LEGO Star Wars Set Discussion 2025 - READ FIRST POST!!!

[Darth_Bane13]

2 hours ago, Omand said:

I suspect you are joking here, but having missed those as I was in my dark age at the time, not a bad plan.  I think to make them relevant right now you would need to add something to them though.

Perhaps you get the planet, the mini-figure, and a mini-build of a vehicle or creature related to the planet?

Something to think on.

Cheers :) 

And shows what I know.

There were mini-builds included the first time around.

Cheers :)

1 hour ago, Mandalorianknight said:

I assume this is a joke, but I could kind of see it? The main issue is the planet itself, which is just a big two-piece chunk of plastic, and that the actual builds suffer from scaling issues just as much as microfighters without any play features or figure interactability microfighters have... but as a bionicle fan I am a sucker for unique packaging in which the part container is made of lego elements.

It is impressive that, whatever you thought the planet sets consisted of, your suggestion is 1:1 with them. Apparently you would have been a good subline designer.

I'm not joking. The Planet sets provide more value to me as I think they look cool on display, unlike micro fighters. I think the planet sets were always aimed at an older teen/adult audience, since there are no play features unlike micro fighters. chibi style looks ugly and would rather just get the microbuild which still looks like the source material, just at a small scale. Since Lego is all in on 18+ sets these days, I think it makes sense to have a display set at a low price point. Also, the bonus is you can use the planet sets as ornaments. Planet sets were peak and we all took them for granted.

[Lordhelmet]

5 hours ago, BrickPrick said:

Definitely the latter. I had to google the "Imperial Dignitary's" name. But I know who Clone Commander Bacara is.

Opposite for me but I largely agree that clones and officers are easier to recognize.  I didn’t know the chipmunk clones name but knew he was some special clone that looked familiar.

 

We need more “glup shittos” in sets, I would love a set with just background characters, they are hard to find in sets but when we get some they really make the sets feel more like Star Wars.  They should make a “village” style set for tatooine, just some random building with a handful of aliens that show up in the cantina or jabas palace.  Like castle gets town sets without all the knights, Star Wars could use that too.  Would be great for MOCs.

[CloneCommando99]

10 hours ago, BrickPrick said:

You are shy of a hundred days, my dear fellow time traveler. 

Back to the future to Day #230 of requesting a Lego Tie Avenger

[Commander501]

2025 is coming to a successful end: I bought the UCS AT-ST for only 45 euros, what a deal!

[icm]

Do tell how?

[Commander501]

Dunno, put it in my basket at Smyth Toys and when I was ready to pay, it got a big discount. A surprise, I'm sure, but a welcome one.

[icm]

I hope that when you get your order, the item delivered and the price deducted from your account are what you expect them to be.

[BrickBob Studpants]

1 hour ago, Commander501 said:

2025 is coming to a successful end: I bought the UCS AT-ST for only 45 euros, what a deal!

That's not just a deal, it's a steal! Must be an internal error, but legally you should be in the clear. Similarly, I got a discount of 25% on the 2006 Star Destroyer because the Swiss price on s@h was set too low by accident, just on the day the set came out  They fixed it shortly afterwards, but the prices shown on webshops are legally binding in most places, at least during checkout. 

[CloneCommando99]

I saw the complaints about the new Supergirl poster. So I decided to fix it.

Day #231

Edited December 11 by CloneCommando99

[BrickPrick]

On 12/9/2025 at 10:47 PM, Kit Figsto said:

Ah, I got a few of those years wrong - in my defense, I was going off the top of my head, rather than actually checking Brickset 

But yes, I own the MBS version, as well as both the 2014 and 2018 versions, because the scene is one of my favorites (perhaps my favorite) from the entire franchise.  While I don't know if I'd shell out $70 or whatever is being charged for the new one for just one new minifigure, I think I'd be very tempted to buy the set and sell off the repeat figs or something.

Ha, you got me on this one. I was sure about the 2018 Cantina, but also would have mistaken the 2004 version for taking place in 2003. 

Yep, It's one of my favorite scenes as well. It's unforgettable in the best way possible... so iconic. The theme lives rent free in my head ever since.

I don't know if one new Alien fig would be enough to tempt me getting this set on a good sale either, but that's the only way I could care for it at all.

On 12/9/2025 at 11:54 PM, Darth_Bane13 said:

Time to bring back planet sets, the superior $10 subline.

