Critique of instructions

[knotian]

If you have a second or two I'd like to get some comments on the start (draft of one small section) of an instruction set for a major build.

My thoughts were to reduce the number of pages with the assumption that the builder would be experienced.

Comments?

Thanx

,https://www.dropbox.com/s/l97rzpwd9htiyug/traveller 2.pdf?dl=0

Ed

[syclone]

Imo these instructions are clear enough to understand, was able to follow the steps so far. Much better than TLG ones 

[Toastie]

2 hours ago, Xewyz2001 said:

Imo these instructions are clear enough to understand, was able to follow the steps so far. Much better than TLG ones 

Fully second that. Funny - in the good ol'days TLGs instructions were at least as condensed as that - without any assumption of "experience". Just look at instructions from +/- the 1980's.

The instructions are perfect!

Best
Thorsten  

[mocbuild101]

I'd say they look good, they could be condensed slightly, but they're still okay.

One thing that does need changing though, is step 7 - the assembly should be rotated around so you can see where the parts go. 

BTW, what software are you using to make the instructions? IMO the quality looks really bad...

[knotian]

Thanks for the reply's so far

'quality looks bad'......Can I have more info concerning this? I am using a low quality render while working to speed things up.

Stud.io 2

[mocbuild101]

10 hours ago, knotian said:

I am using a low quality render while working to speed things up.

It's probably just that then, it should be fine with a higher render quality.