msk6003

The fact is, while I don't know about other cars, but for this specific car, the transmission multiplier is more realistic. In my opinion, the only cheat Lego did with this model's transmission is the creation of the new 14/18t gears.

I playing taiko no tatsujin. I am planning to make an MOC inspired by this, but I'm not sure when I'll do it.

Like this?

I think yes if we exclude 2 rangler, bronco and maybe top gear rally car. IDK top gear rally car is this scale.

Honestly, I don't really like the concept of a custom garage too. This is Technic. If it's going to be custom, you should do some technical customization; I don't think it makes sense to submit something that only changes the appearance to Technic.

Wheel is dark pink not magenta? I wanted it will be magenta because of this. F it. I will not buy this.

I just found out that there is a post like this on this forum.

It just occurred to me that the large CV joint disc hub in this set is modular, unlike the previous 3-pin version. I suspect they might use the same principle to discontinue the existing integrated 3-pin large CV joint hub and create a new modular part like the one in this set. If that happens, the old hub had internal roller bearings that were useful for heavy-duty models, but since the new hub is 100% likely to lack such features, we might need to get my hands on the old hub quickly.

Although it has little problem like don't have physical controller and high price but standardise hardware of PU/C+ system is already perfect. Main problem of PU/C+ is software. From Spike to C+, all the software in this system operates independently. It is the default for features supported in one software to not be supported elsewhere, some software cannot be shared, and as of this month, even the Robot Inventor software, which previously supported the above, is completely unavailable for download.

Racingbrick raced in

No it can't. Tested. That is another reason why CS&AI system is SUCK. And there is one more surprisingly serious problem with this system that no one on the forum has noticed yet: the fact that each individual motor contains a battery means that to charge the model, you need either a multi-headed cable or a massive amount of cables. With the former, the length of the split ends would be an issue, and with the latter, a charger with multiple ports is required Which usually people don't have it at home. in both cases, it implies that a spiderweb-like mass of cables is required just to charge a single model. As for CS&AI's solution? TLG include ONLY ONE type c cable in each set(remind CS&AI need to charge 4 component) and released a spider-shaped charger. But because the price was so high relative to its functionality, my company didn't even bother to bring it in. We also can't leave out the fact that the individual price of the motor has become at least twice as expensive as that of the Spike Prime. While the ability to control multiple motors simultaneously is certainly an advantage compared to any other system, its other drawbacks are too severe. This system is BAD for general use outside of educational applications.

I want release in normal sets. Magazine set is very hard to get in korea.

Working breake with re introduce of flex cable system. And convertible gimmick that operates via links, just like a real car would be nice. The current method of simply detaching the roof is neither fun nor technical.

I hope that front wheel and tire are release on more sets. AMR25 F1 include wheel but only one.

No. CS&AI system is suck. NEVER bring it on normal technic system. Ok for educational perpose, but not good for normal set. The only advantage is that it is convenient to use in models where the motor part needs to move, such as cranes with grippers, due to the absence of a connecting cable, but that is it. The motor torque is poor, the battery life is poor, and unlike spike motors, it only has two pin holes instead of four, which is also unappealing. Furthermore, the fact that the rear must be exposed externally for charging and connection is also a drawback.

The world's most detailed reviewer.

Last release of that offroad tire is 2019. Gled to see it again.

Considering geartrain on steering system, this also has steering wheel correction problem.

That's exactly what I thought always.

The large CV joint hub in the pin version features roller bearings inside to reduce friction when used with heavy models. It is a real shame that these are missing in the brake disc version.

So, all Technic MOCs were rejected in this 11th funding round as well. At this point, I can only conclude that TLG is intentionally ignoring and excluding Technic.

To answer humorously, TLG likely no longer has motors to install in a vehicle like this because most C+ motors have been discontinued. To give a more realistic answer, while the motor of the Chiron was made of Lego, the entire model was built tens of thousands of Lego parts mounted on a steel frame like this.

I don't understand why people complain about color coding. Why don't you just suggest unifying all the pins, axles, connectors, bushings, and gears to black? That would make finding parts much easier, wouldn't it? I still remember when the 42009 was released, people criticized it, asking why it was covered in 2L pins on third stage of crane boom when 3L pins could have been used.

For new 18/14 gear meshing, @Sariel already did test even before 11 years ago. I timestamped to 18t gear but 64 also has test.