Oh, absolutely. I would welcome any sets that provide cheap ways of getting desired minifigs nowadays. Given Lego's relative reluctance of Bespin based sets, I'm sometimes under the impression the only way of getting another, say Lobot figure, would be the revival of the planets product line.

On 12/10/2025 at 1:19 AM, Mandalorianknight said:

It does. I don't mind the current method of microfighters being "exclusive or expensive figure in a cheap set" since I use the builds as part packs anyway, but it would be nice to get actual microfighter packs again rather than "plo koon and some blue pieces nobody cares about" or "Rex and some blue pieces nobody cares about" or whatever. That said, with $10 price point non-gimmick sets coming... maybe we don't need microfighters at all anymore and can start just having system scaled $10 sets.

Yeah, I'm not overly dependent on that particular format either. I just, now more than ever, would like to see a healthy and steady supply of sets starting at lower price points. Where you don't feel the need to justify your own purchasing decisions when you may prioritize minifigs over the actual builds. Be it the hopeful return to classic $10 sets, more of the Duel sets, the aforementioned Microfighters be it solo or double, good varied Battle Packs or even the gone but not forgotten planet sub-theme... there are really more than enough options to give us better balance.

On 12/10/2025 at 4:46 AM, Lordhelmet said:

Opposite for me but I largely agree that clones and officers are easier to recognize.  I didn’t know the chipmunk clones name but knew he was some special clone that looked familiar.

 

We need more “glup shittos” in sets, I would love a set with just background characters, they are hard to find in sets but when we get some they really make the sets feel more like Star Wars.  They should make a “village” style set for tatooine, just some random building with a handful of aliens that show up in the cantina or jabas palace.  Like castle gets town sets without all the knights, Star Wars could use that too.  Would be great for MOCs.

Seriously, that disproportionate helmet mould... What on earth were they thinking?! 

That sounds like a great idea. In this instance, it screams for a modular approach. Even though I think the chances of that to happen is approximately on the same level as getting a Star Wars CMF. 

On 12/10/2025 at 9:10 AM, CloneCommando99 said:

Back to the future to Day #230 of requesting a Lego Tie Avenger

Next time, you may go a hundred days in the future and tell us if the TIE Avenger made the cut for the upcoming summer wave. 

19 hours ago, Commander501 said:

2025 is coming to a successful end: I bought the UCS AT-ST for only 45 euros, what a deal!

Okay, that's insane... good for you. Now I imagine what would happen if more UCS sets were sold by regular retailers. 

[Mandalorianknight]

6 hours ago, BrickPrick said:

Yeah, I'm not overly dependent on that particular format either. I just, now more than ever, would like to see a healthy and steady supply of sets starting at lower price points. Where you don't feel the need to justify your own purchasing decisions when you may prioritize minifigs over the actual builds. Be it the hopeful return to classic $10 sets, more of the Duel sets, the aforementioned Microfighters be it solo or double, good varied Battle Packs or even the gone but not forgotten planet sub-theme... there are really more than enough options to give us better balance.

The Duel sets were such an excellent subtheme and I don't understand why they only made a few of them. They're such an easy way to get two major characters on shelves for a low price point, so the sales should have been excellent. 

13 hours ago, CloneCommando99 said:

I saw the complaints about the new Supergirl poster. So I decided to fix it.

Wouldn't this imply she has a lax or uncaring attitude towards the TIE Avenger? Though I suppose if the movie's good, she'll gain an understanding of the importance of upholding the values of truth, justice, and the TIE avenger, so maybe it'd work out in the end.

On 12/9/2025 at 10:46 PM, Lordhelmet said:

We need more “glup shittos” in sets, I would love a set with just background characters, they are hard to find in sets but when we get some they really make the sets feel more like Star Wars.  They should make a “village” style set for tatooine, just some random building with a handful of aliens that show up in the cantina or jabas palace.  Like castle gets town sets without all the knights, Star Wars could use that too.  Would be great for MOCs.

I know people tend to hate battle packs with named characters, but a battle pack of four cantina aliens would be great. Unlikely- kids would probably not be as interested in a factionless pack, and while you could throw weapons and a speeder in to make it more dynamic it's still not going to do as well as clones or imperials or rebels or what have you- but it would be great for us.

[BrickPrick]

25 minutes ago, Mandalorianknight said:

The Duel sets were such an excellent subtheme and I don't understand why they only made a few of them. They're such an easy way to get two major characters on shelves for a low price point, so the sales should have been excellent. 

