how besides the poll, it was asked to write some explanations and now this has turned into 15 pages of some trying to persuade them otherwise. No judging, but it seems that the mods have made up their mind of what they want to try and are now trying to persuade everyone it's the right idea. If you're so sure about it, go for it and we'll see what happens. Quite a few of us are not native speakers here and there's a lot of room for misunderstanding. But I find all the nitpicking of legality and so on, very unproductive. If someone voted for option 1 because he finds "clonebrands" illegal it won't change his mind if it is shown to them it is legal, but still illegitemate to some degree or even not - this is a subjective matter. To add in some drama - Bricks and Minifigs did nothing illegal up to the point of all the charges, or did they? Don't want to start anything bigger, just saying that there's always two sides to a story and for the end of it, I might just say fuck it all! And FYI if I wasn't a fellow, the f-word would have been censored with megablocks - dunno if it's still the case though?! :D
-
Probably, but my namnig is waaay cooler. Now I don't understand how some people don't want to accept the car comparison forum. If we skip different brands, how about someone starts posting how his last model chipping achieved 1-100km/h in 3.5 sec in an old timers forum?! It's all about cars, modifications, maybe even same brands, yet still makes little to no sense. And then the alternative comparison is DIY handcrafting and nails of different manufacturers?! c-c-c nails from different manufacturers usually have the same function and are used for same things. The main concern here is, that yes different brands all produce bricks in the same interlocking system, yet the few pieces that do not exist in other brands (this going either way) offer a lot of different possibilities. Now as I said, I'm a LEGO purist and I consider myself as a creator / MOCer and not that much of a collector, nor am I interested in sets themselves or reviews. Now as such, my main concern is, that there will be a flood of MOCs from people that mix brands or only use one different brand and I will find some details that I find interesting to use in my builds, only to realize that the pieces used to achieve that are not produced in my brand. I must say, that in this case I will quickly loose interest in visiting the site and stay elsewhere ...
-
Interesting to see how things are moving after half a year of my very vague following of the online communities! I voted for option 1, though I see no problem with 2 and 3. Somehow I am against option 4! But we all have to bare in mind that sometimes, the same door may reopen again - relating to the other topic about the TLG support ... I've always been a LEGO (bricks) fan and a purist. Despite TLG making various (for most of us) unreasonable decisions regarding their fan connections and support. I do think that this might turn back on them and in a few years another 2000s may be coming? Or maybe they just have things figured out in a way, we refuse to understand. Anyway, I've never had any interest nor need to invest money or time into research of any alternatives, since LEGO despite their attitude still fills up all my "needs"! Also my slight ACDC would not be fine with mixing different brands when colors, minifig shapes or even just the stud toppings don't match. Although I do understand @aFrInati0n point of view, I imagine that there are many older, more hardcore fans around here, that would have a problem with either option but 1. But how many are still here checking regularly, how many are still active?
-
Eurobricks' Licensed Multiverse Mayhem contest - Voting Topic
MstrOfPppts replied to Clone OPatra's topic in LEGO Licensed
3 Mandalorianknight 8 sipka 11 Kritch -
[FINISHED] Maintenance of Eurobricks on 20th January
MstrOfPppts replied to aFrInati0n's topic in Forum Information and Help
Well I guess I'll have to kind of agree with you, I knew it was a bit of a personal preference, since I rarely use the quote buttons (the quote selection is far more useful!) and even more rarely bother to reply on mobile. I prefer to be fast and reply directly under the post or don't bother replying at all (; And the longer the post, the less sense it makes to quote it anyway for keeping the forum clean ... so there still might be something behind the idea? -
[FINISHED] Maintenance of Eurobricks on 20th January
MstrOfPppts replied to aFrInati0n's topic in Forum Information and Help
I do have some small suggestions, don't know how much work and if possible at all. It's just my visual preference (maybe suitable for a future poll). Not necessarily connected to the upgrade, but since there seems to be some activity on the backend works I might just throw them in: I find the MultiQuote button quite distracting since it takes it's whole own row. Especially on mobile. I think it'd be great if it could be moved up to the three dots for more options of the post? Also, this has been brought up quite some times. Due to the forum structure and the menus there are 3 taps required on mobile to get to the forums index, which I guess is the most important area of the site. Is there a way to restructure the menus for mobile and make the forums reachable in just one tap as is the case on desktop version? Great work on the upgrade and thanks for taking care of the site! -
[CONTEST] Infamous Steve - Sudden Death Tiebreaker - Closed
MstrOfPppts replied to Mister Phes's topic in LEGO Pirates
"From Merchant to Pirate" by Yatkuu/Gregory Coquelz -
[CONTEST] Infamous Steve - Building Categories Voting - Closed
MstrOfPppts replied to Mister Phes's topic in LEGO Pirates
Small Category Sneaking Steve by YellowFrog RAFT: The King’s Merchant + Comic book by Marooned Marin International Society of Steve by BrynnOfCastlegate From Merchant to Pirate by Yatkuu Large Category The Crimson Raider (Pirate Brigantine) by Andy-Roo Captain Steve of the Revenant by Sebeus I The Rusty Rudder Pub by CaptainDarkNStormy TAPU ISLAND + MEGA COMIC by Marooned Marin Escape from the Imperial Trading Post by A_Goodman -
Sorry, my previous reply was written in a bit of a hurry, since I saw I was a bit late to the party. It's not about what I want, it's about what all of us want, which is more activity in this part of the forum. At least that is what I've pulled from the previous conversations we've had after the last contest. My complaint was more aimed towards the regular users here, to maybe show some more love to Pirates theme in general. It's OK to like the classic pirates sets and style, but to stay permanently stuck in time with the outdated building techniques, old color schemes, to despise fleshy figures and anything that would require a small upgrade of ones collection is another thing. I don't know about the others but this sure is a bit repulsive to me. Long story short, regarding the poll and this topic, I really don't understand this: since I thought that the contests in general are aimed towards eurobricks users which have an interest in a certain theme, which in this case is Pirates. Just trying to explain that the classic pirates theme narrows down the possibilities of luring fresh new builders to these parts and that in my eyes going for the Steve might not be such a wise decision especially straight after a heavily classic focused contest. Despite the polls showing us otherwise.
-
I don't know the exact connection or history between EB and classic-pirates but I do know there was something ... anyway, this subforum is called LEGO Pirates and it saddens me a lot that it is so much classic pirates oriented and - excuse my expression - narrow sighted. Lego Pirates should be so much more than a few over 3 decades old sets. Maybe one of the reasons for not having that much of an interest, or maybe it's just me!? Although it already saddens me, knowing I might not have time to participate (any hints about the approximate dates?), I'll share my thoughts, already greatly explained by @Mazin: Monkey Island Madness - although a classic, maybe a bit too restrictive for people who have not played the games or it's been too long to remember all the cool stuff Distant Waters - maybe a second pick, but a bit harder parts-vise for everyone Pirates of Pop Culture - voted for this, it offers most possibilities and I am still under the influence of recent Shadow Gambit game, also Pirates of Dark Waters comes to my mind! The Infamous Steve - too much classic vibes ... ):