JimBee

Okay, Bear has waited for more people to speak up, and is now going to unvote, because I am going to bed now, as prescribed. My attempt to provoke the crowd into coming to a decision has failed. It looks like Cookie will have to face the consequences if Cam does not unvote. There's nothing I can do about that, sorry. Unvote: Nurse Penny/ YumiYoshi And, Bear doesn't want to be held responsible for voting the wrong person when no one else has discussed it, especially with another's vote.

Maybe you should remember about a page's worth of conversation (if it were to be written) back. I listed deductions on almost half of the roster. ...or maybe actually listen to what I have to say. I relisted my reasons when I cast my vote.

Well since we're not getting anywhere, and Bear is becoming drowsy, I will vote, based on my reasoning and deduction of the staff. Vote: Nurse Penny / yumiyoshi And that counts as two. Bear votes for her because we think that one of the staff is Sinister because the staff had access to most of the building, which was in the description of that walrus's killer. Must be staff, right? Bear will gladly take back my votes if someone has a good argument against my choice. By the way, I'm forced to vote either way because of the two votes already in place, neither from which I want to choose from.

How about we vote for someone likely to be scum, who's not spoken up? We think that a staff member could be sinister, so let's looks at that list, and narrow it down from there. Dr Ballbricker (Ricecracker) Has spoken a fair amount, no reason to be suspicious of. Voted for once. Dr Rajim (Admiral Ron) Talkative, probably innocent. Nurse Pendleton (Zephyr) Talkative, voted for once, got off without much to suspect of. Seems trustworthy due to this post: And this: Nurse Pepper (Bob the Construction Man) Quiet. Made this post: Not much of help. Nurse Penny (Yumiyoshi) Quiet, made a couple, not very helpful, comments: --- If we are to vote out any staff member, Bear thinks it should be either Nurse Penny or Nurse Pepper. There are also a few others Bear's got his eye on, the quiet ones. Including: Sparky Trucks (TinyPies) Perry Noid (ADHO) Ted Nathan Tompkins (WhiteFang) Sandy Craws (Sandy) - a little on the quiet side, not sure about this one. Lupo (Rufus) - see above Shadows Martin Century (Stash2Sixx) Again, Bear is just pointing out that they have been quiet, some more than others, and if anything is to be learned from books that we've read (during the allotted reading time, of course) about games... of life, then it's that scum like to fly under the radar by keeping their posts at a minimum. This has already been explained. The King and Bear are good childhood friends, and know of each other's innocence. And yeah, that's when the flood started because I was online awake and campaigning at the time. Read remember back to when all of the people who voted for Bear was discussed. I'm not going to vote for you, because I agree. King, as much as you and Bear are friends, please stop throwing around votes because the files have nothing to do with the patient's intent.

Possible conversation? You voted for him, apparently unintentionally at first, but then, as Butz said, quoted him directly, so it looked like you were passively voting for him. It was suspicious. One person proxied their vote to me, and he explained that it was because I was PR and therefore trustworthy. It was on his own free will, I had nothing to do with it. Seven people gave me their votes for PR, some of which were undecided and no better choice came to them, others, just because (I said I didn't know). And trust me, Bear wouldn't be this obvious if I was Sinister.

Yet you admitted your mistake, and then said, and Bear quotes, So you did plan to vote for him anyway, which raised a flag for Bear. And if Bear really was sure that you were sinister, I would have voted for you. Meta-gaming? Too much medication for you, Bear thinks. Bear is offended that you think I would be that stupid as a Sinister. Like Jesus said, they're probably laughing at us bicker, glad the spotlight is on someone else. Well, Dr. Buttsgiggle did say that the roles have nothing to do with the files. The Sinister could be anyone, no matter what the files say. He already answered this, but Bear confirms that he asked me the same question. Nurse! Bear is hearing voices again! Bear did, thank you for speaking up. Bear also spoke to Salvatore, and King. The rest, I have no idea why they voted for me.

