DC Superheroes 2025 - Rumors & Discussion

[RobbieHxC]

19 hours ago, Mandalorianknight said:

To be fair Gunn saying "there's an overarching narrative" doesn't suddenly give direction to what you have to admit is a pretty scattered start for the DCU- some actors are coming back, some aren't, blue beetle's actor/character is canon to the DCU but not his movie, Peacemaker season one is canon to the DCU but the DCEU justice league that show up in it aren't, the official start is a TV-MA animated show, etc.

Complete agree with this.  The CEO of DC Studios declaring that the DCU has direction and it actually having direction are two entirely different things. The audience gets to decide whether the it feels like the DCU has direction.  Although we are only one project into the new DCU with Creature Commandos, so far it doesn't seem to have direction, as shown by the dozen or so announced projects that feel more like an ambitious and sprawling later chapter of a movie universe than its simple easy-to-join first chapter.  Further, not having a definitive reboot, with Gunn's favouritism for his Suicide Squad characters carrying over from the DCEU to DCU, and already having multiple competing theatrical universes with The Batman and Batman: Brave and the Bold, contributes to this feeling incohesive.

3 hours ago, psqidexslizer said:

I really don’t understand why that’s so confusing for people especially when no one is batting an eye with Daredevil and the other Netflix shows being integrated into the MCU in basically the same way.

We've discussed this before on this forum, but the Netflix Defenders shows have never not been canon to the MCU, they frequently reference the Battle of New York from the first Avengers film, and there are newspaper articles describing other MCU films, and even Justin Hammer gets a shout-out with a Hammer Industries weapon in Luke Cage.  Admittedly, they didn't crossover with the theatrical MCU characters and began to stand more on their own, but ultimately there is nothing in these series that contradicts the MCU in terms of casting or lore.  Unlike, for example having two Supermans portrayed by two different actors with different lore, but carrying over Viola Davis as Amanda Waller and the events of The Suicide Squad from DCEU to DCU.

[Lego Nostalgia]

On 2/26/2025 at 7:43 AM, BrickBob Studpants said:

I feel like we’re stuck in that underground prison from TDKR with this theme. Every time we think we might have a chance to escape, we fall right back in  

We will RISE (most likely the theme will die for good in 2027)

On 2/26/2025 at 1:03 AM, calebcold3 said:

With all this DC news, I just know we'll only get 3 sets next year and it's gonna be like: 

A Green Lantern Mech or A Lex Luthor Mech with Supergirl

A 4+ Batman set with a Bat-Cycle 

And a UCS set of the Batman Vs Superman Batmobile (for the 10th anniversary of BvS)

I'd love a UCS Batfleck mobile or playscale one, could come with Jared Leto's Joker even though he was bad, Knightmare version was cool and slightly better IMO, Need a Battinson UCS Mobile too

Wish we got a Gotham City kinda street like Marvel is doing with Oscorp and the Deli, could get a row of buildings for 120$ that would be GCPD,Wayne Tower,Ace Chemicals,Iceberg Lounge and a Court House

[RedHoodPug]

Seems folks are confusing direction with a bunch of films that lead to a culmination. We're one project in and the current aim is world building - that is a direction. It's not going to matter whether anything is canon to the previous films when it's essentially a reboot. And I'm so pleased that Pattinson's Batman isn't part of this when it was never intended to be, which means it won't be forced. On top of that the script hasn't been finished, so rather than getting a rushed mistake that is forced to tie in to the new world it can be it's own story. Wait until things come out, watch them, enjoy a bit of world building and be pleased that DC is being led by someone who actually enjoys and understands the source of these adaptations.

[Rwbricks]

1 hour ago, RedHoodPug said:

Seems folks are confusing direction with a bunch of films that lead to a culmination. We're one project in and the current aim is world building - that is a direction. 

Agreed. Creature Commandos was being developed before Gunn and Safran took over, so that was never going to be the big set up for the DCU. Superman is supposed to be the official beginning, so we have to wait and see from there. 
 

Also, there is going to be some continuity/effects of the events of some films over others, as Gunn and Safran recently said that the script and story for The Authority has been changing as other scripts have come through. 
 

In LEGO news, Arkham is going to have 2953 pieces, which I don’t think we knew before. It’s not the best ppp value, but it’s not surprising, either. 

