Brickdoctor

I don't know the answer. I moved your question to the correct topic so that someone who does know can answer it.

It's better than the little - if any - information you can get from doing nothing. It can be frustrating, I agree, but if you defend yourself well, it shouldn't be confusing. If you think you can't defend yourself well or if you behaved in such a way that you think it would be impossible to defend yourself, then, yes, you wouldn't want to be accused...but that's obvious no matter what part of the situation you're in. So...we obviously have to do something, but you're not going to contribute. You might not like this portion of the situation, but that doesn't mean you should sit back and wait for other people to do the contributing during this time.

I'll merge this with the thread for prices and availability... ...and done.

This has been debated over and over again, but the short answer is that technically, no, it is not. It doesn't have 'UCS' in its name. It has a five-digit number because it's a LEGO Exclusive.

Dark Orange is actually pretty close to the color of the 'real' thing. I think the presence of the bright green acklay in this scene just makes it look a little redder than it really is.

Accusations are good for us. Accusations generate reactions. Reactions can be analyzed to help us find Scum. The only reason for someone to want to avoid being accused is if he has something to hide...

Results of Round Ten of the Battle of Drakencourt: Imperial Pikemen C move one hex south-west. Lion Pikemen D move one hex south-west. Lion Crossbowmen A move one hex north-west. Lion Crossbowmen B vs. Rogue Lion Knights B - Special Damage (No Damage) Lion Pikemen B vs. Rogue Lion Knights B - Miss Lion Knights C vs. Rogue Lion Knights B - Damage (3-2=1 Damage) Lion Knights C vs. Rogue Lion Knight B - Hit (8-3=5 Damage) Rogue Lion Pikemen A - Free Movement one hex south-east. Teuthisal Crossbowmen A - Free Movement one hex south-east. All your troops converge around the rogue knights, and, at long last, Alexandre, your knights make another move down the hill and drop the last of the knights. "Quickly, to the west!" Enemies: Rogue Lion Pikemen A Type: Footsoldiers Level: 4 Health: 10/10 Defense: 1 Passive Special: Footsoldiers gain a +1 Power flanking bonus whenever their target is adjacent to one of their allies. Drops: 12 Gold Teuthisal Crossbowmen A Type: Ranged Level: 4 Health: 3/10 Defense: 1 Passive Special: Ranged units can fire over obstacles or other units to attack enemies up to two hexes away. If their target is two hexes away and not also Ranged, they cannot take Damage. Drops: nothing Allies: Lion Pikeman B, Level 3 Footsoldiers (lead by Capt.JohnPaul) Power: 3 Health: 6/10 Defense: 1 Passive Special: Footsoldiers gain a +1 Power flanking bonus whenever their target is adjacent to one of their allies. Lion Pikeman D, Level 3 Footsoldiers (lead by Flipz) Power: 3 Health: 2/10 Defense: 1 Passive Special: Footsoldiers gain a +1 Power flanking bonus whenever their target is adjacent to one of their allies. Imperial Pikemen C, Level 2 Footsoldiers (lead by Flipz) Power: 2 Health: 7/10 Defense: 1 Passive Special: Footsoldiers gain a +1 Power flanking bonus whenever their target is adjacent to one of their allies. Lion Knights C, Level 4 Mounted (lead by Capt.JohnPaul) Power: 4 Health: 9/10 Defense: 2 Passive Special: Mounted units can act twice in a Round. (move two hexes, move one hex and attack, or attack twice) Lion Crossbowmen A, Level 3 Ranged (lead by Flipz) *On a Hill* Power: 6 Health: 10/10 Defense: 0 Passive Special: Ranged units can fire over obstacles or other units to attack enemies up to two hexes away. If their target is two hexes away and not also Ranged, they cannot take Damage. Lion Crossbowmen B, Level 3 Ranged (lead by Flipz) Power: 3 Health: 10/10 Defense: 0 Passive Special: Ranged units can fire over obstacles or other units to attack enemies up to two hexes away. If their target is two hexes away and not also Ranged, they cannot take Damage. Party Second-in-Command, choose the order of actions. All of you, choose what action(s) each of your units will perform. Any enemy not targeted will get a Free Action at the end of the Round.

