Lord Arjay

I should like to remind you of something. If we assume that there are 6 hallowed then three more innocent lives and it is all over. After what happened last night it is entirely possible that by voting me off you will not see tommorow. Also, there is always the chance that there is a hallowed convertor, in which case only two more deaths are needed. Now then, that means the hallowed only need 2 misguided innocents to follow them. I hope that you will think carefully before voting. It is almost given that the hallowed are seizing there chance and will all vote for me. My last chance it seems is to reveal my informant, I have told Miss Ching of this person so she can back me up. Elloquence Malleus is my mystery informant. I urge you to wait before coming to a decision, we still have plenty of time. Forgot to add something, I have been in contact with Miss Ching and she has provided me with suitable evidence that Elloquence is to be trusted. Therefore I shall Vote: Sheila Bones/Matn What?! How did that get there? Please ignore it, it is nothing to do with what I was saying.

I am not lying. In truth last night I attempted to retrieve the antidote from the poisoner. You see, I believed that there was only one poisoner, another assumption I made. Truth is, there is every chance I was in your room last night but I can assure you it was not of my own free will. I have no idea what happened only that Crudo Alakhazam did something to me, causing me to fail to not even get to my intended target. Then, well I do not know, I can not remember anything else. Perhaps you are correct that I was in your room, I assumed I was simply blocked but now I am not so sure. I changed my mind about Sheila because I realised that I was only after her because of someone I trusted, that person has yet to bring up thier evidence so I now am having doubts.Finally, I had already told someone of my real reasons for the Sheila vote, so no I did not change my story.

In my view an impartial is better than an innocent any day. Everything against her was true, I made the mistake of revealing the truth and am now paying for it. How could I have known that she was impartial?! You are disregarding everything I have said in order to get your point across. My arguements against her both applied to hallowed and impartial, I did not think there would be another impartial so I assumed she was hallowed. Also, there was nothing to suggest that she was helping us either. How many times must that you repeat that? How did I manipulate? Regardless of whether I was in danger or not I would still have gone after her. You include remarks that do nothing just so your arguement can seem more formiddable. I see nothing at all that points to your innocence, does anyone else? No, he hiding behind words in the hopes that others will not actuaaly look at what he is saying. Are you now imagining things to aid your attack? I am not voting for Sheila as I have yet to see this near-perfect evidence! You'll notice I said I am having doubts on whether I was correct or not. Of course this doesn't matter to you, you seem eager to divert attention from Valerie and Sheila. Perhaps one of them is hallowed and you want to cover them? megablocks! You are now lying to aid your attack, I did not attempt to steal from you I was in fact blocked. You are not in possesion of a foe glass so are lying to aid your cause. Answer me this, did I once lie in voting off Nene? No, I witheld some of the truth (as otherwise you would not have listened to my arguements) and admitted it after. Unfortunetly I did not realise how easily the hallowed would use that against me. You are being hypocritical and are lying in your accusation. However, I do not wish to throw another spanner in the works, tonight I suggest you be blocked. I still feel we should focus on Sheila and Valerie for today, one of them is hallowed but I must admit I believe Valerie more. Oh and that voting thing. It's quite simple, I placed my vote with someone I trusted. Only the hallowed would know that I was lying and I hoped they would call me out on it. This did not happen so I dropped it. It was never my intention to frame you, you'll see that I always placed my own reasons for voting someone so framing was not an option. I have cotacted my informant and shall not be voting until I hear from them, but Desiree please would you unvote me? Or at least listen to my defence.

Aha, a late reply is better than no reply. Excellant entry Admiral, I look rather fetching in blue don't I? I certainly do. Very nice idea, there is not a better sight than Redcoats killing each other. At least I got to be an enemy of the redcoats and I should therefore execute myself...urrk. Thanks for including me.