No, Bear called you an idiot for convicting Big Cam. It was too late to vote for PR and you knew it. And then you admitted it. And still didn't call your vote off, hoping no one notice and you would get away with a conviction. If there's anything we've learned about scum, it's this. Bear won't vote quite yet because it will not only make me a target, but also cause a three-way tie in which Bear is responsible for breaking. And with this new position of power that my fellow innocents have given me, Bear doesn't want to abuse it by going against what everyone else wants. But, everyone, do listen to Bear. I'm definitely not certain that Jesus is Sinister, but think about it: - He got two votes for PR before he even said a word - A possible agenda might be to convict Big Cam, kill me at night, and then kill Ryan Catchers the next night, leaving him to become PR, if he were Sinister. He may have covered this up by saying "Oh, no, I don't wanna be the PR! Don't vote for me!" ... after the PR was already chosen. - Who would you rather have convicted, Big Cam, who I trust at this point, Dr. Balls, who would be the other choice, or Jesus, the sneaky fox animal who tries to secretly convict someone? And no, not having a conviction is not an option, since no one will take back their votes. Think about it. Because if no additional votes are made, Bear will be forced to choose between Balls and Cam. Oh, and if Jesus switches his vote to me, then Bear is obviously not going to choose himself over Balls. That is, if no additional votes are made.

And that's a conviction. Idiot.

Washing Bear doesn't. But it does think that someone has a point about one of the staff being suspicious, for having access to almost all rooms. And like it said before, Jesus seems suspicious too.

Clearly. Washing Bear thanks you all for the support, and it will to its best to serve the innocent animals. Oh, and yes, the PR candidates would be a good place to start. Washing Bear can say in its defense that King of Delaware already trusts me, and Bear appealed to some others via "bathroom chat sessions". They voted for me because they trusted me. Bear does not think Big Cam is Sinister either for the same reasons. However, Bear has its eye on Jesus, because it hasn't said a word, yet has gotten two votes. Would the Sinister be that obvious? Maybe. It's worth considering, Bear thinks.

Agreed, Delores. I will have to think about Mrs. Jefferson's death more, again. I am also in agreement to go to the Jefferson household, as planned.

Happy New Year! Congrats to EB for having 13000 members, I can barely believe it. I remember when I joined, there were only some 2000 members. I'm glad no one said anything about a decade being over, that was last year. 2000-2010 is eleven years.

I will also change my vote. Unvote PR: King of Delaware/ KingoftheZempk Vote: Chief Washing Bear/ JimButcher Washing Bear is curious why people are voting for this Jesus animal, it hasn't even said a word yet. You should vote for Washing Bear. Washing Bear trustworthy. This Oak Tree animal? Washing Bear does not find it untrustworthy, but trusts Washing Bear more. Hoo-ha! Big Cam (4; Big Cam, Roncanator, Sandy, ADHO15) Washing Bear (2; KingoftheZempk, JimButcher) Mr. Nowhere (2; Rufus, Scouts) Jesus (2; iamded) Dudley Eisenhower (1; Mrlegoninja) Ryan Catchers (1; Rick) Stanley Spussemmin (1: CorneliusMurdock) Excuse Washing Bear's nonsense above, it meant, Vote for PR: Washing Bear/ JimButcher

Hm, Washing Bear trusts King of Delaware. Washing Bear votes. Vote for PR: The King of Delaware/ KingoftheZempk Why, little animals ask? No, am not sinister. Washing Bear knows King from many moons ago. Washing Bear knows of King's innocence. Hoo-ah!

Agreed. These are completely different from Bionicle, because they appeal to a much, much larger fanbase (AFOLs, TFOLs, and children), whereas Bionicle (for the most part) appealed to children. Plus, TLG can barely keep these on the shelves. As long as they keep coming up with good ideas, I don't see these decreasing in number per series, ever, even if it will end eventually.

I still prefer the first shot, simply because the lighting is more dramatic.

I wasn't planning on buying this one, but it looks a lot better now that I've seen it from all angles. That canopy piece is pretty neat, but what tops this set off are the figs. That pilot is amazing overall, with a black version of the clone pilot head and helmet. The metallic droid is pretty sharp, too. Thanks for the review, Starstreak.

Glad to see you're back to making comics, Sandy. This one's better than ever, with really great MOCs and photo effects. I don't know anything about Final Fantasy, but the story is interesting so far. Is it your own or one of the games? A little critique, one that that I wasn't so fond of in this comic was the RPG turn-based action. I know it fits in with the theme, but even when I like RPGs, I hate turn-based action. Is the enemy just going to wait for you to attack? Anyways, that's just my opinion, it's good that you tried something new. By the way, what is the torso on the red mage from? I don't remember seeing it before. Keep up the good work.

Happy Birthday SlyOwl! Have a fantastic day.

brickcitydepot - 2 points brickzone - 1 point Cornelius Murdock - 1 point Nieks - 1 point

Like I said before, I had urged my colleague to investigate the case further, but he wouldn't listen. That's all I can give you on this case (as far as I know).

Nice shots! Very clear and sharp. My favorite would have to be the one with Indy next to the shiny cocoon. If it's not too late, you should enter the Star Wars photography contest, I think you'd be a good entrant.