I know people tend to hate battle packs with named characters, but a battle pack of four cantina aliens would be great. Unlikely- kids would probably not be as interested in a factionless pack, and while you could throw weapons and a speeder in to make it more dynamic it's still not going to do as well as clones or imperials or rebels or what have you- but it would be great for us.

Yep, I don't get it either. I mean, you see lots of concepts which didn‘t quite work out for anyone all the time, so they often get axed rather quickly. But when it comes down to the same result despite delivering something of value to positively resonating consumers, like it actually should be worthwile for Lego to keep doing as well, it's tough to tell why they abondon ship from the outside. Even though the disappearance of certain sub-themes is not always tied to commercial performance, but because of making space to avoid oversaturating the market. Which ironically, in my eyes, they still do. Just want to say that too many different ideas can ruin some much needed consistency in the long run. Too many cooks spoil the broth. 

Oh, I would love such a Battle Pack. The same way I appreciated the last one of it's kind with four named figures, the 2017 Bounty Hunter one. This reminds me... whatever happened to the Star Wars Acessory Packs? They came and went out of nowhere... never to return. Despite being pretty popular and usually out of stock, especially the Clone Trooper Command Station. In principle, this is just as irritating as the phased out Duel sets. 

[Lordhelmet]

12 hours ago, BrickPrick said:

That sounds like a great idea. In this instance, it screams for a modular approach. Even though I think the chances of that to happen is approximately on the same level as getting a Star Wars CMF. 

I love the modular idea.  The current Harry Potter Hogwarts sets combining are really cool and I wish some other themes would do this.  Sorry not trying to get wish list here, but I do love the idea of multiple sets combining in a wave, or over the course of a few years.   And I agree with the outlook. 

[Omand]

32 minutes ago, Lordhelmet said:

I love the modular idea.  The current Harry Potter Hogwarts sets combining are really cool and I wish some other themes would do this.  Sorry not trying to get wish list here, but I do love the idea of multiple sets combining in a wave, or over the course of a few years.   And I agree with the outlook. 

I agree as well.  I have made up set ideas in the past built around the idea of modular sets, especially for the original Death Star.

It seems like such a no-brainer as giving people things that link together can create a "got to get them all" mentality for completionists.

Cheers :)

[Mandalorianknight]

5 hours ago, BrickPrick said:

Yep, I don't get it either. I mean, you see lots of concepts which didn‘t quite work out for anyone all the time, so they often get axed rather quickly. But when it comes down to the same result despite delivering something of value to positively resonating consumers, like it actually should be worthwile for Lego to keep doing as well, it's tough to tell why they abondon ship from the outside. Even though the disappearance of certain sub-themes is not always tied to commercial performance, but because of making space to avoid oversaturating the market. Which ironically, in my eyes, they still do. Just want to say that too many different ideas can ruin some much needed consistency in the long run. Too many cooks spoil the broth. 

Oh, I would love such a Battle Pack. The same way I appreciated the last one of it's kind with four named figures, the 2017 Bounty Hunter one. This reminds me... whatever happened to the Star Wars Acessory Packs? They came and went out of nowhere... never to return. Despite being pretty popular and usually out of stock, especially the Clone Trooper Command Station. In principle, this is just as irritating as the phased out Duel sets. 

Avoiding oversaturation of the market with too many gimmick lines is likely part of why. I'm not sure how well Starkiller Base Duel did, but I know the Mustafar duel did fairly well being the cheapest way to get obi-wan and anakin at a time when non-headset versions hadn't appeared in some time, so I doubt it they did poorly enough to kill the subline. Whereas the battle packs moving to $20 happened the year after the last duel set, implying they absorbed it's slot. I wouldn't mind the duel sets moving to $25, though, especially if it let them squeeze in a third figure where necessary (such as a throne room duel- not that we need one right now).

The accessory packs are a lot easier to understand IMO. The limited availability caused a lot of fan backlash, and while lego doesn't listen to fans as much we might like, they do do it sometimes. Though it's probably more likely that it was simply an experiment as to how to adapt battle packs- inflation vs shrinkflation, as it was, do we get more expensive battle packs at full size or these 3-fig, smaller build accessory packs?- and they chose the inflated packs. Which, while obviously we would all prefer $15 packs with four figs, I do think the $20 packs with four are better than $15 ones with 3 and an even smaller build.

33 minutes ago, Omand said:

I agree as well.  I have made up set ideas in the past built around the idea of modular sets, especially for the original Death Star.