[Lego Nostalgia]

I just don't see the DCU continuing if Superman fails, Zaslav and the WB people are very strict on stuff hitting a certain amount at the Box Office, Even 600M would be considered a failure to them, The Batman did 780M which was good and one of their only success besides Joker in recent years, I feel that 780M is too low for a Batman Movie but maybe it's because it's Battinsons first movie so I'm sure if Part 2 ever gets made it'll make 1B, same thing happened with Batman Begins, the sequel made 1B whereas Begins made 370M

Obviously Supergirl and other things that have filmed will have to release since filming is happening but after that it'll stop I'm sure

The plan might be just to focus on the Reeves Batverse if Superman fails

Which personally I am ok with ,love that world, WB has proven to me that they can't do DC right, either sell it to Universal or just stop making them

Batman is probably the only thing they can do right, but they won't even do a Batman live action show because they believe he's too big for TV and that annoys me, WB is the problem, what they did to Snyder was terrible and they have done it to others I'm sure with meddling

They are in big debt too, I don't even think they can afford to hire big name actors 

There's a reason the DCU only has B-list and below Actors and Actresses, they just can't afford em, Nicholas Hoult and Frank Grillo are the only people they have that are close to famous

I'd pay lots to see a Batman TV show like Daredevil with a TV-MA rating

Battinson reminds me of Daredevil a lot, the tone, the grounded feel and gritty fighting crime

If they ever do a full reboot of the MCU which I'm sure they will, Robert Pattinson would for sure be a good Daredevil/Matt Murdock

But alas, I'm yapping too much, I hope Superman does well and we get a DCU that's kinda like the old JLA cartoon from the 90s/2000s

I just worry that Gunn will make Batman goofy like Peacemaker/Guardians, I don't think we've seen him do a serious tone besides that Rocket scene in GOTG 3, all he does is just make Suicide Squad/Guardians with different characters and uses his Wife and Brother in everything

[Mandalorianknight]

7 hours ago, psqidexslizer said:

We’re not even one film into this new universe. Prior to the release of Iron Man, we had no idea they were building up to anything whatsoever. It wasn’t until after that film that they announced Thor, Captain America, and The Avengers (and then moved the dates around multiple times). We have a general sense of what films and series are coming out, who will be involved in this story, and some hints about what the overall story will be. Comparatively speaking, we know a lot about what is happening. We just don’t know how it all fits together, which we’ll get a better sense of once we actually have more than one project to go off of.

As far as the recasting and what is and isn’t canon, Gunn is keeping the characters he cast and the movie and shows he already made but will be making minor changes because obviously he’s no longer bound by the canon of the old universe. I really don’t understand why that’s so confusing for people especially when no one is batting an eye with Daredevil and the other Netflix shows being integrated into the MCU in basically the same way.

But we're some number of shows in. It'd be like if the MCU started by canonizing Hulk (2003)- except for a scene featuring, let's say nicholas cage ghost rider or something, since there'll be a new ghost rider in the MCU so he's not canon. Then we get an animated show where Thomas Jane's punisher and any other actors Fiege liked return as their characters, but canon to the new universe. And THEN we get iron man.

For the GA it won't matter but you can't deny it's messy to canonize most of a show from the old universe and start your universe with - aside from the canonized show from the other universe- a TV-MA animated series with any actors the head honcho worked with returning.

The netflix analogy really doesn't work- maybe I'm missing something big from Luke Cage or something, but the netflix shows always acted as if they were canon to the movies, and depending on which official you talked to, they were. It's not like Andrew Garfield's spider man shows up after Matt defeats Kingpin. Peacemaker was a show that was set in and included characters from the DCEU that they retroactively decided to make canon to a new universe and just handwave away the actors and characters Gunn didn't like enough to bring with. Daredevil was always intended to be canon to the MCU, references events from it multiple times, and has nothing contradictory to it.

4 hours ago, RobbieHxC said:

Complete agree with this.  The CEO of DC Studios declaring that the DCU has direction and it actually having direction are two entirely different things. The audience gets to decide whether the it feels like the DCU has direction.  Although we are only one project into the new DCU with Creature Commandos, so far it doesn't seem to have direction, as shown by the dozen or so announced projects that feel more like an ambitious and sprawling later chapter of a movie universe than its simple easy-to-join first chapter.  Further, not having a definitive reboot, with Gunn's favouritism for his Suicide Squad characters carrying over from the DCEU to DCU, and already having multiple competing theatrical universes with The Batman and Batman: Brave and the Bold, contributes to this feeling incohesive.

