RobbieHxC

Team Bigfig for the Thing! I think it makes the Fantastic Four a more dynamic group design wise, children want to have The Thing fight the Hulk, and overall another bigfig would make the upcoming sets feel better value for money. I don't think the scaling is an issue here when compared to the Hulk, as if you compare the Hulk against any of the million Hulkbusters we have there is a far worse scaling issue. Also compare Iron Man versus Iron Monger for another more serious scaling issue.

Agreed. I definitely want the Thing to be a big-fig and the design looked great in the LEGO Marvel Super Heroes Videgame! I really dislike the Axl and TMNT mutant molds as their torso is increased but the legs are the same, making the torso width about triple the size of their legs, resulting in the proportions looking wrong:/

I completely agree with the pain points about repetitive figures, but to be honest I have little love for legacy sets based on Marvel films that have already been well represented in LEGO form. All the Avengers films had significant waves upon release with and have since had supplementary sets so I don't fancy revisiting them year after year. Given a limited number of sets per year, I much prefer the legacy sets on films that did not receive sets upon release, for example the sets based on the first two Iron Man films. Sets for the first two Thor films or The Incredible Hulk would be great some day!

Completely agree that Morph is the least desirable character from the X-Men '97 team because he has the least iconography over X-Men media as a whole. Hoping for X-Men villains either in the X-Mansion or very soon else my heroes are gonna get very bored defeating Magneto and Sentinels soon Mystique, Sabreooth, Mr Sinister, Pyro, White Queen, Silver Samurai, Pyslocke are to mention a few without any new molds.

Wow Colossus and Jubilee look amazing here! Wishing for their minifig debut :)

I would love an Asgard D2C! The set could feature the Bifrost Bridge, Yggdrasil, Odin's Vault, and the Destroyer. Minifigures would include with Thor, Loki, Odin, Heimdall, Frigga, Lady Sif, the Warriors Three, and some Thor villains; such as Malekith, Kurse, Echantress, Executioner, and Laufey.

Assuming this leak is real, does anyone think that the set number 76294 could be covering up a minifgure, eg Magneto? Gambit and Storm seem to be attacking that location, and it's not like LEGO to miss a chance to put Magneto in an X-Men set.

Ditto, I'm hoping this is a promising sign of more X-Men sets to come.

Obviously Professor X

Wow, not sure a LEGO forum is the best place to be airing your discriminatory opinions. Triple threat with the racism, sexism, and homophobia.

Completely agree at how zero effort the latest set names are. It's either AI generated or SEO over-optimised - but either way it's creatively bankrupt.

Which LEGO DC sets am I buying this year? None. What are my top 3 LEGO DC sets? Batman: Arkham Asylum Breakout Darkseid Invasion Batcave Clayface Invasion Which set do I hate the most? Flying Fox: Batmobile Airlift Attack If we're including non-system sets such as Mighty Micros, then any Mighty Micro set that gave us a Superman rogue without ever having a normal system version. I wonder if we will ever get a normal Bizarro or Doomsday. What would be my dream set of next year? Build: Titans Tower Minifgures: Nightwing, Starfire, Raven, Beast Boy, Terra, Kid Flash, Speedy, Deathstroke, Trigon, Brother Blood, Blackfire, Jinx.

I don't think this is a myth. I actually think LEGO Marvel is really keen on antiheroes - for example, they recently produced minifgures for Loki, Namor, Scarlet Witch, Magneto, Agatha Harkness, and Echo. However, a lot of genuine villains have been missing from sets recently and it has become a pattern. Granted, the recent MCU villains haven't all been A-Listers but you only have to look across the aisle to LEGO Star Wars or Harry Potter and observe that lots of D-Listers from their films and shows get minifigures. Kang the Conqueror, Baron Zemo, Kingpin, and Mr Sinister are all big names in the world of comics and could all easily be included in recent sets or the CMFs. Marvel has a much bigger catalogue of supervillains than AIM goons, HYDRA goons, Chitauri, and Thanos.

Is this a reliable leak or your expectations? For the price of the X-Mansion, 10 figures seems very low. Great to finally have Professor X, Jean Grey, Gambit - although I have zero interest in Morph considering there are other more iconic X-Men not yet produced. I would prefer Nightcrawler, Jubilee, Sunspot, Cable, or Bishop to take his spot on the roster for this set. Moreover, the previously rumoured Mystique, Sabretooth, and White Queen would make great additions to this set. To be honest, any other X-Men villains such as Bastion, Mr Sinister, or Apocalypse would be great inclusions. It does seem strange that over the past few years, LEGO Marvel has almost completely ditched supervillains from their sets and focused entirely on superheroes. This pattern is the inverse of LEGO DC which focuses completely on Batman's Rogues Gallery and mostly features Batman as its only superhero. The popularity of the comic book media is driven by both its superheroes and supervillains and it's frustrating that LEGO doesn't reflect that. Praying to any and all gods out there that there is a follow-up wave of sets next January to satisfy my long-awaited LEGO X-Men desires.

Sorry, my message might as come across as very direct. I didn't mean they shouldn't be allowed to post - I just think they or anyone else shouldn't be allowed to post what is clearly spam for what feels like a long period of time now. I would rather not talk / read about anything in this forum than have it be full of spam. Hey I know you're just a spammy joker on here but this CMF released in 2018, which is 6 years ago. For custom figures, I'm sure a lot of people have a couple in their collection, but for the most part the official figure is the best. True, but some users are really stretching the definition of AFOL.