Technic magazine sets general discussion topic

[AJB2K3]

We don't have a W.H.Smiths anymore and never seen it in lidl

I do have the double poly

[anyUser]

On 2/27/2026 at 1:07 PM, Auroralampinen said:

Here is the newest member of magazine sets. An interesting tracked scooter:). 

 

In my version

the front wheel is rubbing against the mudguard. Maybe I used an old(er) tyre with slightly larger diameter?

Other side:

The inner part could be unfinished

and I haven't counted the number of pieces yet.

 

 

Edited March 1 by anyUser
accidentally tripled the content

[Auroralampinen]

13 minutes ago, anyUser said:

In my version the front wheel is rubbing against the mudguard. Maybe I used an old(er) tyre with slightly larger diameter?

 

Well, maybe it's again lego botching up the build;).

Since lego released the T Model with illegal building solutions:/. 

 (Sorry again that i roasted/criticised lego and no, i still don't get any paychecks for roasting/criticising lego;).).

[R0Sch]

It's a pity the chain doesn't drive any piston engine. I feel like this is the weakest model of the bunch. 5 newer reddish orange parts and 2 cheap spur gears don't make this 7€ set a bargain either. The yellow axles and the blue gears stick out like sore thumbs. I get that bevel gears don't work with chainlinks, but lbg 3L axles would have made a huge difference. The next magazine should be released end of April as the cadence is every 2 month.
Here's my Studio file of it: L0002292.io

 

[Johnny1360]

Sure looks better with grey axles, makes you wonder why?

[Satisfied]

On 3/3/2026 at 4:07 AM, R0Sch said:

It's a pity the chain doesn't drive any piston engine. I feel like this is the weakest model of the bunch. 5 newer reddish orange parts and 2 cheap spur gears don't make this 7€ set a bargain either. The yellow axles and the blue gears stick out like sore thumbs. I get that bevel gears don't work with chainlinks, but lbg 3L axles would have made a huge difference. The next magazine should be released end of April as the cadence is every 2 month.
Here's my Studio file of it: L0002292.io

 

Are L0002291 and 412602 the same set? Why did they stop following the previous numbering pattern?

[anyUser]

6 hours ago, Satisfied said:

Are L0002291 and 412602 the same set? Why did they stop following the previous numbering pattern?

You could be referring to the same model. At the magazin publishers web site, you do not get any search result(s) for "412602" but for L0002291:

https://www.blue-ocean-ag.com/bi/?tx_kesearch_pi1[sword]=L0002291

Why did they change? I don't know. But both Rebrickable and Brickset database are using the "L0029..." as identifier for Technic magazins sets.

412601 => L0002290 redirection at Rebrickable

412602 => L0002291 redirection at Rebrickable

L0002292 only at Brickset

Edited Sunday at 04:24 PM by anyUser

[Satisfied]

10 hours ago, anyUser said:

You could be referring to the same model. At the magazin publishers web site, you do not get any search result(s) for "412602" but for L0002291:

https://www.blue-ocean-ag.com/bi/?tx_kesearch_pi1[sword]=L0002291

Why did they change? I don't know. But both Rebrickable and Brickset database are using the "L0029..." as identifier for Technic magazins sets.

412601 => L0002290 redirection at Rebrickable

412602 => L0002291 redirection at Rebrickable

L0002292 only at Brickset

That's right. For the magazine sets, the numbering ran from 412401 to 412403 starting in 2024, and from 412501 to 412506 in 2025.

Now 2026 has just kicked off, and we initially still used 412601, but the numbering has now switched to this alphanumeric format.