Peanuts

I'd like to read all the evaluations out loud.

I believe it said "megabluck, no" about being a friend of that fish.

In the last game...of life which took place in this asylum, the scum was able to change their killer among themselves, but keeping the same MO. Also, there is the chance that the killing action was based on medication, which I doubt. I'm still going with Heng, I think we should show some consistence right now. We can't let him off the hook so easily.

I'd like to look for recent cases in the "cases" folder and I'd like to know what exactly he was evaluating in the "evaluations" folder and if there are any recent evaluations as well.

I wonder why you want to go back to the chief's home, Sarah? Do you think we've forgotten something? I don't really know what to look for, the evidence suggests the chief died brawling drunkenly with someone. Although, of course, there are certain dubieties, such as why there is only one bruise, while a brawl would indicate several punches. Couldn't the chief withstand a single mere blow? And according to the criminal records the only citizen who has shown himself to be violent is James, but only once, so he's not showing a tendency either. So who could the chief have fought against? There's still a second theory, which sounds far-fetched, but I came to think about it: It seems like all the police officers are rather ambigious, and like the chief was in the way of all their promotions. What if one of them didn't want to wait for him to retire, knew he used to drink heavily and wants his death not to look like a murder? It's just my only theory apart from the obvious. I'm not sure what to look for, as I already said, or where to look. I think, Town Hall could provide something, or, following the above theory, to one of the police officers' houses. Right, I forgot about that. Sounds like the best course of action to me.

I believe that's a confession! We may have our first scum!

Nevermind, I'm just telling you. It's just we were told there's only one SK.

Does that mean Sunny was town? Damned! So we better convict one of Bloodbrick's agents tomorrow. But that's tomorrow, and who needs tomorrow if he has booze? Oh, and Kelly, about what you said in the end of the day, I thought we had agreed there's a vigilante/vigilante pill, not a third serial killer. Just saying.

I'd like to ask Zepher a question about his Arena quest: What exactyl happens if a rogue attempts to flee and you actually roll "flee"?

Okay. I guess that makes sence. If you're town, you should actually have gone after Heng from the beginning on. I would have believed you more in that case. You told us Belle would have been suspicious of Heng, while you later claimed she had investigated him and found him not town. That's just another fact that makes it hard to believe you. Why do you assume there's a remaining neutral? We were told there's just one serial killer.

I think the most important question has already been asked by Jeremy, and I can't think of anything else I could ask. I think we can assume the chief's wife has actually died of suicide, as everyone who knew about the murder, save for Doctor Barker, the reporter and maybe the chief's killer, was with our group back then and therefore can't have killed her. And if she died of suicide, I think we'll learn nothing important by her death.

No, she really said she owed you an apology at some point for some reason.

Which brings me back to a point I asked you earlier, which I believe was never answered. Why did you even apologize? It's a good thing to have many people accusing, and as I thought, the only reason you dropped your accusation of Stan was because of the much stronger case there was against Heng. There was nothing that influenced your accusation at all. So why apologize?

Nah, you wouldn't, he's a chocolate pie faced weirdo, and he tried to kill a pudgy little and perfectly innocent and peaceful little girl (). He was almost as freaky as you all. You're right about that. But we'll learn at least as much as we'd learn by convicting Heng.

Dang, that's what you get when you play three games at the same time, while Hinck in the last game was named Henry as well. I'm so confused.

What makes you so sure of that? Did anyone blabber again? Can we have this confirmed or denied by somebody who actually took the double talk pill? Everything I myself "know" about the double vote is that it exists. Anything else is speculation. I don't even know that whoever votes twice has to vote for the same person both times. Actually, it would be a pretty good scum move, voting for Heng, to make people believe the scum wants to save Sunny. It would be considerably stupid of the scum to vote for Henry if Sunny is really scum. I don't know if it's a townie or the scum voting twice. I don't know if it's a fixed ability or a pill either. I must say, I tended to change my vote for Henry, mostly because of the in my opinion ridiculous theory of a framing pill, the claim of an investigation which mustn't be disregarded, and the multiple captatio benevolentiae ("I don't think I'll survive this day, but") he did in his first defending post, which I'm suspicious of, and a bit more, but I'll stay with my vote for several reasons: Sunny has more far votes on her, she has been acting scummy, we'll gain more information from her death, her pill has no ability, etc.

