-
Posts
35,896 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Hinckley
-
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
I met that little boy. Good job answering his question. I missed the trick of it. This is odd. If that kid contacted you and you actually asked him about the murder...I doubt you're guilty... This is enough to drive anybody nuts! Let's update the list. I have a plan to protect the people I believe are most important, but I've only let a select few in on the details. In case it doesn't work and I get killed during the night...or both...here are my thoughts going into Day 4. Trusted Salvatore (Dragonator)-As previously stated, Martin's daytime investigation revealed him to be insane. However, since so many people trust him, he is a high target for conversion if the Sinisters can do that. Remember that it is a possibility Dr. Rajim (Admiral Ron)-I believe he has the best intentions and he is our connection to the photographer. Ryan Catchers (Rick)-Trusted ally. I see him doing a lot to find the Sinister. A great actor if he turns out to be Sinister. Mr. Nowhere (Scouts)-The representative of our remaining investigator. Opened my eyes to the treachery of the King and Bear. However, if the King is found innocent, then he is my main target for vote tomorrow. Until then, he's a great and trusted friend! Lupo (Rufus)-Also seems on the level from interaction and the way he is searching out Sinisters. A great actor if he is a Sinister. Stanley Susseman (Cornelius Murdock)-this one seems trustworthy to me because of the clarifications he's asked me for. He was doubtful of Martin which makes me believe he was trying to figure out who to trust. This would be a great acting job if he was just trying to soft-sell convince me to vote Martin out. Professor Diem (Walter Kovacs)-My first friend in this game! Another phenomenal actor if he is a Sinister. Untrusted The King of Delaware (KingoftheZempk)-I trusted him at first but due to info from the investigator and his death bed attempt to explain away a possible murder, I doubt his innocence now. Dr. Ballbricker (Ricecracker)-Not sure her reasoning behind votes is solid. She seems to be paying attention only to small parts of the overall conversation. Perhaps just to her Sinister allies? Misty Monroe (badboytje88)-Doesn't care that our investigator is dead, but is upset over neutrals who had bad intentions. Also, just kind of went looney and weird towards the end of the day. Sinister actions indeed. TamTam Timmers (QuarryMan)-Too quiet and too abrasive. When he does vote, it is long after a majority is reached. Puts the nail in the coffin when he's sure he's already lost one of his own? Not all of my allies agree here, but I just have a suspicion. Cat Manuel (ThePenguin)-Not even rationally voting. Went for BigCam because his cats told him to. Makes little to no sense. Rarely stops by and when he does, only attempts to cause confusion. Unsure Chief Washing Bear (JimButcher) At the top of unsure because I've just taken him off of the untrusted list. His meeting with the boy in the garden makes me think he is telling the truth about other things...-unexplained trust that gets him voted to PR, possible night killer according to Confidential letters from the Dr. He is definitely guilty if the King is. That we know for sure. I trusted him as well until the investigator found him Sinister as well. Nurse Pendleton (Zepher)-has earned my trust for the most part. I believe he is on my side. But I know how crafty he can be. As our nurse, he tricks us all the time, am I right? In the back of my head is him proxying his vote to me and then taking it back when I voted for Shadows to vote for Martin instead. Was the proxy a ploy to gain my trust? He did take a vote away from an Evil Neutral and place it for our Innocent Investigator... Nurse Pepper (Bob the Construction Man)-has explained to me sufficiently why he flew under the radar at first. I think I can test his allegiance to the innocent tonight. I'll explain it to a trusted ally, in case I am killed tonight. Nurse Penny (Yumiyoshi)-offered nothing but commentary until we called her out on it. Now she is asking good questions, but can we do anything about the briefcase until the murderer is caught? Could be a diversionary tactic. Perry Noid (ADHO15)-This guy just doesn't make any sense. Maybe he's trying to cause confusion deliberately. I don't mind when people defy me, but he offers no explanation and makes interactions up. Very weird... Senor Canny Bolero (iamded)-Hasn't said much. It's hard to gauge. Ted Tompkins (WhiteFang)-Despite not being around a lot, he also hasn't contributed much when he does stop by. Seems to avoid serious conversation and convictions. A lot of people have found him suspicious as well. Sandy Craws (Sandy)-I want to trust him. I mean, he's Santa. And he uses badass Christmas one-liners when voting for jerks. Just don't know enough yet. He has reached out and I'm almost sure we can trust him, but not enough yet to put him on the trusted list. Petey Pirowski (Peanuts)-I think I trust him. Can't think of why I wouldn't but wouldn't tell him sensitive information yet. I suspect he is trustworthy. TimTam Timmers (Lord Arjay)-Certainly seems trustworthy! Don't know for sure, but he seems like it. Dudley Eisenhower (mrlegoninja)-doesn't make his vote bold and rarely even shows up. Cookie Custer (Roncanator) & Havel Pavlov (Sok117)-Don't know a lot about these two. Have they been around. Have they been voting along with us? Not sure what to think. Well, these are my thoughts. If I'm unable to protect everyone tonight or don't make it through myself, this is all the info I've received and all the thoughts I have towards the others. I hope this helps. If anybody has info about a misplacement on this list, please let me know ASAP. Thanks. I love you all, children of God. Did the boy in the garden contact anybody else? I'm trying to gauge how easy it would be for Chief Washing Bear to fabricate a meeting with him... -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