We've discussed this before on this forum, but the Netflix Defenders shows have never not been canon to the MCU, they frequently reference the Battle of New York from the first Avengers film, and there are newspaper articles describing other MCU films, and even Justin Hammer gets a shout-out with a Hammer Industries weapon in Luke Cage.  Admittedly, they didn't crossover with the theatrical MCU characters and began to stand more on their own, but ultimately there is nothing in these series that contradicts the MCU in terms of casting or lore.  Unlike, for example having two Supermans portrayed by two different actors with different lore, but carrying over Viola Davis as Amanda Waller and the events of The Suicide Squad from DCEU to DCU.

Couldn't have said it better myself.

[psqidexslizer]

40 minutes ago, Rwbricks said:

In LEGO news, Arkham is going to have 2953 pieces, which I don’t think we knew before. It’s not the best ppp value, but it’s not surprising, either. 

$400 for less than 3000 pieces?!

That’s not as bad as The Hoopty, but still, that’s bad. 

[CloneCommando99]

22 minutes ago, Lego Nostalgia said:

I don't even think they can afford to hire big name actors 

There's a reason the DCU only has B-list and below Actors and Actresses, they just can't afford em, Nicholas Hoult and Frank Grillo are the only people they have that are close to famous

You forget that Jason Momoa, Kyle Chandler, Nathan Fillion and Alan Tudyk have all been casted. Also John Cena is being carried over via peacemaker. And likely Margot Robbie.

 

There are also rumours that Daniel Radcliffe has been cast as clay face 

[Lego Nostalgia]

16 minutes ago, CloneCommando99 said:

You forget that Jason Momoa, Kyle Chandler, Nathan Fillion and Alan Tudyk have all been casted. Also John Cena is being carried over via peacemaker. And likely Margot Robbie.

 

There are also rumours that Daniel Radcliffe has been cast as clay face 

Jason Momoa is just being reused, Margot Robbie was the best Harley Quinn ever but it doesn't feel right to bring back some and fire everyone else, it needs a full reboot, I forgot about John Cena because that show is so forgettable, the rest aren't that famous besides Daneil Radcliffe if he is cast, Alan,Kyle and Nathan are C-list at best 

You had Ben Affleck,Henry Cavill and Gal Gadot, and they wasted them so much, that was the perfect trinity if written better

Can't believe we lost Will Smith too, he was good as Deadshot 

Everything was disconnected after Jostice League, it didn't feel like a connected universe at all, Batman and Superman were gone, Hamada and Geoff then just made their own little thing then with comedy worse than the MCU

I remember seeing the Batarang in Shazam, just showed that we'll never be seeing him again

And a faceless Superman too, wtf was with that

I'm sure if they let Snyder carry on his vision then it would have made more sense and maybe the DCEU could have survived, if we look at the Box Office, Man Of Steel,Batman V Superman and Suicide Squad,Wonder Woman,Aquaman did more money than the newer regime (Shazam,Birds of Prey,The Suicide Squad,Blue Beetle,Shazam 2, The Rock

I get that the Snyderverse had it's issues but it was WB's fault more than his, cutting movies, adding things in, Suicide Squad in 2016 was going to be a different movie than the one we got, it was darker and better, WB cut Joker and Harley abuse and made it more into a comedy

I am deeply saddened that I will never get to see Batfleck fight Deathstroke and see the Knightmare timeline story again

You can tell by the Comic Con trailer for Suicide Squad and compare it to the other trailers, the tone is vastly different 

I wouldn't be surprised if WB was meddling with Superman too and adding things in

Does Gunn really have that much control, it's the executives that make the big decisions at the end of the day

Edited February 27 by Lego Nostalgia

[psqidexslizer]

5 hours ago, RobbieHxC said:

We've discussed this before on this forum, but the Netflix Defenders shows have never not been canon to the MCU, they frequently reference the Battle of New York from the first Avengers film, and there are newspaper articles describing other MCU films, and even Justin Hammer gets a shout-out with a Hammer Industries weapon in Luke Cage.  Admittedly, they didn't crossover with the theatrical MCU characters and began to stand more on their own, but ultimately there is nothing in these series that contradicts the MCU in terms of casting or lore.  Unlike, for example having two Supermans portrayed by two different actors with different lore, but carrying over Viola Davis as Amanda Waller and the events of The Suicide Squad from DCEU to DCU.