The death star is the only one that I think would really work all that well, but at the same time I think it would work EXCEPTIONALLY well. So many rooms work as sets on their own (trash compactor, detention block, we've already had a system playset of the chasm escape and imperial cannon/tractor beam room, the vader duel scene, etc), and connecting them together would be a great gimmick.

 

I was fortunate enough to be given a copy of the new advent calendar- I tend not to buy them myself, unless I find it after christmas on sale- and I have to say, while I'd like more minifigures in these, format-wise this is far and away the best advent calendar lego's ever produced for this theme. As an experience, getting to build a new bit of the workshop every day really makes you feel like you're building towards something more than just random ships. I'm very happy with this calendar and hope lego continues to produce themed calendars with no minibuilds.

[BrickBob Studpants]

Kinda funny how divided opinions on this year’s AC are. People either seem to think it’s one of the best or one of the worst (especially commenters on brickset, but those guys hate almost anything that isn’t Classic Space or Castle anyway)

To me, it’s easily the best, and not just because of Babu friggin Frik. Themed and location-based ACs are my favourites (like the HP ones often are), and it’s nice to see SW giving that concept a shot! I don’t mind the microbuilds, but it’s refreshing to see a SW one devoid of them for once

As for modular location sets: I don’t dislike the concept, but with SW, I don’t see the benefit of spreading things out like that. I’d rather have a complete Jabba’s Palace for instance rather than parts of it spread across multiple sets. It works for HP, sure, but Hogwarts is THE location there so it makes sense to have so many sets. Each SW location is only one of many, and I wouldn’t want a single location to hog multiple set slots  It worked in 2003, but SW is so much larger now!

[CloneCommando99]

So Fate of the Old Republic got announced at the game awards. That’s cool. Though it unfortunately will likely not get sets.

But where is the Lego Tie Avenger announcement? (Day #232) That’s the real question.

 

On the subject of modulars. I firmly believe that some for Mos Eisley, Coruscant underworld and some sort of imperial instillation whether it’s the DS or a random base would be awesome. It’s kinda what I hope the 14+ set next year is.

[Kaijumeister]

5 hours ago, CloneCommando99 said:

So Fate of the Old Republic got announced at the game awards. That’s cool. Though it unfortunately will likely not get sets.

On the subject of modulars. I firmly believe that some for Mos Eisley, Coruscant underworld and some sort of imperial instillation whether it’s the DS or a random base would be awesome. It’s kinda what I hope the 14+ set next year is.

A canon video game? With distinct character designs, unique vehicles, and likely a massive fanbase? Why on earth would the Lego Star Wars team consider something so distasteful?

(To riff on the ongoing TIE Avenger campaign, this is my Year #5 of asking Lego for a Stinger Mantis)

I haven’t played the KotOR games but this announcement is huge news and having the original director of the KotOR games on board is promising. It sucks that the game is still in its nascent stages, but Lucasfilm announcing things extremely early before having anything close to a finished product is nothing new.

Modular Star Wars playsets based on locations like the Death Star(s), Endor, Cloud City, Mos Eisley, Naboo, Geonosis etc. make perfect sense for this theme. Having such sets with the quality of, say, the ongoing modular Hogwarts system would be genuinely incredible, although I agree with @BrickBob Studpants that it wouldn’t be the best having them completely occupy larger price points either.

@Mandalorianknight it’s a shame the location playsets from 2024 don’t seem to be selling very well. They’re some of the best location builds the theme has seen in a while.

Edited December 12 by Kaijumeister

[BrickPrick]

11 hours ago, Lordhelmet said:

I love the modular idea.  The current Harry Potter Hogwarts sets combining are really cool and I wish some other themes would do this.  Sorry not trying to get wish list here, but I do love the idea of multiple sets combining in a wave, or over the course of a few years.   And I agree with the outlook. 

Yeah, I like the modular approach for Lego Harry Potter as well. Sure, it being based much more on a single location than Star Wars makes it more suitable for these kind of sets. So I wouldn't expect the same treatment for the galaxy far, far away. Nevertheless, the potential to do something is definitely there.

9 hours ago, Mandalorianknight said:

Avoiding oversaturation of the market with too many gimmick lines is likely part of why. I'm not sure how well Starkiller Base Duel did, but I know the Mustafar duel did fairly well being the cheapest way to get obi-wan and anakin at a time when non-headset versions hadn't appeared in some time, so I doubt it they did poorly enough to kill the subline. Whereas the battle packs moving to $20 happened the year after the last duel set, implying they absorbed it's slot. I wouldn't mind the duel sets moving to $25, though, especially if it let them squeeze in a third figure where necessary (such as a throne room duel- not that we need one right now).