I'd say quite the contrary, that it merely helps the scum keeping the pill in the game. Yes, the townies would have learned about it sooner or later, as I already said before, but then still we'll have to deal with it instead of the scum, wasting one of precious kills to waste the framing pill. And about the "Look, he's scum!" play: It only works if the framer is scum, as we all know that a townie would reveal his framing; unless it's a dead townie, but in that case the dead townie would have to tell only the scum and no townie at all that he framed a townie, which is unlikely, as any townie would either tell everyone or no-one who they framed. But can't they do the same if the town knew there's a framing ability? They could simply mislead the townies by saying that fellow scum or different townies were framed, instead of actually revealing the real target of the frame. "I feel if a townie found about the framing action, they'd reveal it", you say, but in fact, there was a twonie who foudn about teh action, the late Belle. She didn't tell anyone about any framing action.

Why exactly did you tell us that? It makes me feel easier voting for Sunny, but it doesn't really influence my vote. While thinking about the theory that opium gives people a framing ability, I must say, it sounds not very reasonable. Why would the scum take out the propably only pill that helps only them, even if a townie uses it? They wouldn't even have to take it to create confusion. And if any townie takes a framing pill (especially one who likes to blabber about pills and effects) there's no good reason not to tell the effect publicly. It would only enable us to deal with it and create strategies such as framing always the same person to minimize its effect. Also, it would be kinda mean of Bloodbrick to give us a pill that makes us harm ourselves and we don't even know yet we have to do what the pill enables us to do, we just know we must take it. That's not quite the same, is it? But my main point is, Sunny wouldn't even have had the faintest motive to take the framing pill out.

I've decided to vote: Sunny Day (Sandy). I understand why people vote for Heng, and as I said, I don't trust him either (as I trust nobody), but I really think Sunny's behavior is scummy. How can anyone forget and suddenly remember somebody has been investigated as scum? And why did Sunny apology to Stan by the way? It's not like her accusation has been voided, there just has appeared a stronger case against somebody else.

I've just finished "Feet of Clay", after previously reading "Guards! Guards!" and "Men at Arms". Now I've started with "Going Postal". I discworld.

The Arena doesn't look that boring at all, I'm rather afraid if I'll have a chance against my enemy. Well, time will show.

Wow, you talked quite a lot. And I had to read it all. I'm really bewildered at the moment, both sides seem to have good arguments somehow. But one thing I wondered about, was, why Sunny started the day by charging Stan so early, although she already must have been suspicious of Heng as well, as he was investigated guilty. And I don't know if anyone could forget that somebody else was investigated innoncent, no matter if the investigator says he doesn't trust in his pills. And by the way, Tammo must have had a reason why he believed his pills to be wrong. I agree with you, it's either Sunny or Heng, and to be honest, at the moment I'm inclined to vote for Sunny. Of course there's also a lot pointing towards Heng, I won't disregard this. And I'm not making my final decision so far, as I said, basically, I'm confused as hell.

Oh, that's a surprising turn indeed. And even more, because Bell seemed to be suspicious of Heng. Sounds a bit better than the case agaisnt Stan, but I'll have to think about both first.

Well. But Heng's strange behavior of loving Shalonda doesn't seem to be based on what he took, unless Rhino Horn works one day later than everything else. So maybe he got it by an action against him? Or Hinck's just showing who much he loves Shadows?

Strange, who steals a microwave from the police station? I suppose there has to be more behind this. And about the password, I'd suggest to the others to take candle, as you can use it to light the others, isn't it?