Sure, the Netflix shows referenced the elements of a larger Marvel universe but that was it. And the MCU never referenced them. Until Born Again got a complete creative overhaul and brought back Karen, Foggy, and Bullseye, it was clearly going to be a reboot and not a continuation of the original series at all that just happened to reuse some of the casting from the Netflix series. Heck, as recently as 2019 Feige said the Netflix shows weren’t canon. 

47 minutes ago, Lego Nostalgia said:

Jason Momoa is just being reused, Margot Robbie was the best Harley Quinn ever but it doesn't feel right to bring back some and fire everyone else, it needs a full reboot, I forgot about John Cena because that show is so forgettable, the rest aren't that famous besides Daneil Radcliffe if he is cast, Alan,Kyle and Nathan are C-list at best 

You had Ben Affleck,Henry Cavill and Gal Gadot, and they wasted them so much, that was the perfect trinity if written better

Can't believe we lost Will Smith too, he was good as Deadshot 

Everything was disconnected after Jostice League, it didn't feel like a connected universe at all, Batman and Superman were gone, Hamada and Geoff then just made their own little thing then with comedy worse than the MCU

I remember seeing the Batarang in Shazam, just showed that we'll never be seeing him again

And a faceless Superman too, wtf was with that

I'm sure if they let Snyder carry on his vision then it would have made more sense and maybe the DCEU could have survived, if we look at the Box Office, Man Of Steel,Batman V Superman and Suicide Squad,Wonder Woman,Aquaman did more money than the newer regime (Shazam,Birds of Prey,The Suicide Squad,Blue Beetle,Shazam 2, The Rock

I get that the Snyderverse had it's issues but it was WB's fault more than his, cutting movies, adding things in, Suicide Squad in 2016 was going to be a different movie than the one we got, it was darker and better, WB cut Joker and Harley abuse and made it more into a comedy

I am deeply saddened that I will never get to see Batfleck fight Deathstroke and see the Knightmare timeline story again

You can tell by the Comic Con trailer for Suicide Squad and compare it to the other trailers, the tone is vastly different 

I wouldn't be surprised if WB was meddling with Superman too and adding things in

Does Gunn really have that much control, it's the executives that make the big decisions at the end of the day

Yeah, the reason DC films did so poorly after Snyder left is because the DC brand was damaged by his films. BvS had a massive, record setting, opening weekend. But the legs were terrible. It had a record breaking second weekend drop off and failed to cross a billion. The first film to open to over $400M WW and not cross a billion. JL was the immediate follow up and the opening weekend was abysmal. The only reason it did as well as it did was because it actually had decent legs ?much better than BvS’s). Sure, WW and Suicide Squad did well, but there was also a lot of hype for Harley Quinn’s first film appearance and Wonder Woman’s first film that really helped those films make bank. No one cared to see Shazam or another Suicide Squad movie and the DC brand was damaged, which is why they did so poorly.

As for this idea that the universe would have done better had WB not interfered with Snyder’s plans, just ignoring his ideas of killing Dick Grayson and having Batman and Lois hook up, he was pushing for R-rated, longer versions of the films we got. Regardless of any question of quality, long movies do worse at the box office and R-rated movies do worse at the box office. If WB hadn’t forced him to cut his movies into shorter, PG-13 versions the box office returns would have been much worse.

Edited February 27 by psqidexslizer

[Renny The Spaceman]

22 minutes ago, psqidexslizer said:

 

Yeah, the reason DC films did so poorly after Snyder left is because the DC brand was damaged by his films. BvS had a massive, record setting, opening weekend. But the legs were terrible. It had a record breaking second weekend drop off and failed to cross a billion. The first film to open to over $400M WW and not cross a billion. JL was the immediate follow up and the opening weekend was abysmal. The only reason it did as well as it did was because it actually had decent legs ?much better than BvS’s). Sure, WW and Suicide Squad did well, but there was also a lot of hype for Harley Quinn’s first film appearance and Wonder Woman’s first film that really helped those films make bank. No one cared to see Shazam or another Suicide Squad movie and the DC brand was damaged, which is why they did so poorly.

As for this idea that the universe would have done better had WB not interfered with Snyder’s plans, just ignoring his ideas of killing Dick Grayson and having Batman and Lois hook up, he was pushing for R-rated, longer versions of the films we got. Regardless of any question of quality, long movies do worse at the box office and R-rated movies do worse at the box office. If WB hadn’t forced him to cut his movies into shorter, PG-13 versions the box office returns would have been much worse.

