EXO-CHAMP

Blue Spaceman 5 Classicness, 8 Technology, 5 Team, -6 Aggressiveness Your results: Classic High-tech Goodguy Citizen You scored higher than 99% on Classicness You scored higher than 99% on Team You scored higher than 99% on Technology You scored higher than 99% on Aggressiveness

Overall I like these sets. The designs of the flyers are quite cool, and some of the vehicles have great MOC potential. However... TLC should really get rid of all these user opperated guns. Disck launchers, spring missile launchers etc. They don't work half the time and does nothing to enhance the look of the models.

Great work on the Bogatyr. It looks like the real thing, using a minimum of bricks.. Now we want to see a mini-fig version. ;-) I haven't tried Battlefield 2142 yet, but it looks like a great game.

This is true. The Thunder Fury is IMO just as fast as GT, Uplink etc.

Good work Dill. It looks almost like a starfighter. Personally I think it would look even better with a set of cannons on the other wing, but the set doesn

Very impressive. Very few studs showing and wonderful design. It's almost hard to tell it's lego. The display stand is also quite nice. Maybe a future project could include a landing gear?

Very nice MOCs The jet: Very nice colours and coherrent design. I really like the way the cockpit shows details. It looks quite combat vorthy and fast. A few E-F stickers would improve the look. Ryo's hoover bike: Nice little vehicle. With the new robot skimmers comming up, it feels like something that E-F could have. Bridge Wasp: Nice bold colours. I like the wing design and the overall feel of the machine. Maybe you could do something to hide the blue technic pin located at the shoulder.

??? What do you mean?

2006. No doubt about it. However the new summer sets has a few promissing models. NOT THE TANK....

Welcome Hikaru. Always nice with another Exo-Force fan on EB...

True. Maybe I'll make a MOC from the Tank or something... I've just ordered the Combined package of 07 jan BMs, so my E-F collection will soon be complete again...

I really think that the Tank (or whatever it is) looks like a pile of garbage thrown together by a shovel.... When you compare it to a set like the Bridge Walker, it really looks too random and plain old ugly. It has no design. It's simply a box with wheels.... It may be the ONLY E-F set I'm not getting... Future pictures will tell if it really is that horrible...

Fair enough... I guess you mean all these launcher type of weapons too. I agree. It's getting out of hand.

What a great idea. I think I'll do the same. I just have a question: Why do so many people comment on a line that they don't even like? Comments like bleh, bah, I don't like mechs etc. are not very constructive. I really think tow-trucks, cranes, boats and all City are a waste of space, but I generally don't post in those boards either. Maybe others should do this too...

It looks nothing like Exo-Force. Give all this Exo-Bashing a rest. It

Check this out Dill: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Amx10rc_045.jpg Tanks don't always have threads...

I guess this competition is over by now or what???

Ha-Ya-To finally gets his revenge. The most awesome human battlemachine to date IMO. I'm not quite sure what to think of the robot tank though. It looks somewhat thrown together compared to the MDT. I'll wait more more pictures before judging. But what a great find. Thanks DoubleT...

I sure will. That's an awesome machine jeffrey. Once more you have outdone yourself. May I add it to my Exo-Dice moc page also?

I really like the Gate Defender. Small, robust looking... and I'm not a Ha-Ya-To hater... As a matter of fact I have 3 of them. Great little machines. Nice reviews BTW.

Just make a new thread in the Wargames forum. Pictures are not required. They just add to the experience.

Could you make a small example of combat? I'm having trouble understanding all the rules...

I really like the complecated one. It reminds me of Battlefleet Gothic where you have to plan ahead for movement.

Bridge Walker vs. White Lightning.

Obviously not...