jluck

Eurobricks Counts
  • Content Count

    1333
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About jluck

  • Rank
    stupid, stupid me!
  • Birthday 08/21/1989

Spam Prevention

  • What is favorite LEGO theme? (we need this info to prevent spam)
    Western

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Indiana
  • Interests
    Umm...Legos...
    and music
    If they made musical legos I'd be set!

Extra

  • Country
    USA

Recent Profile Visitors

1637 profile views
  1. Wow, that was miserable! well played scum!
  2. Are we claiming public or should I PM LMF? To have a vote down, I’m willing to vote for Vote: Diane Greene (fhomess) A vanilla claim does very little to move the needle for me. I’m actually surprised he felt the need to claim it at all.
  3. Honestly, town doesn’t stand much a chance unless the scum number is low but we can’t control that. I agree with you analysis though.
  4. The problem is there are half a dozen possible explanations of what’s happening, like paranoid gun owner or false investigator. I’ve even questioned if there’s a traditional number of scum given how unlucky we’ve been. But until we know otherwise it’s all just rampant speculation. All we have concrete is who was blocked, who was killed, and who was investigated.
  5. This is the only real hard evidence we have to go on. It seems apparent that the scum have killed every night, so it’s likely we haven’t blocked the scum killer. That does not clear anyone on this list, but it makes it likely the killer isn’t on this list at least.
  6. Huh... Yep, name mixed up. I meant Benson, sorry about that. Im willing to support the lynch on MT, seems like our best shot of completing one. Vote: Zip (mostlytechnic) without the aid of our town block, this feels like a 50/50 proposition.
  7. Look, at this point we have basically zero margin of error. We have to have a lynch and we better hope it’s right. The town block has either been unlucky or doesn’t exist so we’re not getting much there. Idk how Moore has skated by with such a weird display but I know it does seem too bold for a scum player. Still, why is he voting for me then? He’s also responsible for the votes on MT with his vague “the investigator doesn’t trust MT” line. He’s basically created both candidates for today’s lynch and yet given us no reason to trust him. I don’t know what to make of it.
  8. When you claim to be in contact with the investigator and then start a vote, everyone will follow. They think you’ve got a sure thing!
  9. I don’t get what he’s after. Claiming to know the investigator and asking if there’s a real investigator they’d should claim to him. He’s not offered anything verifiable, just loose claims.
  10. Wow, things have taken an unfortunate turn. I’m on the road ATM but will be stopping in the next few hours. You are wrong, very terribly wrong. The scum can take a chance because they likely have killed our investigator. The problem is, once you realize this tomorrow, it will be too late. I find it likely that you are scum. It’s a win win for you. If the real investigator comes forward you have their identity. Otherwise, you kill of one of the few remaining townies. If the real investigator is alive, please contact someone you’ve cleared and have them dispute Moore’s claim, otherwise this is lost. So wait, your not voting for me because I’ve been investigated scum?? Please clarify ASAP.
  11. Ya, at this point there is no option. We have to lynch and we have to be right. The numbers are too lopsided for us to stand much a chance otherwise. I continue to hold my suspicions of Moore. Also, tend to agree with the thoughts on Benson looking a bit fishy. Problem is, Lady K didn’t give us that much, I feel the scum are simply picking off anyone they please at this point.
  12. Based on what I said earlier, I’m voting for Moore. He also PMed me saying my argument was baseless and he can’t defend himself against outright lies, which didn’t really help look clean in my eyes. So vote: agent Moore (kwatchi)
  13. Looking for clarification on the part i put in bold. Do you mean that the people jamesn voted for or those that voted for him? Actually, something doesn’t feel right about this. I’ve played lots of games, many times as scum, and an old tactic was to avoid the bandwagon on a townie so I felt like I looked clean the next day. It wasn’t a very good strategy but your self-righteous line “I didn't vote for a lay-up lynch i didn't believe in” Just feels like that. I don’t hold your post amount against you, were all adults, but that’s different from being middle of the road. The “both on notice” line just feels like false aggressiveness to back down would be prying eyes. Just doesn’t feel right...
  14. There are most definitely scum in that group, as there always is in a bandwagon. Likely one voted for him early too. We’ll have a decent start to our discussion next hour when all this shakes out.