Inconspicuous

They match up: each night has the three killers' actions explained. And they were the answers for different questions. And what do you mean by we? Are you saying that you're Mafia? And FYI, I'm not arguing with him to draw suspicion away from me. I was highly suspicious of him because I didn't believe three killers were likely. He told me what he thought, and it makes some sense. But he didn't tell us how he knew, so this doesn't mean that he couldn't be Mafia.

That makes quite a bit of sense. Thank you for answering my question. Do you have any ideas as to what "Mr. Right's Effect" is?

I mean, in terms of night actions for the last two nights. Three killers, and only three kills in two nights? Please explain what you think happened. Those are some awfully accurate blocks!

Well, why don't you tell us how three killers could be possible, and how you know this? If you can't prove either, it's likely you're lying.

I'm going to a friend's party. I have no idea what's planned, but I can count on lots of sparkling cider.

I think there are only two, and that the Mafia is trying to confuse us. I meant the vigilante/serial killer, since it is not clear which they are. Yes, it is, because it's basic logic. If the Mafia killed Martin, who else could have 'killed' Mary besides a vigilante or a serial killer? All based off of logic, my friend. I can assure you that I am in no way related to the vigilante. Although I understand your suspicion, since some of my phrasing isn't the best. I share the same suspicions as Mr. Right. I am suspicious of Dr. Wilkerson, and doubtful of Robbie Willis. Citizens, I implore you to consider lynching one of them today.

I think that Mr. Right has some sort of role that makes him tell the town he was blocked/protected. There's simply no other explanation. I'm thinking it might be a handicap of some sort if he is the mafia boss. I'm not sure what you mean. What I told you were the theories brought up on Day 2. I'm still unsure about the three killer thing. Unless there have been some amazingly accurate blocks, why wouldn't there have been more night kills?

Using logic, we determined that it was likely the vigilante/serial killer killed Lois. Since Lois' name came up on day one, it would make sense for the Mafia to let the town vote her off on their own. As a vigilante, it would make sense to try to follow the town's suspicions. How did you find this out? Through PM? Or are you a killer who didn't attack last night, but there were still two deaths? I suspect that you are right. With the fact that we have three killers makes it very unlikely that two didn't kill on Night one. One being blocked and one not killing makes more sense.

Indeed, it is. I'm not an English major, and brain is slow this early in the morning. So you think he is innocent, because he woudlnt' want to 'do the deed himself' and draw suspicion?

I think it's safe to assume that a vigilante attacked Mary.

I'm not quite sure what you mean, Robbie. Could you explain this a bit better? Thank you for correcting my error.

Something seems out of place... Mary predicted her own death. What could she mean by this? Is it a clue? If it's meaningless, I'm sorry that I'm distracting us away from more important conversations. Since by logic we predicted that it was likely the vigilante killed Lois, and that a vigilante killed Martin, it leads me to wonder if the vigilante is one of those who uses the "Rule of 3", as Andrew put it. The entire family is now dead or separated, which dismisses the theory completely, but I wonder if the vigilante believed in it so strongly that he tried it, and by luck Mary was removed too. Often, it's a good idea to go back to our memories and see who the deceased was suspicious of, but since both Mary and Martin voted for Leanne, who was innocent, this may not be the best idea. However, if I recall correctly, Martin was suspicious of Mr. Willis (your first name escapes me at the time) and Mr. Mayor. Excuse me, I meant that a vigilante killed Mary, not Martin.

I agree, I so desperately want to listen, but my brain cramps when I try, and I collapse on the floor, rolling in agony, at being denied the valuable information in this interview. That would make sense. I can't wait for the text!

After a long LOTR Mocing break, I decided to do another small one. I built this in about 15 minutes with the help of a friend, and I'm pleased with the result. This is a small vignette of the scene at Mount Doom where Gollum gets the ring, but falls into the lava. Gollum is a burnt skeleton holding the ring and sinking into the lava. There is a mini cliff and mini Frodo and Sam and the top. I also made it tilt back to use "forced perspective" to make it look better. Enjoy, and check out my other LOTR MOCs in my signature. -Inky

I believe he is referring to Winter Toy Shop themed PaB boxes, which were given out with orders over $75 on Black Friday. I don't know how, but I ended up with 5, so maybe it was for every $75.

He voted for you after you accused the police. I doubt there's more than one mafia in the police, and if there is scum in the police, the other police would likely be innocent. Basically you're saying that Chris is scum, and you are innocent. Or he's innocent and is retaliating to your remarks. In other words, we take your word for it. It's not that you're pushy, it's more that you're accusing blindly, and making up stories to explain your accusations. If you're admitting that you're basing off of theory, then your case is illogical. We'll only get justice if we act, and it's better to choose or own ending than to let he Mafia choose it for us. Leanne, I am extremely sorry if your are a Townie, but we must take action and trust our guts. Vote: Leanne/Forresto

Mr. Right, I think Sarah is correct in saying your intentions are good, but your evidence is lacking. Basing a vote off of activity is fairly weak evidence, and basing off of occupation is even weaker. I am perfectly willing to vote for Sarah if you can bring much stronger evidence to the table.

I'm not sure if this counts, but I got an IOU Freeco Bike from my friend. He crossed out the box art on a Clone Battle Pack and scribbled in outlines of the set and figures. It was simple but hilarious. I technically didn't get the set yet, so does that count? I'm not sure if I missed anything else, I didn't ask for much this year. (Usually I end up with piles of rattling boxes, but this year only one.)

With wild accusations flying around, and the absence of many people due to the holidays, we'll never convict if we don't settle down. There are definitely some clear heads in the community, emphasizing that "one police officer must be scum". In these games of life, it's completely random. If this pattern was really kept up, half of us would be scum, since there are two or three people to a similar profession. Our female cinema worker (can't remember your name right now ) seems suspicious, but I have a gut feeling there is more than meets the eye. I suspect she is some kind of investigator, and conducted an experiment to see how the police reacted. I'm still not sure what the results mean, but the police seem to be very close. As much as I hate to talk about doing something and not actually take action, in these circumstances I must. I am not sure who is lying or not, but I'm trying to keep a clear consciousness. Maybe some rest will help.

At this point, I definitely believe that the vigilante killed Lois, because why would the scum kill someone who might be voted off anyways? Also, the two people voted for were Susan and Lois. Since Susan was voted out, the vigilante would want to go with the town's suspicions and get Lois. As to Mr. Right, are we even sure that someone tried to kill him? We only know someone tried to get it, could it have been an investigator? Either way, I believe he is innocent, but the killer/investigator and the blocker/protector are still a mystery.

This doesn't rule out the fact that he could be the vigilante. It would seem that there are two killers, since Lois was killed, and someone else attempted to break into the courthouse.

Here's a close-up. Hope this helps.

Seems like the question has been nailed. I remember thinking that the one shooting cannon my brother had was the most valuable thing in the world, and begging him to let me try it once. I would agree that the pattern on non-shooting cannons is pretty cool. I believe it's also used in Western sets.

So far, all I've gotten is an IOU Freeco Speeder from my friend. Then again, it's not Christmas yet, so what's the big deal if I didn't get anything else?

I am still strongly suspicious of Susan Webb, due to her contradictory stories. I believe there may be a shred of truth in what she is trying to say, but she's just done a terrible job of conveying it. I am a little hesitant to vote for her, since she seems confused, but she has been given many chances to reprove herself and continues to confuse us and herself. As these games of life progress, things get even more complex and confusing, and a blabbermouth like her many end up hurting us a lot. Susan, I ask you to show that you can be well-reasoned and logical, otherwise you have my vote for sure.