The accessory packs are a lot easier to understand IMO. The limited availability caused a lot of fan backlash, and while lego doesn't listen to fans as much we might like, they do do it sometimes. Though it's probably more likely that it was simply an experiment as to how to adapt battle packs- inflation vs shrinkflation, as it was, do we get more expensive battle packs at full size or these 3-fig, smaller build accessory packs?- and they chose the inflated packs. Which, while obviously we would all prefer $15 packs with four figs, I do think the $20 packs with four are better than $15 ones with 3 and an even smaller build.

Yes, from their standpoint they try ro avoid flooding the market. From my point of view, they do exactly that by taking away or pausing the good stuff far too soon and replace it with subpar stuff. Sort of like a self fulfilling prohecy. 

Duel Sets getting absorbed into the more expensive Battle Pack set slot is a good point. In terms of pricing, though, I think there is some room in for Duel sets to be able to coexist besides them.

So you think, rather meant to be an addition to Battle Packs, they tried testing whether the Accessory Packs could be more profitable and thus, potentially completely replacing them. Huh, that makes sense. Of course, business is always about optimizing costs as much as possible, but in this case I never made that connection. Though I would consider the value to be about the same.

5 hours ago, CloneCommando99 said:

So Fate of the Old Republic got announced at the game awards. That’s cool. Though it unfortunately will likely not get sets.

More importantly, old Sebulba showed up at the end of the Galactic Racer reveal. 

Edited December 12 by BrickPrick

[Mandalorianknight]

6 hours ago, BrickPrick said:

Duel Sets getting absorbed into the more expensive Battle Pack set slot is a good point. In terms of pricing, though, I think there is some room in for Duel sets to be able to coexist besides them.

So you think, rather meant to be an addition to Battle Packs, they tried testing whether the Accessory Packs could be more profitable and thus, potentially completely replacing them. Huh, that makes sense. Of course, business is always about optimizing costs as much as possible, but in this case I never made that connection. Though I would consider the value to be about the same.

Yup- they just need to bump the price of the duel sets up to $25 (Ideally with some more pieces and/or a third fig where necessary to make up for it) and we're golden.

Exactly. As you were saying about not wanting competing products, it just doesn't make sense to have two different army-builder sublines at close price points out at the same time. My guess was they were trying to determine which whether shrinking battle packs for the same price or keeping them the same with a higher price would do better, and between the fan backlash and the sales failure of the hoth pack ended up going with the latter.

6 hours ago, Kaijumeister said:

@Mandalorianknight it’s a shame the location playsets from 2024 don’t seem to be selling very well. They’re some of the best location builds the theme has seen in a while.

They really are, it's unfortunate that they aren't doing well and I'm not entirely sure why, unless it really just comes down to kids overwhelmingly preferring vehicles to playsets. They're well-built, have a number of interesting figures, etc.

11 hours ago, CloneCommando99 said:

So Fate of the Old Republic got announced at the game awards. That’s cool. Though it unfortunately will likely not get sets.

Fate has so much potential, I've been saying since TROS that KOTOR is the best chance disney has to revitalize star wars as a whole, and the fact that this new game takes place at the end of the old republic gives me some hope that they're saving the meat of that era for movies. And the fact that the KOTOR director is behind this game gives me some hope that it could actually be good.

11 hours ago, BrickBob Studpants said:

As for modular location sets: I don’t dislike the concept, but with SW, I don’t see the benefit of spreading things out like that. I’d rather have a complete Jabba’s Palace for instance rather than parts of it spread across multiple sets. It works for HP, sure, but Hogwarts is THE location there so it makes sense to have so many sets. Each SW location is only one of many, and I wouldn’t want a single location to hog multiple set slots  It worked in 2003, but SW is so much larger now!

Like I said, the only one that I think really works is the death star, just due to how many different things can be done with it as we saw this year with the $1000 set.

[BrickPrick]

2 hours ago, Mandalorianknight said:

Yup- they just need to bump the price of the duel sets up to $25 (Ideally with some more pieces and/or a third fig where necessary to make up for it) and we're golden.

Exactly. As you were saying about not wanting competing products, it just doesn't make sense to have two different army-builder sublines at close price points out at the same time. My guess was they were trying to determine which whether shrinking battle packs for the same price or keeping them the same with a higher price would do better, and between the fan backlash and the sales failure of the hoth pack ended up going with the latter.