Time to explain! Yay! First my reasoning for the Sheila vote. During day 4 I was told this by someone who I trusted after revealing I was in contact with an innocent poisoner: As I said, I trusted them. I also knew that if they were being truthful about their action then they would have the means to gather this near-perfect evidence. It would have been foolish for him/her to stick out their neck without reasoning. So I sent this to the poisoner: They did not follow my advice and the next morning Madame Kingston had been poisoned. Naturally I assumed it was caused by my contact. However I now know this not true. There are two poisoners! Anyway, dissapointed I thought about how to get Sheila voted off. In the end I decided to say it was because she blocked me with malicious intents (I might add, that I still believed anyone appearing in the foe glass was evil) and that she had been suspicious during the day (Her defence of Nene seemed as though she knew that Nene was not hallowed) Now, that is exactly what Madame Kingston had against Bulltoad. There was also the fact that another who blocked me did not appear in my foe glass whereas Sheila did. I felt it strange that Sheila not directly attacked anyone. She has not even voted. Could this be because she wanted to go un noticed. During every arguement she has stayed on the middle ground. Not really leaning to one side at all. Anyway, these are my mane reasons. I should include that after day 5's end I contacted Madame Kingston with my true reasoning to which she replied: She agreed with me, the plan being that since I had given her everything she could lead the attack as she was more trusted than I. Of course it did not go that way as Madame Kingston is dead. I must admit I am very annoyed that this near-perfect evidence has not turned up. The one who informed me has had ample oppertunity to do so and refuses. Therefore I am having my doubts about whether I am correct about Sheila and have not voted. That and Miss Chings new revelation. I would like to hear Valerie out first. Simply because Miss Ching is not in possesion of a foe glass and if I am correct in my thinking, then the person who turned me on Sheila and the one who gave Miss Ching that info are the same. Now then, a few more points. Excuse me? None of my arguements were made up, they were all true! -Angela was acting suspicious to me and several others. I was not the first to suspect her no, I was the first to put my suspicions clearly. If you remember I asked her many times to explain herself, mainly about the camera. Each answer though got more and more crazy thus I voted for her. She was also our best lead. This you can't fault me for. -I presented my thoughts on Harriet as it was clear that no others would come forward with anything. She was innocent in the end and I did go after her. But Madame Kingston went after Bulltoad and he turned out innocent! I doubt you'd use that against her. Finally you voted also if I remember correctly: -I realised I was in danger with Nene. However, I had already stated my suspicions to Rocky before I knew she had found me out. All of my evidence against her was valid and true. The only thing that changed was that I was a little more insistant than I would be if I was not in danger. As I suspected my suspicions were correct. She was impartial, how was I to know that she would be impartial? I made the mistake of assuming that Brandon was the only one, however the fact remains that this has been our only succesful conviction. If it were not for me Bulltoad would have been voted out. Do you think I would have admitted the revenge thing if I was hallowed? No, I would have kept it secret and made my position stronger. Looking back, I should've realised the hallowed would use that against me. -Eh? Loki has admitted that he gave me the potion because of my attack on Nene. I also feared for my life (I still believed Nene to be hallowed) and went in search of a magic mmirror that would kill halllowed. I did not find it hence my "I have exposed a liar" remark. However after talking it over I believe that another theif beat me to it. My reasons for voting Sheila can be found above. Believe as you wish. The fact is no one else has openly accused people as much as me, in reality Madame Kingston was the only other and she was wrong whereas I was not. I lead to the one succesful conviction. I see no-one else doing anything to help. Wrong! Sheila has admitted blocking me. Now, can you back her up by revealing that last night she stupified you? Make no mistake Desiree, I think that you are innocent and trust you. I have revealed that to the one person I know that I can trust, however due to the non-appearance of the near-perfect evidence I doubt they would support me. Or if they are being truthful then it is certain that they would be at danger. That's what I look for. Let's see who can help: -Trusted informant. Unlikely as they have not done so far. -Madame Kingston. Dead, though it should be noted that she clearly trusted me. -The poisoner. They could, I shall make a plea here. If you reveal yourself then surely some innocent who cann protect will make sure no harm comes to you. Of course, I understand if you choose not to. -Living investigator. Last resort and should not reveal themselves. -Loki Malfoy. Already confirmed it was he who gave me the luck potion. -Rocky Bromwell. Can confirm that I had already told him I suspected Nene during day 3. Before my life was in danger. -Crudo Alakhazam. He appeared in my foe glass last night hence he cannot be the killer. Has already sort of confirmed. -Rhubarb Uxley. Same as Crudo, except on night 4. More explaining to come I promise.

