jluck
-
Content Count
1333 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by jluck
-
So at this point we need to ask do we need a day 1 lynch? We have around 12 hours left and have split between 3 suspects. Personally, I’m not convinced a lynch is necessary on day 1, but I know many other experienced players feel differently. If we want a lynch we’ll have to make a move soon.
-
If you're speaking of Clifford I didn't vote for him because his actions struck me as noob, not nefarious. Im not criticizing your fluff posts, I'm critical of your vote with no support. I personally don't post much fluff, I prefer to wait til the game gets going in earnest but I appreciate those that do get into the roles a bit.
-
I know this'll is your first time on jury, but to those of us that'd have served a few other times this is generally frowned on. It's ok to wait till later to vote, but don't base your thinking on the crowd. Im not gonna read into it much, like I said, this is your first day on the job. My current suspicions are on Cathy. She posted4 fluff posts and then voted without any reason given. She wasn't involved in pushing her suspicions of Clifford but was very quick to vote when the tide moved in that direction. Vote: Cathy (Drunkok)
-
Is it any surprise that we’re stuck here The meals brought in have not been acceptable and the company is mediocre at best. And now you’re telling me some of ya are Ballagio?! Don’t think this day could get any worse!
-
Trial by Jury - Confirmation and Discussion
jluck replied to mediumsnowman's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
Mama-Mia, Chef Tony here! You may remember my famous father, Papa Brickolini. I've been proudly carrying on his legacy ever since he disappeared during an argument with the Brickster. I'm happy to serve this jury, I hope justice is served in memory of my father! -
Trial by Jury: A Quickshot Mafia Game - Sign Ups
jluck replied to mediumsnowman's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
Count me in! Have you played Mafia on Eurobricks before more than once? Heh 2) Will you be active and available (ie don't sign up if you're planning a three-week hike in the Swiss Alps with no internet access!) for the next 4-6 weeks? I’ll postpone the Alps 3) On a scale on 1 to 12, how mad will you be if the game makes no attempt to follow "proper" courtroom procedure? 3.14159 -
This was some great mafia! Thanks to the hosts, it was good to dig back into it!
-
It looks like you'll be the lynch, but this comment seemed like a soft claim.
-
So it seems we have enough for a lynch at this point. I would like to here from Brick again about one of his earlier statements.
-
Host what's the vote count and time left?
-
Are you soft claiming right now?
-
He can speak for himself and phrase it as best he can, but in the first sentence he sent me he asked who I was tracking. Also, he never said anything about being a PR or vanilla, and even if he had i wouldn't have revealed that part as it woulda shown the scum another PR/vanilla identity.
-
Rule 6 says you fancy quote pm's but you can give the general idea. You: hey, good chance you'll die tonight. Who you gonna track? The town needs that info and you could likely die tonight. I know you might not trust me, but give the info to me or someone. Me: doesn't matter, if I die I won't be able to share anyway. However I plan to target XYZ (not my real target) you: ya, he seems suspicious. I hope hope hope that this is accurate enough for everyone to determine if Brick deserves your vote.
-
He contacted me first asking who I was targeting since my results would be needed for the town if I died. I told him if I died I'd not be able to share the info anyway. Then I gave him a name of who I'd target which may or may not have been my real target. Figured if he was actually scum (and that's be pretty ballsy of a scum player) then I'd throw him off a little bit if possible. I don't know guys, something about this post has me uneasy. I know I pushed this yesterday before the result was revealed, but I wanna revisit it. First, he soft pushes a vote for the quiet person, a day 1 strategy but not helpful on day 2. Then he criticizes the vote on Ari, which looked weak at first. But what threw me was that after criticizing the vote, he then immediately voted for Ari too. Note this is before the result was revealed so there wasn't much of a valid reason to cast the vote. I know in previous films where I've worked with the scum, if an early vote is cast against a teammate, one Scum often try to vote the same way early just in case it gains momentum. Gophers (zepher) vote was correct, but it came way before a case was built. This is all gut for me but I'm gonna kick the tires on this one more time: vote: gopher (zepher)
-
My only worry with this vote is that an inactive player is unlikely to be scum IMO. A day 1 lynch of an inactive player helps get rid of useless distractions but idk if we can afford to lynch an inactive townie day 3.
-
Sure, it was successful and there was nothing to see.
-
Ya, I'd really like to have someone trustworthy to funnel results to. I will say that last night's action was fruitless. I'll likely tell someone by the end of the game day who I targeted. Additionally, Ari told me nothing, claiming to not trust me yet. Also, Rosamun contacted me last game night and asked who I would target. Didn't seem like info that any townie needed to know since if I'd died I wouldn't have been able to reveal the results anyway. Figured I'd share here and let the conversation be public.
-
Can someone make that my new title? Ite unfortunate that I'll have to die before you believe me but if that needs done, kill me and then work with the info I've given you. I won't throw our kind host under the bus, I can only work with what he's told me. Ari was shown as investigator. If the blocker or some such person got lucky on night 1 why didn't they prevent the night 2 kill as well? If it was a Vig instead then are we to assume the scum don't have a kill?
-
I think he was lying personally. The only motivation I could see for him being honest about being recruited would be if he truly was the town investigator and the other one was a scum plant. But that wouldn't add up since the other investigation gave us Ari. The only thing that doesn't add up if he wasn't recruited is the lack of a day 1 kill and the unlikeliness of a scum investigator. That's where I keep getting caught up.
-
I answered this question yesterday. Kinda surprised you guys didn't notice. To recap, I was the source. I tracked (not watched, my bad) Ari and saw he performed an investigation. Playing the odds I assumed he was town and contacted him. Hence my defense of him.
-
I can only tell you what my role as it was given to me and the result I have. It makes a whole lot more sense than there being 2 investigators and Ari giving up. The scum didn't quit, their using the loss of one of the players to throw us off of the fact that we had night 1 success.
-
It did not reveal who the action was aimed at. I targeted Ari and it was revealed that he performed an investigation, I do not know who he investigated though.
-
The result I got specifically stated Ari Performed an investigation. I assumed it was a town role as scum investigators are uncommon. However, I'm now thinking he was a scum investigator. That would mean the recruitment was faked (which would explain Ari's "lazy" admission) which means that the town was successful in stopping a kill last night. The more I think about it, the more I believe it.
-
Sorry, my role PM says tracker. I was going off memory. Ari didn't reveal his result, claiming he didn't trust me at first. Makes sense now though.
-
I was planning on being secretive about all of this but now I realize it's useless since Ari is scum. I am the town watcher. Last night I watched Ari and saw him perform an investigation. I immediately reached out to him as I wanted to start the town block. That's how I know he was the investigator. Unfortunately, he knows my role and thus the scum team does as well. That is why I am making it public.