I think the format lends itself to a rather flexible price range. You can have your $20/25 style of sets featuring two figs and Battle Pack+ builds, like Duel on Mandalore/Mustafar. Just as you can have a $40 set akin to 2013's Duel on Geonosis with four figures and much more substantial builds. Or not, because this would probably be 60 bucks in today's money. And no longer qualify as a smaller scaled set. 

Yeah, I might have been a little too... self-serving with my thoughts. Keeping both sub-themes might have made little sense for Lego. It's just that I would think about half a dozen other things to pull the plug instead of the Accessory Packs. I swear to the maker, some of the ongoing overpriced sub-themes, be it within the same overall theme or not, exist only to make the slightly less expensive ones look more attractive to the naked eye. Even though it's still egregiously expensive... just not to such an extent. 

Edited December 12 by BrickPrick

[Darth_Bane13]

2 hours ago, BrickPrick said:

I think the format lends itself to a rather flexible price range. You can have your $20/25 style of sets featuring two figs and Battle Pack+ builds, like Duel on Mandalore/Mustafar. Just as you can have a $40 set akin to 2013's Duel on Geonosis with four figures and much more substantial builds. Or not, because this would probably be 60 bucks in today's money. And no longer qualify as a smaller scaled set. 

Yeah, I might have been a little too... self-serving with my thoughts. Keeping both sub-themes might have made little sense for Lego. It's just that I would think about half a dozen other things to pull the plug instead of the Accessory Packs. I swear to the maker, some of the ongoing overpriced sub-themes, be it within the same overall theme or not, exist only to make the slightly less expensive ones look more attractive to the naked eye. Even though it's still egregiously expensive... just not to such an extent. 

I think we need $100+ sets of Palpatines arrest and duel on Mustafar.

[Darth Malgus]

11 hours ago, Kaijumeister said:

A canon video game? With distinct character designs, unique vehicles, and likely a massive fanbase? Why on earth would the Lego Star Wars team consider something so distasteful?

(To riff on the ongoing TIE Avenger campaign, this is my Year #5 of asking Lego for a Stinger Mantis)

I haven’t played the KotOR games but this announcement is huge news and having the original director of the KotOR games on board is promising. It sucks that the game is still in its nascent stages, but Lucasfilm announcing things extremely early before having anything close to a finished product is nothing new.

Modular Star Wars playsets based on locations like the Death Star(s), Endor, Cloud City, Mos Eisley, Naboo, Geonosis etc. make perfect sense for this theme. Having such sets with the quality of, say, the ongoing modular Hogwarts system would be genuinely incredible, although I agree with @BrickBob Studpants 

I would be happy if Lego did a while wave of gaming ships and characters.  It would never happen but it would be great, all the ships and characters from the different games would be quite a number to choose from.

[Kaijumeister]

2 hours ago, Darth Malgus said:

I would be happy if Lego did a while wave of gaming ships and characters.  It would never happen but it would be great, all the ships and characters from the different games would be quite a number to choose from.

The ‘Gaming Greats’ figures Hasbro offer in their Black Series and Vintage Collection lines come to mind. Just a handful (if that) of figures every year based on the Star Wars games spanning both the old EU and current canon.

I understand the average Lego Star Wars set needs to appeal to as large an audience as possible (because the Galactic Marines are incredibly mainstream). But with the volume of sets we receive each year, I refuse to believe that dedicating a set or two towards some lesser known properties within the Star Wars canon or EU is too much to ask for. 

Anyway, from January to May 2026, the non-UCS sublines this theme encompasses include

- ‘Normal’ System sets (2)

- Smart Brick sets (8)

- Mechs (1)

- Battle Packs (1)

- 4+ (1)

- Buildable Characters (1)

- Starship Collection (1)

- Busts (1)

Haven’t yet included the 5 TMaG sets until we know what they’ll actually be, but thus far this is a very interesting split. I’m pinning a lot of hope on the TMaG and summer wave sets being good because otherwise, Ninjago and Marvel are dominating my attention next year.

[CloneCommando99]

6 hours ago, Kaijumeister said:

 

- Buildable Characters (1)

- Starship Collection (1)

- Busts (1)

Haven’t yet included the 5 TMaG sets until we know what they’ll actually be, but thus far this is a very interesting split. I’m pinning a lot of hope on the TMaG and summer wave sets being good because otherwise, Ninjago and Marvel are dominating my attention next year.

This makes me concerned for the 2HY.

 

But don’t worry. The Tie Avenger will hopefully make an appearance. (Day #233)