One last quick reply. I was acting for someone else. If Desiree can back you up then that is fine, I was given the potion it is not mine. I am sure that the supplier can back me up. Due to Miss Chings claim I am having some doubts about your guilt though.

It is amusing how quickly Miss Chings evidence is disregarded. Anyway I do have explaining to do. I can promise you that in 2-3 hours (internet troubles). First a few points: -I was acting on behalf of another whom has real evidence against Sheila. -Desiree please look before attacking me. Sheila has already admitted to blocking me. -No matter what other reasons I had, my points against Nene remain true and I would use them against her regardless. -Miss Bathory, I have given my reasons to you. She agrees with them. -Miss Ching, were you stupified? If so I presume Sheila the cause, if not then I believe you on Valerie. I shall not vote untill I can explain and I ask the same of you.

No, I don't. That's why I added that last remark. Never the less it's true. Though I do know some actions others are because they appeared in my foe glass and I did not die. They'd all probably appreciate me shutting up now.

Actually Professor Longbottom, I know that Uxley, Bathory, Alakhazem and Malleus each have actions unrelated to killing. Though all that proves is that they are not the killer. I only have Miss Malleuss' word on the subject but she seems to be truthful. The others are fact. We can rule out you as well. Which leaves Miss Hearth and Jingle. Coming from me this probably means little to you though.

I don't have much time for a long speech. YOU IDIOTS!! I HAD MORE AGAINST SHEILA THAN BULLTOAD!! I will explain a lot in full later but today please follow my advice and vote out Sheila! The female canine must leave!!

Right, I have caught up on the days events. Yes you cannot vote me out today. The one who poisoned Madam Kingston is innocent, I am sure! Just a bit stupid. If they do not give you the antidote then I will get it myself! You have three nights to live at the least so don't waste them. Now then, Sheila is hallowed. I cannot reveal to you how I know this but I am quite sure that my suspicions are correct. -She defended Nene yesterday thinking it would make her look good. -She blocked me on night three with malicious intents. Okay these are not the best of reasons but currently I am tired due to the stress of yesterday. Look at how she acted yesterday though and you will see the truth. I also have someone who contacted me about this matter. Vote: Sheila Bones/Matn Yes I regained the ability to vote freely. In fact, I never lost it! Trust me, I had good reason for the charade. I can't explain in full for now but I will as soon as I have the chance.

What the hell!? Well, I've still got to catch up on the happenings of today but first I have some explaining. A few of you called me out yesterday on being a bit desperate about voting out Nene. This is very true, I was struggling for survival. You see, when I first came to Hogwarts I was a bit of a hooligan. I stole a locket of Nene and well.. lost it. How was I to know it carried the only picture of her dead mother. My diary informed me that if Nene should find out that I was a thief then she would kill me in the night. I must have accidently mentaly scarred her for life leading her to torture ect. I didn't bring it up in case you disregarded my arguements as desperate ramblings. I suspect she did not for the same reason. Now, I know who has poisoned Madam Kingston. This is a bit of a pickle as I cannot see reason behind it. However, Madam Kingston this person also has the antidote. Maybe you can convince them that you are innocent? Now then, last night I exposed one person as a liar. What about that magic mirror? This is honestly very confusing.

Haha, great conclusion. I see that I get to lead the conga line of accusation this time! Boo you Milacol, how dare you attack me! I have to say this has been a great game so far, thanks for doing it.

I shall be away from today to the 26th. I won't be able to post nearly as much. So don't bother trying to use that against me! Sorry for any inconvenience caused.