Okay, let's all be like Francis. Let's 'not contribute' and not accuse anyone, not lynch anyone, and have no reactions to accusations or other behavior to analyze. Let's sit back and hope that the Vig gets lucky and/or that the Scum lie down and die. Let's also repeatedly criticize the discussion - if there actually is one after all the other stuff we're not going to do - and make no attempts to fix the problem.

For clarity's sake, I never said that there was no way for Daly to overturn my vote, only that what Daly has said so far has not convinced me to change it.

So, you're saying that I'm suspicious because I continue to suspect you and you say that you're Town. How is anyone else supposed to know if you really are Town at this point? We can't. I have no way of knowing if you're telling the truth when you claim to be Town, and I've already laid out my reasons for continuing to suspect you.

So when you were wrong about Wright, it was okay, but if I'm wrong about you, as you insist is true, then that makes me suspicious?

The frontpage is primarily for EB announcements and for highlighting news and reviews of new products and MOCs are frontpaged if there's nothing else recent to have up there. The staff does try to give each frontpage post a good amount of time at the top of the frontpage, so they have to prioritize what really needs to be on the frontpage. Star Wars just hasn't had a lot of that kind of stuff lately.

Hopefully, I'm not inferring too much from your statement, but just because I didn't unvote you doesn't mean that I didn't take your statements into account. I stated what I found suspicious. You defended yourself. I found part of your defense suspicious. I still find you suspicious, but for a different reason, therefore, my vote is unchanged.

I think that there's no reason for anyone to rush out an early post other than to try to look active, because anyone trying to help should be carefully reviewing his statements to make sure that they make sense. At this point, though, there's really no way for me to know what your reasons were other than what you claim, and you can just keep insisting that you did it to help. In any case, you've admitted that you rushed to make an early statement, which I still find suspicious, and the fact that you used IIoA remains, so I will keep my vote as it is.

So you claim that you don't think about whether it would make you look bad, but you also claim that you feel rushed to make an early post? There is no reason to try to rush to get out an early post other than to try not to "look bad". No, I was just responding to your statement that you claimed to have acted confused, because you couldn't figure out why an SK would kill him. IIoA is Information Instead of Analysis. That refers to posts that speculate about the setup of the situation (number of Scum, number of factions, etc.) at a time when such knowledge can't help us decide on a lynch, instead of trying to actually find the Scum by analyzing behavior. In your earlier defense, you said, "Yes I was wrong on both counts, but most of us were.", and I was responding to that. I apologize if that's not what you meant.And, for the record, I myself never said that it was suspicious that you went against the bandwagon. Slight correction: You claim to have been confused, not to have acted confused.

Clearing the cache of your home computer's browser should make the new avatar visible for you.

So if you figured it out after you started writing, why didn't you just go back and remove the sentence in which you acted confused before you submitted the post finished the statement? You even said in that statement that it only made sense as an Scum kill, yet you still made a statement as if you were confused.And also, it makes sense for an SK to kill Burbank. The SK wants to kill someone who hasn't been active. Not only was Burbank inactive, he's also the sort of person with enough experience in these situations to find an SK. It might be a little more risky for the SK than killing a sheep who isn't going to attract as much attention based on metagaming, but I don't think it's really that ridiculous for an SK to kill Burbank. (not that I think it was, because I think there's a better chance that it was a Scum metagame-kill, just saying...) There's nothing wrong with telling people to be rational and calm, but when you say that and nothing else, (other than the speculation about who was behind the kill, which, as I've said, was obvious) then it looks like you're trying to look helpful without actually adding anything to the discussion of suspicions. To be fair, that was your first statement Today, which is usually just a general reaction to the events of last Night, but when I consider both this and your use of IIoA yesterday, then it really looks like you're trying to look helpful without discussing suspects. No one said you were suspicious because you were wrong.

I believe that this is the second time I've seen Daly read this topic enter the room after being accused and leave without saying anything. Let's apply some more pressure... I Vote: Arnold Daly (darkdragon).

Welcome, fhomess!

Being aggressive is a Town-tell. Scum prefer to jump between suspects trying to agree with the rest of the votes and/or act unsure about their suspicions to give them an excuse if they lynch a Townie.