TrumpetKing

Interesting how Miguel voted me, yet had never mentioned any specific suspicion for me, unless I missed something. The fact that Katalina had voted is interesting as well, especially since she seems not to like to talk. I'm going to catch up shortly and compile my thoughts a bit better.

Except when people look scummy? Like Alan? Yet you vote for Bebe because she's annoying? Interesting.

Saying anything that's already been stayed is better than nothing at all. In our situation, that's better actually, because we can see where people are likely to put their votes and where their suspicions lie.

Way to bring up your fluffy post from the beginning of the day. Don't you think, that within 48 hours, you would have came by and been able to say anything substantial to help the town progress?

Is this the first time you've said anything today? Why????? Can't you at least speak up a bit and try not to look scummy?

Using this as your first game is no excuse. You were good enough to get here. What Shan is saying is that the fact that you're new means that it's a very easy mistake to make as a new player, which makes it even more scummy.

Defending other people makes you scummy near the beginning unless you have information, which this early means you've either gotten a role claim, or are scum with them. I see no other reason as to why you would even consider defending somebody, and the incredibly unlikeliness that somebody would even attempt to make a claim this early makes me feel you are more likely to be scum.

You're responding to my accusation with defensiveness, and awkward reasoning. Am I not supposed to point out my suspicions? Especially with little to go on, since nobody seems to be talking a whole lot, you still sound rather defensive. All I have done is provide more substance as to why I suspect you, and instead of at least trying to show that you are town in your actions, you are just trying to push my suspicion back towards me and being overly defensive of both yourself and Juan. It's important to note that I didn't initially show suspicion of you until you defended Juan. How does that make me eager to get rid of you, when I have voiced my suspicion for Juan just as much?

There may have been a misunderstanding. Slipping is usually used as a term for accidentally givin away that you are scum, not messing up with posting IC. I was leading towards saying that Juan and Alan acting close to the point where they could be scum partners, saying they could have slipped. So yes, I would say the two of them are acting kind of scummy, not to mention that Alan seems to continuously try to get us on task without adding much but defense for himself and Juan.

I understand that your posts may come like that, but it seems awfully close, like an accidental slip. Not posting in character 24 hours into the day is hardly suspicious, also.

Bebe does sound like a reasonable lynch for the day, but my suspicions for Juan, as well as now Alan, keep increasing. Has anybody else noticed how close they've been acting? -When I accused Juan, he responded pretty defensively, and it seems as if Alan came in and defended him, calling me suspicious for making such an accusation, providing no evidence as to why it does. -Just recently, Juan gave feedback on Abbot's idea of tracking accusations, saying it could work, and Alan came around and responded to Juan, applauding him for the idea, not Abbot. This is a bit more loose of evidence, but if he was giving credit correctly, I see no reason for him to make such a post thanking Juan, when Abbot's idea was just a few statements before. In conclusion, I do find Juan and Alan suspicious, for grouping up so quickly and being highly defensive.

In a lot of cases, though, voting the lurker has been seen to be an easy lynch, but also tends to be unsuccessful. In what ways would such a strategy be more helpful? I wouldn't expect too many scum to hide in such a way.

Just double checked the rules, I had forgotten voting is always open. Regardless, the transition is going to need to be made soon.

Ahh dahhn't mean tuh sound so accusatory, but wouldn't it make sense, if you are just here to establish character, as the normal Day and Page One consists of, surely you would have been able to say something that developed your character without leaving and coming back half an hour or so later. I'm just curious as to why you felt the need to do so if you're just building character. I'm not sure how not being drunk, and being clear headed makes me suspicious. Care to elaborate? And besides, it's not even all that early. We're nearly 1/3 into the day, and voting should be beginning soon, so we're going to need to start transitioning from the fluffing to the scumhunting.

I hate to be questioning so early into the day, but Juan, you do seem to be checking by every so often without saying anything... Is there any reason as to why you're so quiet?

Hand me sum' mahhh booze, Colin sir. I'm gettin' really tired of hearing all tis bitchin'. Wait, what's it fahh? Sinclahh? Dead? Ugh, we need to get to the bahhtahh of this.

I appreciate yahh humahh

Just a warning that I will probably be gone for a decent chunk of the first day. I have internet but I'm also going to be decently busy over the next 24 hours or so. I should be able to post, but just a heads-up.

I hope you're all ready to find some nasty criminals... *trips* Ahh this Bahhston exclusive is great Tahhm, keep it up.

You played, and had me convinced you were town the whole time or was that Ragnarok??

Now that you mention it, it might be interesting to see how tallies line up to how people say they are suspicious of. That could be an interesting way to catch scum. EpicMafia is very different, but I actually like it a lot. Mafiascum is similar to EB but I found it a lot more complicated in terms of management overall.

I could use some more playing time. 1. Played quite a bit here. Tried sites like epicmafia and mafiascum but not a big fan of them, I do prefer epicmafia over mafiascum though. 2. I'm not sure what I would label my strengths and weaknesses. I think I am pretty solid at scum hunting but I'm admittedly not anywhere near the best. I find myself looking scummy sometimes and I do tend to get a bit excited when playing as scum. 3. I would definitely abide by the rules, but I don't care for it. To me it makes it a lot harder than it already is to find scum unless you provide vote tallies frequently, to narrow it down; however, that then makes it unfair to the people voting because it can put them under scrutiny. Also, if people are expressing suspicions publicly, why need a private vote? 4. I played in it, so yes.

The official release is May 1st, around the time of the episode. I mentioned previously that I thought this was the release and WhiteFang did in his review as well Keep in mind that some stores are likely to release them early though, so I imagine TRU and maybe Target to have them in 2-3 weeks. Probably 2 at the earliest.

Another stunning review, WhiteFang! It's interesting how different the figures are spread out in probability this time. I'd at least suspect the family to all be equsl, but it makes sense from an economic standpoint. I'm decently surprised with these figures and I definitely won't be skipping out on them. Thanks again!

I don't think it needs to change. People consider the numbering differently than others, despite LEGO's canon. I'm interested in seeing how this will all work out! I'm not a Simpson's expert so I'm not even going to bother guessing.