3 more votes and she's out. The thing is, I really doubt that a second torturer is running around. Not similar, identical. Why did you not know what your action was? It honestly seems more likely that you are halllowed at this point. Acually a few people are in contact with a loyal investigator apparently. I am safe in the knowledge that if the investigator truly needs to then they will come forward. Yet, there is no need for that now. Again, I'll go over the main reasons for voting her out: -She claims that I was the first she tortured. Madame Kingston and Rhubarb Uxley say otherwise. I doubt both are hallowed so therefore Nene is lying. -The foe glass did not show me the identity of the investigator, yet it showed me Nene. It only shows those with bad intentions. It's a foe glass. -Nene says that she did not know what her ability did. Even if she was confused her diary would have told her. -She asked me to reveal the identity of the investigator in private. -She willingly has thrown out my ability. This only benefits the hallowed. Why would she do that? She is our best bet and those who do not vote for her, then find someone else and make an arguement for it. We cannot continue to wait around and do nothing. You must understand that voting is our best weapon and gives us the most trustworthy evidence.

Thank you. I am confident that I am correct and although this makes it obvious who controls my vote, I must also Vote: Nene Grandstaff/Millacol88 We finally got one.

What?! How is her finding out the identity of the investigator got anything to do with my loyalties? If the investigator revealed themselves publicaly then wouldn't they be attacked the next night? How is that helpful? You were fine with voting out Angela before yet suddenly your against voting out someone who has more against them.

You are either hallowed or choose to be ignorant. Let's think that someone who tortures is innocent then and look at everything else: -Nene Grandstaff has lied publicly. When I brought it up she denied it, however Madame Kingston and Rhubarb Uxley say otherwise. I doubt both are hallowed so Nene is clearly lying. There is no escaping that fact. -Nene Grandstaff tried to get me to reveal the identity of the investigator. -Nene Grandstaff tortured me with bad intentions. The foe glass shows me those who wish me harm, not innocents. Therefore she must be hallowed. There is no debate about any of the above. It is fact. If you are so sure that she is innocent then explain that.

Oh I see why you’re confused. Sorry, those statements were not connected. I was just repeating that she lied to me. If she was innocent then why would she do that? I have stated my reasoning and I really don't know how I can further prove to you that she is hallowed. Maybe I am too intense; I know that I'm being truthful. She has more against her than anyone else yet people don't want to vote her out. Why? A couple of you have only said that I'm arguing too much without giving any reasons for not voting her off. I am certain she is guilty. Professor Longbottom, you don't think she is innocent but you do not vote for her? I have given sufficient evidence. Nothing that I have said is "far-fetched" or if it is, state your reasons. Finally, people seem to not be listening. So I'll say it out loud: Nene can torture people into revealing their actions. She has already said what she found out about me. I have also been found innocent by an investigator. If I was guilty then it would have been brought up. Isn't this contradictory? One of you is lying here and I think Rhubarb is innocent. This should convince you now at least. Those who still think she is being truthful are blind.

No we should not. Yet I don't know how someone could feel that torturing is innocent. You don't seem to understand. She knew about the foe glass. It is her ability to find out night actions. The thing about the foe glass is that it only shows those who have malicious intents. She must have forgotten that it would not show me the identity of the investigator. This also tells me that she had bad intents. The investigator stayed hidden to me because they are innocent. Nene was not hidden though. Did you listen? She told me that I was the first to be tortured by her. Madame Kingstin told me that a blocker was tortured during night one. That is why she lied. What? This is an arguement against her. Did you not read the rest? All I was meaning to say there was that we should not vote of Bulltoad yet. Whoops. I hardly think that's an arguement against voting her off though. Actually, you haven't argued against a lot of my points. Most of your arguements back are just you misunderstanding as well.

Actually he was the first. He wanted to try and help me keep my action secret. An effort that was wasted thanks to Nene and her deliberate loose tongue.

*Sigh* Nene, you are our best bet. This is the only true evidence that has been built up. Do you see any better options? No, I think that you are our most likely a hallowed. You have not put enough forward for Rocky either. Don't call me stupid either.

Ah, wrong. Someone saying a lot of truth but can't vote yet.

I have no idea whether to believe that. I did suspect him. Though the reasons I produced are pretty bad. That was while I had no hard evidence and was graping at anything, now though I have much more against you and I believe he is innocent now. Over the past day I've gained a lot of knowledge so I don't suspect him anymore. You however I suspect even more. You know why I haven't voted yet!

It is one of my actions. No I did not steal it from her but what have you just done? Why did you feel like revealing that? You've both confirmed yourself as a torturer and revealed an important action of mine. How is that supposed to help innocents?