efferman

as far as i know all of these sets will be released till march 2013. most of them in january

there is a nda on the pictures so it is not legal to make them public. maybe the size measurement is a way to show lego where is the leak

only three examples of mobility. from left to right: high, good and no mobility

the german webshop "Technicminds" has listed the first half year sets. all sets ar not available yet 14,99€ hovercraft 19,99€ Wheel loader action racecar action Racebuggy 29,99€ Motocross bike it has a great offroad pattern on the tires 59,99 material handler with a scrapclaw like this only a little bit smaller 99,99€ Formula racecar it seems that it has tires similar to 81,6x34ZR on the actual 44772 rims from 9398. and it seems that it uses this parts for suspension on the front axle.

again a very cool truck built by Bricksonwheels. and again i think that american trailer manufacturers are building very strange trailers.

does the wave produces a totally disaster or needs the daf only a few days to get dry?

i think the tires which he has used are perfect for his gorgeous design

so many clean workplaces. on my table must something going wrong 101_9765 von efferman auf Flickr

i like your Vid, but what you mean with blub, blub, blub?

yes i have

looks gorgeous with all of the stickers

does it work better?

its a long time ago, since i have seen a moc which is fully studded and using old gears. keep on the good work

maybe using a axle with stop instead, and then locking with two or more half bushes

looks cool you have said the steering pins are popping out. a mechanical or a optical problem?

iam awaiting your vid

hm, ok then the tires are the limiting factor and i can take a look at the design. but hopefully we get no surprise during reading the rules

playing around with my first chassis prototype, i get a question in my mind. where we should set the priority? turning circle or climbing ability? my first prototype has a very good traction, but the turning circle is lousy because i use no diffs. in the afol point of view the climbing ability is more important, but what would say a kid? sure on the voting will make the optical design the difference, but i think the playability should fit ok, i could use my G Setup, but this would be massive to expensive . whats your opinion to this point?

where is the problem? to build a childproof rc is much more problematic than a non rc. when it is against the rules we had much fun during the building and we are constructing something new.

a second pneumatic cylinder on the boom will double your lifting power and in addition with a second pump you will have the same speed when aou have a single cylinder. with one pump it will work slower

i dont think that they will tolerate thirdparty parts and a crawler like my G chassis would maybe win the contest, but it is to expensive for a official set. or do you think tlg could sell a technic set which costs 250 euros?

but it sounds very plausible

thanks for making some things clear. some of my ideas are now canceled, but that power puller tires are be allowed is a good news.

the wheelbase is 45 studs, but the length of the frame is not limited and could made 8 studs shorter the trackwidth, outside of the portalhub pins, is 24 the length of the basic chassis (without body attachment points) is 55 studs. the overall length of the G is 66 studs

i think it is only a bit to less round at the corners, maybe, if it is not to long, using round 11x2x3 panels?