You know as someone who never gave a shit about how much movies make I never got how BVS was a flop despite the 7 million internet arguments I've seen about it. You put it in context in a really clear way, that's genuinely a really atrocious drop off, too often people just compare contactless numbers and that doesn't help but man you could see the audience goodwill to DC wilt there. 

[Mandalorianknight]

4 hours ago, psqidexslizer said:

$400 for less than 3000 pieces?!

That’s not as bad as The Hoopty, but still, that’s bad. 

Lego is mentally unable to comprehend good DC sets. I'm not even going to cope and say "there's just a ton of that 1x5x6 panel piece" because even if there was (there won't be) I think the set would still probably end up looking kind of bad.

What's funny is I saw your comment and went "well, that does sound about as bad as the hoopty, but.. nope, the hoopty was almost 22 cents per part, whereas this is "only" 13.5 cents per piece. The Hoopty might be a contender for worst licensed, non-gimmick playset.

4 hours ago, CloneCommando99 said:

There are also rumours that Daniel Radcliffe has been cast as clay face 

There's literally no role you could tell me Daniel Radcliffe is rumored for that I'd be skeptical of. The man takes the most random roles, does WELL in them, and has the fame to get a lot of them, so if you told me "Daniel Radcliffe has been cast as Storm in X-men" or "Daniel Radcliffe will be playing a 10 year old Damian Wayne", I'd be like "huh, a little strange the studio's letting him do that but yeah I guess he would"

3 hours ago, psqidexslizer said:

Sure, the Netflix shows referenced the elements of a larger Marvel universe but that was it. And the MCU never referenced them. Until Born Again got a complete creative overhaul and brought back Karen, Foggy, and Bullseye, it was clearly going to be a reboot and not a continuation of the original series at all that just happened to reuse some of the casting from the Netflix series. Heck, as recently as 2019 Feige said the Netflix shows weren’t canon. 

You're missing the point he's making, which is that they worked seamlessly with the MCU and didn't contradict it. Like I've been saying, it's not like Andrew Garfield's spider-man shows up in Daredevil for a scene. They were also made to work with the MCU, not made as part of another universe and retroactively yanked forwards into the new one too.

I'd also point out that Born Again- which as far as I know we've never seen anything concrete about it being out of continuity with the original show, just that it was gonna be a soft reboot and extremely disrespectful to the lore- DID CHANGE. They didn't go through with it. They certainly seem to be going through with the peacemaker/TSS/etc stuff. If Gunn wakes up tomorrow and changes it to be a more streamlined canon break, with Superman being the start of the DCU and the scattered TSS era stuff being just the last of the DCU, I'll give him props for it. But that's not happening, whereas Daredevil, if it even was going to be a hard out of continuity reboot, WAS fixed to be essentially season 4.

[BatDeanj]

I'm surprised we have had so much more detailed leaks from marvel and nothing for DC. we know the Oscorp building is based off the comics and what minifigures are included. we know more about the spiderman 2 train battle but we haven't had any updates from Arkham, both are releasing around the same time.
This isn't a Lego hates DC thing its just if every other superhero leak has more detail why not Arkham. its my dream set I've wanted for years and the fact of it being based of the game or batman forever will be massive to know.

[BrickBob Studpants]

12 minutes ago, BatDeanj said:

I'm surprised we have had so much more detailed leaks from marvel and nothing for DC. 

This can be explained with one word (or rather, acronym): D2C. Exclusive sets are usually revealed much closer to release and leakers tend to get less information about them

Also, it’s inconsistent anyway. We know next to nothing about the Bag End and Krusty Burger sets that are both scheduled for April, yet we already have the full minifig list of the Enterprise, which comes out in November

[BatDeanj]

My only reference is avengers tower and the shadow box as I kept up with those before release and I swear we knew what they were based on very early on.
I'm only interested in the train battle and the Black Pearl outside of Arkham this year and both we know almost everything important.

[THELEGOBATMAN]

13 hours ago, Lego Nostalgia said:

I just don't see the DCU continuing if Superman fails, Zaslav and the WB people are very strict on stuff hitting a certain amount at the Box Office, Even 600M would be considered a failure to them, The Batman did 780M which was good and one of their only success besides Joker in recent years, I feel that 780M is too low for a Batman Movie but maybe it's because it's Battinsons first movie so I'm sure if Part 2 ever gets made it'll make 1B, same thing happened with Batman Begins, the sequel made 1B whereas Begins made 370M

The thing is, Superman doesn't actually have to be a box office success. What it needs to be is a good movie that people will talk about afterwards.