No hard feelings. I trust you right now. If The King of Delaware is shown to be innocent, I'll trust you less. I credit you for opening my eyes to the King's guilt. He certainly seems that way now. I was duped by him and Bear. If you're right, I will trust you 100%. If not, my suspicion towards you would be highest. Does that make sense? I mean no offense, that's just the most logical way for me to approach this. I love you. -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
Typical scum tactic: Right before death, plant the seed of doubt that you would try to craft if you could admit you had committed the crime. Seems like you are revealing yourself to be the Sinister the investigator found you to be... Besides, I injected you on the first night and nobody was killed. And my findings were consistent with the death and lobotomy results of Shadows... Perhaps the seed of doubt you planted will work and people will think I caused it. If you are innocent it will certainly look bad for me now that I seem convinced of your guilt. But for me, this ridiculous ruse seems like an amateurish attempt to get rid of me after you're gone. Or you're afraid you'll be executed and they'll find evidence you're Sinister, even though in this crazy place you were actually Insane, so you're overly paranoid and pre-thinking the worst case scenario! This place is cuckoo-bananas! -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
You approached me in the bathroom and asked if I had a night action. I had never spoken to you before. I wouldn't tell someone I don't know, and therefore don't trust, about my night action. Is that the big lie? Well, I feel I have now more than sufficiently explained that. Dirty work? What dirty work have you done? This seems like a new tactic. Are you suggesting we'll find, after you're lobotomized, that you were the one that killed Martin? Are you saying it was the injection that caused you to kill Martin? Now I'm rather happy that we've voted for you today. Are you a scummy little Sinister piggy after all? Oink oink. Interesting... Very interesting, indeed. Please clarify for us. Is that what you're saying now? You're bad but I made you bad? I just want to make sure everything is crystal clear before you're executed. -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
I can understand you're being upset, but what is it you have against me? It wasn't me who brought the information against you. That person has revealed themselves. Is there other reason you have to suspect me? I'm certainly not saying it isn't unreasonable to suspect me. I'm just wondering your reasoning. I wish we didn't have to do this. I did trust you, but the only way to test our theories is to vote you off. This is a horrible thing and I am very sorry. Even more sorry if you are innocent. But it wasn't me who brought this theory forward, so if you are innocent, your blood is not on me, but Mr. Nowhere. -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
I've only explained this about 15 times... No, there does not appear to be a fourth group. I think there's a very thorough explanation as to why voting for the King makes the most sense. There are many things that will be clear once we find out his allegiance. The fact that he has only appeared once to briefly defend himself, weakly I might add, and has since disappeared makes him seem all the more guilty to me. Now your odd and weak rationale behind not voting and asking again about the 4 groups makes me suspicious of you. It's no longer just the unexplained absence... -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
Agreed. I've asked for clarification here and have been told...by disembodied voices...that it's consistent. Not sure why the discrepancy (really not sure ) but the results speak for themselves. The investigator, who was shown to be Insane, investigated Shadows and got the result of Not Insane. The autopsy of Shadows's brain showed that he wasn't Sinister, but had intention to do us harm. Those are the results. -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
No, if you're paying attention!, you would know that Martin's investigation showed them as Not Insane. I confess to editing to fix those tags. It's confusing enough without the broken tag making half the paragraph red. I apologize for rule-breaking. Sowwy. The content of the post remained the same. -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
Martin got that result because he investigated someone who was not insane. He never investigated a Sinister. There are three groups: Insane, Sinister Insanse, Not Insane. If Martin never investigated a Sinister Insanse, he'd never get that result. Since the person he investigated was Not Insane, that's the result he got. He also investigated Dragonator/Salvatore who is Insane, so that's the result he got. Make sense? We've been over it a few times, so please try to pay attention. Thanks and God bless you, my child. -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
We've been told that investigations came back on both of them as Sinister. Please pay attention. Sinister. And there haven't been two different investigations with different results. What are you talking about? -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
That's quite a move after everything else that has happened today. -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
After clarification...with my brain (??)...I believe that it didn't work because Shadows was neutral/independent. I believe my action will work on Sinister and Insane alike. It's seemed crazy at first, but I understand the potential benefits more and more now... -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
How many times do I have to repeat this giggle-brain? If I inject two non-protected insane people with my syringe, their personalities and abilities are switched for the night. I tried to inject Shadows on the first night but it didn't work because he is insane. I believe I was blocked last night. I can use it every night. Infections? What? There are no antibiotics inside. I don't know what is inside. I'm not a doctor, I'm Jesus. -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
This is a great question. However, there's no way to find it unless we have a investigative or peeping-tom-type night action. Hopefully his final investigation will turn up at some point. Is there a resident with a black arm? It looks very blue anyway. As for the syringe, I've always had it and I still have it. Petey Pirowski has a black arm... it could have a bluish tint due to the lighting... -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
