Trekkie99

Now that, is a tractor. Bravo!

Awesome layout! How was the overall reception?

All this time and I forgot to mention that courtesy of @djm, he created a Motor Assembly Instructions PDF for the monorail motor base awhile back! Enjoy!

I was hoping the investigator had a new spokesperson. But like you've said if there was info it would have come out by now. Looks like it's up to us now. I was waiting to hear more from @KotZ. I mean joking aside, what's with this quote? @KotZ your behavior is odd to say the least. Seeing that we're possibly not going to receive a investigative result, I'm going to... Vote: Karai (KotZ) Reasons? Mostly for giving insufficient reasoning for why he cast his vote for Barbossa, as well as somewhat dodging @fhomess question as to why he voted for Barbossa.

Does the wheel axle have enough side-to-side free play that would allow the tyre closest to the gears to rub up against the black bevel gear? The motor axle length on mine is 3L.

I personally recommend removing the two middle tyres, and shift the tyre on the left a little to bit to the right. The reason I shift the tyre is because sometimes it runs risk of rubbing up against the black bevel gear. Also as @FiliusRucilo has mentioned, using one of these in place of the 6 long cross axle that you've used for the black bevel gear is very important. In the above photo, the space between the two tyres is probably 4/5ths the width of a technic bush. The tyre closest to the gears is ever so slightly closer to the other tyre to ensure that the tyre does not rub up the gears. The half bushing in back of the tyre is there to ensure the tyre doesn't move any closer to the other tyre while the monorail is running.

So are you the jester now?

And what brings you to that conclusion?

No word from a new investigator spokesperson. I'm starting to fear WW was the investigator. So what's on the menu? @KotZ is being accused of bandwagoning and skimping on his explanations for why he voted for those that he did. More recently he cast a revenge vote against @Khscarymovie4 @Rider Raider has been accused of "acting very surprised at how many votes Ellie got on Day 1 after he threw a vote her way", sitting on the fence, and giving WW a pass to which he defends his case saying he "didn’t want to lynch someone who was either the investigator or cleared". Of these two I would definitely say KotZ is the most suspicious while Rider Raider on the other hand is innocent on all charges except for maybe being a fence sitter IMO as he has explained himself quite well I feel. Can you please quote which part of said post your referencing?

I see. Thanks for clarifying that. Well I'm hoping our investigator has a new spokesperson who can show us de wae...

This is...odd. Why would @Tariq j make such a seemingly black and white statement only to clarify that he has know idea whether or not there is a watcher.

Sorry to hear your monorail went kaput. Hope you'll be able to get it working! Do you have a link to the facebook thread?

As you've stated multiple times, your miller claim means you can not be permitted into the town block. However, I just wanted to say that this statement you've made feels genuinely townie. As to whether or not Chell is scum, I'm leaning no. However if it's true, hopefully (like you've stated) our potential investigator has found someone to deliver the message in a more concrete manner.

Whoo! Caught a scum! Sucks to lose WW though now knowing she was town.

No worries! Besides, it's Thanksgiving weekend. I'm sure everyone is probably busy.

Nor I.

OMG welcome! I'm such a huge fan! Your the reason I love custom Lego monorails so much. It's an honor to have you here!

This has been my thinking as well. If MostlyTechnic flipped town tomorrow however, I'd be more interested in this "neutral town" claim. Can we get your quick take on this @Forresto?

Never been a battle pack fan...until now!

That's worth noting, but IMO most of those votes were based off of a mild suspicion (bandwagoning) and the need for a lynch. If the scum were to use this tactic, it could result in a max of four town kills before it would come back to bite them. If we are to assume there are four scum players among us and don't account for a potential vig, that would level the playing field. Interesting idea. Again, interesting idea. But risky to say the least. Would the scum attempt this? Well for now and I'm going to... Vote: Moody (mostlytechnic)

Well Foreman clearly wasn't scum which means he was either exhibiting "new player behavior" and was trolling, or was a jester who couldn't kill and who's win condition was to get lynched. In the end, Foreman flipped town, and you saved your butt. I clearly stated my reasoning for why I voted for you yesterday, and I don't have to much interest in voting for you at the moment. All I'm saying is that your definitely not confirmed town at this point.

Well the only thing I really found suspicious about Wonder Woman yesterday was her bandwagony nature. Aside from that, the need to lynch her was mostly out of need of a lynch in the first place. As I had mentioned, I felt like @Forresto was the wrong choice, and that we could instead lynch someone potentially less (as I put it) "high impact". Like @StickFig for example. However, it seemed as if Forresto was the direction we were heading, and because I would potentially not be available by the time the day was over, I cast my vote for Forresto simply because I felt we needed a lynch, and I certainly didn't want to go into day three without a lynch. I (and probably others) felt pretty confident about lynching Foreman considering he had (at least it seemed at the time) confessed to being scum once faced with no escape from the lynching mob that had formed against him. Also if Foreman's claim were to turn up as true come morning, it would put Forresto in a better light in my eyes, and potentially other's since he was somewhat of a leader of the lynch wagon against Foreman. But now that Foreman's "confession" has been proved to have been a farce, my suspicion of Forresto has been rekindled, if not potentially further fed.

@Foreman wasn't scum?! And what about his jester claim? Well at least we didn't lose anyone in the night.

I'll give it a try! Maybe I'll put the dyed one and a real one next to each other and see if people can guess which is which.

Must be. Night everyone.