Right now, they are building a franchise from ground-up. Realistically, you don't expect the first movie to be a huge success, especially after DC (but especially non-existent Superman) have barely had any successes in the past few years.

What Superman absolutely needs to do though is be so good that people will start getting hyped for the movies afterwards. It must reignite people's interest in DC as a whole.

Obviously, while highly improbable, if it's a huge box office bomb it will be the beginning of the end of the DCU. But even if it barely makes even (the modest budget does help), but makes people interested in upcoming movies and other projects (like Supergirl), then it is already a huge success.

Even Zaslav knows that they're building a franchise, and its overall success is much more important over Superman making a billion. 

[BrickBob Studpants]

4 minutes ago, THELEGOBATMAN said:

Even Zaslav knows that they're building a franchise, and its overall success is much more important over Superman making a billion. 

Zaslav knowing *anything* is a pretty bold statement. I highly doubt that absolute moron can tell the difference between Batman and Spider-Man  I have no faith in WB as a studio as long as that buffoon is still around. The chance of him axing another finished movie again to save pennies on taxes is high.

[THELEGOBATMAN]

14 hours ago, Rwbricks said:

In LEGO news, Arkham is going to have 2953 pieces, which I don’t think we knew before. It’s not the best ppp value, but it’s not surprising, either. 

Wow, that's actually horrible. Especially for a D2C set.

10 minutes ago, BrickBob Studpants said:

Zaslav knowing *anything* is a pretty bold statement. I highly doubt that absolute moron can tell the difference between Batman and Spider-Man  I have no faith in WB as a studio as long as that buffoon is still around. The chance of him axing another finished movie again to save pennies on taxes is high.

To be fair, both Gunn and Safran are talking about him pretty positively. Obviously he's given them a clean slate that they can do pretty much whatever with—that's why he hired them in the first place.

[BatDeanj]

14 hours ago, Rwbricks said:

In LEGO news, Arkham is going to have 2953 pieces, which I don’t think we knew before. It’s not the best ppp value, but it’s not surprising, either. 

so it will be smaller than the x-mansion and more expensive.... eww
was expecting a little under 4000 similar to the museum. 
 

Where is the source from i dont see it on insta

[psqidexslizer]

2 hours ago, BrickBob Studpants said:

This can be explained with one word (or rather, acronym): D2C. Exclusive sets are usually revealed much closer to release and leakers tend to get less information about them

Also, it’s inconsistent anyway. We know next to nothing about the Bag End and Krusty Burger sets that are both scheduled for April, yet we already have the full minifig list of the Enterprise, which comes out in November

Wait… Krusty Burger is also releasing in April?

So that means Bag End, Beauty and the Beast castle, the Western River steamboat, and Krusty Burger are all releasing in April. Either Lego has no problem releasing 4 D2C sets in a month or someone mixed up some dates.

[BrickBob Studpants]

1 hour ago, psqidexslizer said:

Wait… Krusty Burger is also releasing in April?

Never mind, it’s June now, apparently! My bad  

[psqidexslizer]

1 hour ago, BrickBob Studpants said:

Never mind, it’s June now, apparently! My bad  

Ah, gotcha. Still makes me wonder why there’s three supposedly coming in April. Usually Lego only does 2, unless that’s changed and I just haven’t been paying close enough attention.

And since DC is dead, that makes this the perfect forum to ask this question in.

Edited February 28 by psqidexslizer

[BrickBob Studpants]

1 hour ago, psqidexslizer said:

Ah, gotcha. Still makes me wonder why there’s three supposedly coming in April.

Ideas sets are all 18+ now, but they don‘t count as D2C sets

[psqidexslizer]

11 minutes ago, BrickBob Studpants said:

Ideas sets are all 18+ now, but they don‘t count as D2C sets

Ah, the steamboat is Ideas. Makes sense. I thought it was Icons. 

[RobbieHxC]

7 hours ago, THELEGOBATMAN said:

To be fair, both Gunn and Safran are talking about him pretty positively.

 In public, sure they do.  What rational high-profile employee is going to criticise their boss online, for the whole world to see?  Gunn also said The Flash film was "one of the greatest superhero movies ever made" - and we all know how that film turned out   Don't conflate someone protecting the brand and having your team's back with someone's true opinions.