You're very strange. I have no idea what you're talking about, but if there's an apology somewhere that I missed, I accept it, my son. And I apologize too. Sowwy. What? You're very strange. -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
I do accept it. I've been admitting it from Day Two. What are you trying to say? You just keep making yourself more suspcious in my eyes, and you're not making any sense. Oh another Jesus pun. How droll. -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
No, it's my fault really. I guess saying it 50 times isn't enough. -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
Yeah, it's definitely me. I injected The King of Delaware on Night One. -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
Oh, you're right: -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
I don't see it this way. They look tan in the picture to me. Are you trying to cause a distraction? I believe Dr. Raj is bringing us pictures from somebody else. The real photographer must remain protected. It's too valuable of a role to lose. He is smart to use Dr. Raj as an ambassador to the rest of us. Pay attention, Peanuts. He was found innocent by our slain investigator. King of Delaware, do not blame me. I was not the one who found the information. It was only brought to me. As it says in the Bible, "calm down." Don't shoot the messenger, good king. If you go over my posts, all my many long-winded posts (sorry ) you will see that I believed and supported you until I received this information from Mr. Nobody. It made little sense at first. I'm sorry that losing you is the only way to test this information. Playing with someone's life this way is an awful thing. But these are ugly times and the Dr wants to find out who killed the walrus without alerting the authorities. But again, why the hell was a sea mammal living in our hospital? That has to be against some state law. Don't we have a union rep or something? -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
Trusted: Mr. Nowhere, Dr. Rajim -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
There's one way to test these theories: Vote out the King of Delaware. (That's not a vote.) And if he's not sinister, do we just go through all those with blue arms? Well, I must be off for some rest. My brain hurts. Since I trust Salvator Ricardo Samuels/Dragonator so much, I shall proxy my vote to him in case it is needed while I slumber. proxy: Salvator Ricardo Samuels/Dragonator -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
Very possible. Good theory, in fact. The investigator, if my source is correct, investigated Bear on Night one and King on Night 2. Why weren't more of us warned about Bear on day 2 then, I wonder. Perhaps we were and we didn't realize it. Thank you for your trust. I wonder if everyone who trusts me at this point is an innocent... I trust almost everyone who has been confiding in me and siding with me. It's kind of creepy really. Now I know how Jesus must've felt... Anyway, the photographer is different from the investigator then. Perhaps the person contacting me assumed they were the same. Is that a purple or dark blue arm? One of the space twins? Considering how many people seem on the level, perhaps we should take out one of the quieter folk, if we can't decide whose blue arm that is. The candidates for killer are The King of Delaware, Mr. Nowhere and (less likely) the Space Twins, judging by the color of the arms. -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
I'm so glad somebody posted as I've come up with an intriguing theory. I didn't want to quadruple post, as I don't need to seem crazier than I already am. Follow me here: On Day Two, Dr. Rajim comes to us with a picture from our investigator that shows me injecting The King of Delaware with a syringe. On Day Three, somebody comes to me with info that the same investigator has found Washing Bear and the King of Delaware to be Sinister. Here's what bugs me about this. If the investigator knows the King of Delaware is Sinister, then he/she must've found that out on the first night when the picture was taken of me. If this is the case, why did Dr. Rajim accuse me of foul play, when the investigation would've revealed that The King of Delaware was sinister? So, either Dr. Rajim, is Sinister and trying to turn people against me or The person, who I'll give a chance to reveal themselves before I reveal them, who told me the investigator has found Bear and King to be Sinister is lying to me. What do you guys think of that? -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum - Day Three
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
And the award for "Reads the most without commenting" goes to Dr. Ballbricker/Ricecracker. Due to the fact that Martin was suspicious of her as well, she goes on my not trusted list. There's a little group of flying under the radar folk here: Dr. Ballbricker (Ricecracker) Perry Noid (ADHO15) Señor Canny Bolero (Iamded) Cat Manuel (The Penguin) 'Lupo' (Rufus) 'Tamtam Timmers', Spacetwin #2 (Quarryman) Cookie Custer (Roncanator) Just trying to group everybody. Sorry if it's confusing. Upon further inspection, it appears Lupo/Rufus has actually posted a lot. I need to take a break before I go insane. Don't say "too late." Oh yeah, too late. DER HER HER DUR. Add Cookie Custer/Ronconator to my trusted list, if for no other reason, than he just asked me the two questions that should not be asked at this point in the game. In case anybody else is confused, Martin Century was a good guy and he was our daytime investigator. The Sinister know who each other are, so they already know who the innocents are. Making a list isn't helping them pick us off, they already know who's Sinister and who's innocent. That's why they have the advantage. I'm glad questions were asked, these things are important to understand. I don't mean to poke fun at somebody just for being an amateur. But, people, please, make sure you're understanding what's going on. If we're just a bunch of bumbling idiots who can't follow the plot...of our own lives...then the Sinister will just pick us off one by one.