Jump to content

Milan

Technic Moderator
  • Posts

    5,988
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Milan

  1. Hey, welcome to Eurobrick! haha, it is great to welcome somebody who is almost Duke! As someone said before, if you have any questions, just pm
  2. I saw this at lego shop few minutes ago. http://shop.lego.com/ByTheme/Product.aspx?...cn=587&d=70 Nothing on BL yet.
  3. It works for me.
  4. Nice review, and nice set. Definitely beautiful model, with great look and excellent technical aspect.
  5. Very nice. You captured the scene pretty well.
  6. Welcome, enjoy your stay!
  7. Whoa, great topic, it is a great pleasure for me to see all those sets different than original ones.
  8. how's the new rechargable battery? take a look here:
  9. Hi, For power info and comparation check this: http://www.philohome.com/motors/motorcomp.htm It is compatible with power functions via this: http://www.brickset.com/detail/?Set=8886-1 You can use receiver with this if you have that extension wire. Can be found cheaper than 42 euro on Bricklink
  10. Thanks CP5670, nice concept! I have similar idea, but it was too complicated to integrate that concept into scale model. I am working on 3 studs wide outriggers with Pneumatics on the ends. But, 3 studs wide are both outriggers together, and are motorized. All of that on just 20 studs wide crane carrier. I will open tread when I build the chassis of Liebherr.
  11. Welcome and have fun!
  12. Do not worry because the 4wd in title of this set. They exploit that mark on real cars, too. On my Lada Niva there is s sign 4X4, although this car has 3 differentials, of which is only the center one lockable, so it is no 4x4. it would require all three diffs to be lockable for a car to has 4X4 mark on it...but it looks cool!
  13. Hahaha, blame ferrari, not me!
  14. Same here. Bus looks great, but those doors looks kinda-not-belong here.
  15. Everybody has its own point of interest, either studs or studless. The best thing is we can use the best from both. In my models i use mainly studs, but would probably stuck without those 5% of studless. It is just that i would never want my model has blocky look or huge hollow sections, which it is almost impossible to fill with studless. It is important that we all enjoy building, studless or not, having fun is final goal.
  16. Studless is much easier way to finish body and it is way long from realism. Just look to firas abu jaber on mocpages. His cars are IMO the best looking studded cars on world, he uses tiles and slopes, but still those are not studless.
  17. Welcome, nice store, too.
  18. Can you explain this a bit detailed, please. I will present my new fully automated outriggers soon, and i am interesed in these setting.
  19. His chassis are awesome, with ingenious ideas of transmission and suspension, and overall realism, but i really do not like body of the cars. Flex tubes, and big gaps are just not good enough for such good chassis.
  20. Why dont you write more detailed description, if not review of it, based on your opinion? It would be great!
  21. If you really did place an order, than his answer is very appropriate. They hate very much if you place order and stall. Also, in general, as the store is bigger, the seller is less polite, guess because of the numerous orders he has on daily bases.
  22. Original sets. I just want the Model Team back
×
×
  • Create New...