Jump to content

Starwars4J

Banned Outlaws
  • Posts

    4,959
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Starwars4J

  1. Jealous of a generic hardsuit? Hardly :-P It's really simple, for the barrel, but it looks nice. Just take one of those half pins, and add on one of those...bah, the piece is available in sentai fortress. It's round and black. I'll take a pic the next time I go home (since I have no parts here with me)
  2. Very nice! I'd change the feet though, and I need to take a picture of the barrel I designed, it would go beautifully with that. Mind taking a few pics of that beauty exploded?
  3. Yeah. The Hoth set is real but we don't know details yet. The rest are just dreams (for now)
  4. Check here Posts for the most part, except Fellows which is experience, devotion, and respect.
  5. Ah, thanks. I was thinking 2 was more redesigned. Frankly I'd take any version of the AT-AT, though fixing the head to be less prone to falling off, and a larger inside would be nice
  6. What's really the difference between numbers two and three though?
  7. Very true, but look at it this way: if they're doing something extra to it in order to make you want to buy it, you're getting a superior product! Win-win! At least that's what I tell myself to justify it :-P
  8. Why not release the same model again? I'm sure we'd like that, but you can't forget Lego is a business. If they can get a few extra people to buy another model for completion, why not? Nobody's forcing you to get the new one if you have the old one, you know :-P Especially since you like the old one so much! It's a smart business move, and I'm fine with it. It only starts getting to me with the 50 versions of the X-wing :-|
  9. It's not that we want them to re-design the AT-AT because we disliked the original, in fact it's quite the opposite! Many people unfortunately didn't get a chance to buy the first one, or would like more copies, so we'd like them to re-release it in the form of a re-design (which is the only feasible way they would) so one of our favorite sets could become available again :-)
  10. Admiral 4J to Lord *vader*: Hoth? What would he be doing on Hoth? It's nowhere near Vile. I'm setting a new course.
  11. Admiral 4J to Lord *vader*: My Lord, we've appeared in system and are heading at maximum speed towards The Kid's location, but we've lost communications. Any idea what's going on?
  12. Interesting colors for some of those parts. Looks nice, though I most likely won't pick one up
  13. As far as I know, "skeletons" will still be the originals, but the undead zombies will be the new design.
  14. Wasn't this a joke? I mean in your container topic wasn't this cleared up? Nobody really thinks he's a thief :-P (hence all the faces)
  15. I doubt it too, but it can't hurt to ask :-P
  16. I voted for the robot factory. It would be phenomenal to see what people could come up with. Especially if we could get our elusive member Keith Goldman in it :-)
  17. That's quite an impressive collection of sets you have there. Space is always my biggest block when buying/building (well, that and time!). Anyway, I hope you're enjoying the community :-)
  18. Welcome (albeit a bit late), I hope you enjoy the community :-)
  19. Ah, you weren't that clear on it. Now that the issue is resolved (I hope), we can get this topic back on track. Although it would be best for a moderator to delete all these posts so the topic doesn't go too far off track.
  20. Well first of all, deleting posts and the like is really the responsibility of the moderators. Secondly there was nothing wrong with his posts as-is. Why aren't you getting that?
  21. Oy, don't you understand that there was no real need to edit it, l2k? You see, if it was merely edited, people might miss the new announcement. It was really fine as is. And I'm well aware of the edit button, are you aware of what I'm saying though?
  22. I think he's saying the sub in the shipwreck set looks like a hybrid sub/heli It kind of does, I guess, especially in the rear
  23. Actually l2k...there was a large gap in the time of his posts. And they were about a different subject. He was double posting in order to inform people of a change who might have overlooked the topic otherwise. IMO it was perfectly fine in this case. You really DO need to lighten up :-P
  24. Well that wasn't meant to be offensive, it was supposed to be humorous. Sorry if you were offended by it. Trying to lighten the mood and all ;-)
×
×
  • Create New...